Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Terrorism

The following discussion comes from Categories for deletion. With one vote to delete and two to keep, the consensus was to keep the category, though it may need POV work. (Note: In answer to IZAK's comment, the entry for "Terrorism" under unresolved does not refer to this category itself but rather to other categories related to terrorism.) -Aranel (" Sarah ") 19:26, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Category:terrorism
Bizarre list of articles which are entirely from the point of view of the US. - Xed 17:56, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I propose fixing the list rather than killing the category. --Gary D 23:03, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

NOTE: There was already a VOTE on this a few weeks ago and the vote was to KEEP because it was UNRESOLVED see Categories_for_deletion/unresolved, why is this here again now? IZAK 13:20, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep nearly everyone agrees on the existence of Terrorism.  Disagreement revolves around which acts are and which acts are not. Lance6Wins 21:19, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The solution to systemic POV is not to curtail information, but to add more. -Willmcw 00:18, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)