Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 11



April 11

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete  --Kbdank71 18:26, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Video directors and Category:Music video directors
are both about music video directors. --Nikai 23:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * ...and as such should be at Category:Music video directors. Delete (or redirect) the other one. Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 00:23, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Combine and keep the one called Music video directors, delete Video directors. -- Lochaber 10:05, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Since this is a week old, quasi-concensus and non-controversial, I was bold. All articles moved to Category:Music video directors, Category:Video directors is empty and can be deleted. -- grm_wnr Esc  14:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete  --Kbdank71 18:26, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Aboriginal peoples of Canada
Should be renamed to Category:Aboriginal peoples in Canada. The Government of Canada's Department of Indian and Northern Affairs specifically states in their naming guidelines that authors should "Avoid describing Aboriginal people as "belonging" to Canada". This policy of not implying belonging has been followed by several older Wikipedia categories that group aboriginal peoples, for example Category:Aboriginal peoples in the Canadian Arctic. Discussion regarding this renaming has also been held on the Canadian wikipedians' notice board. Kurieeto 20:11, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support SchmuckyTheCat 02:44, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge into Category:British trade unionists.

Category:English trade unionists
Voting results:

"Merge" (2): Necrothesp, Lochaber

Consensus is to merge into Category:British trade unionists.

Content should be merged into Category:British trade unionists. These two categories seem to have been used indiscriminately (most of those in the latter category are English too), and as most British trade unions operate UK-wide the latter category seems more appropriate. -- Necrothesp 12:13, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - though there may come a time that Category:British trade unionists becomes too large, should that happen I would support the recreation of this subcat. -- Lochaber 12:45, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.