Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 November 30



Category:Ushering

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ushering


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete per nom Johnbod 22:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shadow Yamato X

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * shadow yamato x


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete, game in question is a hoax. See Articles for deletion/Shadow Yamato X series. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: As above. -Carados 02:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shadow Yamato X games

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Suggest merging Category:Shadow Yamato X games to Category:Video games developed in Japan
 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete, game in question is a hoax. See Articles for deletion/Shadow Yamato X series. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete:As above. Note, the user's page is an exact copy-paste of an older version of the page, and he is the creator of both the page and the category. -Carados 02:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Serbian building and structure stubs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was wrong forum - taken to WP:SFD -- Grutness...wha?  23:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * serbian building and structure stubs


 * Nominator's rationale:
 * Stub categories should be discussed at Stub types for deletion. A  ecis Brievenbus 23:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, no. Templates for stubs are discussed there, not categories that have been created without any template or real stub associated with it. Carlossuarez46 18:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Aecis is right - this belongs at SFD, not here. Grutness...wha?  23:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Projects by Dubai Properties

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * projects by dubai properties


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete as empty. We do have Category:Buildings and structures by architect which includes categories for buildings by company but I have not looked into them to see if the companies are all architectural firms. Otto4711 17:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:National extreme journeys

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * national extreme journeys


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete per nom, unless others produced. Rename needed anyway. Johnbod 13:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Market research

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was '''no consensus. Reverse merge might work ok, but Marketing research wasn't tagged. Relisting for the reverse is in order.'''. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * market research


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Reverse merge with the huge Category:Marketing research. Actually the holy fool who set this up without looking for the real category has hit on the better name. Marketing research explains that Market research is the broader term, and the contents of the older category cover both. In addition "market research" is the term used in Britain for what (if the article is to be believed) is called "marketing research" in the US (though the accuracy of this is much debated on the talk page).  Either way, a reverse merge is best, but the note on the older category is better, & should be moved over. Johnbod 03:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Georgists

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * georgists


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Justification for the creation of these 3 categories: long list of people developing on Georgism page, analogy with categories such as Category:Socialists and Category:Feminist economists. The word "opinion" does not appear anywhere in the text of Categorization_of_people so I don't understand the rationale given here. Pm67nz 01:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Georgism, as explained in the WP article that anyone can read, is a school of economic and political thought. There are similar and justified categories for various schools of thought.  Just because it might not known to one editor is no reason to delete the catgegory. Hmains 03:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Hmains. So long as the members all wrote or campaigned in support of Georgist policies, which a small sample suggested was the case, they are not caught by the "opinion" section, as I think precedents have found. Compare Category:Neoplatonists and Category:Abolitionists as well. Johnbod 03:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So, what styles come and go in various economic and political thought are now bases for categories, we have Category:Supply-Side Economists and now we can have Categeory:Supply-Side politicians to lump in any politician who favored that economic theory at any time and Category:Supply-Siders to lump them both together? It's various people by opinion, which is OCAT. Carlossuarez46 19:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So that's where that policy is. It does say there "Please note, however, the distinction between holding an opinion and being an activist, the latter of which may be a defining characteristic" and I think Category:Georgists can meet that test. I am not planning on categorising Henry Ford, Leo Tolstoy, Mark Twain or William F. Buckley, Jr. as Georgists because their Georgist opinions didn't lead them to do much in the way of active promotion of Georgist policies.  I first created only Category:Georgist politicians and Category:Georgist economists because it is in the nature of those professions that their positions on thing like land tax are relevant to (and usually clear from) their work.  Later I found there were quite a few trade unionists etc. such as Edward_McHugh who were so heavily involved in the Single Tax movement that they deserve to be categorised as Georgists if anyone is, even if they were never elected to a political office, so I put them directly into Category:Georgists.  The discussion above has given me the idea that  Category:Georgist activists is probably where they should be.   There will be borderline cases where people may be improperly classified based on their opinions rather than their actions or their academic work - eg: I'm not sure about Herbert Simon and if better evidence doesn't turn up over the next couple of weeks I will remove him - but that doesn't invalidate the categories themselves. Pm67nz 22:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * "Fooist activists" is often a good route. The other two are probably ok Johnbod 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Georgist politicians

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * georgist politicians


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Keep Georgism, as explained in the WP article that anyone can read, is a school of economic and political thought. There are similar and justified categories for various schools of thought.  Just because it might not known to one editor is no reason to delete the catgegory. Hmains 03:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Hmains & my comment above. Johnbod 03:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Georgist economists

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * georgist economists


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Keep Nothing improper at all.  Georgism, as explained in the WP article that anyone can read, is a school of economic and political thought.  There are similar and justified categories for various schools of thought.  Just because it might not known to one editor is no reason to delete the catgegory. Hmains 03:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Hmains & my comment 2 up. Johnbod 03:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fukuoka Asian Culture Prize winners

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * fukuoka asian culture prize winners


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete First let's have an article on it... Johnbod 04:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:European Poker Players Hall of Fame

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * european poker players hall of fame


 * Nominator's rationale:

The Wikiproject Poker has been notified of this AfD.
 * Neutral leaning delete I am neutral on this AfD. I had never heard of this hall of fame before.  But I'll let others from the WikiProject chime in.Balloonman 21:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation. I've heard of it... most notably when the nearly identically named category was deleted in this "Halls of fame" nomination just three weeks ago.--Mike Selinker 03:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * comment as the creator of the cat, I was unaware of the previous CFD.Balloonman 05:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, & the article seems to be borderline notable at best. Not exactly a crushing majority last time, so I won't add as recreation. Johnbod 04:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per this nom and my previous nom. Otto4711 16:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:EuroCup 2007-08

 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * eurocup 2007-08


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Disturbed
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * disturbed


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete Having checked, I can confirm that all of these articles are in the usual appropriate categories (Category:Disturbed albums, Category:Disturbed songs and the newly-created Category:Disturbed members) as well as this eponymous category. Furthermore, there is Disturbed to link the material together.  Usual precedents point to deletion.  BencherliteTalk 21:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and countless precedents. Otto4711 18:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs about drug use
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * songs about drug use


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete category with overly subjective criteria. JuJube 15:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete suffers from the same problems most of these "songs about" do: how much about the subject matter must it be and what RSes tell us that it is at least this much. Unlike most of these categories there are probably some songs that are clearly "in" the category but they often come from both a pro- & a con- point of view that makes lumping them together seems incongruous compare Cocaine by Eric Clapton with Cocaine by Jackson Browne, for example. Carlossuarez46 17:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no clear criteria for inclusion, encourages original research; Carlossuarez makes good points too, as usual. BencherliteTalk 20:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2-3D Students
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Used only to create non-notable pages. Spellcast (talk) 11:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2-3d students


 * Nominator's rationale:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jacksonville
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename all. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Jacksonville to Category:Buildings and structures in Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Culture of Jacksonville to Category:Culture of Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Jacksonville musical groups to Category:Jacksonville, Florida musical groups
 * Category:Geography of Jacksonville to Category:Geography of Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Government of Jacksonville to Category:Government of Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Mayors of Jacksonville to Category:Mayors of Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:History of Jacksonville to Category:History of Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Jacksonville stubs to Category:Jacksonville, Florida stubs
 * Category:Jacksonville media to Category:Jacksonville, Florida media
 * Category:Jacksonville television anchors to Category:Jacksonville, Florida television anchors
 * Category:Television stations in Jacksonville to Category:Television stations in Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Sports in Jacksonville to Category:Sports in Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Transportation in Jacksonville to Category:Transportation in Jacksonville, Florida
 * Category:Bridges in Jacksonville to Category:Bridges in Jacksonville, Florida


 * Nominator's rationale: Lets clean all of these up. If I missed any, feel free to add them. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename I've been making an effort to clean a few of the Jacksonville Categories up to distinguish them from other cities named Jacksonville. I'm glad others are also making an effort to do the same. Subwayatrain 21:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Universities and colleges in Jacksonville
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Universities and colleges in Jacksonville to Category:Universities and colleges in Jacksonville, Florida
 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Rename - There are other cities with similar names. And, non-Americans may not know that Jacksonville is in Florida. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kid Nation participants
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Xaosflux. BencherliteTalk 17:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * kid nation participants


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Speedy delete per creator's request. You can tag the category with should this sort of thing recur in future. Otto4711 (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll try to remember that for the future. Ospinad (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per creator's request. Doczilla (talk) 09:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Miller
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * miller


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete per nom, though there must be a "food processing companies" or similar it should also be in. Johnbod 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I added Swany Mills to Category:Food manufacturers shortly after nominating this category for deletion. Cheers, GentlemanGhost 00:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * OK for delete of Miller provided article under it is transferred to Category:Grinding mills since the article was originally mis-categorized under flour --J'ai osé (talk) 01:04, 03 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I did so shortly after I nominating the category. Cheers, GentlemanGhost 00:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sint Maarten
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename all. Kbdank71 (talk) 21:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming several categories to include Sint Maarten instead of Saint Martin (Netherlands)
 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Rename all to match main article, but perhaps a redirect (at least for the main category) wouldn't go amiss. BencherliteTalk 21:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong support - almost proposed the same thing myself abouyt two weeks ago. Should any named "Saint Martin (France)" be renamed to "Saint-Martin", too? Grutness...<small style="color:#008822;">wha?  22:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure. Such a renaming might cause confusion with Saint Martin (the entire island) and other articles included in St. Martin (disambiguation). A  ecis Brievenbus 14:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:NHS Highland
<div class="boilerplate vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * nhs highland


 * Nominator's rationale:


 * Delete as empty and as superceded by Category:NHS Highland and Argyll. Not empty for 4 days, it appears, so not speediable. BencherliteTalk 21:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.