Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 April 17



Category:Mystic philosophy

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 12:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * mystic philosophy


 * Nominator's rationale: delete. The Category's only member is Category:Taoism. It can be moved and have better company at the parent Category:Mysticism where Category:Pythagorean philosophy and Category:Neoplatonism reside. Anyway Mysticism is quite philosophic in its nature, so it's futile to try to list some especially philosophical mysticisms. Perhaps double-categorizing with some prominent subcat of Category:Philosophy is the way to assert something's philosophical importance independently of its mystical qualities. trespassers william (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 21:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. I feel like a tourist (talk) 04:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, what's going on with this? trespassers william (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Literature articles

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good call on figuring out the template. Kbdank71 12:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * wikiproject literature articles


 * Nominator's rationale: Non-controversial housekeeping. This category is empty except for the subcategory, Category:Literature articles needing expert attention, and a soft redirect to Category:WikiProject Literature. The subcategory contains the template expert-subject-cat. As I understand the template code, if Category:WikiProject Literature articles did not exist, the subcategory automatically would be recategorized (in keeping with the soft redirect) to Category:WikiProject Literature; however, as long as the soft redirect exists, the template will keep it in the wrongly-named parent category.  (Don't ask me why; I'm just reporting what I've found.)  Therefore, this category must die!! Russ (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Haïti

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 12:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Haïti to Category:Roman Catholic dioceses in Haiti
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to remove the diacritic. The country's main article, Haiti, does not use the diacritic, nor do any other Haiti-related categories. In English, it is most commonly spelled without the diacritic. jwillbur 19:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 21:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy rename per nom as "spelling error". Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alumni of the Medical University of South Carolina

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 12:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Alumni of the Medical University of South Carolina to Category:Medical University of South Carolina alumni
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename. Per standard format of Category:Alumni by university or college in the United States.  Good Ol’factory (talk) 13:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Rename - nom is spot-on. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 21:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename sounds good to me. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 23:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Diss songs

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 12:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * diss songs


 * Nominator's rationale: Delete: Overcategorization at its finest. No useful reason that these songs are related to each other, the very idea is a neologism, and which songs to include or exclude is completely arbitrary and WP:OR Oren0 (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per overcat and NPOV. Lugnuts (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete indeed - member of Category:Categories to be dissed (nothing to do with Diss - a diss-ambiguation page seems to be needed). -- roundhouse0 (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I feel like a tourist (talk) 18:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 21:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.