Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 June 26



Category:All Dogs Go to Heaven characters

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Courcelles (talk) 08:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:All Dogs Go to Heaven characters to Category:All Dogs Go to Heaven
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OC, category will unlikely grow beyond this point. — ξ xplicit  23:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:T3h 1337 b0y deletion guidelines

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: speedy delete under G7. —  ξ xplicit  23:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * t3h 1337 b0y deletion guidelines


 * Nominator's rationale: Delete per large precedent. Category does not meet WP:USERCAT criteria as it does not facilitate coordination and collaboration between users for the improvement and development of the encyclopedia. — ξ xplicit  23:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not "facilitate coordination, blah blah blah..." The only page in the category is a guideline for the user that happens to be incorrect (contrary to WP:GHITS) — m o n o   23:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - I created it --T3h 1337 b0y —Preceding unsigned comment added by T3h 1337 b0y (talk • contribs) 19:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Malaysian political parties

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename all. —  ξ xplicit  00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Category:DAP politicians to Category:Democratic Action Party politicians
 * Category:MCA politicians to Category:Malaysian Chinese Association politicians
 * Category:MIC politicians to Category:Malaysian Indian Congress politicians
 * Category:PBS politicians to Category:United Sabah Party politicians
 * Category:PBB politicians to Category:United Traditional Bumiputera Party politicians
 * Category:PKR politicians to Category:People's Justice Party (Malaysia) politicians
 * Category:PRS politicians to Category:Sarawak People's Party politicians
 * Category:SAPP politicians to Category:Sabah Progressive Party politicians
 * Category:SPDP politicians to Category:Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party politicians
 * Category:SUPP politicians to Category:Sarawak United Peoples' Party politicians
 * Category:UMNO politicians to Category:United Malays National Organisation politicians
 * Category:UPKO politicians to Category:United Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun Murut Organisation politicians
 * Rename all to expand abbreviations and match main article names. - Darwinek (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Rename all. Abbreviations are certainly the exception, not the rule for WP cat naming. Mayumashu (talk) 01:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Renames to match title of parent article. Alansohn (talk) 04:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Labour MEPs

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. —  ξ xplicit  00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Labour MEPs to Category:Labour Party (UK) MEPs
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to match grandparent category and parent, and because the current name is ambiguous: the Labour Party (Ireland) has also had a number of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) over the years (Currently 3 of Ireland's 12 MEPs, and so has the Labour Party (Netherlands) (currently with 8 MEPs).  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom has been notified. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Pondle (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * See also related discussion at Categories for discussion/Log/2010 June 29. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - the current name certainly has a level of ambiguity. Road Wizard (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Irish Labour Party

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename both. —  ξ xplicit  00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming:
 * Category:Irish Labour Party to Category:Labour Party (Ireland)
 * Category:Leaders of the Irish Labour Party to Category:Leaders of the Labour Party (Ireland)
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to match head article Labour Party (Ireland). The party is not called the "Irish Labour Party", its is just called the "Labour Party". Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * WikiProject Ireland has been notified.-- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support We should definitely go with the official name and then add disambiguate as per convention or what should be the standard. Mayumashu (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Content syndication markup language

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. —  ξ xplicit  00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Content syndication markup language to Category:Web syndication formats
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge both per WP:OC. (If not, then speedy rename Category:Content syndication markup language to plural per WP:NCCAT.) --4th-otaku (talk) 11:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vandal history

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Vandals (tribe). In a perfect world, the nomination would work as is, but in a perfect world we wouldn't have any modern vandals.--Mike Selinker (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Vandal history to Category:Vandals (people)
 * Nominator's rationale: At 03:59, 26 June 2010 User:BokicaK listed this move as a page move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh?? What does this comment mean? PS - It's not properly tagged. Cgingold (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment it appears that the move template was attached to Category talk:Vandal history... 76.66.195.196 (talk) 07:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well that's quite interesting -- especially considering that there IS no page Category talk:Vandal history! LOL - Cgingold (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 05:44, 26 June 2010 Anthony Appleyard (talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Vandal history" ‎ (now in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 June 26) &mdash; there was such a page. 76.66.195.196 (talk) 05:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support the concept. However Category:Vandals (people) would be totally ambiguous since anyone who is a modern vandal will wind up in there.  Now, how many modern vandals do we have with articles?  Vegaswikian (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Suggest Category:Vandals (tribe) as a better name. Cjc13 (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Supersuckers albums

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. —  ξ <sup style="color:#000000;">xplicit  00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Supersuckers albums to Category:The Supersuckers albums
 * Nominator's rationale: Per main article, The Supersuckers. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Rename per nom. Occuli (talk) 09:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Rename (speedy?), per nom.  Lugnuts  (talk) 13:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Rename to match title of parent article. Alansohn (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.