Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 December 3



Category:Birds described in the 21st century

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Birds described in the 21st century to Category:Birds by year of formal description
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge. Unnecessary extra level of categorization for an underpopulated tree. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Oculi (talk) 10:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge I don't see year of description as defining though so I'd be open to eliminating the tree. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roman Catholic Prince-Primates

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator.  Red rose64 (talk) 11:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting roman catholic prince-primates


 * Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, and the only member of this category is already in Category:Roman Catholic primates because he was Archbishop of Mainz. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Possible keep (probably as Category:Prince-Primates). The title was so rare that we do not need a denomination, but it existed, so that there should be a category.  I see no indication that there were any of tother denominations.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't agree that everything that existed deserves a category. The main concern is that the one member of this category remains in the Primates tree, and fortunately that is the case because he was an Archbishops of Mainz, hence a primate. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment – there are some Hungarian Prince Primates with articles: see Archdiocese_of_Esztergom. Oculi (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * In that case the rationale to delete is no longer applicable - withdraw nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Valentin Vodnik

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting valentin vodnik


 * Nominator's rationale: Categorization is redundant, the two articles in this category already refer to each other in the text of the article, while the child category does not belong here. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Banned political parties of Turkey

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename for now, to match the convention. Carlossuarez46 makes a decent argument in favor of deletion, so this is without prejudice to a future nomination to delete the categories in, including this one. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Proposed rename: Category:Banned political parties of Turkey to Category:Banned political parties in Turkey
 * Nominator's rationale; per naming conventions. Charles Essie (talk) 21:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Support But if it's "per naming conventions" (which judging by the members of is correct), it sounds like WP:C2C applies, so you could have sent it to WP:CFDS. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete this and its siblings are a "current" category. Political parties are banned, unbanned, etc., with remarkable frequency. The Nazi Party is in the German sister category. Banned now, but not in 1920-1945. Where are the all the now-OK parties of Germany that were banned from 1933-1945, like SPD?? Oh, they're not banned now, so we don't categorize them as banned. Thus, these categories are merely "current" and that which is transitory isn't defining. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sheffield Legends

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting sheffield legends


 * Nominator's rationale: Award is not significant enough to warrant categorisation on the subject articles. The topic is much better dealt with by the list already at Sheffield Legends. SFB 19:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Local award/honour. Oculi (talk) 10:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A NN award: list exists already. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cybersecurity

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Delete. Empty except for the loop of the category itself. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Cybersecurity to Category:Cyberwarfare
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge. is a recently-created cat which has no obvious delineation from the existing cat, to which I believe it is redundant.  Red rose64 (talk) 10:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Support Also a potential duplication of Category:Computer security (one of the children of the target category). SFB 19:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * delete Category:Cybersecurity since it does nothing but point back to itself and has no content whatsoever. Does anyone actually read and think about the category being nominated or are editors just looking at names and reacting. Hmains (talk) 05:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I do consider these matters. At the time that I filed this, the cat did have content - specifically, Randy Borum - but it was removed from the cat with . I did not carry out that edit myself because it is disingenious to depopulate a cat prior to nominating at CFD. But be assured that when I do find cats that point back to themselves and which have no content, I mark them, as I did with: , , , and (all 12 November 2014);  (1 October 2014);  and  (both 20 August 2014); , , and  (all 30 July 2014) - there are [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ADeletedContributions&target=Redrose64&namespace=14 plenty more]. -- Red rose64 (talk) 11:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not look at the history. Please forgive. Hmains (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.