Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 January 2



Category:Indian lunar exploration program

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Indian lunar exploration program to Category:Indian lunar exploration programme
 * Nominator's rationale: Clear case of WP:TIES; in Indian English the spelling "programme" is used.  W.  D.   Graham  22:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * REname per nom: Indian English generally follows British English, though it has some extremely convoluted compound nouns that seem to be a literal translation of a Hindi or Urdu compound noun. However, is there enough content to justify a separate category for a lunar (as opposed to a space) programme?  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Liberal parties in the United States

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Non-admin closure of duplicate discussion. See December 29 for discussion still open Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Liberal parties in the United States to Category:Modern American liberal parties
 * Nominator's rationale: i want to renaming from liberal parties in the united states to modern american liberal parties which is more accurate naming category. User:Adn1990 21:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose at this time. How does using the ambiguous 'modern' help? Vegaswikian (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose as is. Contemporary would be better than modern, but both are ambiguous. Also American can refer to anything in the Americas, and not just the United States.AioftheStorm (talk) 05:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy close nominator has nominated this exact thing once already, this is clearly trying to avoid an unfavorable result by double-posting. The prior nomination is at Categories for discussion/Log/2013 December 29 -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment the nominator seems to have an obsession with these two categories, with several warnings concerning the older category on the nominator's talk page. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.