Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 January 28



Indian Territory

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: KEEP ALL as is. -Splash - tk 23:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Establishments in the Indian Territory by year to Category:Establishments in Indian Territory by year
 * Propose merging Category:Decades in the Indian Territory to Category:Decades in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:19th-century establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:19th-century establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1870s establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1870s establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1870s in the Indian Territory to Category:1870s in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1871 establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1871 establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1872 establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1872 establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1871 in the Indian Territory to Category:1871 in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1872 in the Indian Territory to Category:1872 in Indian Territory
 * Nominator's rationale: I recently created a category structure for Category:Establishments in Indian Territory by year without realizing these already existed. In the article Indian Territory, it is referred to as both Indian Territory and the Indian Territory, but it is much more common without the. Kennethaw88 (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose We are trying to invoke with these names the more specific name and limit it to parts of the United States clearly in no other territory, and primarily to modern Oklahoma in the era from the Civil War to 1907. Having "The" makes it clear that it is a specific and not a general usage of the name.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose per JPL; use of "The" avoids finding various things that began in Delhi being included. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 07:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deadly Avenger albums

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: KEEP (I interpret both the comments thus, and respect the established consensus). -Splash - tk 23:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting deadly avenger albums


 * Nominator's rationale: Category only has one page, and the artists' page is redlinked Mjs1991 (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment If the artist's article doesn't exist, does that make the album non-notable too? I see that the artist page has never been created, rather than it being deleted. If the album is notable, then I see no problem with having the category.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep for as long as there is at least one article to populate it with. There is a long-standing consensus that albums are categorised by artist, even if there is only one article on that artist's work. The fact that there is no article on the artist is irrelevant. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pombal

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: speedy rename per C2B and C2D. The Bushranger One ping only 22:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Pombal to Category:Pombal Municipality
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename. Disambiguation, picking the larger topic. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buildings and structures in Pombal

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: MERGE to Category:Pombal Municipality and Category:Buildings and structures in Leiria District. If I understand correctly, this is probably OK with Vegaswikian, too. -Splash - tk 00:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Pombal to Category:Pombal Category:Pombal Municipality and Category:Buildings and structures in Leiria District
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge as WP:SMALLCAT. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Maybe oppose. Is this part of a by city series set of categories, which would argue for keeping?  Also should the correct upmerge target, if we go that way, be Category:Pombal Municipality and not Category:Pombal?  Yea that last is a rename proposal. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Vegaswikian: Pombal, Portugal is a town of c. 18,000 people. It has a one-line article. List of cities in Portugal confirms that it has city status, but there is no evidence that it has more than one notable building. TripAdvisor lists a water park and a disco as well as the castle. Therefore I do not think this category is worth keeping as part of the city hierarchy. As for the Pombal category for upmerging, yes the target is up for renaming.  – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom and per WP:SMALLCAT. This category appears to have no chance of expansion. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The municipalities are the basic and most stable entities. Districts lost some functions in the last years, regions, subregions, municipal cooperations overtaking some. @User:Fayenatic london, the city may have 18,000, but the municipality has 58,617. There can be several cities in one municipality. Propose rename to Category:Buildings and structures in Pombal Municipality. Androoox (talk) 04:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * , the category has only one article, which fails WP:SMALLCAT. Why do you want to keep a 1-article category, however it is named? Is there a slew of notable buildings in Pombal Municipality which fall outside the city boundaries?  If so, they don't appear to be in the tiny parent Category:Buildings and structures in Leiria District. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Usama Mukwaya

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: RELISTED, since the category has expanded (slightly) beyond only containing the bio, so we can't run with a no objections basis. -Splash - tk 23:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Usama Mukwaya to Category:Ugandan film directors
 * Nominator's rationale: pointless single-article category for the Ugandan film director Usama Mukwaya. Fails WP:SMALLCAT. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:26, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Cardinals (rock band)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: MERGE to Category:Ryan Adams seems like an editorially reasonable move, followed by DELETE. -Splash - tk 23:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting the cardinals (rock band)


 * Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary overcategorization. Only serves to categorize the category for members. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: no it doesn't, it also links to the parent Category:Ryan Adams. Should it be upmerged to that? – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Confucianism in Indonesia

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting confucianism in indonesia


 * Nominator's rationale: Too little content. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:SMALLCAT. The one article is now adequately otherwise categorised in both the parents of this category. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shipbuilding

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: reverse merged invoking C2D. The Bushranger One ping only 22:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Shipbuilding to Category:Ship construction
 * Nominator's rationale: They mean the same thing Quest for Truth (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Reverse Merge to Category:Shipbuilding They do seem to mean the same thing, and the parent article seems to be Shipbuilding (not Ship construction, which redirects to the reverse merge target). Alansohn (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Your argument sounds convincing. As the nominator I agree to reverse merge. --Quest for Truth (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Reverse Merge per Alansohn. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * reverse merge as more common name. Seyasirt (talk) 13:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy reverse merge WP:C2D per shipbuilding. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:31, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Reverse merge, since "Shipbuilding" is the more common name. bobrayner (talk) 21:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.