Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 June 10



Category:Roller skating championships

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Roller skating championships to Category:Roller skating competitions
 * Nominator's rationale: These are competitions and part of the Category:Sports competitions structure. "Championships" is not an easily definable attribute. SFB 17:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Rename per nom. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Support as other such categories. NickSt (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roman Catholic cleric–scientists

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Roman Catholic cleric–scientists to Category:Roman Catholic cleric-scientists
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename. This category represent an inappropriate implementation of the guideline WP:ENDASH. One example that is given is that of singer-songwriter: "Wrong: a singer–songwriter; not separate persons, so use a hyphen: a singer-songwriter". Like singer-songwriters, each cleric-scientist is one person, and so it should be hyphenated, not endashed, just like . Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * ugh I dislike these "one job-another job" formulations, but it has a list, and sources. Can I still not like it? I'm just going to register that. the same for actor-politicians and other hyphenated annoyances. Why can't we just use category intersection to find "Footballer/philosophers" and "Rabbi/biologists" and "Actor/directors" and so on and so forth. Must we really create these two-job-intersection categories? ah, yes, I know, reliable sources, blah blah.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Obi-Wan Kenobi, what do you mean by 'category intersection'? It's a feature of Wikipedia that I don't know yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * See Category_intersection - the best is quick intersection. You can also do a non-recursive search intersection as follows: using the incategory tag. For recursion (which is much more useful) you need to use the outside tool.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree that in general these categories are weird, if nothing else, and quite liable to hatred. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Rename according to nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Listify and Delete. We really need to cut down on the number of two occupations categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * There is already a list at List of Roman Catholic cleric-scientists. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * In that case just plain delete. We don't need this hybrid category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Andy Lau

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting andy lau


 * Nominator's rationale: The category violates WP:OC. There is also no point for that category since Andy Lau filmography and Andy Lau discography already exist. Timmyshin (talk) 02:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – an excellent illustration of the dangers of eponymous categories. Oculi (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, there isn't enough valid content to warrant an eponymous category.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.