Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 October 28



Category:Anime articles needing expert attention

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting anime articles needing expert attention


 * Nominator's rationale: Category:Anime and manga articles needing expert attention already exists.  十  八  20:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - the anime and manga articles categories already exists, no need to subdivide. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Create soft redirects from this and Category:Manga articles needing expert attention (the latter of which I already did) so they don't get recreated again. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 17:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2010 pornographic films

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; upmerge contents to Category:2010s pornographic films. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting 2010 pornographic films


 * Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary diffusion by year Fortdj33 (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Upmerge if needed and then delete.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep We already have corresponding structures for Category:2010 3D films, Category:2010 animated films‎, Category:2010 direct-to-video films, Category:2010 horror films‎, Category:2010 science fiction films and Category:2010 television films, all of which allow navigation through the parent Category:2010 in film. There are enough films in the structure to justify retention as an effective aid to navigation. Alansohn (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Upmerge to 2010 films and 2010s pornographic films as appropriate. The previous by decade categories seem to be working well for the moment with article ranges of 20-100 articles for each decade (a good navigable size). Year does not indicate a much greater commonality for these films over a decade-style grouping. SFB 10:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep it seems that, at least for recent years, these will be sufficiently numerous to diffuse by year - why create a lot of work by undoing it now only to re-do it later. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Upmerge/delete to reflect the otherwise unquestioned practice of categorizing such films by decade. It would also be worth considering retitling the category as "releases" rather than "films", since most of the items are shot and released only on video. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Medieval England articles by quality

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: wrong place Duonaut (talk &#124; contribs) 02:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting medieval england articles by quality


 * Nominator's rationale: I was gonna create this article for assessment, But I changed my mind cause it would be too hard. Duonaut (talk &#124; contribs) 02:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.