Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 September 29



Category:Anglophobes

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic  L ondon 23:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting anglophobes


 * Nominator's rationale: I don't think this is a useful category, but if it is and it's intended for user pages then it should be renamed to something like "Anglophobe Wikipedians". DexDor (talk) 21:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Rename or Delete per nom -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * For preference Delete; if not rename per nom . Peterkingiron (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SMALLCAT.Marcocapelle (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Florida Registered Historic Place stubs

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as nominated. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Florida Registered Historic Places district stubs to Category:Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose merging Category:Florida Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose renaming Category:Duval County Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Duval County, Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose renaming Category:Hillsborough County Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Hillsborough County, Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose renaming Category:Miami-Dade County Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Miami-Dade County, Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose renaming Category:Sarasota County Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Sarasota County, Florida Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose upmerging Category:Ohio Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Ohio Registered Historic Place stubs
 * Propose upmerging Category:Vermont Registered Historic Places building and structure stubs to Category:Vermont Registered Historic Place stubs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.236.106 (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * And all stub tags for these categories, accordingly
 * Nominator's rationale: No other state has a split of the NRHP stub categories into structure and district categories - there's a top-level state NRHP stub category, split (if necessary) with county tags and with regional/county categories. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Campeche Municipality

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; contains nothing but, so is largely redundant at this stage. Can be created again in the future if circumstances warrant. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people from campeche municipality


 * Nominator's rationale: Overlaps with People from Campeche, Campeche José Gnudista (talk) 10:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I think the merge request at Talk:Campeche, Campeche should be dealt with first, and that will provide an indicator of whether this category is required. SFB 21:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Find a merge target, rather than deleting. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of Peace Now

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; category was empty at close (see discussion). OK to make a list. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting members of peace now


 * Nominator's rationale: We (en wp) do not normally categorize people by which organizations they are a member of (except possibly where being a senior member of a political party etc is their reason for notability) and especially not where it is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic (e.g. it's not even mentioned in the person's article). This might be appropriate for a list (which also has the advantage that a note can be added if people leave the organization etc).  If categorization of people by organizations they are a member of was widely used then some articles would be in many such categories. DexDor (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Listify and delete Not significant enough for a categorisation, but perfectly viable as a list format which can clarify the level of involvement. SFB 21:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Support SFB, but better still plain Delete. We do not normally even list people by memberships of clubs and pressure groups.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Creator's rationale: Given the arguably high level of interest among readers of English in topics on the Israeli-Arab peace process, and the nature of Peace Now as a long-standing nonpartisan movement protesting Israeli government policy, the category mechanism provides unique and easily accessible information through its appearance on the mainspace page of members notable for their activities in the Arts, Letters and Sciences rather than primarily as politicians. A List of Peace Now members (nonexistent in :he:WP) would not serve this purpose; such a list would be accessed primarily by searching on the organization's name and only secondarily appearing is "What links here" for an individual member's page. I populated the category here according to its equivalent in the Hebrew Wikipedia, and indeed neglected to review the individual page's existing content for mention of Peace Now membership. An authoritative measure at this point would be for an editor to cite published information with the names of charter or founding members; I have yet to find such a source. -- Deborahjay (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Listify and delete (Creator's conclusion): Based on the above discussion and reading the WP:NONDEF editing guidelines, I acknowledge that the Category:Members of Peace Now is a nondefining characteristic for the great majority of the pages in this WP project. I'll delete the category and the subsequent red links on the individual pages. Thank you for advising! -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Smocking

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete for now. – Fayenatic  L ondon 23:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose Upmerging Category:Smocking into Category:Embroidery
 * Nominator's rationale: per classic WP:SMALLCAT. There are only 2 articles with little room for growth. No objection to recreating later though, if needed. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: Notified the category creator and this discussion has been included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Textile Arts. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure it's really a classic SMALLCAT - in theory, we could have articles such as Smocking in 19th century Britain, Smocking Arts Guild of America etc. If deleted then it should be on the basis that it can be recreated if wp gets more articles on the topic. DexDor (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I think something is a smallcat just because I lack imagination on what articles can be created. If I'm proven wrong later, so be it, we'll recreate the category. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wander Over Yonder characters

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Upmerge/Delete (equivalent as the category is empty) (NAC). DexDor (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting wander over yonder characters


 * Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary, orphaned cat. Only two members, both of which are at AfD and unlikely to survive.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Upmerge 2 articles to Category:Wander Over Yonder per WP:SMALLCAT. No objection to recreating later if there is more content. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The two members of the cat are unlikely to survive AfD, as is the only members of and Template:Wander Over Yonder, which is also nominated for deletion. That will leave only 2 members of the newly created, which will then be nominated for deletion per WP:SMALLCAT. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 02:28, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not going to predict what the outcome of the AFD discussions will be. Also, if and when Category:Wander Over Yonder is nominated separately, we can discuss the merits of that proposal in the context of whatever articles are left. In any case, I'm mostly agreeing with you: this category should go. (-: RevelationDirect (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Upmerge to Category:Wander Over Yonder. My rule is "one franchise: one category".  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Both character articles have now been redirected after AfDs. As a result, the category is empty. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 04:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wander Over Yonder episodes

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Upmerge/Delete (equivalent as the category is empty) (NAC). DexDor (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting wander over yonder episodes


 * Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary, orphaned cat. Only one member and that is at AfD and unlikely to survive  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Upmerge 1 article to Category:Wander Over Yonder per WP:SMALLCAT. No objection to recreating later if there is more content. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The only member of the cat is unlikely to survive AfD, as are the two members of and Template:Wander Over Yonder, which is also nominated for deletion. That will leave only 2 members of the newly created, which will then be nominated for deletion per WP:SMALLCAT. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 02:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not going to predict what the outcome of the AFD discussions will be. Also, if and when Category:Wander Over Yonder is nominated separately, we can discuss the merits of that proposal in the context of whatever articles are left. In any case, I'm mostly agreeing with you: this category should go. (-: RevelationDirect (talk) 12:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to parent -- For most franchises, my rule is "one franchise, one category". Peterkingiron (talk) 11:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The only member of ths category did not survive AfD and has been redirected, leaving this category empty. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy This is now an empty cat. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.