Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 August 1



Category:Albums produced by Rick Dutch Cousin

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting albums produced by rick dutch cousin


 * Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry which isn't an album Fixuture (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – it's not an album, RDC is not mentioned in the text, RDC has been added in the infobox as about the 6th producer, and Rick Dutch Cousin is a red-link. Oculi (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Koya, Erbil, Iraq

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic  L ondon 06:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Koya, Erbil, Iraq to Category:Koy Sanjaq
 * Nominator's rationale: Koya is another name for Koy Sanjaq (and Erbil Province is another name for Arbil Province). Randykitty (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Congregational church buildings

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Congregational church buildings to Category:Congregational churches
 * Nominator's rationale: Suggested in line with this discussion. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Support -- We should implement the consensus. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Caveat - We need to have something for ex-Congregationalist churches. JASpencer (talk) 08:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * A separate split for Category:Extinct Congregational churches? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * More likely: Category:Defunct Congregational churches. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Those should be Category:Former Congregational churches, see Category:Former churches. – Fayenatic  L ondon 06:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, even better. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Baptist church buildings

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge/rename without prejudice to a different name proposal for the by-century ones. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Baptist church buildings to Category:Baptist churches
 * Propose renaming Category:18th-century Baptist church buildings to Category:18th-century Baptist churches
 * Propose renaming Category:19th-century Baptist church buildings to Category:19th-century Baptist churches
 * Propose renaming Category:20th-century Baptist church buildings to Category:20th-century Baptist churches
 * Propose renaming Category:21st-century Baptist church buildings to Category:21st-century Baptist churches


 * Nominator's rationale: In line with this discussion, the consensus is to use churches not church buildings. The verbage ambiguity discussed at that CFD is not a problem here because there is Category:Baptist congregations established in the 19th century and Category:Baptist congregations established in the 20th century here. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Support -- We shoudl follow the consensus. In my view, Category:Baptist congregations established in the 19th century etc. should also be merged into the 19th century category.  At one time (some years back) we had all the churches categorisied as congregations, but the categories were renamed to church builings.  I thought that format was ridiculous, because a congregation has no continuity: it is the people who mgather for worship on each occasion.  Now we have settled on "churches", a church can be regarded as founded in 1805, even if its building was rebuilt in 1900, because it was dilapidated or too small.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It doesn't have to be merged, just a subcategory. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It should not be a subcategory, but have "see also" links instead. It would have been clearer to keep "church buildings" category names for the century categories, as I had argued at the CfD, but now we just have to use category explanations to distinguish them. – Fayenatic  L ondon 06:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In a previous discussion the suggestion was made to name the categories Category:Baptist churches built in the 21st century or Category:Baptist churches completed in the 21st century. I think that was a good idea, as it makes it more clear that these are buildings and this is not about the establishment of Baptist communities. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Following consensus ingand common sense that a church is a building. Dimadick (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Life on Mars (TV series) episodes

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; ensure that articles are merged to all parent categories as discussed (though rather than placing the articles in Category:Television episodes by series, I have sub-categorized them into Category:American television episodes by series and Category:British television episodes by series). Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Life on Mars (TV series) episodes to Category:Life on Mars (franchise)
 * Nominator's rationale: UPmerge. There are only two entries in this category, both list articles, so can be accommodated in the parent category. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: they are already in that parent. If merged, this category should be merged to its other parents, Category:Television episodes by series and Category:Time travel television episodes. – Fayenatic  L ondon 06:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Question about this (without having an opinion about the nomination), would an upmerge to Category:Television episodes by series be correct? It seems like it's meant to be a container category. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * IMHO it's useful and valid for such categories to contain lists as well as sub-categories, especially for lists where there is no corresponding category (because episodes would not be sufficiently notable to have their own articles). – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.