Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 July 25



Category:Decades in the Indian Territory

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as specified. MER-C 12:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Decades in the Indian Territory to Category:Decades in Indian Territory
 * Propose merging Category:Establishments in the Indian Territory by year to Category:Establishments in Indian Territory by year
 * Propose merging Category:19th-century establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:19th-century establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose merging Category:1870s in the Indian Territory to Category:1870s in Indian Territory
 * Propose merging Category:1870s establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1870s establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1871 establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1871 establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1872 establishments in the Indian Territory to Category:1872 establishments in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1871 in the Indian Territory to Category:1871 in Indian Territory
 * Propose renaming Category:1872 in the Indian Territory to Category:1872 in Indian Territory
 * Nominator's rationale: I think the general consensus is that we don't include a "the" for the territories. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Please note previous CFD Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_January_28. Tim! (talk) 06:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Merging should definitely take place, either this way or reversed. I don't have an opinion about the direction of merge or about the rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support as before. Although it was mentioned before that 'the' is needed to disambiguate, the territories in India are just Indian territories. kennethaw88 • talk 04:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support we avoid use of the article in such cases. Indian Territory was not even an organized territory, so "the" is probably misleading.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1932 establishments in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:1932 establishments in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1932 establishments in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1949 establishments in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1949 establishments in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1932 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1932 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1937 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1937 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1940 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1940 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1943 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1943 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1946 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1946 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1949 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1949 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1952 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1952 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Propose renaming Category:1957 in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla to Category:1957 in the British Leeward Islands
 * Nominator's rationale: the names of the territories were British Leeward Islands 1833–1958, Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla 1958–1983 Tim! (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla was a territory from 1882 onwards and had its own Legislative Assembly, to which there were elections in 1937, 1940, 1943, 1946, 1952 and 1957. The move request seems to have been based on the information in the Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla article, which does not appear to be correct. Number   5  7  10:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * St Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla was one of four presidencies which formed the federal colony of the Leeward Islands, the others were Antigua, Montserrat and BVI. Tim! (talk) 06:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose -- These are separate islands. The worst we should do is have a category for each Presidency.  Category:1930s in the British Leeward Islands etc might be useful as a paretn for them all.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Conditional Support - avoid anachronism, but also consider User:Peterkingiron's remark.GreyShark (dibra) 09:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Men Universe Model

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 13:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting men universe model


 * Nominator's rationale: Delete. Articles for deletion/Men Universe Model -- the main article was deleted for failing WP:GNG, therefore categorization by it is not defining. 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - Men Universe Model was recently deleted for failling GNG so it's pointless having a category for something when it doesn't have an article anymore, Being Kept would only serve to confuse those who perhaps may want to know about "Men Universe Model". – Davey 2010 Talk 14:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per IP editor. Liz  Read! Talk! 19:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jes Holtsø

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 13:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting jes holtsø


 * Nominator's rationale: Delete. I don't think an eponymous category such as this one is not needed just for an article (that probably should be redirected anyway) about a character this person plays. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 00:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete There are just two articles concerning this Danish actor, not enough to warrant an eponymous category. Liz  Read! Talk! 19:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now per WP:OCEPON with no objection to recreating if more content appears. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- My guess is that we would only get more content if we allowed performace by performer categorisation (which we do not. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.