Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 March 13



Category:2011 science fiction films

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 05:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting 2011 science fiction films


 * Nominator's rationale: Based on its size and on previous discussions about film categories, it is simply unnecessary to diffuse Category:2010s science fiction films by year. This category should be deleted, and the contents upmerged into the decade category. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Upmerge to Category:2010s science fiction films -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Category:2010s science fiction films. AadaamS (talk) 05:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Upmerge per nom.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 10:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Not necessary or desirable to intersect "films by year" categories with "films by genre" categories in this way — by decade is acceptable, but by individual year is narrower than necessary. Upmerge per nom. Bearcat (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2010 science fiction films

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 05:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting 2010 science fiction films


 * Nominator's rationale: Based on its size and on previous discussions about film categories, it is simply unnecessary to diffuse Category:2010s science fiction films by year. This category should be deleted, and the contents upmerged into the decade category. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Upmerge to Category:2010s science fiction films -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Category:2010s science fiction films. AadaamS (talk) 05:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Not necessary or desirable to intersect "films by year" categories with "films by genre" categories in this way. Upmerge per nom. Bearcat (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:AFL-CIO litigation

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete with selective recategorisation as stated. – Fayenatic  L ondon 17:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Propose Deleting Category:AFL–CIO litigation
 * Propose Upmerging Building & Construction Trades v. Camden and Industrial Dept. v. API to Category:AFL–CIO


 * Nominator's rationale: The parent Category:Case law by party tree groups court cases by the organization that litigated the case but the AFL-CIO is only a party in two of these cases here. I think the intent here is to create a parent category for cases litigated by a trade union that are a member of the AFL-CIO, even if the AFL-CIO wasn't directly involved.  The reality is even more removed though: because most U.S. landmark labor court cases were in the 1930s and 1940s but the AFL-CIO wasn't created until 1955, this category is mostly Category:Litigation by trade unions that would later come join the AFL-CIO.  The Category:United States labor case law category is probably a better choice to ensure all these court cases are easy to navigate. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: Notified Good Olfactory as the category creator and this discussion has been included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized Labour. – RevelationDirect (talk) 02:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * No objection to deletion (category creator). If I'm remembering correctly, it was simply created by taking caselaw articles present in and subcategorizing them. (However, the AFL-CIO is not limited to the U.S., nor is the caselaw in this category, so suggesting that Category:United States labor case law replaces this category as a proper place for all of its contents is not quite the case.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That's a good point, the Canadian cases could go under Category:Canadian labour case law or blends could go under Category:Labour case law. I didn't propose that as part of the nomination but I can certainly take care of that if that's wanted. RevelationDirect (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. RevelationDirect (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, and just to be clear, I agree with the nominator's rationale for why this categorization is problematic. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Close per above outcome - obvious. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.