Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 May 10



Category:Articles created or improved by Dundee Oral Health Wikipedia Group 2016

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting articles created or improved by dundee oral health wikipedia group 2016


 * Nominator's rationale: We don't normally categorize (talk pages of) articles by which groups of editors have edited them (this is the only "Articles created or improved by ..." category in En Wp) - over time it would lead to some pages being in dozens/hundreds of such categories. See previous CFDs (e.g. this). Note: It would be quite appropriate for a wikiproject to use one of the pages belonging to that wikiproject to keep a list of pages they've edited. DexDor(talk) 20:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * KEEP As creator, I followed the lead of other groups who are using talk page categories in templates to identify on talk pages and in categories the articles created by off wiki editing events/groups. For example see Category:Articles created or improved during ArtAndFeminism 2016 for another group using a similar template and category. See previous years Category:Articles created or improved during ArtAndFeminism events It is incredibly helpful to notify other users that a member of a group has edited the article. Plus it assists with quickly finding the articles created by an group for monitoring the progress of the editing group. There is no reason to eliminate the talk page templates and category when they are useful today just because of potential issues that MIGHT occur later. Sydney Poore/FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 00:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Other similar templates that create categories Template:Educational assignment that was used for classroom assignments for years prior to the new system developed by Wiki Ed Foundation. Sydney Poore/FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;
 * See WP:OSE. Afaics every time categories like this have been brought to CFD they've been deleted - e.g. in February. Why do you think it is "incredibly helpful to notify other users that a member of a group has edited the article"? - especially in several years time. This category currently puts pages such as Talk:Lymphatic system under categories such as Category:Wikipedia events and Category:Wikipedians in Dundee (note: when this category was created it put the pages in different categories such as Category:Unassessed medicine articles which was also incorrect).
 * The unusual categorization caused by this category disrupts/complicates maintenance activities; I use category intersection queries to detect pages that are at a strange combinations of categories etc (which for talk pages is often an incorrect reference to a category in a discussion - example fix). This category causes "false positives" during such analysis. DexDor(talk) 06:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello DexDor, I did not add those categories that you mention when I created the category. See it was added by someone else later. . Perhaps, the better solution would be to remove the unneeded categories rather than to delete this useful template and category that makes it easy to monitor the articles created or improved by an Editing Group. Sydney Poore/FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 14:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of the history of the category. Removing some of the parent categories would be an improvement, but a better solution would be to use a list (e.g. like this) rather than a category. DexDor(talk) 18:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Potentially keep but only as an administrative (talk page) category. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If such categories are kept then where should we draw the line - e.g. would a category for "Articles created or improved by in 2016" be ok? When the initiative is over should the template/cat tag be removed? - and if not would (talk pages of) articles (especially those popular with such groups) gradually accrue more and more categories? DexDor(talk) 18:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, the fact that these articles have been edited by a certain group of people is trivial information, I don't even see a meaningful maintenance purpose here. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete ownership issues - not everyone who creates of improves an article (or group thereof) gets any credit other than the CCBYSA or GFDL provides. If we give the nod to some but not others, we're not being fair or assuming that the licenses apply to all. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

eSports

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Propose renaming:
 * Category:Years in esports to Category:Years in eSports
 * Category:1991 in esports to Category:1991 in eSports
 * Category:1992 in esports to Category:1992 in eSports
 * Category:1994 in esports to Category:1994 in eSports
 * Category:1997 in esports to Category:1997 in eSports
 * Category:2000 in esports to Category:2000 in eSports
 * Category:2001 in esports to Category:2001 in eSports
 * Category:2002 in esports to Category:2002 in eSports
 * Category:2003 in esports to Category:2003 in eSports
 * Category:2004 in esports to Category:2004 in eSports
 * Category:2005 in esports to Category:2005 in eSports
 * Category:2006 in esports to Category:2006 in eSports
 * Category:2007 in esports to Category:2007 in eSports
 * Category:2008 in esports to Category:2008 in eSports
 * Category:2009 in esports to Category:2009 in eSports
 * Category:2010 in esports to Category:2010 in eSports
 * Category:2011 in esports to Category:2011 in eSports
 * Category:2012 in esports to Category:2012 in eSports
 * Category:2013 in esports to Category:2013 in eSports
 * Category:2014 in esports to Category:2014 in eSports
 * Category:2015 in esports to Category:2015 in eSports
 * Category:2016 in esports to Category:2016 in eSports
 * Category:Esports by country to Category:eSports by country
 * Category:Esports competitions by country‎ to Category:eSports competitions by country‎
 * Category:Esports competitions in Japan to Category:eSports competitions in Japan
 * Category:Esports competitions in Malaysia to Category:eSports competitions in Malaysia
 * Category:Esports competitions in South Korea‎ to Category:eSports competitions in South Korea‎
 * Category:Esports competitions in the United States‎ to Category:eSports competitions in the United States‎
 * Category:Esports in Canada to Category:eSports in Canada
 * Category:Esports in Japan to Category:eSports in Japan
 * Category:Esports in Malaysia‎ to Category:eSports in Malaysia‎
 * Category:Esports in South Korea to Category:eSports in South Korea
 * Category:Esports in the United States‎ to Category:eSports in the United States‎
 * Category:Esports competitions to Category:eSports competitions
 * Category:Esports at the Asian Indoor Games to Category:eSports at the Asian Indoor Games
 * Category:Esports films to Category:eSports films
 * Category:Esports games to Category:eSports games
 * Category:Esports logos to Category:eSports logos
 * Category:Esports players logos to Category:eSports players logos
 * Category:American esports players logos to Category:American eSports players logos
 * Category:Esports organizations to Category:eSports organizations
 * Category:Esports teams to Category:eSports teams
 * Category:Esports teams by country to Category:eSports teams by country
 * Category:Esports teams based in China to Category:eSports teams based in China
 * Category:Esports teams based in England to Category:eSports teams based in England
 * Category:Esports teams based in Denmark‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Denmark‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in France‎ to Category:eSports teams based in France‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Thailand‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Thailand‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Germany to Category:eSports teams based in Germany
 * Category:Esports teams based in Malaysia‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Malaysia‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the Netherlands‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the Netherlands‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the Philippines‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the Philippines‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Russia‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Russia‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Singapore‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Singapore‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in South Korea‎ to Category:eSports teams based in South Korea‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Sweden‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Sweden‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Taiwan‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Taiwan‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Ukraine‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Ukraine‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the United Kingdom‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the United Kingdom‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the United States‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the United States‎
 * Category:Esports people to Category:eSports people
 * Category:Esports commentators to Category:eSports commentators
 * Category:Esports players to Category:eSports players
 * Category:Esports players by game to Category:eSports players by game
 * Category:Esports players by nationality to Category:eSports players by nationality
 * Category:American esports players to Category:American eSports players
 * Category:Belarusian esports players to Category:Belarusian eSports players
 * Category:British esports players to Category:British eSports players
 * Category:English esports players to Category:English eSports players
 * Category:Scottish esports players to Category:Scottish eSports players
 * Category:Welsh esports players to Category:Welsh eSports players
 * Category:Canadian esports players to Category:Canadian eSports players
 * Category:Chilean esports players to Category:Chilean eSports players
 * Category:Chinese esports players to Category:Chinese eSports players
 * Category:Hong Kong esports players to Category:Hong Kong eSports players
 * Category:Czech esports players to Category:Czech eSports players
 * Category:Danish esports players to Category:Danish eSports players
 * Category:Dutch esports players to Category:Dutch eSports players
 * Category:Finnish esports players to Category:Finnish eSports players
 * Category:Estonian esports players to Category:Estonian eSports players
 * Category:Filipino esports players to Category:Filipino eSports players
 * Category:French esports players to Category:French eSports players
 * Category:German esports players to Category:German eSports players
 * Category:Japanese esports players to Category:Japanese eSports players
 * Category:South Korean esports players to Category:South Korean eSports players
 * Category:Pakistani esports players to Category:Pakistani eSports players
 * Category:Polish esports players to Category:Polish eSports players
 * Category:Russian esports players to Category:Russian eSports players
 * Category:Singaporean esports players to Category:Singaporean eSports players
 * Category:Spanish esports players to Category:Spanish eSports players
 * Category:Swedish esports players to Category:Swedish eSports players
 * Category:Taiwanese esports players to Category:Taiwanese eSports players
 * Category:Ukrainian esports players to Category:Ukrainian eSports players
 * Category:Esports teams to Category:eSports teams
 * Category:Esports teams by country to Category:eSports teams by country
 * Category:Esports teams based in China to Category:eSports teams based in China
 * Category:Esports teams based in Denmark‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Denmark‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in France‎ to Category:eSports teams based in France‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Thailand‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Thailand‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Germany‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Germany‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Malaysia‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Malaysia‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the Netherlands‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the Netherlands‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in the Philippines‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the Philippines‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Russia to Category:eSports teams based in Russia
 * Category:Esports teams based in Singapore to Category:eSports teams based in Singapore
 * Category:Esports teams based in South Korea‎ to Category:eSports teams based in South Korea‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Sweden‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Sweden‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Taiwan‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Taiwan‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in Ukraine‎ to Category:eSports teams based in Ukraine‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in China to Category:eSports teams based in China
 * Category:Esports teams based in the United Kingdom‎ to Category:eSports teams based in the United Kingdom‎
 * Category:Esports teams based in England to Category:eSports teams based in England
 * Category:Esports teams based in the United States to Category:eSports teams based in the United States
 * Category:Esports teams by game to Category:eSports teams by game
 * Category:Esports television to Category:eSports television
 * Category:Esports television series to Category:eSports television series

Rationale: Per main article, eSport. Note that any category where the word shows up at the beginning, a lowercase title will display the name correctly on the page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Support WP:NCCAT. In fact there was previously a CfD to rename these, but for some reason it didn't end up happening--Prisencolin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: apparently you only nominated one category, see . – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Support. This is the correct way to spell eSports, so the categories should follow it.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Rename to match article. I have no opinion or knowledge on which way is "correct", but have to admit I hate in-word capitalization enough to oppose this form in principal, but making it consistent with the article is worth while, even if it leads to horrible orthography.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Full support. Yes, rename, recat, and add lowercase title to the cats. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 22:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hobbyist organizations

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting hobbyist organizations


 * Nominator's rationale: What is the difference between Hobbyist organizations and Clubs and societies generally? Rathfelder (talk) 12:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Question to are you then proposing a merge rather than a deletion? – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I think so. Clubs and Societies are not terribly well defined in thenselves, but I don't think separating out Hobbyist organisations helps.  Rathfelder (talk) 13:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * keep Obviously, a hobbyist organization is devoted to the practice of a particular hobby. Maybe most "clubs and societies" are such, but it's the latter's lack of clarity which is the problem here. Mangoe (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * keep keep as a satisfactory way for helping users to navigate among the articles and sub-categories contained herein Hmains (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Burial sites of the Burr family

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting burial sites of the burr family


 * Nominator's rationale: Burial location isn't a defining characteristic of a family. Only entry is a city, and subcategory has two Burrs buried there. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I am sure we got rid of something similar not long ago. It is in the nature of a Performance category, which we do not allow.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete User:Westfield2015 created hundreds of these categories last May. Unless there is a pyramid involved, cities are not defined by a single burial. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Related Nommination The parent category and sister categories to this category are nominated for deletion here.  Your thoughts (pro/con/other) are always welcome. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anglican bishops by diocese in India

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: split into Category:Bishops of the Church of North India by diocese and Category:Bishops of the Church of South India by diocese and convert into a container category. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 19:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Anglican bishops by diocese in India to Category:Anglican bishops in India or Category:Indian Anglican bishops
 * Nominator's rationale: rename, since the category doesn't look like a container category, there is no reason to add "by diocese" in the name. Change parenting accordingly. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep but diffuse. The 12 sub-categories seem to be correct contents of the nominated category; it only needs the biography articles in it to be moved up or down. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If the biography articles would be moved up, it would be necessary to create Category:Anglican bishops in India or Category:Indian Anglican bishops to move them up to. However I doubt if we really need two category layers here. Two category layers would mainly be useful if the parent Category:Anglican bishops in India would have multiple subcategories "by" a certain characteristic, while now in this case it will only have one, namely "by diocese". Marcocapelle (talk) 21:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename: I must've created it with this name to match with the parent category Category:Anglican bishops by diocese in Asia. I think it makes sense to rename in accordance with reasons given by Marcocapelle. The Discoverer (talk) 14:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Query I'm not sure what exactly is broken here. "bishops by diocese in" is a common construct. What's wrong with this particular example? Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * A "by diocese" category ought to be a container category which it currently isn't. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * split to Category:Bishops of the Church of North India by diocese and Category:Bishops of the Church of South India by diocese. The original problem was that none of the Church of South India bishops were in a "by diocese" category. I created these, which diffused the category. India, unusually, is divided into two national churches. The standard form for for these Anglican church diocese container categories is "Bishops of church name by diocese". Mangoe (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't have any objections against splitting in this case, I'm just curious how it would solve the addressed problem of having articles in categories that are supposedly container categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The only remaining direct members are four lists of bishops which seem to be proxies for diocese articles which haven't been created. They could be moved into the corresponding "bishops of diocese" categories. Mangoe (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sound like a perfect solution. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Split into Category:Bishops of the Church of North India by diocese and Category:Bishops of the Church of South India by diocese. This involves an element of anachronism in that these churches were formed by the amalgamation of the Anglican Church with the Methodists and perhaps others.  Before that, I assume that there was a single Anglican church, but I do not think that matters unduly: this applies the principle we use on alumni categories for merged or renamed colleges - or rather applies it in reverse.  The two new parent categories can be direct children of a worldwide Anglican bishop by province category.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure that the only Anglican predecessors were missionary bishops of the Church of England, who don't seem to appear in these categories. Mangoe (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Economic works

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; merge contents to Category:Works about economics. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Economic works to Category:Works about economics by medium
 * Nominator's rationale: rename, alignment of category name with parent Category:Works about economics and clarification that this is a split by medium. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Suppose we would have Category:Metallic works and Category:Works about metal. Metallic works cannot break out of the material they are made of - the suffixes -ic and -ical imply a defining quality: made of pure metal. Analogically, Category:Economic works categorizes works with a purely economic content, they belong to the discipline of economics, they cannot break out of these confines. By contrast, Category:Works about economics transcend the field of economics (or, before, metallurgy) :
 * Category:Works about economic history: a historical content / point of view, not economic.
 * Category:Works about economic systems: an ideological content / point of view, not economic.
 * Category:Works about globalization: an ideological content / point of view, not economic.
 * Category:Works about poverty OR Category:Works about consumer protection: a social point of view, not economic. Stefanomione (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not following why e.g. Category:Economics books, which is a subcat of the nominated category, would only contain books with a purely economic content. Books can just as well deal with economic history, poverty etc. The same applies for radio and TV programs. By the way, who decides what is purely economic content? - that would require quite a bit of OR. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You are right ! To have a category of purely economic works, we could rename to Category:Works in economics, and more broadly : Category:Works in disciplines. The historical, philosophical, ideological, social, filmish, novelistic, journalistic ... approaches to disciplines could be categorized in Category:Works about disciplines. Stefanomione (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * "In" or "about" economics, that's not much of a difference. The important difference here is that the category divides "by medium". Marcocapelle (talk) 22:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * "In" or "about" psychoanalysis - a world of difference : Category:Psychoanalytic books vs Category:Novels about psychoanalysis, which can belong to Category:Anti-psychiatry books. Stefanomione (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * "In" or "about" economics - a world of difference :Category:Books about wealth distribution = books in economics vs Category:Anti-globalization books = books about economics, criticism of economics, belonging to Category:Criticism of capitalism. Stefanomione (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To begin with I wonder if Anti-globalization books are economics books, they are primarily books about a political movement. But for the sake of this category discussion, let's take another ideology-based category that has more to do with economics, like Marxism, then I don't see why books about Marxism are any different (in terms of category assignment) from books about wealth distribution. Do you perhaps aim for a category of works about Philosophy of economics as a topic within Philosophy of science? (but then you should more clearly indicate so). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 20:02, 10 May 2016‎ : I created Category:Works about the history of economic thought, which is clearly a subcategory of Category:Works about economics (and doesn't belong to Category:Economic works) : the scope is philosophical, epidemiological and historical, not economic. Stefanomione (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * There you go, this is the "about economics" category according to your personal definitions. All other categories can be left as "about economics" according to common language and you may translate those for yourself as "in economics". Marcocapelle (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * Category:Works of art - Category:Paintings, ... ... ... = artistic works = produced within the rules/logic of the discipline : IN the discipline - artistic in approach.
 * Category:Works about the arts - Category:Works about painting, ... ... ... = Category:Works about disciplines : ABOUT the discipline - not artistic in approach, but historical, philosophical, epistemiological, ideological, social, filmish, novelistic, journalistic, ... 
 * Analogically :
 * Category:Economic works = economic in genre/approach - produced within the rules/logic of the discipline : IN the discipline.
 * Category:Works about economics, = Category:Works about disciplines : ABOUT the discipline - not economic in approach, but historical, philosophical, ideological, epistemiological, social, filmish, novelistic, journalistic, ... . Stefanomione (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge with Category:Works about economics, which is much the same thing, but the target may need some tidying up: works about business does not seem to belong. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (as nom) If there's no enthusiasm about the proposed rename, I will support this merge alternative. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename differently These are all literature and media, and are better so called. No one has done a ballet or opera on an economics theme, nor are they likely to. We seem to be moving in the wrong direction with these categories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbod (talk • contribs)
 * Categories like that already exist, e.g. Category:Economics books and Category:Economics films. The discussion here is about one level higher than that. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I too would prefer to simply delete and merge to Category:Works about economics, which already has works about economics of various types, as does Stefanomione's Category:Economic works. I should add that I'm generally not a big fan of 'works about x by y', and which I recall was part of the reason that led to Stefanomione's first community sanction, several years ago. So I'd prefer to keep it simple here, though certainly some form of merge/rename is desirable. I say delete and merge without leaving a redirect, because I do think it's important that we don't litter Wikipedia categorization with the remnants of a now-banned editor's prolific and disruptive legacy. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:August Media Holdings

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. If an article is ever created, then categorization of the television series as being of August Media Holdings could be reconsidered. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:August Media Holdings to August Media Holdings
 * Nominator's rationale: Reads like an article at this point. Fuddle (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Rename to Category:August Media Holdings shows like others within Category:Television series by network. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Can the category exist without an article? Seems likes it's a way around notability requirements.  Fuddle (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I would lean toward deletion until we get a main article or more contents. Company categories can exist without a main article but it's preferable to have one. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete with the possibility to recreate the category after an article is being created. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vosges

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming:
 * Category:Vosges to Category:Vosges (department)
 * Category:Buildings and structures in Vosges to Category:Buildings and structures in Vosges (department)
 * Category:Churches in Vosges‎ to Category:Churches in Vosges (department)
 * Category:Châteaux in Vosges‎ to Category:Châteaux in Vosges (department)
 * Category:Museums in Vosges to Category:Museums in Vosges (department)
 * Category:Geography of Vosges to Category:Geography of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Arrondissements of Vosges to Category:Arrondissements of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Cantons of Vosges to Category:Cantons of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Former cantons of Vosges to Category:Former cantons of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Communes of Vosges to Category:Communes of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Former communes of Vosges to Category:Former communes of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Gardens in Vosges‎ to Category:Gardens in Vosges (department)
 * Category:Landforms of Vosges to Category:Landforms of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Lakes of Vosges to Category:Lakes of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Mountains of Vosges to Category:Mountains of Vosges (department)
 * Category:Rivers of Vosges to Category:Rivers of Vosges (department)
 * Category:People from Vosges to Category:People from Vosges (department)
 * Category:Visitor attractions in Vosges‎ to Category:Visitor attractions in Vosges (department)


 * Nominator's rationale: With the eponymous Vosges mountains being WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the category and many of its subcategories are no less ambiguous than its already disambiguated main article Vosges (department), so all we can do here is bringing the categories in line with article namespace. PanchoS (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy rename per C2D. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Rename per WP:C2D to blindly follow the main article. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Rename per WP:C2D. It also simply makes sense. Olivier (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.