Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 October 16



Category:Films featured in Elvira's Movie Macabre episodes

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting films featured in elvira's movie macabre episodes


 * Nominator's rationale: This is a trivial distinction. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose (as creator) The films shown on Elvira's Movie Macabre constitute a discrete and bounded categorization of films that may be of interest to readers. For example, a cross-category search could find which films were shown both on this series and Category:Films featured in Mystery Science Theater 3000 episodes, something of interest to film buffs, but not readily available in any other way. Matt Deres (talk) 02:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not defining to the films and trivial.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 07:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-defining. DonIago (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-defining to the films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I honestly don't see the point of this. Jackninja5 (talk) 05:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Currency of Belgium

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
 * The result of the discussion was: rename to "Category:Currencies of Belgium" per WP:C2C. Prcc27🌍 (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Currency of Belgium to Category:Currencies of Belgium
 * Nominator's rationale: In line with similar categories Rathfelder (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Support per nom, per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Support -- This enables it to cover successive currencies for Belgium and predecessors. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Belgian industrial relations

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: All agree that these categories should be merged. The logical direction for this merge is into Category:Labour relations in Belgium, for the reason mentioned in the discussion, that it is part of a category tree. Since the UK category was mentioned in the discussion, although it is not part of the nomination, I want to add my agreement with the suggestion that a similar merger should be proposed for it, without expressing my opinion as to the question in which direction that merger should go. Debresser (talk) 15:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting belgian industrial relations


 * Nominator's rationale: delete in the spirit of WP:SMALLCAT, there is no point in having a container category with just one child category. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * On the contrary, Merge Category:Belgian labour relations into this category. Referring to this topic as "labor relations" is an Americanism.  The British English equivalent is "Industrial relations".  I think a similar merger should be undertaken for the UK sibling category.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * So this concerns the child Category:Labour relations in Belgium. I'm neutral between the original nomination and Peterkingiron's alternative. In both proposals it's clear that there should be one category, not two. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into Category:Labour relations in Belgium. The latter sits in a category tree and has the same scope as the "industrial relations" category.—Brigade Piron (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Crude oil companies

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete after having ensured that the content is already in Category:Oil pipeline companies. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting crude oil companies


 * Nominator's rationale: Superfluous. Only one entry - Category: Crude oil pipelines companies Rathfelder (talk) 10:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge both to Category:Oil pipeline companies. The target is also a one-item category.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.