Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 January 9



Category:Australian rules football trade unions

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) . Marcocapelle (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting australian rules football trade unions


 * Nominator's rationale: These "trade unions" aren't - they're representative bodies for participants in professional sport but they aren't (legally) trade unions. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Favor Rename What would be the right description, "professional associations"? RevelationDirect (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that would be a good alternative. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear to the closer, I'm suggesting Category:Category:Australian rules football professional associations. RevelationDirect (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine by me. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 07:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The article Professional Footballers Australia might give a hint!. Twiceuponatime (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That article describes it as "trade union". RevelationDirect (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Professional Footballers Australia is in a different sport and is a member of the Australian Council of Trade Unions. The AFL bodies (which this category concerns) don't call themselves trade unions, aren't legally trade unions, and aren't part of the ACTU. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. RevelationDirect (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * REname somehow, rather than delete. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecoregions

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) . Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose cleanup discussion wikipedia


 * Nominator's rationale: Category is being made redundant to Category:WikiProject Ecoregions. John Carter (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No category members so no need for a merge. VegaDark (talk) 09:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:South Texas Independent School District Libraries

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure)  f  eminist  05:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting south texas independent school district libraries


 * Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article and little growth potential. No need to merge, the article is already in the parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Support With no objection to recreating if we ever get up to 5 or so articles. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the one article is already in the parent. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Order of Good Hope

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure)  f  eminist  05:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Propose Deleting Category:Order of Good Hope
 * Propose Deleting Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of Good Hope
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:PERFCAT and WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
 * When foreign leaders visit South Africa, or vice versa, the Order of Good Hope is given out as souvenir to commemorate the visit. Recipients like Bill Clinton and Fidel Castro just don't seem to defined by this award. If you want to see the clutter this type of category creates at the article level, take a look the train wreck at the bottom of this article. If we delete this category, the recipients will still be listed here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: Notified Mimich as the category creator and I added this discussion to WikiProject South Africa. – RevelationDirect (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Background We recently deleted other medals given to foreign officials and royalty here, here, here, here and here. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.