Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 12



Category:People from Garden, Michigan

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:People from Garden, Michigan to Category:People from Delta County, Michigan
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Small one-county community with just 2 entries. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support This is a very small locality with just 220 residents. Very limited possibility of expansion, does not aid in navigation and and makes sense to upmerge. AusLondonder (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support this is what the 'notable people' section on a city/geography article is for; and where the list is long, it is typically instantiated as a list rather than as a category. I'll add a 'notable people' section to the Garden, Michigan article momentarily. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProjects participating in Wikipedia 1.0 assessments

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: withdrawn.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:WikiProjects participating in Wikipedia 1.0 assessments to Category:WikiProjects participating in article assessments
 * Nominator's rationale: Assessments are no longer "Wikipedia 1.0 assessments". This is a follow-up to Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_17. Editors may be able to suggest a better alternative. – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Withdrawn as the above needs to be reinstated pending changes to WP 1.0 bot. See Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index. – Fayenatic  L ondon 06:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SM Seaside City Cebu

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting sm seaside city cebu


 * Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. One of which is a cancelled project. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Are there any parent categories that that it should be merged to? Marcocapelle (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No but some of the categories this category are in, might have to be put back on the article page....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ammazing World Records:Research Achievement

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting ammazing world records


 * Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under various names Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 06:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as it does appear to be self-serving with no apparent usefulness outside of their draft. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Could an admin warn/block this editor? More categories have been created today for the sandbox article. Oculi (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- If spelt right, this would be a POV category. Clearly useless.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete 1. Blank, and 2. Most likely a POV category. I would delete right now. &mdash; JJ Be  rs  15:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Research Achievement,Ammazing World Records

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting research achievement,ammazing world records


 * Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under this name and Category:Ammazing World Records Research Achievement and Category:Ammazing World Records:Research Achievement. Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 05:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if spelt correectly, this would be a POV category. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Who is Who of Indian Writers(online)/search

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting who is who of indian writers(online)/search


 * Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under this name and Category:Sahitya Akademi:Who is Who of Indian Writers. Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 05:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- now essentially an empty category. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Drawings

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Drawings by Rembrandt to Category:Drawings by artist and Category:Works by Rembrandt
 * Propose merging Category:Drawings by Hieronymus Bosch‎ to Category:Drawings by artist and Category:Works by Hieronymus Bosch
 * Propose merging Category:Drawings by Peter Paul Rubens to Category:Works by Peter Paul Rubens
 * Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one or two articles per category. The nominated categories have all been created by the same editor User:Hocimi of whom some more Dutch history categories have been nominated in the past weeks. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support, though Category:Self-portraits by Rembrandt isn't just about drawings, so should only be merged to Category:Works by Rembrandt. Sionk (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scholars of Dutch history

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge.  ℯ  xplicit  00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Scholars of Dutch history to Category:Historians of the Netherlands
 * Nominator's rationale: merge two categories with overlapping scope. This is another Hocimi creation. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge -- obviously the same thing. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support – consistent with naming convention for the subject matter. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:We Got Married contestants

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic  L ondon 23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting we got married contestants


 * Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization of performers by performance. We Got Married is nothing but a variety show, and the participants are hardly "contestants". There is a long-standing precedence against these types of categories: User:Good Olfactory/CFD. It is non-defining categorization. ℯ  xplicit  01:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- This feels like a performance by performer category. I am surprised that participants are notable, unless for other reasons.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Classic example of a performer category. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge to all parents: Category:South Korean music-related lists, Category:Concert tours of South Korea,  Category:Lists of concert tours and Category:Lists of events in South Korea. – Fayenatic  L ondon 23:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea to Category:Lists of concert tours by South Korean musicians
 * Nominator's rationale: These are not lists of concert tours of South Korea, they are lists of concert tours by South Korean musicians that take place in South Korea, among other countries. Alternatively, this can be upmerged to its parent categories as too small. ℯ  xplicit  01:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As it is currently named, this is a horrible idea: imagine how many concert tours have gone thru America! Tours by artist nationality is probably trivial and wouldn't be used for navigation. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Upmerge or rename per nom. Deletion of the South Korean subcat on its own is not appropriate, it should only be considered for deletion if the parent Category:Lists of concert tours is discussed in conjunction. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.