Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 24



Category:Recipients of the U-boat Front Clasp

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  00:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting recipients of the u-boat front clasp


 * Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category for an obscure decoration. Fails WP:CATDEF & WP:OCAWARD. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medieval law

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge.  ℯ  xplicit  00:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:614 in law to Category:614 and Category:7th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:643 in law to Category:643 and Category:7th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:668 in law to Category:668 and Category:7th century in law


 * Propose merging Category:697 in law to Category:697 and Category:7th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:701 in law to Category:701 and Category:8th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:718 in law to Category:718 and Category:8th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:733 in law to Category:733 and Category:8th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:757 in law to Category:757 and Category:8th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:785 in law to Category:785 and Category:8th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:824 in law to Category:824 and Category:9th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:864 in law to Category:864 and Category:9th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:886 in law to Category:886 and Category:9th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:897 in law to Category:897 and Category:9th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1037 in law to Category:1037 and Category:11th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1063 in law to Category:1063 and Category:11th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1076 in law to Category:1076 and Category:11th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1086 in law to Category:1086 and Category:11th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1100 in law to Category:1100 and Category:11th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1102 in law to Category:1102 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1140 in law to Category:1140 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1164 in law to Category:1164 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1166 in law to Category:1166 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1170 in law to Category:1170 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1176 in law to Category:1176 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1181 in law to Category:1181 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1188 in law to Category:1188 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:1194 in law to Category:1194 and Category:12th century in law
 * Propose merging Category:587 in law to Category:587
 * Propose merging Category:628 in law to Category:628
 * Propose merging Category:713 in law to Category:713
 * Propose merging Category:716 in law to Category:716
 * Propose merging Category:811 in law to Category:811
 * Propose merging Category:815 in law to Category:815
 * Propose merging Category:836 in law to Category:836
 * Propose merging Category:843 in law to Category:843
 * Propose merging Category:855 in law to Category:855
 * Propose merging Category:870 in law to Category:870
 * Propose merging Category:880 in law to Category:880
 * Propose merging Category:907 in law to Category:907
 * Propose merging Category:911 in law to Category:911
 * Propose merging Category:921 in law to Category:921
 * Propose merging Category:945 in law to Category:945
 * Propose merging Category:1005 in law to Category:1005
 * Propose merging Category:1018 in law to Category:1018
 * Propose merging Category:1059 in law to Category:1059
 * Propose merging Category:1080 in law to Category:1080
 * Propose merging Category:1091 in law to Category:1091
 * Propose merging Category:1101 in law to Category:1101
 * Propose merging Category:1108 in law to Category:1108
 * Propose merging Category:1123 in law to Category:1123
 * Propose merging Category:1127 in law to Category:1127
 * Propose merging Category:1136 in law to Category:1136
 * Propose merging Category:1139 in law to Category:1139
 * Propose merging Category:1141 in law to Category:1141
 * Propose merging Category:1143 in law to Category:1143
 * Propose merging Category:1151 in law to Category:1151
 * Propose merging Category:1153 in law to Category:1153
 * Propose merging Category:1156 in law to Category:1156
 * Propose merging Category:1158 in law to Category:1158
 * Propose merging Category:1174 in law to Category:1174
 * Propose merging Category:1175 in law to Category:1175
 * Propose merging Category:1177 in law to Category:1177
 * Propose merging Category:1179 in law to Category:1179
 * Propose merging Category:1183 in law to Category:1183
 * Propose merging Category:1192 in law to Category:1183


 * Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, nearly all categories contain only one article and it's quite unlikely these categories will be populated any better. Some notes:
 * A number of categories don't need a double upmerge to a Law-by-century category because their article is already in a Treaties-by-century subcat (see bottom half of the category list).
 * This nomination ends in 1200, thereafter it makes more sense to categorize by decade instead of century, just like already happens in the Treaties subcat tree.
 * This is a continuation of this earlier nomination.
 * - Marcocapelle (talk) 12:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support -- I do not think treaties ought generally to be in a law tree. I doubtwe will ever find enough law to merit anything less than century categories.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.