Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 May 29



Organisations based in Bolivia

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename as option A.  ℯ  xplicit  05:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Propose renaming under one of the following options:


 * Category:Organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Organizations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Lists of organisations based in Bolivia‎ to Category:Lists of organizations based in Bolivia‎
 * Category:Women's organisations in Bolivia‎ to Cateogry:Women's organizations in Bolivia‎
 * Category:Animal welfare organisations based in Bolivia‎ to Category:Animal welfare organizations based in Bolivia‎
 * Category:Defunct organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Defunct organizations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Indigenous organisations in Bolivia to Category:Indigenous organizations in Bolivia
 * Category:Medical and health organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Medical and health organizations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Sports organisations of Bolivia to Category:Sports organizations of Bolivia
 * Category:Transport organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Transport organizations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Aviation organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Aviation organizations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Wikipedia categories named after organisations based in Bolivia to Category:Wikipedia categories named after organizations based in Bolivia


 * Option B - "Organizations" to "Organisations"


 * Category:Anarchist organizations in Bolivia‎ to Category:Anarchist organisations in Bolivia‎
 * Category:Business organizations based in Bolivia to Category:Business organisations based in Bolivia
 * Category:Bolivian organization stubs to Category:Bolivian organisation stubs
 * Rationale: These categories all have the same national scope, so they should have the same ENGVAR usage. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Brazil - closed as Organisations
 * Greece - closed as Organizations
 * Iran - closed as Organisations
 * Poland - closed as Organisations
 * Israel - closed as Organizations
 * Puerto Rico - closed as Organizations
 * France - still open
 * Angola - still open
 * Turkey - still open


 * Option A Per WP:RETAIN and to be consistent with the parent category, Category:Organisations based in Bolivia which has been stable for more than a decade. Also, the majority of child cats use the same spelling as the parent, so there are less categories to rename with option A. AusLondonder (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Option A per AusLondonder. I do agree that the outcome should be A or B (and not 'no decision'). Most of Category:Organizations based in South America by country use 's', surprisingly. Oculi (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * OPtion A since it is in the Americas. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Note: This was subsequently reopened, relisted and reversed at Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 16. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Sugar industry in the Dutch Empire

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  05:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting sugar industry in the dutch empire


 * Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NONDEF, sugar industry isn't the primary activity of the companies listed here, besides it's pointless to create this category for two companies which are categorized together in numerous more appropriate categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, too narrow cat, Category:Economy of the Dutch Empire and Category:Economic history of the Dutch Empire would suffice for such things. Brandmeistertalk  14:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NARROWCAT and WP:NON-DEFINING. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment see also four nominations on the next day, starting here. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Sugar was an activity PERFORMANCE of the two companies. Both articles have plenty of categories, so no need to merge. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch Financial Revolution

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ℯ  xplicit  05:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting dutch financial revolution


 * Nominator's rationale: speedy delete per WP:G4 as a recreation of Category:Financial system of the Dutch Republic mostly containing general financial terminology. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Some of these things may have been invented in the Dutch Financial Revolution. Others are merely aspects of Dutch history.  Possibly we might allow Category:Financial innovations of Dutch Financial Revolution, but Tulip mania would not be one.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.