Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 4



Category:Animated Wonder Woman films

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Animated Wonder Woman films to Category:Wonder Woman films
 * Nominator's rationale: Only two of her films aren't animated so it's a weird and unnecessary split. JDDJS (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose, this is also a subcategory of Category:Animated films based on DC Comics, we cannot just remove the content of Category:Animated Wonder Woman films from that tree. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Latina Rappers

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting latina rappers
 * Propose deleting latina musicians
 * Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEGRS. These rappers are already categorised by nationality,no need for ethnicity as well - especially since "Latina" is ambiguous. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. I checked a few articles on whether they are in the tree of Category:Female rappers by nationality and found they are indeed. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Broken hearts

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: no consensus on deletion, but a consensus that if kept it should be renamed to Category:Broken heart. So rename. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting broken hearts


 * Nominator's rationale: Seems to be a joke/novelty category. Added the day after Valentine's Day; members currently include Romeo and Juliet and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Quuxplusone (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, I'm the "joker" who created this category, and it came about because I created the page Memory, the Heart, a painting which symbolically depicts the artist, Frida Kahlo, her broken heart, and the emotion accompanying such an event. It wasn't created because of Valentine's Day or to vandalize the encyclopedia by adding a joke category. Broken hearts are portrayed in art, in literature, song, theater, opera, and other forms of communication. The page 'Takotsubo cardiomyopathy' was iffy, as it is a real-world condition with the alternate name of 'Broken heart syndrome', but I thought it was close enough for inclusion. This is a real subject, and instead of wanting to delete it maybe you can please help to expand it. I'd also like to point out that it does include appropriate and closely related pages and a major sub-category (Songs about heartache) other than the two that are highlighted in the nomination. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment We already have a category for 'Love' - see Category:Love, so it seems to be valid to some extent. But the article for Love also links to Category:Emotions so this probably should be in there somewhere? Twiceuponatime (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi (nice user name). You're correct, and after mulling this over came to a personal conclusion that the 'Love' category would be the best place for this as a subcategory. There cannot be a broken heart without first having a love. People, pets, or other loves fully loved have to exist before the life-events and emotions take some sort of chemical left-turn and evolve into the series of physical and emotional wrap-arounds that result in bona-fide card-carrying broken hearts. So as a directly related condition of "Love", that category seems appropriate. Thanks for pointing out that this one needed an up-the-chain home. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * If kept, rename to Category:Broken heart per main article Broken heart and remove Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from the category since this is entirely unrelated to Broken heart. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Will remove the Tak cardio page. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted from CFD 2018 February 20 to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * This maybe should have been closed as kept, with a name change to 'Broken heart', awhile ago, and I ask someone to do so. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I am still not convinced it is a wonderful category, but will go along with rename to Category:Broken heart. It is already categorised under Love. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Crimean Tatar communities and territories

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Merge to Category:Crimean Tatars. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting crimean tatar communities and territories


 * Nominator's rationale: delete, this is a hodgepodge of the island Crimea, an administrative subdivision, a city and a quarter of a city. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment "the island Crimea". Crimea is not an island, it is a peninsula. The Crimean Tatars are a distinct ethnic group, and includes a relatively large diaspora. Dimadick (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I am not convinced we need to make any change, but Merge to Category:Crimean Tatars rather than delete.  My recollection is that Stalin exiled them all from Crimea, but they  were later allowed to return.  However not all did, so that there is likely to be a large diaspora.  In Russia, people have an internal nationality according to their ethnicity.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * All current content is (on) Crimea anyway, there is no diaspora here. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Counties of Appalachia

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: no consensus. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting counties of appalachia


 * Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NONDEF, it is based on a single source, of the Appalachian Regional commission which had been established specifically for economic development of the Appalachians. Besides the county articles barely mention that they are on the list of this commission. Note that these counties have already been listified in List of Appalachian Regional Commission counties. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℯ xplicit 00:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.