Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 January 11



Category:Games created using AGS

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Games created using AGS to Category:Adventure Game Studio games
 * Nominator's rationale: "X games" is the accepted standard for all other categories in Category:Video games by game engine as far as I can tell. So  Why  18:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Least concern biota of California

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting least concern biota of california


 * Propose deleting least concern flora of california added 20 January
 * Nominator's rationale: Created by banned User:Look2See1. Category:Species by IUCN Red List category subcats are already populated and updated automatically based on taxobox  and  . Category appears to be populated by species that are rated least concern globally on the IUCN and also occur in California.


 * An organism that is considered least concern globally by the IUCN may or may not be considered least concern within California specifically. For species that also occur outside California (non-endemics), to make the judgment that the IUCN status also applies to California specifically would likely be WP:OR.


 * Category could be split into something like Category:IUCN Red List least concern species that occur in California and Category:NatureServe apparently secure species that occur in California, but in my view that would be overcategorization. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 14:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Articles such as Pacific sleeper shark shouldn't be in any California-specific categories. The flora subcat should also be deleted. DexDor(talk) 17:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Procedural comment, based on User:DexDor's latter comment I have added the subcat to the nomination. pinging the nominator about it. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I agree with deleting that as well. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 15:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity in New Zealand by city

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep. ~ Rob 13 Talk 03:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Christianity in New Zealand by city to Category:Christianity in New Zealand and Category:Christianity by city
 * Nominator's rationale: upmerge, this is a container category for just two subcategories, it is easier to access them directly from Category:Christianity in New Zealand. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose a quick check found a couple of other categories that belonged in here, and I've created a fifth one. Grutness... wha?   01:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdraw as nominator. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity in Bangkok

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Rob 13 Talk 03:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Christianity in Bangkok to Category:Christianity in Thailand and Category:Religion in Bangkok
 * Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, apart from the subcategory there is only one article in it. The subcategory does not have to be merged, it is already in Category:Churches in Thailand and Category:Places of worship in Bangkok. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't think the sole member Assumption University (Thailand) should be categorised under either target. It's affiliated with the church, but not such a way that makes Christianity in Thailand or Religion in Bangkok one of its defining characteristics. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * (as nominator) I'm also fine with that. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Husbands of British princesses

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting category


 * Nominator's rationale: The category was created in conjunction with Template:Husbands of British princesses. That template was deleted following discussion here. The conclusion of that discussion was being a husband of a British princess was an appropriate classification, as such individuals don't acquire titles or precedence as a result. This category seems to suffer from the same issue as the template. 2601:241:300:C930:1D8E:D402:BEEA:D579 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per this discussion. Husbands of British princesses do not hold any titles, rank, or status through marriage. Grouping Gustaf VI Adolf of Sweden, Ferdinand I of Romania, Christian VI of Denmark, Haakon VII of Norway, and other rulers on the basis of marriage to a British princess is senseless and anglocentric. Surtsicna (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.