Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 March 2



Category:Rom the Spaceknight

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: withdrawn (non-admin closure) . Marcocapelle (talk) 23:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Rom the Spaceknight to Category:Rom the Space Knight
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename category to follow suit with recent main article move per Talk:Rom the Space Knight proposal, which was unopposed. -- 2pou (talk) 22:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * ❌ - After further review, this should be covered by WP:C2D, and it has been added here: Categories for discussion/Speedy. --2pou (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Black British people

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Keep Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Category:Black British people
 * Category:Black British DJs
 * Category:Black British academics
 * Category:Black British activists
 * Category:Black British actors
 * Category:Black British actresses
 * Category:Black British artists
 * Category:Black British classical musicians
 * Category:Black British comedians
 * Category:Black British fashion people
 * Category:Black British female rappers
 * Category:Black British female singers
 * Category:Black British former slaves
 * Category:Black British male actors
 * Category:Black British male rappers
 * Category:Black British male singers
 * Category:Black British musical groups
 * Category:Black British musicians
 * Category:Black British people by occupation
 * Category:Black British photographers
 * Category:Black British politicians
 * Category:Black British radio presenters
 * Category:Black British rappers
 * Category:Black British religious leaders
 * Category:Black British rock musicians
 * Category:Black British singers
 * Category:Black British sportspeople
 * Category:Black British television personalities
 * Category:Black British writers
 * Category:Fictional Black British people
 * Race is a social construct of no scientific significance and is used entirely to segregate people based on the color of their skin (see Wikipedia:Race and ethnicity). Additionally, none of the articles in these categories are sourced adequately to justify their inclusion in them. For example, Lemar, a singer from UK is labelled as a Black British singer on Wikipedia when no sources have ever called him that, which is because sources rarely talk about or identify people's races as it's not of any importance. With that said, the inclusion of Lemar in the category Black British singers is a form of original research and is decided by the editor placing that category in that article, which is assuming the person's race. Furthermore, there is no Category:Black American people, Category:Black Nigerian people, Category:Black Mexican people or Category:Black Japanese people, for instance. My recommended action is to delete all the categories then incorporate their articles into the existing generic British people categories (or create new for those without existing categories). Peopho (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep- these are discussed regularly and the nom should provide some links, eg this one. There is Category:African-American people, not to mention Category:People of African descent by country. "Lemar has also won two Brit Awards and three MOBO Awards" - MOBO yields a clue. Oculi (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, assuming Black British is correct it is a too ambiguous term. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep all - Ethnicity is important on Wikipedia as there are many thousands of ethnicity-related categories. You say there's no Category:Black American people - that's because there is Category:African-American people. Look at how many subcategories under subcategories under Category:American people of African descent. Same goes for Category:African-American people. Category:Black British people is no different - it is a very useful parent category containing a large number of subcategories and pages. Black British is an ethnic group in the UK (see Category:Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom) and there is an article for Black British people so there's nothing wrong categorizing Black British people into their occupation categories. Furthermore, there are many pages under the important Category:Black British history. ~ Hiddenstranger (talk) 02:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep all Black British is an acknowledged academic term, the equivalent of African-American etc. For individuals within these categories, this is a discussion for their talk pages. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep This is about ethnicity, not race. Dimadick (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I am reading through quite a few articles in Category:Black British singers and it seems like hardly any of these people identify as of Black British ethnicity. Presumably we have a WP:BLP and WP:NONDEF issue here. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The fact that there are there are many thousands of ethnicity-related categories, some of which are pretty dubious, is a very weak argument for keeping these. Blackness is arguably not an ethnicity.  It's a skin colour.  Are there clear criteria for deciding to whom the term applies?  Is this a term which the subjects would be happy with, or would they prefer to be described in some other way?  Rathfelder (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Categories about races should be kept but ethnicities and political terms should be deleted. That is not the case here. Mohanabhil (talk) 04:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It is interesting to note that you think these categories are about race instead of ethnicity. But in fact we do not categorize by race. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The article Ethnicity starts with quoting:
 * In essence, an ethnic group is a named social category of people based on perceptions of shared social experience or one's ancestors' experiences. Members of the ethnic group see themselves as sharing cultural traditions and history that distinguish them from other groups. Ethnic group identity has a strong psychological or emotional component that divides the people of the world into opposing categories of “us” and “them.” In contrast to social stratification, which divides and unifies people along a series of horizontal axes based on socioeconomic factors, ethnic identities divide and unify people along a series of vertical axes. Thus, ethnic groups, at least theoretically, cut across socioeconomic class differences, drawing members from all strata of the population.
 * The key concept here is the sharing aspect. So the question is whether Black British share anything at all, apart from their non-pale skin colour, so whether they are truly comparable to African-American ethnicity. African-Americans self-identify as such, and they have shared cultural organisations. That hardly seems to be the case for Black British. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * https://www.sadacca.co.uk/about-us/ looks to me like a 'shared cultural association' and there are similar organisations all over the UK. Black British Music has been known in various guises for decades, http://bedsa.org/ seems to think there are "black and minority ethnic communities" in the UK. British Ethnic Diversity Sports Awards. Oculi (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * https://www.sadacca.co.uk/about-us/ is at best about African-Carribean ethnicity if that exists (more likely it is about two ethnicities, African and Carribean), and apparently it doesn't include people of Indian descent who are supposed to belong to Black British. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Black British Music is about music genres in the UK that were mostly 'founded' by the African-American ethnicity in the US. It does not suggest that this is shared culture of British people of African, Caribbean and Indian descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * http://bedsa.org/ is about ethnic diversity and does not mention Black British as being a single ethnicity. Going into perhaps too much detail, "black" is not capitalized and not followed by "British" while "communities" is written in plural. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * No-one is claiming that Black British (or African-American) is a single ethnicity. African is certainly not an ethnicity and neither is West Indian. Oculi (talk) 08:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Fair enough but then we should categorize people by what their ethnicity actually is, if any. Or otherwise using descent by country categories is sufficient. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete useless race categories to divide people. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If people wish to be identified by labels of this sort that is fine by me. I think some musicians do.  But I am not happy if labels are going to be applied which the subjects would reject, and I cant see how that could be avoided unless the label came with membership of some sort of organization, in which case it would be more sensible to use the organisation as the basis of the category.  Rathfelder (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep "Black British" is an accepted ethnic description for African and Caribbean British people. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * This comment and many other comments above do not address the WP:BLP and WP:NONDEF issues that have been signaled before. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep As reliable sources regularly use "Black British" or refer to individual British people as being black, then as an encyclopedia, we should be okay with categorising people as such. Edwardx (talk) 13:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * While that may happen incidentally, it is not a sufficient basis for a category. A defining characteristic is one that reliable sources commonly and consistently define the subject as having. Most articles in these categories do not even mention this characteristic so it is certainly not something that sources commonly and consistently use. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Having Category:Black British DJs as a subcategory of Category:British DJs, for example, seems to me to be borderline offensive. A black British DJ is not a sub-type of British DJ; a black British DJ is a British DJ, no more and no less. The skin colour or ethnicity of the person is totally irrelevant. If there is a need to categorise a British person by skin colour (I am not convinced either way), for example, a black British DJ, they can be added to Category:British DJs and Category:Black British people. [ Carl Cox for example made his name playing rave music (not a "BAME"/"MOBO" genre), and was born in England. He should be in Category: English DJs. One of the most famous DJs of hip-hop and grime music in the UK is a white man, Tim Westwood.] Neutral on Category:Black British people and Category:Fictional Black British people; Delete the rest. Oh and before anybody gets too carried away by my link to MOBO and wants to use it as evidence that in the UK we categorise musicians by skin colours - we don't. Past winners of the MOBO Awards have included Jamiroquai and Eminem.--kingboyk (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Race or ethnic group does not need to have a scientific basis in order to be a defining characteristic. There is a clear community of Black British people which is formed by racial social structures within Britain. That community clearly expands into sub-cultures of religion, writing, sport, music and entertainment. On that basis, all these categories are defining and relevant (though I'm not aware if there are distinct Black British forms of photography and radio presenting, so potentially worth discussing the merit of those two). SFB 17:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Okemos, Michigan, by occupation

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people from okemos, michigan, by occupation


 * Nominator's rationale: Container category for a small town with only 1 sub-category. TM 13:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Category:People from Okemos, Michigan per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge. Big cities that have a lot of "[Occupation] from [City]" subcategories can have one of these to manage clutter in the main category — but small towns that only have "Sportspeople from [City]" don't need them. Bearcat (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Temecula, California, by occupation

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people from temecula, california, by occupation


 * Nominator's rationale: Container category with only 1 sub-category. TM 13:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Category:People from Temecula, California per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge. Big cities that have a lot of "[Occupation] from [City]" subcategories can have one of these to manage clutter in the main category — but small towns that only have "Sportspeople from [City]" don't need them. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Jonesboro, Arkansas, by occupation

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people from jonesboro, arkansas, by occupation


 * Nominator's rationale: Container category with only 1 sub-category. TM 13:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Category:People from Jonesboro, Arkansas per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge. Big cities that have a lot of "[Occupation] from [City]" subcategories can have one of these to manage clutter in the main category — but small towns that only have "Sportspeople from [City]" don't need them. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Oroville, California by occupation

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge for now. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people from oroville, california by occupation


 * Nominator's rationale: Container category with only 1 sub-category. TM 13:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Category:People from Oroville, California per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge. Big cities that have a lot of "[Occupation] from [City]" subcategories can have one of these to manage clutter in the main category — but small towns that only have "Sportspeople from [City]" don't need them. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose contains two sub-categories now. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Categories containing two sub-categories are regularly deleted. Five is the minimum for keeping per general consensus.--TM 13:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Captaincy General of Chile

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Category:1530s in Chile to Category:1530s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1536 in Chile to Category:1536 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1540s in Chile to Category:1540s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1541 in Chile to Category:1541 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1550 in Chile to Category:1550 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1550s establishments in Chile to Category:1550s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile


 * Category:1550s in Chile to Category:1550s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1553 in Chile to Category:1553 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1554 in Chile to Category:1554 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1556 in Chile to Category:1556 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1557 in Chile to Category:1557 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1558 in Chile to Category:1558 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1560s establishments in Chile to Category:1560s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1560s in Chile to Category:1560s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1563 in Chile to Category:1563 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1564 in Chile to Category:1564 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1565 in Chile to Category:1565 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1569 in Chile to Category:1569 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1570s disestablishments in Chile to Category:1570s disestablishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1570s in Chile to Category:1570s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1575 in Chile to Category:1575 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1580 in Chile to Category:1580 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1580s establishments in Chile to Category:1580s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1580s in Chile to Category:1580s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1584 in Chile to Category:1584 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1590s in Chile to Category:1590s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1598 in Chile to Category:1598 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1610s establishments in Chile to Category:1610s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1610s in Chile to Category:1610s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1611 in Chile to Category:1611 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1615 in Chile to Category:1615 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1619 in Chile to Category:1619 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1620s in Chile to Category:1620s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1630s in Chile to Category:1630s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1635 in Chile to Category:1635 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1640s establishments in Chile to Category:1640s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1640s in Chile to Category:1640s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1641 in Chile to Category:1641 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1643 in Chile to Category:1643 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1645 in Chile to Category:1645 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1647 in Chile to Category:1647 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1650s in Chile to Category:1650s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1651 in Chile to Category:1651 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1654 in Chile to Category:1654 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1655 in Chile to Category:1655 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1656 in Chile to Category:1656 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1670s in Chile to Category:1670s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1671 in Chile to Category:1671 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1675 in Chile to Category:1675 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1676 in Chile to Category:1676 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1680s in Chile to Category:1680s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1710s in Chile to Category:1710s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1712 in Chile to Category:1712 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1720s in Chile to Category:1720s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1723 in Chile to Category:1723 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1726 in Chile to Category:1726 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1740s establishments in Chile to Category:1740s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1740s in Chile to Category:1740s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1741 in Chile to Category:1741 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1750 in Chile to Category:1750 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1750s establishments in Chile to Category:1750s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1750s in Chile to Category:1750s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1760s in Chile to Category:1760s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1766 in Chile to Category:1766 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1767 in Chile to Category:1767 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1770s in Chile to Category:1770s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1776 in Chile to Category:1776 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1780s in Chile to Category:1780s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1781 in Chile to Category:1781 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1790s establishments in Chile to Category:1790s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1790s in Chile to Category:1790s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1793 in Chile to Category:1793 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1796 in Chile to Category:1796 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1800 in Chile to Category:1800 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1800s establishments in Chile to Category:1800s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1800s in Chile to Category:1800s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1801 in Chile to Category:1801 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1802 in Chile to Category:1802 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1803 in Chile to Category:1803 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1804 in Chile to Category:1804 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1805 in Chile to Category:1805 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1806 in Chile to Category:1806 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1807 in Chile to Category:1807 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1808 in Chile to Category:1808 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1809 in Chile to Category:1809 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1810 in Chile to Category:1810 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1810s disestablishments in Chile to Category:1810s disestablishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1810s establishments in Chile to Category:1810s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1810s in Chile to Category:1810s in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1811 in Chile to Category:1811 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1812 in Chile to Category:1812 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1813 in Chile to Category:1813 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1814 in Chile to Category:1814 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1815 in Chile to Category:1815 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:1817 in Chile to Category:1817 in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:15th century in Chile to Category:15th century in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:16th century in Chile to Category:16th century in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:17th century in Chile to Category:17th century in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:16th-century establishments in Chile to Category:16th-century establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:16th-century disestablishments in Chile to Category:16th-century disestablishments in the Captaincy General of Chile
 * Category:17th-century establishments in Chile to Category:17th-century establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile


 * Nominator's rationale: Anachronism: the Captaincy General of Chile declared itself independent in 1818, becoming the Republic of Chile. The categories in the pre-independence era are an uncomfortable mix of old name and (mostly) new name, which this nomination will resolve.
 * I considered adding an option B to consolidate all the categories under "Chile", but I think that the distinction of name is worth preserving because the difference is not just a change of name. For most of its history, the Captaincy General of Chile had a much larger territory than contemporary Chile, including most of what is now Argentina.
 * Note that these categories are (or should be) populated by a series of category header templates, which will need to be amended. I will be happy to asssist the closing admin in implementing this if they ask. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 11:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Support - per nom. Oculi (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Education by Country

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting education by country


 * Nominator's rationale: We already have Category:Education by country (notice capitalization difference), which is a fully-diffused container category. Every article is thus in a "Education in [country]" subcat. So this is redundant to the lower-case version and also generally inappropriate to have in both subat and a diffused parent-cat. Further, some of the entries are not even countries. DMacks (talk) 10:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Support  - redundant. Oculi (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. No need for both, and the correctly capitalise one should be kept. Grutness... wha?   01:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.