Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 2



Category:Uiryeong Yeo clan

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  bibliomaniac  1  5  21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting uiryeong yeo clan
 * Nominator's rationale: Categorizing contemporary people by Korean clan (incidentally, sub-clan) seems pretty pointless, at least when clan adherence is not mentioned in any of the 2 articles therein, let alone sourced. Then, it is better not to tempt people to add irrelevant, unsourced categories - by eliminating the category. Geschichte (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, the two biographies should be purged and thereafter it is a matter of WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:42-cylinder engines
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 10%23Category:42-cylinder engines

Prix Versailles

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  bibliomaniac  1  5  21:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting prix versailles
 * Propose deleting prix versailles by year
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning airports‎
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning architects and designers‎
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning campuses‎
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning hotels‎
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning passenger stations‎
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning shopping malls
 * Propose deleting prix versailles-winning sports facilities
 * Nominator's rationale: Categories created by single purpose accounts to promote Prix Versailles, see Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. The main article is now deleted, see Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles. Four more categories were nominated at Categories for discussion/Log/2021 July 21. TSventon (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all. That main page for this has been deleted. Besides being non-defining, it is also not important enough for an article.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all A corporate structure that is non-encyclopedic and is nothing to do with Wikipedia.   scope_creep Talk  08:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I saw the process is free and promoted by UNESCO and the International Union of Architects . Receiving the prize appears as a high recognition for the architects   and the projects . Competitions are available for students . 2A01:CB06:A017:8F33:559F:5529:3748:20C9 (talk) 08:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC) — 2A01:CB06:A017:8F33:559F:5529:3748:20C9 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * "and promoted by UNESCO": this is misleading. The Prix Versailles is held in Unesco building, but there is no evidence at all that Unesco endorses or promotes it. In fact, it's probable that Prix Versailles only rent a room at Unesco building. —  Jules*  Talk 11:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * UNESCO endorses and promotes it. You can check. 95.140.7.136 (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support and collaboration are proclaimed by the Director-General of UNESCO or her representatives: https://www.facebook.com/leloundou/posts/10219664231449054 176.156.227.162 (talk) 08:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "you can check" and a FB post (I can't even access) are not reliable sources. —  Jules*  Talk 21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep all of them. There are many media sources for each winning project of the Prix Versailles       etc., and even for each selected project    etc. 92.184.98.214 (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC) — 92.184.98.214 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per WP:OCAWARD. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Receiving a place in the world selection (i.e. being among the 6 finalists) is seen as defining The Guardian The New Zealand Herald or ABS-CBN Manila Bulletin 95.140.7.136 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC) — 95.140.7.136 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * You are linking to web pages specifically about these buildings' nomination for Prix Versailles, that does not tell anything about definingness in general. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

TSventon, you added very specific information to the World Architecture Festival page. That page was created by the organisers themselves, and mainly updated by SPAs. It's not possible to add so specific information to the page without explicit interest. You also created the dedicated page INSIDE Festival, which is part of World Architecture Festival. The World Architecture Festival is merely known by some architects. That organisation awards buildings, as the Prix Versailles does, but the Prix Versailles adresses also the large public. There are not many awards with this scope. I can't believe you are not acting here for the UK-based World Architecture Festival. Apart from the University of Oxford, up to now your job was mostly correcting typos. Since one month @, Prix Versailles deleting has been a major part of your work. As we can see, your will was clearly to delete Prix Versailles mentions in all wiki: "If Fr Prix Versailles is deleted, will fr Wikipedia remove other mentions of the prize?" @ and. You worked conscientiously for that. And you organised WP:CAN canvassing with that purpose: "you are obviously welcome to comment at Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles as well. If Prix Versailles is deleted, then mentions of the award in other articles will probably be removed as well" @. You said to : "I'm no specialist" about architecture and design. That is not true.  All this reveals manipulation with a big conflict of interest for the benefit of a competitor. 95.140.7.136 (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * (Blocked) IP editor, I edit subjects in Wikipedia I enjoy, including Oxford, architecture and typos. In July I noticed that Prix Versailles related content on Wikipedia had been added by a number of single purpose accounts so I felt obliged to report that at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and do some work on following up the report. I made a few edits mentioning the World Architecture Festival in 2019, but I was and am not acting for them. TSventon (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all. Cross-wiki spam + per Overcategorization. Thanks to the IP for the ping, even if I doubt that was the expected result. —  Jules*  Talk 11:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I concur with Jules and other !voters; it is a cross-wiki spam effort.  --- Possibly &#9742; 11:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WikiProject Android categories

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting wikiproject android
 * Propose deleting wikiproject android members
 * Propose deleting disambig-class android articles
 * Propose deleting category-class android articles
 * Propose deleting list-class android articles
 * Propose deleting android articles by quality
 * Propose deleting start-class android articles
 * Nominator's rationale: All related to WikiProject Android (up for G5) created by blocked sock.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 07:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G5, created by the same sock . Might it qualify for G8, since the WikiProject has been deleted now? –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 05:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.