Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 26



Category:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood mass media and merchandise

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Very small category ★Trekker (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood mass media and merchandise to Category:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood
 * Merge per nom and SMALLCAT. --Just N. (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pages using RhinosF1's UserStatus Template

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT, no collaborative value, redundant to Special:WhatLinksHere/User:RhinosF1/Template/StatusMonitor * Pppery * it has begun... 20:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting pages using rhinosf1's userstatus template
 * Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Oxfordshire

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: speedily renamed already, following separate nomination at WP:CFDS as C2C following renaming of the parent at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_12. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: To be consistent with parent category Scheduled monuments in England RobinYad (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Lincolnshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Linolnshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled ancient monuments in London to Category:Scheduled monuments in London
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Greater Manchester to Category:Scheduled monuments in Greater Manchester
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Merseyside to Category:Scheduled monuments in Merseyside
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Norfolk to Category:Scheduled monuments in Norfolk
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Northamptonshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Northamptonshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Northumberland to Category:Scheduled monuments in Northumberland
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Nottinghamshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Nottinghamshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Suffolk to Category:Scheduled monuments in Suffolk
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Shropshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Shropshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in South Yorkshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in South Yorkshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Staffordshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Staffordshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Surrey to Category:Scheduled monuments in Surrey
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Tyne and Wear to Category:Scheduled monuments in Tyne and Wear
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Warwickshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Warwickshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in the West Midlands (county) to Category:Scheduled monuments in the West Midlands (county)
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in West Sussex to Category:Scheduled monuments in West Sussex
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in West Yorkshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in West Yorkshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Wiltshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Wiltshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Worcestershire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Worcester
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Oxfordshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Oxfordshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Leicestershire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Leicestershire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Lancashire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Lancashire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Kent to Category:Scheduled monuments in Kent
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hertfordshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Hertfordshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Herefordshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Herefordshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hampshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Hampshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Gloucestershire to Category:Scheduled monuments in Gloucestershire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Essex to Category:Scheduled monuments in Essex
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in East Sussex to Category:Scheduled monuments in East Sussex
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in the East Riding of Yorkshire to Category:Scheduled monuments in the East Riding of Yorkshire
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in County Durham to Category:Scheduled monuments in County Durham
 * Propose renaming Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Dorset to Category:Scheduled monuments in Dorset
 * Comment, I took the liberty to merge the nominations. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree - in line with many other categories. Many scheduled monuments date from the 20th century, and cannot be considered to be "ancient".  --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment, I added the other categories for renaming. --RobinYad (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -- "Ancient" is strictly correct, as they are scheduled under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. In most cases things from 20th century would be listed buildings, but there may be some from WWI or WWII, such as trenches on Cannock Chase, dug for training WWI troops.   Peterkingiron (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Now Support in the light of the next two comments. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Strongly support – "Historic" is not strictly correct. Historic England no longer use the word "ancient" as part of the descriptor, for the reasons given above. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support modern terminology. Johnbod (talk) 11:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename all per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hwandan Gogi

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, contains only main and 1 other article (Hwan-guk) after removing an entry that didn't mention Hwandan Gogi. The latter page is already in the merge target. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 19:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Hwandan Gogi to Category:Pseudohistory
 * Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

House of Boso

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The result of the discussion was: Merged as proposed.. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:House of Boso to Category:Bosonids
 * Propose merging Category:Burial sites of the House of Boso to Category:Burial sites of the Bosonids
 * Nominator's rationale: merge, it appears to be the same family. Boso, Margrave of Tuscany, the presumed founder of the House of Boso, was a direct grandson of Boso the Elder, the founder of the Bosonids. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * No objection Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge, though the other way round might be better - "-ids" form are usually for the Middle East. Johnbod (talk) 11:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I am neutral with regard to the merge direction, though "-ids" is certainly not uncommon in early medieval Europe, e.g. Pippinids. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2018–19 MPBL season

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: To accurately reflect the scope of the category. Its a holdover of an aborted plan to organize multiple tournaments (2018 Rajah and 2019 Datu Cups) within a single season (2018-19). The two cup tournaments are considered as standalone seasons.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 09:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:2018–19 MPBL season to Category:2018 MPBL season
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pages containing links with bad anchors‎
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. I have listed the current contents on the report's talk page. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Redundant to Database reports/Broken section anchors, which is actually being updated (unlike this category formerly populated by a bot that has not edited since 2014). * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 16:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting pages containing links with bad anchors‎
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * in what way is it redundant? Maybe it should be, but its contents are not all being picked up by that report. E.g. Talk:HLA-DQB1 is in the category because HLA-DQB1 includes links such as HLA-DQ2 (displayed as *0203); that target anchor was removed in 2008. But HLA-DQB1 is not listed in Database_reports/Broken_section_anchors. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Even if it's not technically redundant, it's still populated by a bot task that hasn't run since 2010, which is itself a sufficient reason for deletion. (for the same reason as the rest of the articles tagged by WildBot series) * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 16:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Histrionic personality disorder
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge.  ✗  plicit  01:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: upmerge, redundant category layer with only the eponymous article and a subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Histrionic personality disorder to Category:Cluster B personality disorders
 * Keep & populate with films, TV shows & fictional characters which show the condition. Jim Michael (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * When clicking "what links here" in Histrionic personality disorder there are quite a few hits but nearly all are occasional mentions, there is hardly any article for which this is a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I've counted 428 items for "what links here" but indeed mostly occasional mentions. Which is not a surprise! There are lots of pothouse politicians, and other self-important "personalities" among actors, TV and music starlets. But as a Wikipedian you wouldn't dare to name them so. You would easily be accused of abusive criticism for even using psycho terms on people and also on popular fictional characters like e.g. Category:Characters in Cats (musical), a lot of Disney fictional characters, most vain Comic characters and fashion victims. So Marco, you require sth almost impossible: explicit mentioning of people/fiction heroes other than criminals, anti-heroes or Walter Mittys as histrionic personality disorder cases. But we all know that people /fiction heroes like that are quite frequent and sometimes popular (e.g. It girls or James Bond) in pop culture and in real life. --Just N. (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not require anything, I just agree with you that the chances of getting the category more populated are small. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

<p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  18:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Upmerge. It's going to be almost impossible to populate with a substantial number of articles. There's little community awareness of the disorder, and people tend to use the narcissistic or borderline personality disorders when they're making media about a cluster B disorder, so it rarely comes up. --Xurizuri (talk) 10:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Upmerge per the rationales above. The result will correspond to the existing categorisation of Category:People with antisocial personality disorder, which is held directly in the target and does not have a similar redundant sub-cat layer Category:Antisocial personality disorder. – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United States mainstream rock radio stations by state templates
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete as empty (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Both templates in this category have insufficient links to warrant a navbox (one of them has no links whatsoever!). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting united states mainstream rock radio stations by state templates
 * what should happen with the category if the templates are not deleted? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * : Probably upmerge to . Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 19:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Category has been emptied. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No use anymore obviously. --Just N. (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Farranfore–Valencia Harbour line
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Farranfore–Valentia Harbour line. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: The Valentia spelling is in far more common use than Valencia in real life and sources (O'Sullivan being an exception) and also this is to use Valentia consistently throughout Wikipedia. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Farranfore–Valencia Harbour line to Category:Farranfore–Valentia Harbour line
 * Support, consistent with Valentia Island and the rest of the articles.-- Mvqr (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Somehow I never noticed that inconsistency, this can be speedily moved per WP:C2D. --PhiH (talk) 11:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support, seems consistent with most all of the articles. --Just N. (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scottish people of Hungarian descent
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Keep parent, merge sub-cat as nominated and to Category:Scottish people of Hungarian descent. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Just the 2 grandsons of Emeric Pressburger. Rathfelder (talk) 09:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Scottish people of Hungarian descent to Category:British people of Hungarian descent
 * Propose merging Category:Scottish people of Hungarian-Jewish descent to Category:Scottish people of Jewish descent and Category:British people of Hungarian-Jewish descent
 * Oppose. Hmmm - given that half the Scottish royalty and nobility is of Hungarian descent (through Saint Margaret of Scotland), I suspect there's been a bit of undercategorising here. Grutness... wha?   03:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand we dont categorise people by descent unless its fairly immediate. Rathfelder (talk) 11:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Even so, that would still allow the first members of several noble lines to be added. Grutness... wha?   12:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Let's not start doing this. It opens up a far too large can of worms. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I suspect there is scope for populating both, but Hungarian-Jewish seems overspecific, being a triple intersection. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * At least merge the 2nd category Category:Scottish people of Hungarian-Jewish descent to Category:Scottish people of Hungarian descent and Category:British people of Hungarian-Jewish descent per Peterkingiron. As these people apparently no longer identify as Jews it goes a bit far to categorize them by the religion of ancestors who lived in a different country. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per reasons given above. Well okay, I'm not strictly against merging the second. --Just N. (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * would you oppose merging just the second one? – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it's fair enough to merge that one I think. Grutness... wha?   13:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed. And to Category:Scottish people of Hungarian descent, of course. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:15th-century BC High Priests of Israel
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. They would clearly also be eligible for, but we don't seem to categorise people directly by millennium. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: merge, dating is too uncertain, the oldest century for the parent categories is Category:12th-century BCE Hebrew people. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:15th-century BC High Priests of Israel to Category:High Priests of Israel
 * Propose merging Category:16th-century BC High Priests of Israel to Category:High Priests of Israel
 * Support but where do you draw the line? When does the dating become more certain? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support as most of these categories are small and the dating is uncertain. As an aside, why are the Category:High Priests of Israel categories named after centuries BC? As these categories are associated with Judaism, I would have expected them to be named after centuries BCE instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Because they are a subcategory of Category:15th-century BC clergy and the subcategories tend to match the parent category. I would prefer BCE myself, but I am not the one who created the clergy category tree. Dimadick (talk) 07:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you can nominate the remaining categories at WP:CFDS, a rename would surely satisfy speedy criterion WP:C2B, as all Jewish categories use BCE. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose As already specified in the categories, the dating follows the Biblical literalist chronology. Dimadick (talk) 07:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge -- The template lists 11 high priests of the Tabernacle: I would suggest Category:High priest of the Hebrew tabernacle. I agree dating in this period is too uncertain to merit by century categories.  It depends on whether the periods of successive judges were in fact consecutive, or alternatively to a reference in New Testament to 400 years.  How to provide dates in Hebrew history before Solomon (or possibly Saul) is a POV issue.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Merge the dates are too speculative for this to be a useful distinction in the category tree. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 04:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. While all that datings are uncertain?! --Just N. (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Psychiatric, mental health, and addiction nursing journals
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Psychiatric and mental health nursing journals. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: In line with Psychiatric and mental health nursing. Although, Category:Psychiatric nursing journals to match the parent Category:Psychiatric nursing would also be fine. My main issue is with the inclusion of "addiction" in the name - there is only one journal here relating specifically to addiction, which could easily just be recategorised under both Category:Addiction medicine journals and Category:Psychiatric and mental health nursing journals. Xurizuri (talk) 08:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Psychiatric, mental health, and addiction nursing journals to Category:Psychiatric and mental health nursing journals
 * Suggest -- Category:Mental health nursing journals. The present name is much too long-winded.  Its scope can if necessary be further defined in a headnote.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support removing addiction per nom. Regarding the long-windedness, please check the RM for the article. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. --Just N. (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deviance (sociology) journals
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete delete SMALLCAT.  Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 00:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: It has only one article (although not eponymous, hence not C2F) and is unlikely to significantly expand. -- Xurizuri (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting deviance (sociology) journals
 * Comment Is merging not possible or not reasonable? --Just N. (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per SMALLCAT. --Just N. (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.