Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 February 6



People who have or had an infectious disease that didn't kill them, at least not yet

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete, except no consensus to delete Category:Ebola survivors. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose Deleting Category:Survivors of infectious diseases
 * Propose Deleting Category:Syphilis survivors
 * Propose Deleting Category:Ebola survivors
 * Propose Deleting Category:Meningococcal disease survivors
 * Propose Deleting Category:People with cholera‎
 * Propose Deleting Category:People with syphilis
 * Propose Deleting Category:People with Ebola
 * Propose Deleting Category:People with tuberculosis
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NOT and WP:NONDEFINING (WP:TRIVIALCAT and maybe WP:PERFCAT)
 * We have a categories for people who died from all of these diseases so these are the equivalent categories for people that did not die. One problem here is that many of these diseases are chronic or have significant long-term health implications. The bigger problem is that Wikipedia is not a medical history of every diseases or ailment (even serious ones) notable people contract in their lives. - RevelationDirect (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Background We recently deleted other disease survivor categories here and here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from any other consideration there were millions of people who had these diseases who were not diagnosed.  In fact most of us are Survivors of infectious diseases Rathfelder (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, having survived a disease is hardly ever a defining characteristic (with exception of e.g. polio). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete most -- However Ebola was so deadly that having survived it may be a notable characteristic, so Keep Category:Ebola survivors. Pauline Cafferkey is probably notable only for having had the disease, caught while treating victims of it.  People who have survived a disease but are left with long-term disabilities as a result might make a useful category.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The early death rates were 88-90% while, during the subsequent Western African Ebola virus epidemic, the death rate was lowered to 40%, and the recent ebola vaccine reduces that much further. A decade ago I would have agreed survival was rare enough to be defining. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete some people are defined by having or surviving a disease, but they are few. Category:Ebola survivors seems to have a few who are only known for their Ebola work - their having been infected in the course of it probably highlighted their notability. Perhaps a Category:People of the Ebola epidemic to replace that one, would more carefully describe their notability because according to our biography of Fatu Kekula, she never got the virus - she survived the epidemic but not the illness. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep These are not trivia, but important aspects of their biographies. Dimadick (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty trivial. -TheodoreIndiana (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete non-fatal infection by an acute disease is not defining.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete most -- However Ebola was so deadly that having survived it may be a notable characteristic, so Keep Category:Ebola survivors. --Just N. (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Metropolitan Special Constabulary

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete; users can work out the proper parentage of the subcategory Category:Metropolitan Special Constabulary officers in the normal ways. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose Deleting Category:Metropolitan Special Constabulary
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:SMALLCAT)
 * The Metropolitan Special Constabulary is a voluntary auxilary to London's Metropolitan Police and I have no conceptual objection to the category. But the only things in this category are the main article, a well populated subcategory for volunteers, and a 2nd article about a national law that authorized special constables nationwide including in London with no potential for growth that I can anticipate. (If I'm mistaken and we ever get up to 5+ direct articles, no objection to recreating.) All the contents are already well catgorized under the Metro or Special Constabulary cats so no upmerge is needed. - RevelationDirect (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SMALLCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge -- The subcat would be better parented by Category:Metropolitan Police as special constables are a type of officer, not an operational unit. The 1831 Act does belong here, as in 1831 only London had a police force (apart from the Royal Irish Constabulary, created when Robert Peel was a minister there).  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge -- The subcat would be better parented by Category:Metropolitan Police as special constables are a type of officer, not an operational unit. --Just N. (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films made before the MPAA Production Code

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting films made before the mpaa production code


 * Nominator's rationale: This seems like an unnecessary and redundant category. We already have categories like Category:American films and Category:Films by year. It makes no sense to have this category when every American film made before 1934 is always going to contain the other two categories I mentioned. For those of you who don't know, the MPAA Production Code was implemented in 1934. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete There are a lot of things true about films made before 1934: they are not in 3-D, none of them premiered at Cannes Film Festival, and unfortunately they didn't star Leonardo DiCaprio. None of those attributes are any more or less defining than this category. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NONDEF. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as being non-defining. Hardly mentioned in any articles I checked, let alone in the lead.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a defining trait and corresponds to the article Pre-Code Hollywood. It covers an early stage of the sound era, with films not subject to censorship. Dimadick (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not every trait that exists is worth categorizing by. This is a by time cat, and we already cat films by year so this is unneeded.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as being non-defining. --Just N. (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lokomotiv Yaroslavl plane crash

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting lokomotiv yaroslavl plane crash


 * Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. The topic itself. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There is no reason this category should exist. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete (or rather upmerge). This is a category that only exists so as to have a subcategory.  The victims subcat can have the crash article as its main article, which means that this is an unnecessary level.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty trivial. -TheodoreIndiana (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Burials at Saint Andrew's Cemetery, Bratislava

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting burials at saint andrew's cemetery, bratislava


 * Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, and non-defining as there is no article on Saint Andrew's Cemetery, Bratislava, nor on a church by that name. The one member article Július Satinský does not otherwise mention the place of burial. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete also seemse non-defining for the article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename five from "subdivisions" to "administrative divisions"; no consensus on Category:United Kingdom by country. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Withdrawn Category:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom to Category:United Kingdom by country


 * Alternative
 * Propose renaming Category:United Kingdom by country to Category:Political divisions of the United Kingdom
 * Propose merging Category:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom to Category:Political divisions of the United Kingdom


 * Propose renaming Category:Subdivisions of England to Category:Administrative divisions of England
 * Propose renaming Category:Subdivisions of Northern Ireland to Category:Administrative divisions of Northern Ireland
 * Propose renaming Category:Subdivisions of Scotland to Category:Administrative divisions of Scotland
 * Propose renaming Category:Subdivisions of Wales to Category:Administrative divisions of Wales


 * Nominator's rationale: C2C. Nearly duplicate parentage. The usual expectation of "by country" is there aren't countries inside of them ("by country by country"). This complicates the naming of all country categories. Meanwhile, Countries of the United Kingdom calls them "nations", also country, province, or region.


 * WP:NPOV: Per Countries of the United Kingdom, the descriptive name used "can be controversial, with the choice often revealing one's political preferences". Therefore, I'm proposing we distinguish each by the anodyne formal political geography terms.


 * subdivisions of the united kingdom — Created by banned, so that's the one to be deleted WP:CSD under our rules for sockpuppets.
 * united kingdom by country — Created by.
 * William Allen Simpson (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support renaming of Category:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom to Category:Administrative divisions of the United Kingdom (per the recent rename of the parent Category:Administrative divisions by country by cfd). I would just upmerge Category:United Kingdom by country to Category:United Kingdom rather than getting bogged down by a choice of descriptive terms for the usual 4 constituent entities. Oculi (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The UK doesn't have administrative divisions, it has political divisions. England, Scotland, and Wales have administrative divisions. The Brits came up with this hierarchical nomenclature, now used throughout the English-speaking world.

William Allen Simpson (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Oculi's alternative, "by country", "by nation" and "political divisions" are confusing, even if technically correct, and the alternative is a very easy way to avoid that. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You know my preference is usually "technically correct". Made-up stuff is how we ended up with this UK mess.

William Allen Simpson (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * cmt whatever else is done, we should end up with a sub-category named Category:United Kingdom by nation or Category:United Kingdom by constituent nation for the four constituent entities. This is how the UK describes itself ('nations') though not what some independence minded people there call the entities.  These four entities are unique and should not just be placed directly into a category with the rest of the admin divisions of the UK Hmains (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not. It is Hmains who has created all these unnecessary 'by country' subcat schemes for the UK; eg was perfectly OK with subcats for the 4 sub-nations at the top level until Hmains intervened in 2020. I doubt whether there would be consensus approval for this. Oculi (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Informative. I'd wondered how the UK and Irish categories became such a mess over the past decade.
 * I do not think that a level called by country or by nation is useful for UK categories, and it would also open a can of worms. British categories have been organized for years with head subcategories for the 4 home nations and BOTCD placed at the top of each topic category with a or * or + sortkey. This works fine, there is no reason to change it. Otherwise we see absurdities like the duplicate  (4 C) next to  (7 C). Place Clichy (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Expanded nomination — given that history, I've expanded the nomination to include the subcategories. This should please both Oculi and Hmains, as the Brits came up with this neutral nomenclature.
 * I would support the revised alternative nomination. Oculi (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The sole purpose of this is to make the names longer, which is unnecessary. However I support changing country to nation: we talk of the "four home nations".  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * rename Category:United Kingdom by country to Category:United Kingdom by nation.  The other renames nominated are ok; no merges. Hmains (talk) 01:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or rename all to use administrative divisions. The renaming of the parent to  was done under the argument that this was better English. However fine-mincing political vs. administrative divisions does not seem to be any improvement in terms of navigation among these categories. I prefer to keep consistency with a common title. Place Clichy (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Oculi's alternative, --Just N. (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree with Place Clichy with respect to the amended proposal, the alternate use of political and administrative is confusing. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Peterkingiron. Deb (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Abbasid governors of the Jazira

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: do not merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Abbasid governors of the Jazira to Category:Abbasid governors of Mosul
 * Nominator's rationale: merge (or reverse merge), it concerns the same region since Mosul is the capital city of the Jazira. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose Mosul was often governed separately from the rest of the Jazira, especially during the later Abbasid period when the Jazira itself was fragmented, and the sources are not always clear when a 'governor of Mosul' was also 'governor of the Jazira'. Constantine  ✍  08:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Constantine. Same for the preceding Umayyad period—sometimes Mosul was included but often it was a separate province. —Al Ameer (talk) 15:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Constantine. --Just N. (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Circus strongmen

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Circus strongmen and strongwomen. As noted,  exists; I have added the circus strongwomen in that category to Category:Circus strongmen and strongwomen but also kept them in . Further tweaks may be appropriate. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Circus strongmen to Category:Circus strongmen and women
 * Nominator's rationale: There are several women in the category. Not sure what to rename it though: "Circus strongmen and women"? "Circus strongmen and strongwomen"? "Circus strongpeople"? Clarityfiend (talk) 08:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Alt rename to Category:Circus strongmen and strongwomen per article title Strongwoman. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename to Category:Circus strongmen and strongwomen per Marcocapelle's suggestion. Dimadick (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. I see now that there is a Category:Strongwomen, so maybe a split to Category:Circus strongwomen instead? Clarityfiend (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename to Category:Circus strongmen and strongwomen per Marcocapelle's suggestion. --Just N. (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Spanish municipal councillors

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Ávila, Spain municipal councillors to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:People from Ávila, Spain
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in the province of Badajoz to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in the Basque Country to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in Galicia to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in La Rioja to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:Riojan politicians
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in the Region of Murcia to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Murcia municipal councillors to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:People from Murcia
 * Propose merging Category:Palma de Mallorca municipal councillors to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:People from Palma de Mallorca
 * Propose merging Category:Pozuelo de Alarcón municipal councillors to Category:City councillors in the Community of Madrid and Category:Pozuelo de Alarcón
 * Propose merging Category:Rivas-Vaciamadrid municipal councillors to Category:City councillors in the Community of Madrid and Category:Rivas-Vaciamadrid
 * Propose merging Category:City councillors in the province of Segovia to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Municipal councillors in the province of Tarragona to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Toledo city councillors to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:People from Toledo
 * Propose merging Category:City councillors in the province of Valladolid to Category:Spanish municipal councillors
 * Propose merging Category:Vigo municipal councillors to Category:Spanish municipal councillors and Category:People from Vigo
 * Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles in each category. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge for Now While they would have had more than five councillors, most would be non-notable. No objection to recreating any that exceed expectations and get up to 5+ articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge for Now . --Just N. (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Schools in Sri Lanka by city

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Ambalangoda to Category:Ambalangoda and Category:Schools in Galle District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Elpitiya to Category:Elpitiya and Category:Schools in Galle District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Matugama to Category:Matugama and Category:Schools in Kalutara District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Tangalle to Category:Tangalle and Category:Schools in Hambantota District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Udupiddy to Category:Udupiddy and Category:Schools in Jaffna District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Chavakachcheri to Category:Buildings and structures in Chavakachcheri and Category:Schools in Jaffna District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Hambantota to Category:Buildings and structures in Hambantota and Category:Schools in Hambantota District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Horana to Category:Buildings and structures in Horana and Category:Schools in Kalutara District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Kilinochchi to Category:Buildings and structures in Kilinochchi and Category:Schools in Kilinochchi District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Mannar, Sri Lanka to Category:Buildings and structures in Mannar, Sri Lanka and Category:Schools in Mannar District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Mirigama to Category:Buildings and structures in Mirigama and Category:Schools in Gampaha District
 * Propose merging Category:Schools in Mullaitivu to Category:Buildings and structures in Mullaitivu and Category:Schools in Mullaitivu District
 * Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles per category. In the first five cases the schools are the only content of the buildings and structures parent category, in those cases a further upmerge to the town "grandparent category" is proposed. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge for NowNo objection to recreating any that exceed expectations and get up to 5+ direct articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 05:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge for Now. --Just N. (talk) 22:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Song recordings produced by The KLF

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename'. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The KLF to Category:Song recordings produced by the KLF
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Alchemist (musician) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Alchemist (musician)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Audibles to Category:Song recordings produced by the Audibles
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Bomb Squad to Category:Song recordings produced by the Bomb Squad
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Cataracs to Category:Song recordings produced by the Cataracs
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Fliptones to Category:Song recordings produced by the Fliptones
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Futuristics to Category:Song recordings produced by the Futuristics
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Inkredibles to Category:Song recordings produced by the Inkredibles
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Invisible Men to Category:Song recordings produced by the Invisible Men
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Matrix (production team) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Matrix (production team)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Maven Boys to Category:Song recordings produced by the Maven Boys
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Messengers (producers) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Messengers (producers)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Monarch (production team) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Monarch (production team)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Monsters & Strangerz to Category:Song recordings produced by the Monsters & Strangerz
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Movement (production team) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Movement (production team)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Neptunes to Category:Song recordings produced by the Neptunes
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Rascals (producers) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Rascals (producers)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Runners to Category:Song recordings produced by the Runners
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Smeezingtons to Category:Song recordings produced by the Smeezingtons
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Stereotypes to Category:Song recordings produced by the Stereotypes
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Trak Starz to Category:Song recordings produced by the Trak Starz
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Ummah to Category:Song recordings produced by the Ummah
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Underdogs (production team) to Category:Song recordings produced by the Underdogs (production team)
 * Propose renaming Category:Song recordings produced by The Y's to Category:Song recordings produced by the Y's
 * Nominator's rationale: We use lower case 'the' in running prose for nicknames, stage names and group names, per MOS:THEMUSIC and MOS:NICKNAMETHE.

Binksternet (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural comment, the category pages have not been tagged yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I should have used a bundled nomination but I saw the instructions too late. Binksternet (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hopefully I have fixed it with manual entries. Binksternet (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. --Just N. (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

IHG Hotels & Resorts

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep.  bibliomaniac  1  5  07:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:InterContinental Hotels Group to Category:IHG Hotels & Resorts
 * Nominator's rationale: Branded as IHG Hotels & Resorts since 4 February 2021. Ridwan97 (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:InterContinental Hotels Group brands to Category:IHG Hotels & Resorts
 * Nominator's rationale: These subcategory must be integrated under the company's main category page. Ridwan97 (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:InterContinental Hotels Group people to Category:IHG Hotels & Resorts people
 * Nominator's rationale: To reflect with the usage of the current corporate branding. Ridwan97 (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comments, if it was an official name change it should be mentioned and sourced in the article. Besides I do not understand the proposed merge of the brands subcategory, why isn't it a proposal to rename? Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * instead of rename, I intent to merge the brands subcategory to the main category, while the IHG people subcategory remain separated. By the way, IHG Hotels & Resorts is now an official corporate brand (not the legal name), so you can check it on www.ihgplc.com. Ridwan97 (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The brands category seems to be a valid subcategory of Category:Hotel chains, I don't see the advantage of removing content from that tree. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose -- The company is quoted on the London stock exchange as "INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP PLC". Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Peterkingiron. --Just N. (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: do not rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction to Category:Astronomical locations in fiction
 * Nominator's rationale: None of the articles in this should be lists, due to Wikipedia policies about fictional listcruft. This should be a subcategory of Category:Space in fiction. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose We have multiple quality lists on fictional topics. Its one of Wikipedia's greatest strengths. Dimadick (talk) 02:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose, regardless of whether we should have these articles in the first place, fact is that they are lists. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per prior. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose I'm not sold on the quality of all these lists but less precisely categorizing them certainly won't improve them. - RevelationDirect (talk) 05:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support -- While most of the content is in theory an article on the location, in practice they are largely lists of works set in those locations. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Support I don't see any necessity of having a 'list of' in category title. -TheodoreIndiana (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Marcocapelle. --Just N. (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.