Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 January 24



Category:Male villains
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 February 26%23Category:Male villains

Category:Scalar quantities

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Scalar physical quantities and Category:Vector physical quantities. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting scalar quantities


 * Propose deleting vector quantities


 * Nominator's rationale: Moving articles from Category:Physical quantities to these new categories loses the information that we are categorizing physical quantities. I propose either deleting the new categories and moving articles back to Category:Physical quantities, or perhaps renaming the new categories to Category:Scalar physical quantities and Category:Vector physical quantities, if it's felt that there is actually a need to split up the parent category.


 * Physical quantities are a specific thing. Not all scalar or vector quantities are physical quantities. If these categories are kept and the current names are retained, they should be moved out of Category:Physical quantities and the latter category should be restored to the articles from which it has been removed. — Srleffler (talk) 16:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Rename (speedy, because WP:C2E) to Category:Scalar physical quantities and Category:Vector physical quantities. These cats are already children of Category:Physical quantities, so no information was lost. Undoing this significant intersection would also require upmerging into, e.g., Category:Vectors (mathematics and physics). Finally, the List of physical quantities highlights scalar/vector as a fundamental property of such quantities. fgnievinski (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename like Fgnievinski proposed. --Just N. (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dictionary of chemical formulas

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Dictionary of chemical formulas to Category:Lists of chemical compounds
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename according to contents. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Support, this does not only contain the "Dictionary of chemical formulas" (now Glossary of chemical formulae). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support, the category contains lists. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support renaming. --Just N. (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political prisoners in Spain

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting political prisoners in spain


 * Nominator's rationale: None of the people in this category is a political prisoner. They are imprisoned after being convicted of sedition, embezzlement of public funds and/or disobedience of courts and not because of their political opinions. StellarHalo (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Support, the articles are already in Category:Spanish politicians convicted of crimes. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete these people are inprisoned for clearly defined crimes, the name itself is inherently POV-pushing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete political prisoners is a quality that is more subjectively than objectively defined. Such nuances can be handled in a sourced article but not in categories which are "in-or-out". Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The category name does not reflect its content. Dimadick (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yes, category name should reflect its content. --Just N. (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Container categories in Safavid Iran

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Culture of Safavid Iran to Category:Safavid Iran
 * Propose deleting Category:Military of Safavid Iran (the content is already in Category:History of Safavid Iran)
 * Propose merging Category:Safavid society to Category:Safavid Iran
 * Propose deleting Category:Deaths in the Safavid Empire (the content is already in Category:People of Safavid Iran)
 * Nominator's rationale: upmerge, redundant container categories with only one or two subcategories each. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge No conceptual objections to these categories but, at this point, they add layers without aiding navigation. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge etc, but would plain "Iran" not be a better target? The country has existed as an entity (though with borders waxing and waning) since at least 1501.  Peterkingiron (talk) 13:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That is a fair question, but it would require a broader nomination to discuss that issue. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:White supremacist organized crime groups in the United States

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:White supremacist organized crime groups in the United States to Category:White-supremacist organized crime groups in the United States
 * Nominator's rationale: "White supremacist" is a compound adjective here, and it runs in my mind that we should be using a hyphen to make that clear. These crime groups are organized and embrace white supremacism, as we all know when we think about the phrase, but with a phrase five words long, it can be easy to mis-parse it initially as white groups that do something.  Nyttend (talk) 11:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — non-notable 4-way category intersection. In any case, that would be "of" the United States.
 * Delete given that this is categorized in Category:Organized crime groups in the United States by ethnicity this is evidently a crime group by ethnicity rather than viewpoint. WP:OCEGRS says we ought not so categorize. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This is an odd rationale. Category:Organized crime groups in the United States by ethnicity may well be a wrong parent category; Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Rename. Organized crime is one of these few areas where ethnic identity is often defining. Place Clichy (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 *  rename per nom. good argument. Hmains (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. I agree with Place Clichy that ethnic category is defining for criminals, but I feel thay a hyphen is needed here. Dimadick (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename, with a hyphen it is no longer an ethnic category, it becomes an ideological category, which is of course the intention of the category in the first place. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename per nom. --Just N. (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Education in smaller cities and towns in Sri Lanka

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Ambalangoda
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Bandarawela
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Chavakachcheri
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Elpitiya
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Galle


 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Gampaha
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Hambantota
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Horana
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Kalutara
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Kandy
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Kilinochchi
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Kuliyapitiya
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Kurunegala
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Manipay
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Mannar, Sri Lanka
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Matale
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Matugama
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Mirigama
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Mullaitivu
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Negombo
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Panadura
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Peradeniya
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Point Pedro
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Ratnapura
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Tangalle
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Tellippalai
 * Propose deleting Category:Education in Udupiddy


 * Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only a single subcategory for schools. There is no need to merge, the schools subcategories are already in the buildings and structures category of the city and in the schools subcategory of the district. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete for Now Right now this is just adding a layer for the school articles. No objection to recreating if other education articles ever materialize. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I doubt these categories have scope for expansion. Dimadick (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Destroyed landmarks

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging:
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Afghanistan to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Afghanistan
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Azerbaijan to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Azerbaijan
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Canada to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Canada purge Ripple Rock
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in China to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in China
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Estonia to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Estonia
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in France to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in France
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Greece to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Greece
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Iran to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Iran
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Iraq to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Iraq
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in the Republic of Ireland to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in the Republic of Ireland
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in South Korea to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in South Korea
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Kosovo to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Kosovo
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Lebanon to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Lebanon
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Malta to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Malta purge Azure Window and Għar Qawqla
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in North Korea to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in North Korea
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in the Philippines to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in the Philippines
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Poland to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Poland
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Portugal to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Portugal
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Russia to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Russia
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Serbia to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Serbia purge Pine of Tsar Dušan
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Spain to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Spain purge El Dedo de Dios
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Sweden to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Sweden
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Syria to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Syria
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Turkey to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Turkey
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Ukraine to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Ukraine
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Yemen to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Yemen
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in the United States to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in the United States purge East Island, Hawaii, Eye of the Needle (Montana), Old Man of the Mountain and Saint Anthony Falls
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Alabama to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Alabama
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in California to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in California
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Louisiana to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Louisiana
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Michigan to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Michigan
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Mississippi to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Mississippi
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in New York (state) to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in New York (state)
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in New York City to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in New York City
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Ohio to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Ohio
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Oregon to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Oregon purge Duckbill (rock formation) and Jump-off Joe
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Pennsylvania to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Pennsylvania
 * Category:Destroyed landmarks in Washington, D.C. to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Washington, D.C.
 * Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:OVERLAPCAT, nearly all of the articles are about buildings and structures. The ten articles that are an exception (i.e. not about buildings and structures) should be purged, they are already in Category:Destroyed landforms or in Category:Destroyed individual trees. This is follow-up on this discussion, this discussion and this discussion; pinging contributors to these discussions. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * At a brief glance, some of these don't appear to be landmarks, either. I looked at the Ohio entries, and three of them apparently never had any landmark status: Palace of the Fans, Gibson House (Cincinnati), and League Park (Cincinnati).  Unless you're restricting the definition to officially designated landmarks, or unless you have some other clear definition, "landmark" is vague and ought to be avoided.  Nyttend (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support on the assurance that non-buildings etc are identified fully for purging, following my vote on UK case. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. In the absence of a unique definition for landmarks, these categories have been used indiscriminately with notable buildings. However the categories for notable buildings should be no other than the buildings and structures categories, because non-notable buildings do not have articles. Place Clichy (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support — with thanks, among the most detailed and carefully selected nominations we've had in a long time.
 * Support We've been consistently merging each country in seperate noms based on the subjectiveness of "landmark". Merging them all makes sense at this point. - RevelationDirect (talk) 18:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support Per precedent in previous discussions. Dimadick (talk) 17:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Participants of the 2021 Capitol storming

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. This may become more amenable to categorization when the dust settles a bit more and we start to get criminal convictions. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting participants of the 2021 capitol storming


 * Nominator's rationale: Potential libel issues. Previously deleted in this CfD. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:G4. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Rename to Category:Participants of the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol so the category title can be in line with the title of the main article, 2021 storming of the United States Capitol. Love of Corey (talk) 08:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I have taken the liberty to merge the two nominations regarding the same category. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to make clear that I vote to keep this category. Some articles of the participants were clearly created in relation to the notability of this broader event, and they were kept as such. Love of Corey (talk) 06:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep/Rename At some point, this won't be WP:TOOSOON. This has generally been added to the ledes of existing articles and, based on date of creation, a number of articles were created because of this event: Jake Angeli, Baked Alaska (activist), Derrick Evans (politician), Rick Saccone. I can't predict what someone will accomplish in the future, but it's hard to see those new articles ever not being defined by this event. By all means change the name to match the main article but, since most of these people admit they were there but claim their intents were peaceful, I don't know if if this is such a libel/BLP issue prior to any possible future criminal conviction. - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That is a fair objection. While perhaps these new articles are a case of WP:TOOSOON, I will assume that they are kept for the time being. This means that my WP:NONDEF comment in the earlier discussion no longer holds and I need to withdraw my delete vote. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC) William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC) William Allen Simpson (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep (renamed per Love of Corey). Yes! there are BLP issues, but in due course there are likely to be criminal convictions.  If any person objects to inclusion, saying "I was not there", they should of course immediately be removed, perhaps with an apology placed on their bio-page.  However, it should be possible to provide a source from newspapers etc, which might be cited in a parallel list article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G4 again, we shouldn't be having this discussion every week. Swapping a few words around, or replacing "in" with "of" does not make this a valid category under any rule. IFF there are notable criminal convictions, it might be named Category:People convicted for the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol under Category:People convicted of sedition under Category:People by criminal conviction. Until then, they should be in Category:Prisoners and detainees of the United States federal government.
 * The claim is that the content in the article space has shifted since then and many participants are now admitting to being present, while denying more serious crimes. Those may not be persuasive arguments, but no is claiming the wording change makes the difference. RevelationDirect (talk) - 18:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That claim is not persuasive. Presence at the riot itself would not be a crime. Presence in a restricted area (that includes the steps and the works being built for the inauguration) is a crime. The article currently has 3 concurrent RFCs for Requested Move. This is a mess, and there's no good reason to bring that mess into the categories.
 * One thing we agree is not reviving this every week in CFD! Now that we have more content, if the consensus is still to wait for criminal convictions so be it. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, my guess is that many of those stubs are likely to be deleted at AfD WP:1E. As we already have Category:Prisoners and detainees of the United States federal government, there's simply no need for a temporary, constantly changing, more specific name.


 * Delete this has the same general problems of performance by performer category. We do not want to set a precedent for categorizing people by every riot they participate in, down that road lies madness.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PERFCAT, also don't like "participants" as loosely could include stormers, defenders, congressmembers, various folks who allegedly egged on or conspired to bring it about. No doubt we'll have a category eventually of Category:People convicted of crimes in the 2021 Capitol storming but now we don't. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep/Rename I agree with RevelationDirect that this is a defining category for these articles,. and in several cases their some claim to fame. I disagree that "performance by performer" has any relevance to crime categories. Dimadick (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment if it's kept, shouldn't it be "participants in"? (See for example Category:Participants in the September 11 attacks, Category:Participants in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, Category:Participants in the 1976 Nigerian military coup.) There are only three categories beginning with "participants of": this one, a container category holding "participants in" categories, and a user category. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:PSA Group people

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: do nothing: discussion was corrupted. Articles were moved during the discussion, so a complete reassessment of the appropriateness of this category and related ones is needed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:PSA Group people to Category:Stellantis people
 * Nominator's rationale: To reflect the merger of PSA and FCA to form Stellantis. Ridwan97 (talk) 01:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Category:Peugeot people per actual content of the category. For example Pierre Authier has no connection with Stellantis, nor with PSA Group. Move Carlos Tavares to Category:Stellantis. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * For the record, nominator has moved Carlos Tavares to Category:Stellantis just now. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm confused about :Category:Peugeot people by Marcocapelle. If that's indeed factual, it should be chosen. --Just N. (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I am confused too after most articles have been purged. The two remaining articles appear to belong in Category:PSA Peugeot Citroen people so that it should become a rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United Daughters of the Confederacy awards

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose Upmerging Category:United Daughters of the Confederacy awards to Category:United Daughters of the Confederacy
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:SMALLCAT)
 * I have no conceptual objection to this category grouping awards by an organization but the only article is the Southern Cross of Honor. The United Daughters of the Confederacy article does not mention any other awards so I don't think there is any room for growth. No objection to recreating this later if I'm wrong and it ever gets up to 5+ articles though. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge per WP:SMALLCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge there is no justification for having this as a one-entry category. In the unlikely event that the UDC creates a bunch more notable awards, such as the African-American daughter of the confederacy award, the Mexican American daughter of the confederacy award the Vietnese American daughter of the confederacy award and the Botwanan American daughter of the confederacy award for descendants of officers or soldiers who fought for the confederacy who also have those other named ancestries and have made significant community or other contributions, we can revisit it, until then there is no reason for this category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:SMALLCAT. --Just N. (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alumni awards

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose Renaming Category:Alumni awards to Category:Awards honoring alumni
 * Nominator's rationale: Per WP:CATNAME and a loose reading of WP:C2C
 * Just about every established university has a scholarship or other awards from alumni. In contrast, this category is for awards given to alumni. This rename is just meant to clarify the inclusion criteria by following the format of some of the other subcategories of Category:Awards by type of recipient. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment some of these like the Yorke Prize are open to both current students at the graduate level, and former students at the graduate level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I double checked the contents and removed one that was for a "graduate", meaning a graduating senior not a an alumna. I left the Yorke prize but agree it's an edge case. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Supportrenaming. --Just N. (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.