Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 15



Category:48 Hrs.

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: I don't think that the 48 Hrs. film could be considered big enough of a franchise to warrant its own category. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting 48 hrs.
 * Delete per nomination and WP:SMALLCAT. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:OpenTravel Alliance

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  bibliomaniac  1  5  04:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Delete longstanding consensus here is that categorizing trade association members is an overcategorization, and that such membership is not defining for any of the companies within this category. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting opentravel alliance
 * Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Government bodies in New Jersey with .org websites

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  bibliomaniac  1  5  04:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: The fact that a governmental body has a .org website is hardly a defining characteristic. Alansohn (talk) 17:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting government bodies in new jersey with .org websites
 * Comment there are three similar categories, , and snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 17:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all four: WP:NOTDEFINING for any of the bodies so categoirzed. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all four per UnitedStatesian. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural comment, I have just tagged the other three categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment, I just realized that the other cats existed after I created this CfD and was ready to add the other three. Thanks for beating me to it. I concur that all four should be deleted. Alansohn (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all four - almost a definition of undefining. Oculi (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The tld is defining vis-à-vis the website. However, I am pretty sure it's going to be difficult to find support here for this.
 * I want to explore the tld's used by various governmental and official bodies.
 * I made these hidden categories with the hope and belief that would preserve them, but clearly I was wrong.
 * These are not a s nor s what, if any, other options are available?
 * --CmdrDan (talk) 17:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I don't think there is an alternative, since I don't think what you "want to explore" is, in this case, consistent with building an encyclopedia. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If these were articles about the websites themselves, perhaps the tld might be a relevant defining characteristic. But assigning these categories to articles for the governmental bodies is not defining. Alansohn (talk) 20:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Compositions by Harry Gregson-Williams

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  bibliomaniac  1  5  04:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: The two subcategories in this category contain articles on films and video games not compositions. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 16:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting compositions by harry gregson-williams
 * Comment -- It is for works with a music composed by him: rename? - Category:Works with music by Harry Gregson-Williams. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom but add "See also" cross-references on the subcategory pages so that navigation between them becomes even easier. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.