Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 3



Wikipedians interested in webcomics
Relisted, see Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 24%23Wikipedians interested in webcomics

Category:Filipino women
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 11%23Category:Filipino women

Template:ArHighland-geo-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely out-of-order. Curbon7 (talk) 20:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Grutness... wha?   00:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1890s-comedy-novel-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete While it is technically in-standard-order, this stub template marks the floor of it, so the floor would just move to the 1900 one. Curbon7 (talk) 07:48, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1890s-ah-novel-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This stub template is out-of-standard-order for this date range. Curbon7 (talk) 07:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's possible that all the alternative history by decade templates need looking at - "ah" is not very intuitive and is not in line with the main Alternative-hist-novel-stubi. Grutness... wha?   00:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1890s-Western-film-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Now used, there were a number of stubs in that weren't marked as stubs. Curbon7 (talk) 07:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep is now in use.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1870s-philos-novel-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete While it is technically in-standard-order, this stub template marks the floor of it, so the floor would just move to the 1880 one. Curbon7 (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Considering the very small number of articles with Template:1880s-philos-novel-stub and Template:1890s-philos-novel-stub, merge them all up to a Template:19th-century-philos-novel-stub, or the like. BD2412  T 06:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merging templates seems a bit peculiar in this case. Just leaving them and having them pointing to the same category makes a bit more sense. Grutness... wha?   01:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1860s-US-basketball-bio-stub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting


 * Nominator's rationale: unused stub —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete scan shows 0 intersection between and ; that means that it is highly doubtful this template will ever be used, and the floor is the 1870 one. Curbon7 (talk) 07:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Grutness... wha?   01:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.