Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 September 26



Category:Castles in Buchach Raion

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Please consider nominating the main article for renaming, as the category is unlikely to budge if it remains in place.  ✗  plicit  12:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Castles in Buchach Raion to Category:Castles in Buchach urban hromada
 * Nominator's rationale: Procedural nom on behalf of, who said on the talk page that the administrative subdivisions in Ternopil Oblast, Ukraine have changed. Raion is former administrative subdivision in ternopil Oblast. New administrative subdivision - Buchach urban hromada User:力 (power~enwiki, π ,  ν ) 22:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Procedural oppose, this requires an RM for the article name and it requires nominating the entire category tree. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeed, we would need to handle the Ukrainian administrative reform at some point. As soon as I am ready with the articles, and I am currently about 30% done, I will deal with the categories.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment from category creator Yes, the Buchach Raion is already history, it does not exist. But it has existed for over 80 years, and we are not going to rewrite history, are we? therefore I am against deleting this category. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 16:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Category:Buchach Raion may be kept if there are numerous articles about the history of the raion as such, but I doubt that this will be the case. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Magazines reestablished in 1924

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Magazines reestablished in 1924 to Category:Magazines established in 1924
 * Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Support - we had a similar cfd recently: 2021 August 1#Category:Newspapers reestablished in 1945. Oculi (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Why not all such categories? Are only the small, isolated ones being nominated, and not those for recent years? – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. This is exactly like this 1795 one from day before. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Merge per nom. No real distinction. Dimadick (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Safavid governors of Erzincan

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: upmerge.  ✗  plicit  12:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Safavid governors of Erzincan to Category:Safavid governors and Category:History of Erzincan
 * Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one article in the category, and Erzincan belonged to the Ottoman Empire rather than the Safavid Empire most of the time. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Upmerge per nom. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest a group nomination for the other single-entry categories in Category:Safavid governors. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * See this follow-up nomination. It also includes categories with currently two articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Story-driven video games

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ✗  plicit  12:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting story-driven video games
 * Nominator's rationale: This is a highly subjective category that could be argued to apply to most video games that prominently feature narratives. The category page attempts to narrow the scope by defining it as "characterized for its dynamic change in its game mechanics so they can add to the story", but this is not how "story-driven" is conventionally used.--AlexandraIDV 02:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom, most video games could be described somehow as "story-driven" so it's far too vague criteria for inclusion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Subjective use is inevitable and the scope is too broad for this to be a worthwhile categorisation. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.