Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 25



Category:Leaders of American trade unions
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 29%23Category:Leaders of American trade unions

Category:Criticism of work

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: procedural close. There is nothing left to do here, as the category has been deleted. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  13:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Criticism of work to Category:Critique of work
 * Nominator's rationale: The rest of the template and main page is named critique of work, so it makes sense to have a uniform name. Pauloroboto (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance

Kind regards, Pauloroboto.

Pauloroboto (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC) The nominator is a Single Purpose Account that has been adding categories to various pages and has added links within article text on several pages, apparently in an effort to bolster search results and page view counts on the fringe topic on which they edit. This proposed merge matches the category name to one of the articles of interest to the editor. Category:Critique of work has been proposed for deletion and should be deleted, not enhanced to match one editor's POV article content. SPECIFICO talk 13:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Category:Critique of work has been speedy deleted per WP:C1 on March 24. At this stage, the question is whether Category:Criticism of work should be renamed to Category:Critique of work or not. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JBchrch   talk  13:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Support To match the main article, critique of work. Dimadick (talk) 04:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Reverse merge, not all criticism is part of Critique of work, for example Tang ping isn't, but Critique of work is part of Criticism of work. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree - Reverse merge -That makes sense to me, and it addresses the SPA problem, reflecting a more NPOV general definition of the topic. SPECIFICO talk 15:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Reverse merge. --Just N. (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * As there is no content left for a reverse merge the nomination has become moot. Marcocapelle (talk) 02:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Theaters in Derbent

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 02:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Theaters in Derbent to Category:Derbent
 * Nominator's rationale: The member page Judeo-Tat theatre is a cultural genre, not a building. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User kik

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: soft rename. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  17:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:User kik to Category:User ki
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to use ISO-639 1 code rather than ISO-639 2 code. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 05:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * just checking: is there consensus that ISO-639 1 code is preferable over ISO-639 2 code? Marcocapelle (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's codified anywhere, but it's clearly followed by the majority of the Category:Wikipedians by language tree. For example, we have Category:User en and Category:User es, not Category:User eng and Category:User spa. * Pppery * it has begun...  14:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User kua

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: soft rename. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  17:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:User kua to Category:User kj
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to use ISO-639 1 code rather than ISO-639 2 code. Alternately delete since the category contains only a userbox and no actual users. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

User lub

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: soft rename. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  18:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming user lub to Category:User lu
 * Propose renaming user lub-n to Category:User lu-N
 * Nominator's rationale: Rename to use ISO-639 1 code rather than ISO-639 2 code. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 21:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bakeries based in California
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  17:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Bakeries based in California to Category:Bakeries of California
 * Nominator's rationale: For consistency with the other "Bakeries of ...X" categories. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy rename per C2C, although the entire tree should be renamed to "Bakeries in X" convention for consistency with other types of businesses. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 05:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree and planned to propose separately. Support moving all categories to "in", if possible. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Support - convention in Category:Companies by country is 'of Foo'. Oculi (talk) 12:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Prefer Category:Bakeries in California, but the nom's target would do. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree, if all other categories are changed to "Bakeries in ..." for consistency (see above discussion). --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.