Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 28



Category:Sports venues in Decatur, Illinois

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  19:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting sports venues in decatur, illinois
 * Nominator's rationale: Five of seven pages are redirects –Aidan721 (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to and .--User:Namiba 02:41, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * dual merge as above.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:National Hockey League venues by team
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 5%23Category:National Hockey League venues by team

Historians of religion
Relisted, see Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 5%23Historians of religion

Category:Trinity Parish Church (Seattle)

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  19:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting trinity parish church (seattle)
 * Nominator's rationale: No need to have a category for a single entry about topic. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Animated television series about teenagers

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  19:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting animated television series about teenagers
 * Nominator's rationale: Not a WP:CATDEF. There are dozens if not hundreds of animated television series featuring teenagers, which is inevitable as many of these series are targeted at young children/preteens/young adults, and we have other categories for those. The numerous shows in this category otherwise have very little in common, and, as far as I can tell, sources are not referring to nor discussing these series as "being about teenagers". silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  13:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * This category cannot be deleted, again. Ajacraig2011 (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment, a previous discussion was about renaming, not about deletion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Even if it had been about deletion, outcomes of previous discussions generally do not prejudice future ones. silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  22:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete with prejudice — merely having teenagers in a work does not make it about teenagers, any more than having a dog in a work makes it about dogs. Yet Category:Family Guy is defined as being about children, teenagers, and dogs. It is more accurately Category:American adult animated comedy television series.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wives of the Beatles
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 5%23Category:Wives of the Beatles

Category:Ports and harbours in Yemen

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  19:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting ports and harbours in yemen
 * Nominator's rationale: Same scope as Category:Ports and harbours of Yemen. DB 1729 talk 13:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, "of" is the default format. No need to merge, the three articles in Category:Ports and harbours in Yemen are already in Category:Ports and harbours of Yemen. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Buildings and structures by style

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename/merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl  talk  20:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures by country and style to Category:Architecture by country and period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Belarus by style to Category:Architecture in Belarus by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Baroque buildings in Belarus to Category:Baroque architecture in Belarus
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Denmark by style to Category:Architecture in Denmark by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Aarhus by style to Category:Architecture in Aarhus by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Copenhagen by style to Category:Architecture in Copenhagen by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Ireland by style to Category:Architecture in Ireland by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Republic of Ireland by style to Category:Architecture in the Republic of Ireland by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Italy by style to Category:Architecture in Italy by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Abruzzo by style to Category:Architecture in Abruzzo by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Apulia by style to Category:Architecture in Apulia by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Campania by style to Category:Architecture in Campania by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Emilia-Romagna by style to Category:Architecture in Emilia-Romagna by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Bologna by style to Category:Architecture in Bologna by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Parma by style to Category:Architecture in Parma by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Lazio by style to Category:Architecture in Lazio by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Rome by style to Category:Architecture in Rome by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Liguria by style to Category:Architecture in Liguria by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Lombardy by style to Category:Architecture in Lombardy by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Mantua by style to Category:Architecture in Mantua by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Milan by style to Category:Architecture in Milan by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Marche by style to Category:Architecture in Marche by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Molise by style to Category:Architecture in Molise by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Piedmont by style to Category:Architecture in Piedmont by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Turin by style to Category:Buildings and structures in Turin (WP:SMALLCAT)
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Sicily by style to Category:Architecture in Sicily by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Palermo by style to Category:Architecture in Palermo by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Tuscany by style to Category:Architecture in Tuscany by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Florence by style to Category:Architecture in Florence by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Lucca by style to Category:Architecture in Lucca by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Pisa by style to Category:Architecture in Pisa by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Pistoia by style to Category:Architecture in Pistoia by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Siena by style to Category:Architecture in Siena by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Umbria by style to Category:Architecture in Umbria by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Veneto by style to Category:Architecture in Veneto by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Padua by style to Category:Architecture in Padua by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Verona by style to Category:Architecture in Verona by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Venice by style to Category:Architecture in Venice by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Mexico by style to Category:Architecture in Mexico by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Puebla by style to Category:Buildings and structures in Puebla (SMALLCAT)
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Peru by style to Category:Architecture in Peru by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Spain by style to Category:Architecture in Spain by autonomous community and period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Andalusia by style to Category:Architecture in Andalusia by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Granada by style to Category:Buildings and structures in Granada (SMALLCAT)
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Seville by style to Category:Architecture in Seville by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Aragon by style to Category:Architecture in Aragon by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Asturias by style to Category:Architecture in Asturias by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Balearic Islands by style to Category:Architecture in the Balearic Islands by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Basque Country (autonomous community) by style to Category:Architecture in the Basque Country (autonomous community) by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Cantabria by style to Category:Architecture in Cantabria by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Castile and León by style to Category:Architecture in Castile and León by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Burgos by style to Category:Buildings and structures in Burgos (SMALLCAT)
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in León, Spain, by style to Category:Architecture in León, Spain, by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Castilla–La Mancha by style to Category:Architecture in Castilla–La Mancha by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Catalonia by style to Category:Architecture in Catalonia by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Barcelona by style to Category:Architecture in Barcelona by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Extremadura by style to Category:Architecture in Extremadura by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Galicia (Spain) by style to Category:Architecture in Galicia (Spain) by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in La Rioja (Spain) by style to Category:Architecture in La Rioja (Spain) by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Community of Madrid by style to Category:Architecture in the Community of Madrid by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Madrid by style to Category:Architecture in Madrid by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Region of Murcia by style to Category:Architecture in the Region of Murcia by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Murcia by style to Category:Architecture in Murcia by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Navarre by style to Category:Architecture in Navarre by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in the Valencian Community by style to Category:Architecture in the Valencian Community by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in the United Kingdom by style to Category:Architecture in the United Kingdom by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in England by style to Category:Architecture in England by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Northern Ireland by style to Category:Architecture in Northern Ireland by period or style
 * Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures in Scotland by style to Category:Architecture in Scotland by period or style
 * Propose renaming Category:Buildings and structures in Wales by style to Category:Architecture in Wales by period or style (move nominated page over newer page)


 * Nominator's rationale: With a couple of minor exceptions, these are intermediate container categories holding only sub-cats titled "architecture" rather than "buildings", and there is nothing to distinguish them from the hierarchy which was recently renamed (see CFD Sept 2). A few have only one sub-cat, in which case I have proposed upmerging instead of renaming. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  08:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The proposal implies that we remove the content of e.g. Category:Buildings and structures in Denmark by style from the tree of Category:Buildings and structures in Denmark, isn't that odd? More generally, I think we have far more articles about buildings than about architecture, so this seems a step in the wrong direction. It would make sense if and only if we would regard "architecture" to be the plural of "building". Marcocapelle (talk) 15:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * At the top level, each country's "Buildings and structures in Foo" should be within "Architecture in Foo", which also contains content about Fooian architects, architectural styles, schools and history. I acknowledge that the hierarchy of mainly contains sub-cats of articles on buildings, with occasional articles about styles, but some intersections are an architectural style of their own e.g., so I would oppose rename them all the other way. To maintain navigational links, I would be happy to add "see also Category:Architecture in Denmark by period or style" on the face of Category:Buildings and structures in Denmark, and likewise for all other countries. – Fayenatic  L ondon 16:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I am still not thrilled about the proposal, but if it goes ahead these navigational links are needed indeed. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I have now added those links for every country that has "Architecture in Foo by period or style." – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Support together with the nominator's reasoning that "Buildings and structures in Foo" should be within "Architecture in Foo" and with adding the see alsos to the cats. It will upgrade the usefulness of all of the involved categories. —Alalch E. 19:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Admin note: I suggest that all the merged categories should initially be redirected, to allow careful attention to the Wikidata links. Alternatively, I am willing to implement the merges manually. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Support — with thanks for the considered attention to detail.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:House impeachment managers

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  19:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting house impeachment managers


 * house managers for the impeachment trial of bill clinton
 * house managers for the impeachment trial of andrew johnson
 * house managers for the first impeachment trial of donald trump
 * house managers for the second impeachment trial of donald trump
 * members of the congressional defense team for the first impeachment trial of donald trump
 * Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERCAT / WP:CATDEFINING. These individuals are notable for being in the U.S. House and are otherwise already categorized in Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives. Being impeachment managers is not a defining characteristic. Likewise for the defenders. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  08:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Nominator's rationale is greatly flawed. If prime notability is the only defining characteristic were are to organize by, most, if not all, sub-categories of Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives should be deleted. Organizing the defense for an impeached individual before the senate (being a defender) or prosecuting a president, judge, or cabinet official before the Senate is indeed a rare and noteworthy credential. Particularly in presidential impeachments. Some individuals only received national notability due to holding these roles, in fact, and were backbench congresspeople prior to that. SecretName101 (talk) 02:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Tend to support, the biographies in these categories are very brief in describing what each of the individuals did or achieved while they were in this position. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Is that a fault of the article's coverage though? In many cases, I'd say so. Plenty of these congressmen have bare-bones articles that do not elaborate at all on any aspect of their congressional tenure with more than a sentence or two. SecretName101 (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Apparently you did not bother reading these articles. Even articles in as far back as Category:House managers for the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson are very elaborate. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Good point. The more developed articles in these categories (b-class, good articles, featured articles) tend to go in-depth on their involvement in the impeachments and impeachment trials.
 * Examples:
 * Thomas Williams (Pennsylvania politician)
 * Benjamin Butler
 * It's the less developed ones that only dedicate a passing mention or less.
 * Many of the articles in this category are stubs merely adaptions of congressional biographies. Who could expect an in-depth analysis on such incomplete articles?
 * SecretName101 (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I was making a completely different point. All articles in these categories are well-developed, yet they seldom elaborate on this topic. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Marcocapelle Then you didn't really read the articles for Andrew Johnson's era yourself, since those by large go very well into depth with the congressmen's involvement in the impeachment and the trial. SecretName101 (talk) 07:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * See the above examples (particularly Butler) as well as others from that impeachment such as George S. Boutwell. SecretName101 (talk) 07:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Butler is quite an exception among all others in these categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Support — after consulting with the former Member of Congress in my home, this is simply WP:NONDEFINING and WP:OCTRIVIA. Nobody is best known for prosecuting or defending an impeachment (those members are usually the most well known and respected chairs of committees), or carrying the impeachment papers from the House to the Senate and attending the Senate hearings (ceremonial), or even holding press conferences about them. That public notoriety is temporary. Instead, impeachment managers should be listed in the impeachment articles, and navigated thusly.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anti-patterns
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 5%23Category:Anti-patterns

Category:English-language education
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 5%23Category:English-language education

Category:Adult comics
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting adult comics
 * Propose deleting children's comics
 * Nominator's rationale: These two categories (Category:Adult comics) and Category:Children's comics) seem to be rather arbitrary, many comics are intended for both or intended for one and read by the other. In Europe at least, nearly all the comics listed here as for children are read widely by adults, and at least some of the "adult" comics like De Kiekeboes are read very frequently by young children, while most in this category are ready by adolescents. Vice versa, things like Calvin and Hobbes are listed as children's comics, but are probably more popular among adults. Some like Asterix are already included in both, making it rather poor defining characteristics. Fram (talk) 08:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  09:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I mean, we do have Adult comics and Children's comics. The nominated categories are not about who ends up reading the comics, but what the intended target audience is. If a comics article has sourced content about this, why not? It seems to work okay as a defining characteristic. But only a small subset of comics need one or the other category, because there are no relevant sourced claims of this type in most comics' articles. What should not happen and seems to be happening is a tendency to categorize any given comic as either an "adult comic" or a "children's comic" which I believe is not the original purpose of these categories; they only address the two extremes while leaving out the middle. Indeed, most comics are "adolescents' comics" (a "middle" demographic that is presumed) or are undefined in this respect. twsabin 13:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep If there is sourced information about the intended target audience, I do not see a reason not to keep the categories. What should be avoided is guess-work by Wikipedia editors. Dimadick (talk) 13:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, I checked a number of articles both in Category:Adult comics and Category:Children's comics and none of them mentions an intended children or adult target group. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * What about the comics mentioned in Adult comics, such as Jane (comic strip): Jane was born when artist Norman Pett made a wager that he could create a comic strip as popular to adults as the strip Pip, Squeak and Wilfred was to children.? twsabin 22:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This is apparently exceptional. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There's also Viz (comics) (article about character: Sid the Sexist; a reference used is the book "Adult comics", Routledge, 2002). Should I keep looking to find cca five examples? —Alalch E. 18:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  08:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment While I'm mostly indifferent to whether these should be deleted or not, if they get kept, there needs to be a stricter criteria for what gets included. Articles should only be included if their inclusion is supported by WP:RS, not just because a comic "looks like" it's for a certain audience because of stereotypes. Zerbu  Talk 10:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know how this could be accomplished... Maybe by emptying the categories except for a nominal number of ideal members, and then letting them fill up again, but this time under a particular guidance about this. (But where to advertise the guidance?) —Alalch E. 19:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete — too hard to WP:V and too hard to maintain. Very few have WP:RS (other than self-description) as to whether they are Adult or Child targets.
 * Delete  per William Allen Simpson and per nom.<span id="Qwerfjkl:1672948928320:WikipediaFTTCLNCategories_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_28" class="FTTCmt"> — Qwerfjkl  talk  20:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, we are taking ourselves too seriously if we think we cannot tell the difference, and it's generally documented even if indirectly. But purge or split to adult/childrens' comic strips, as these categories mix comics with comic strips. There is no point putting members of Category:Beano strips individually into a children's category – the Beano has always been a children's comic. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports venues in West Sacramento, California
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  20:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Sports venues in West Sacramento, California to Category:Sports venues in Yolo County, California and Category:West Sacramento, California
 * Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT (one page). Merge to county-level. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Dual merge, also to Category:West Sacramento, California. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * dual merge as above.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports venues in Stockton, California
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  20:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Sports venues in Stockton, California to Category:Sports in Stockton, California and Category:Buildings and structures in Stockton, California
 * Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT (one page). Merge to . –Aidan721 (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to as well.--User:Namiba 03:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * dual merge as above.


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.