Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 21



Category:Facebook employees

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Facebook employees to Category:Meta Platforms employees
 * Nominator's rationale: Current name. 2001:16A2:E949:D100:59AB:420D:F464:CCDD (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose, better known for and as Facebook and not their current brand name.-- Mvqr (talk) 15:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support renaming. The article has been moved, and the cat includes people from other, non-Facebook divisions of the company.  UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose rename; split as suggested in previous CFD, Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 10. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Mvqr. Mahesh Sty (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose - it is already a subcat of Category:Meta Platforms people (via Category:Facebook people). Oculi (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American-Canadian joint production

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete.  ✗  plicit  01:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting american-canadian joint production
 * Propose deleting indo-bangladesh joint production
 * Propose deleting co-production films
 * Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAT by intersection of characteristics. Apart from these two categories, Wikipedia does not otherwise have an established scheme of creating "X-Y joint production" categories for every possible combination of national film industries that might have collaborated on jointly producing films, and it would not be wise to start now -- if we keep these, then we would also need to start categories for up to 32,000 other combinations of countries whose film industries might have worked together on films (e.g. Canada+UK, Canada+France, Canada+Mexico, Canada+Cuba, Canada+Italy, US+UK, US+France, India+Pakistan, India+Canada, India+US, and on and so forth.), with the added bonus that some films even get into three or four or five country combinations and thus explode the number of possible categories even further. This just scales out to the point of total unmaintainability, and these two combinations aren't so much more special than all other possible combinations as to warrant special treatment. If a film is a joint production of two or more countries' film industries, then it should obviously be categorized for all of the relevant countries individually, but there's no value in a separate "X+Y" tree for coproductions on top of categorizing for "X" and "Y" on their own. Bearcat (talk) 19:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. If kept, add "films" to the category names. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Rename Don't delete Category:Indo-Bangladesh joint production. Rename it to Category:Bangladeshi Indian films. We have two state film collaboration category such as Category:British Indian films. The proposed category will serve Films created by the Bangladeshi Indian community, as well as Bangladeshi films starring a majority Indian origin cast and Indian films set in Bangladesh or vice versa. We can merge/rename other categories like that as well. Mehedi Abedin 12:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Category:British Indian films is not for UK-India film collaborations, it's for UK-produced films about Indo-British characters, as in Bend It Like Beckham or Amar Akbar & Tony, regardless of whether the Indian film industry had any collaborative involvement in them or not. Bearcat (talk) 15:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * But the category states that "Films created by the British Indian community, as well as British films starring a majority Indian origin cast and Indian films set in the United Kingdom." We can see many film articles produced by British company in this category. For example, The Accidental Prime Minister (film) has this category. are you sure about your claim? The category says the opposite. I can see this article says that it is a joint production film. So I think maybe we can keep joint production films in this type of categories. Mehedi Abedin 21:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That description does not imply that all or even most of the films in the category are UK-India coproductions — you need only look at the articles in the category to see that the overwhelming majority of them are either "exclusively UK-produced without Indian partners" films about UK characters of Indian background, or "exclusively Indian-produced without UK partners" films about Indian characters of UK background. There are very few films in the category that are actually described by their articles as being genuine coproductions of the UK and Indian film industries, and even those very few are still there on the basis of being thematically Indo-British in content, not on the basis of having both Indian and UK production money behind them per se. We simply do not categorize films for the latter characteristic at all — again, what the contents of the category have in common is not "UK-India coproduction", because the vast majority of them are no such thing, but "stories about Indo-British characters". Bearcat (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * OOjs UI icon add-constructive.svg Support per nom. &#8213;  Qwerfjkl talk  18:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with Non-fungible tokens

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  18:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting people associated with non-fungible tokens
 * Nominator's rationale: People associated with something is generally not a defining category for people particularly with this. Articles categorized generally have no indication this is a notable attribute for those people. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: I created this category. There is already a Category:People associated with cryptocurrency, but NFTs are distinct from cryptocurrencies, so I felt there was a need for a separate category. Uhooep (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, not a defining characteristic of the people in this category. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non defining. Mahesh Sty (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No conceptual objection to category but, in practice, these biography articles don't seem defined by it. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OCASSOC. - jc37 11:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jackson Dean songs

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting jackson dean songs
 * Nominator's rationale: The single member of this category is a redirect. Serves no practical use to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Mahesh Sty (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:IPadOSユーザー

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting ipadosユーザー
 * Nominator's rationale: Per Categories for discussion/User/Archive/Topical index. Needs to be renamed to use an English title rather than a Japanese one if kept. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment This category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mahesh Sty (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Presiding bishops of the International Circle of Faith

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting presiding bishops of the international circle of faith
 * Nominator's rationale: There is only one element in this category. Also, the WP article on the International Circle of Faith was deleted after an AfD in 2007. Therefore, the category should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - this was created by a sock of user:Pastorwayne, who gave us a host of bizarrely named categories (this one is perfectly named, but probably superfluous). Oculi (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete  - per Oculi.--Bduke (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete  per nom. Mahesh Sty (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a one-person category is useless. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video game lists by franchise
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 31%23Category:Video game lists by franchise

Category:Hospital films

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: Merge. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Hospital films to Category:Films set in hospitals
 * Nominator's rationale: I don't understand the difference between the two categories. Fuddle (talk) 00:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Category:Hospital films is the much older category of the two, so preferably the history of that page should be preserved. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Mahesh Sty (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Support merge -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.