Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 18

 &lt; April 17 April 19 &gt;

Category:Chicago television shows

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Original programming by local channels in Chicago. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  12:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Propose renaming Category:Chicago television shows to Category:Local television programming in Chicago
 * Nominator's rationale: Current name is way too close to Category:Television shows set in Chicago and much too vague given its actual, very specific meaning, and needs to be changed. This suggestion is based on Category:Local television programming in the United States, and it's probably the best I can come up with, though alternate suggestions are very welcome. Similar issue exists for all of Television in Cleveland, Detroit, Minnesota, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and the San Francisco Bay Area, so this nomination could be expanded. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 21:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. I think I created this, it's hard to tell after a few name changes.  The intent was to list shows made by local channels.  The existing categories and subcategory support this. Fuddle (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Shouldn't this become Category:Original programming by local channels in Chicago, comparable to Category:Original programming by American television network or channel? Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Flip-flop: I like this idea better. It's longer, but more precise. Fuddle (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed to this, even if it's a bit of a mouthful. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 23:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Habitats Directive Species
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27%23Category:Habitats Directive Species

Category:Shabbat observant businesses

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  21:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Shabbat observant businesses to Category:Shabbat-observant businesses
 * Nominator's rationale: I think "Shabbat observant" is a compound adjective that should have a hyphen. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: delete? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  19:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NONDEF. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per Marco Mason (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Religious extremism

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 14:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose renaming Category:Religious extremism to Category:Religious fanaticism
 * Propose renaming Category:Religious extremism in the United Kingdom to Category:Religious fanaticism in the United Kingdom
 * Nominator's rationale: rename per main article Religious fanaticism. This could perhaps be speedied, but let's see if there are objections after all. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Rename. Religious extremism is a redirect to religious fanaticism.  If it weren't, I would oppose.  123.51.107.94 (talk) 23:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music of Extremadura

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 14:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose upmerging Category:Music of Extremadura to Category:Culture of Extremadura
 * Nominator's rationale: 1 P, 0 C. Already in other parent. Upmerge for now without prejudice. NLeeuw (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy merge per WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 23:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge per WP:C2F. GCarty (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bulgarian encyclopedias

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: split as nominated. (non-admin closure) House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Propose splitting Category:Bulgarian encyclopedias to Category:Books about Bulgaria and Category:Bulgarian-language encyclopedias
 * Nominator's rationale: It is not useful to lump together works from or about Bulgaria with works in the Bulgarian language that could be about different topics. Some entries might remain in the original category if they are about encyclopedias from Bulgaria. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 19:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Split per nom. Alt rename target 2 to Category:Encyclopedias in Bulgarian per the c:Category:Encyclopedias by language naming scheme of Encyclopedias in Fooian. I already proposed Category:Encyclopedias in Dutch. I recommend we follow the recent renaming of Category:Texts by language, Category:Songs by language, and others to this same Things in Fooian naming convention for clarity and consistency. NLeeuw (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  15:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment That an encyclopedia was published in Bulgaria does not mean that the topic is Bulgaria. Encyclopedias tend to cover a wide variety of topics. Dimadick (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * In practice it is very unlikely that an encyclopedia published in Bulgaria wouldn't be Bulgarian-language encyclopedia, so they would fall in the second split target. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That's not what Dimadick said; he pointed out that country of publication and topic do not need to match, rather than that country of publication and language do not need to match.
 * Incidentally, specialised English-language encyclopedias are published all over the world all the time. Within a few seconds I just found the Encyclopedia of Coastal Science (2005), published in Dordrecht, the Netherlands. Last I checked, English still isn't the dominant native language over here, but that doesn't stop anyone from publishing encyclopaedias in English on "Dutch" soil. ;) NLeeuw (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Given the Option 2 outcome in the Dutch encyclopedias CfR below, I suppose I will retract my !vote for an Alt rename, and instead Split & Rename per nom. NLeeuw (talk) 08:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch encyclopedias

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: option 2. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  12:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Option 1
 * Propose renaming Category:Dutch encyclopedias to Category:Encyclopedias in Dutch
 * Propose renaming Category:Belarusian encyclopedias to Category:Encyclopedias in Belarusian
 * Propose renaming Category:Albanian encyclopedias to Category:Encyclopedias in Albanian
 * Propose renaming Category:Bengali encyclopedias to Category:Encyclopedias in Bengali
 * Propose renaming Category:Tamil language encyclopedias to Category:Encyclopedias in Tamil
 * Option 2
 * Propose renaming Category:Dutch encyclopedias to Category:Dutch-language encyclopedias
 * Propose renaming Category:Belarusian encyclopedias to Category:Belarusian-language encyclopedias
 * Propose renaming Category:Albanian encyclopedias to Category:Albanian-language encyclopedias
 * Propose renaming Category:Bengali encyclopedias to Category:Bengali-language encyclopedias
 * Propose renaming Category:Tamil language encyclopedias to Category:Tamil-language encyclopedias
 * (both options):
 * Propose purging incorrect parents Category:Encyclopedias by country and Category:European encyclopedias/Category:Asian encyclopedias
 * Nominator's rationale for Option 1: Per the actual scope of the main article, List of Dutch encyclopedias, which I have just renamed List of encyclopedias in Dutch, because the scope as indicated by the definition in the opening sentence is 'Encyclopedias in the Dutch language', and includes several encyclopedias published in Belgium rather than the Netherlands. The connected Commonscat was already named c:Category:Encyclopedias in Dutch. The interwiki to frwiki was already fr:Liste d'encyclopédies en néerlandais, a redirect to fr:Liste d'encyclopédies par langue, and to nlwiki already to nl:Encyclopedie. This also means we should Purge parents Category:Encyclopedias by country and Category:European encyclopedias, because the Dutch language is not necessarily limited by geography to Europe either (e.g. there is an nl:Encyclopedie van Suriname, published in 1977 in Suriname, two years after it became indepedent). Because I recently renamed the main article myself, speedy criterion C2D does not count, but as you can see, it has always been the main article's and category's scope. NLeeuw (talk) 12:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Update 6 April 2024 and rationale for Option 2: Belarusian, Albanian, Bengali and Tamil language encyclopedias have been added to the nomination following their speedy renaming nomination by LaundryPizza03, and Marcocapelle's suggestion to go full, and my suggestion to centralise discussion over here. The rationale for Option 2 is that it conforms with most older naming conventions to name things Fooian-language things. By contrast, emerging new conventions (Option 1) favour Things in Fooian. We all agree the current categories should be renamed, but the question is which Option is preferable. For both options, it is proposed to Purge them out of the by country and by continent trees, because these encyclopedias are by language. NLeeuw (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  12:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  15:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Support, language is generally much more a defining characteristic of a book than the country where it is published. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree. Country of publication could be defining, and it's okay that we've got a Category:Encyclopedias by country tree. But if we need to choose, I think language takes priority over country of publication. We could do both, but then we risk situations like Category:Latvian encyclopedias and Category:Latvian-language encyclopedias, which are technically distinct, but both contain the two same items in practice. Only for larger languages and countries like France versus the French language, it is evident to have separate category trees, especially if the latter has a subcategory like "Belgian encyclopedias in French" or something, showing that France and French don't always coincidence. NLeeuw (talk) 12:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping, you might want to clarify or change your !vote based on the amended nomination and rationale. Thanks. NLeeuw (talk) 16:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I do not have a strong preference between option 1 and 2, both are an improvement versus current. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Support option 2. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Support option 2. Matches with Category:Mass media by language tree. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 23:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Estonian numismatists
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27%23Category:Estonian numismatists

Category:18th-century American slave owners
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure)  Qwerfjkl  talk  12:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Propose deleting 18th-century american slave owners
 * Propose deleting 19th-century american slave owners
 * Propose deleting 18th-century slave owners (added by Mason on (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC))
 * Propose deleting 19th-century slave owners (added by Mason on (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC))
 * Propose deleting slave owners by century (added by Mason (talk) 19:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC))
 * Nominator's rationale: Do we really need to diffuse by century of ownership? I don't think that the category is helpful. I think diffusion by state would be more helpful. Mason (talk) 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  17:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It looks like the categories have been depopulated. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * FWIW: @MarcocapelleWhen I nominated the categories, there were zero pages in them, just the slave-trader categories. Mason (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Upmerge to Category:American slave owners. Redundant layers. NLeeuw (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Opose Whyever delete it? It is always usefull to sort people by century, and the category American slave owners is too big, and need sub categories. Nothing prevents having both a category by state and a category by century; other categories of people do. Slaves have century categories, and nothing prevents having century categories for slave owners as well. They are always helpful when a reader need to find people by century, and do not prevent the creation of other categories, such as state categories.--Aciram (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * As the category creator,Aciram, are you planning on populating them? Mason (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If it's just 2 centuries, I strongly recommend against subdividing by centuries. There will be a lot of duplication without navigational advantage. Splitting by state seems doable and defining, however. NLeeuw (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm adding the newly-created parent categories, that are also not populated with pages, in a moment. @Aciram@Marcocapelle@Nederlandse Leeuw Mason (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's very helpful to start creating new empty categories with little navigational value in the middle of a CfD. That said, I'll emphasise that I favour upmerging for now without prejudice. If a newly created category can be properly filled with items and has demonstrable navigational value, there's nothing wrong with it. NLeeuw (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. It is not helpful to sort by century.--User:Namiba 00:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose Diffusion by century is always useful in large categories. Dimadick (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not always. For example, we very intentionally don't have activists diffused by century or athletes by sport. Dimadick, are you planning on doing the diffusion? Because right now these categories are *very empty*. Mason (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  15:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is also a Category:Slave owners from the Thirteen Colonies so this century scheme only separate biographies of the very last part of the 18th century versus what we already have separated. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That seems like an argument for deleting the American-specific categories above, but not the ones for slave owners in general. --GCarty (talk) 07:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Agree to some extent. On the other hand, apart from American slave owners, we just have slave traders who have their own category tree anyway. Modifying to: delete Category:18th-century American slave owners and Category:19th-century American slave owners at the very least. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete/upmerge: Diffusing by country/state makes a lot more sense and would save from the overlap issue that NLeeuw mentioned. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 23:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Muslims
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: split to Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Middle East and Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in North Africa. (non-admin closure) House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 20:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Muslims to Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms
 * Nominator's rationale: This category feels WP:COATRACKy. There is no Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Christians, even though those are far more prevalent. Moreover, many of the incidents here were not even defined by the participation of Muslims so inclusion into the Islam and anti-Semitism article would not always be appropriate. User:Namiba 18:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I originally created that category, feeling that pogroms by Muslims were notable precisely because they were much less common than pogroms by (especially Russian or other Eastern European) Christians. --GCarty (talk) 07:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Understandable. But the effect might be that unnecessary emphasis is placed on Muslims as perpetrators in a way that is currently not done for Christians (or others) as perpetrators. NLeeuw (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Perhaps rename to Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Middle East and North Africa, or something similar? --GCarty (talk) 08:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This would be comparable to the existing Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia.
 * Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in Mandatory Palestine and Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in Ottoman Palestine could also be moved into this category.
 * Splitting to Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Middle East and Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in North Africa could be an option indeed. (Note that we do not have a Category:Middle East and North Africa tree.) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * "Middle East" is a very modern term, coined in the 20th century. "Middle East and North Africa" is even more recent. I don't think it's a good idea. If we are going to rescope by geography rather than perpetrator's religion (which is an improvement), let's stick to continents:
 * Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in Asia; and
 * Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in Africa.
 * That would work for me. NLeeuw (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Middle East is the modern successor term of Near East which has existed for a long time. Jews have been very prevalent specifically in the Middle East (since ancient times) and in North Africa (since many centuries) so splitting to Middle East and North Africa fits very well with Jewish history. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Soft support for upmerging. The fact that there is no equivalent Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Christians tree is striking; either it will have to be created, or the Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Muslims needs to be upmerged. Given that, as far as I can see, there are no article titles identifying the religion of the perpetrators, only identifying the location and or year of the pogrom(s), nom is probably correct. NLeeuw (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping for your consideration. NLeeuw (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with upmerging, for the same reasons as NLeeuw gives Mason (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with consistency and do not oppose the nomination. Alternatively we may create and populate Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms by Christians. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile GCarty proposed another alternative which (if slightly modified) I would not oppose either. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl  talk  15:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge. If not, delete. "By Muslims" is simply unacceptable in a category name. Even when the majority of the perpetrators were Muslims, the name implies that their religion was a key factor in the process (rather than politics, economics, etc.). Usually this is either false or unknown. Would we name a cat about things done by Israel with "by Jews"? Zerotalk 04:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * As mentioned above, I now think the this category (which I created originally) should be replaced with Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Middle East and/or Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in North Africa. --GCarty (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * As the nominator, I suggest we merge with no objection to splitting off articles by continent for consistency's sake.--User:Namiba 20:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge per nom and per discussion above. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge or delete per Zero (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Support splitting to Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Middle East and Category:Anti-Jewish pogroms in North Africa, as these will fit within Category:History of the Jews in the Middle East and Category:History of the Jews in North Africa. – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim field personnel
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl  talk  12:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim field personnel to Category:Los Angeles Angels field personnel
 * Propose merging Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim managers to Category:Los Angeles Angels managers
 * Propose merging Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim coaches to Category:Los Angeles Angels coaches
 * Propose merging Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim executives to Category:Los Angeles Angels executives — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnis Scientia (talk • contribs) 15:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge categories per previous discussion here. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Pinging @Eureka Lott and @Natg 19 from the previous discussion on the matter. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge per precedent. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Book of Boba Fett episodes
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  18:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose deleting the book of boba fett episodes
 * Nominator's rationale: All episodes were redirected so no content here. The child category will automatically be placed in the parent category if this is deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant layer. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 23:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NLeeuw (talk) 22:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Swedish emigrants to Japan
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 25%23Category:Swedish emigrants to Japan

Tourism in Brazil by city
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  18:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Belo Horizonte to Category:Economy of Belo Horizonte
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Curitiba to Category:Economy of Curitiba
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Porto Alegre to Category:Economy of Porto Alegre
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Salvador, Bahia to Category:Economy of Salvador, Bahia
 * Nominator's rationale: These only contain subcats for tourist attractions, which are already categorised in Category:Tourist attractions in Brazil by city. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom (or delete, as I am not sure if tourist attractions really belong in economy). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

History of Ipê
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. (non-admin closure)  Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  18:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Propose merging Category:History of Ipê to Category:Ipê, Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose deleting Category:History of the municipalities of Rio Grande do Sul
 * Nominator's rationale: Only contains 1 article on a museum. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge/delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Talian dialect
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  18:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Geography of Antônio Prado to Category:Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Geography of Ipê to Category:Rio Grande do Sul
 * Nominator's rationale: These categories only contain one article, That article is about Talian dialect, which I don't think we would generally categorise as geography anyway. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. NLeeuw (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Queen of &#x2661;  &#124;  speak  17:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in the municipalities of Rio Grande do Sul to Category:Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Flores da Cunha to Category:Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Flores da Cunha to Category:Municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Garibaldi to Category:Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Garibaldi to Category:Municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Ipe to Category:Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul and Category:Ipê, Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose merging Category:Tourism in Vila Flores to Category:Tourism in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Propose deleting Category:Geography of Vila Flores
 * Propose merging Category:Vila Flores to Category:Municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul
 * Nominator's rationale: Merge for now, only one or two pages in these sub-categories, and mostly it's the same regional article. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.