Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 24

Administrators' noticeboard/Archive290
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive290 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by 78.26. --George Ho (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958
Needs an uninvolved closure. I would welcome a solo or duo closure, i.e. one or two editors/admins. --George Ho (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

already done Dr Strauss  talk  19:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race
I would like a closure as the user is being disruptive and preventing the community's decision from being enforced. The consensus is also nearly unanimous. nihlus kryik (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The RfC has hit 30 days today. Calling it "nearly unanimous" is contentious and some arguments go against WP:PRIMARY, so there is enough to sift through that it might be advisable to seek an admin particularly well-versed in that policy.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * After two days of heavy comments, this RfC is well over 30 days since initiation. The WP:PRIMARY-related question is: "Can editors make subjective claims based on the primary-source episodes without providing a cite (timestamp and quote) as to what exactly was said?" --Tenebrae (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done and Exhausted. And Lame. Snuge purveyor (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 139
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 139 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Otto Warmbier
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Otto Warmbier ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * - Winged Blades Godric 06:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed with no consensus to remove "allegedly". (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Paris Agreement
Consensus has been reached that United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement should not be merged into Paris Agreement. I'm requesting that this stale discussion is closed. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 21:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Winged Blades of Godric. --George Ho (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Be bold
Would someone please formally close this. Legobot removed the RfC template as lapsed after a month a few days ago, and it has yet to be closed. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for proposed instruction. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:HIStory/Ghosts
As suggested at Good article reassessment/HIStory/Ghosts/1, I am requesting a closure done by an uninvolved closer. Pre-RFC: ; RFC: --George Ho (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * not done - discussion is only 22 days old, and it's a fairly clear outcome. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This can be closed on or after 9 July 2017. Cunard (talk) 07:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Voting method
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at RfC at Talk:Voting method ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 17:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Be bold
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Be bold ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by (non-admin closure) (duplicate request). Snuge purveyor (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)/Archive 140
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)/Archive 140 ? A close is necessary to determine whether the Historical tag should be kept or removed from Administrator review. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * not done. Already archived and the discussion was not set up in a way that required formal closure. Deryck C. 15:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 30
. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * done Tazerdadog (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Canvassing
Needs an uninvolved closer. --George Ho (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done Proposed wording was declined. I boldly altered the second sentence of WP:CANVASS in a way I believe reflects the result of this discussion. Someone please have a look and revert if considered inappropriate. Snuge purveyor (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alleged Saudi role in September 11 attacks
The consensus needs to be assessed by an experienced user. -- M h hossein   talk 19:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * close Dr Strauss   talk  18:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Breitbart News/Archive 6
Can someone uninvolved close this please? The discussion was partially closed, but then the conversation continues. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 00:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Per your below request (this is a duplicate), not done. --Izno (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Breitbart News
This should be also closed by uninvolved closer soon. --George Ho (talk) 00:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC); amended for neutrality, 06:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see any reason whatsoever to "close" this. The discussion is of the typical POV-pushing sort and has otherwise petered off naturally. not done --Izno (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958 ? Thank you, — xaosflux  Talk 10:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I rewuest admin assist to close the related BRFA which has consensus and all the BAG mebers I conacted deny to close it. I also note that Primefak did not rejet the idea of Yobot doing the task. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958
Abequinn14 (talk) 19:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done User blocked by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958
Because of the nature of this ANI — and what resulted from the closure by a non-administrator of an interpersonal ANI related to it — closure by an Administrator is essential. Thank you. Pyxis Solitary talk 13:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 20:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958
This is an interpersonal ANI that the OP prevented from being closed. It has deteriorated. Constructive responses by neutral editors has ended. Pyxis Solitary talk 13:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Melania Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Melania Trump ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Done - The RFC was closed prior to 30 days having run, with a No Consensus finding. (Did someone step outside in the Southern Hemisphere and conclude that it was snowing No Consensus?)  The closure was then reversed (re-opened), but 30 days did not run, and there still is no consensus.  I am only closing the RFC to conclude that there was no consensus but the RFC was not allowed to run its course.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, Robert. May you fix the indentation please? It looks awkward. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * User:George Ho - Indentation of what? The handling of the RFC was awkward.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh... I see that you already fixed the formatting of your response. Well, I realized that "indentation" was unclear, so I struck it. I should have specifically said, " should be added". It's fixed, so there. --George Ho (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:PhiloSOPHIA
The RfC template has been removed by Legobot because the discussion has petered down. However, a formal close is highly desirable, as the result of this RfC potentially affects thousands of articles on academic journals. An uninvolved closer is sorely needed. Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 11:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It wasn't removed because the discussion has petered down, it was because thirty days (actually 30 days and 48 minutes) had elapsed since the  . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 11:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I stand corected. Nevertheless, a formal close seems higly desirable. --Randykitty (talk) 12:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * done Tazerdadog (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems
. Request emphatic and clear closure directing the complainant to drop their quest. I would further appreciate their being strongly warned that they will be blocked, or actually, better, for them to be blocked for a month or two or six now, for pursuing it, given extensive and clear feedback they have received already. They made their preferred edit today (which I reverted). -- do ncr  am  20:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I volunteer that it is not necessary for a closer to go further than simply considering the merits and closing the discussion. You can skip considering any block or other action;  please excuse my wishful thinking about that, it is really not necessary (and by the way there has not been any further re-implementation of the inappropriate deletion).  There is unanimous agreement by all but one editor that the quotation is fine, so it should be an easy call. -- do  ncr  am  01:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

done Tazerdadog (talk) 19:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the discussion, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:HIStory/Ghosts
An uninvolved closer is needed please as (re-)requested at Good article reassessment/HIStory/Ghosts/1. pre-RFC: ; RfC: --George Ho (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Proposed split unananimously approved. Snuge purveyor (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Lagardère Sports and Entertainment/Archive 1
Stale discussion, needs someone to put it out of its misery please. GiantSnowman 08:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * for RFC to increase participation. --George Ho (talk) 09:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Another request to close this discussion. --George Ho (talk) 07:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done:- Winged Blades Godric 04:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin
Would appreciate it if an uninvolved editor would review and close the discussion on coverage of the "Scalability debate" in the Bitcoin article. N2e (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--General talk-page discussions are hardly ever closed. Winged Blades Godric 04:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:CNN controversies
The consensus for this discussion has been established as a merge to CNN controversies. The brunt of the opposed voters have been blocked as sockpuppets, in addition to the fact that the page was stale days prior to the discussion, bringing it to a WP:NOTNEWS issue. D ARTH B OTTO talk • cont 22:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done:- Winged Blades Godric 04:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring/B4 clarification
An uninvolved closer may be needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 01:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done:- Winged Blades Godric 08:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack
Please, close this. . Erlbaeko (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for the RfC as asked. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alone in the Universe
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alone in the Universe ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed with limited consensus to reduce the infobox to one studio album chronology. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2017 June
Discussions need closure by uninvolved editor. George Ho (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've closed the two oldest, the one remaining is the most recent, I've updated the counter just above.  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Furry fandom
Last post was made 1 July on a merger proposal that reached a consensus to not merge. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done Snuge purveyor (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the merger proposal, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 8
-- Tavix ( talk ) 13:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * closed  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Archive291
Would an admin close that in relation to Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 55? The close can be either a) No b) Yes c) Yes but by your account. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * closed  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the discussion, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Closed as moot; the section in question has been removed entirely. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC) updated Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Your closure is reverted, Eggishorn. May you please modify the "done" template, so the bot won't archive the request? Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done again Closed with consensus to retain the POV tags but further specific remedies for other concerns expressed requires further focused discussion. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 08:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Hasan Salama
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hasan Salama ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Drmies (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Drmies; for the bot :D. --George Ho (talk) 01:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Russo-Georgian War
Need some help closing this discussion since it's contentious + I'm involved + opinions are mixed. Thanks! Banedon (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by RileyBugz, to whom I thank. --George Ho (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, RileyBugz! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Files for discussion/2017 May 30
The discussion at has been relisted SEVEN FIVE times since August 2016. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 *  Comment - I have relisted all of the simple discussions that I can disposition. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – OTRS agent, I left a statement on the discussion about the status of that file's claimed pending ticket. seb26 (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Deryck C. 18:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the FfD, Sandstein! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 1
Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Deryck C. 18:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the TfD, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles
This needs a stake driven through its heart, per WP:SNOW and WP:IDHT. Hopefully an Admin can get the message across. I suggest if the editor wishes to pursue this, rather than carry on debate at articles, or at the WikiProject level, they must make a proposal to change WP:UNITS, and WP:CARUNITS and WP:MCNUM will defer accordingly. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done. ANRFC does not try to force an end to ongoing discussions that aren't set up to explicitly require closure. If you want fresh pairs of eyes in the discussion, please request further input on the talk pages of the other WikiProjects and guidelines you've referred to. If you are concerned about the behaviour of an individual editor, please take it up with them directly or request intervention at WP:ANI. Deryck C. 18:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:American Revolutionary War/Archive 13
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:American Revolutionary War/Archive 13 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Edited to update link to correct archive page. Snuge purveyor (talk) 06:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done - Nothing in need of a close. Collaborative discussion agreeably applied various infobox changes. Alsee (talk) 10:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Dismissal of James Comey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Dismissal of James Comey ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 10:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for closing the RfC, ! Cunard (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 7
-- Tavix ( talk ) 17:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Deryck Chan. Thank you for closing the RfD! Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 1
Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Plastikspork. Thank you for closing the TfD! Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 4
-- Tavix ( talk ) 17:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 4
-- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 15:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017 July 7
-- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:42, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bahá'í Faith
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bahá'í Faith ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as moot due to consensus being previously implemented. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Could somebody kindly assess consensus at Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections Early close requested because discussion has ceased for a while and the debated issue is kind of moot. — JFG talk 05:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by on 18 July 2017 with a consensus to not include. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Vladimir Lenin
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vladimir Lenin ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for removal of the challenged statement. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017 Portland train attack
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Portland train attack ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done TonyBallioni (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Files for discussion/2017 July 7
Was sent to a first FFD on 15 June 2017 at. Closed as delete. Sent to DRV same day of FFD close at Deletion review/Log/2017 June 23. Closed as overturn and relisted. Placed for FFD again as linked above. Discussion has died down for 2+ 6+ days now. The issues at the core of this discussion require an administrator with significant knowledge in WP:NFCC issues. Regardless of close, if an administrator doesn't get this close right, it's likely to end up at DRV again. The cycle needs to be broken. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Cycle broken (hopefully?) Ben—Salvidrim!   &#9993;  21:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Maxford Nelsen
No activity in >30 days and near-unanimous delete. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done as delete by . Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2017 June
Needs uninvolved editor to close this. --George Ho (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * closed Ben—Salvidrim!   &#9993;  20:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ethereum
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ethereum ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for any one of the presented options. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of porridges
Requesting closure of this merge discussion by an uninvolved admin or user. North America1000 03:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * closed, FWIW Ben—Salvidrim!   &#9993;  04:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
The request is a little early, but this should not imply early closure, which should be performed by uninvolved editor, also not involved in the previous discussion: Village pump (policy)/Archive 135. --George Ho (talk) 10:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Kaldari, who proposed it. --George Ho (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Women's Equality Party
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Women's Equality Party ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Log/2017_July_27
Officially withdrew this nomination. BangJan1999 14:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done closing Articles for deletion/Ashley Maher. --George Ho (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
An uninvolved closer is needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done, summarizing rationale provided--Kostas20142 (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Breitbart News
Discussion went stale; a closure by uninvolved editor is needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 08:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * done I've done it and provided a closing rationale.   Dr Strauss   talk   17:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Matthew Gordon Banks
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Matthew Gordon Banks and determine if it's a BLP issue. . Thanks- Isaidnoway (talk)  18:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Dr Strauss   talk   18:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
As the nominator, I think the consensus is pretty clear now.  Dr Strauss   talk   16:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done per WP:SNOW --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 5
-- Tavix ( talk ) 17:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done by   Dr Strauss   talk   18:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 27
-- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done by   Dr Strauss   talk   18:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 24
-- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * done  So Why  14:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 1
-- Tavix ( talk ) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done  So Why  14:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Log/2017_August_1
Officially withdrawn nomination. BangJan1999 14:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done  So Why  14:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of Sonic the Hedgehog characters
Please close this merge discussion, mind the policy-backed arguments czar  17:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done TonyBallioni (talk) 18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
An uninvolved closer is needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done --Kostas20142 (talk) 17:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
An uninvolved closer is needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as consensus to include. - MrX 13:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Rough consensus to list Newton's scientific achievements in the the introduction of the article. - MrX 13:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:George Harrison
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:George Harrison ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as Tryptofish C.- MrX 21:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Hungarians
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hungarians ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 21:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Italy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Italy ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Consensus is to use the Fiat photo. - MrX 14:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

No original research/Noticeboard
Discussion has faded out on this "No original research" topic - closure by an uninvolved editor would be welcome. Batternut (talk) 12:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * close not done - Far too little participation to assess consensus.- MrX 20:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Would an uninvolved administrator or editor consider closing this request. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done --Kostas20142 (talk) 13:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting
This page was a serious battleground, but consensus for keep has been clearly reached and the page stabilized, with most of the participants on both sides of the spectrum actively and productively collaborating to improve it. . D ARTH B OTTO talk • cont 23:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Requesting whichever admin reviews this to wait until the current deletion review is closed before closing this proposal. Closed now.  WikiVirusC  Simply for the sake of complete closure on the matter that started with the AfD.  WikiVirus  C  (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This really needs to be closed and done with. I am involved, but I think the clear consensus is to Keep and do not merge.Casprings (talk) 03:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

done The consensus for "keep" was clear, so I closed it even though I am WP:INVOLVED. --MelanieN (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Consensus is to exclude the proposed content.- MrX 15:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:McMahon–Hussein Correspondence
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:McMahon–Hussein Correspondence ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Consensus is to keep the table (not original research).- MrX 15:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
An uninvolved closer is needed please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed: consensus is to include. - MrX 15:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Middlebury, Connecticut
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Middlebury, Connecticut ? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - There is rough consensus for including a pushpin map in the infobox.- MrX 16:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Charice Pempengco
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Charice Pempengco ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * close - not done - Malformed RfC terminated by Redrose64.- MrX 16:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Another editor has posted the closing template on the RfC.- MrX 16:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:30 Rock
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:30 Rock ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - No consensus. - MrX 16:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:CeCe Peniston discography
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CeCe Peniston discography ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * close - not done - Not a proper RfC. Not neutrally worded. Impossible to determine consensus with so few commenters and so much bickering.- MrX 17:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of secret police organizations
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of secret police organizations ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done - No consensus. - MrX 17:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy
Needs uninvolved closer please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Teamwork closure is requested by the RfC proposer Guy Macon at "Administrators' noticeboard" Therefore, I shall abide to request for teamwork and wait for two or three closers interested. --George Ho (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * While a team of closers were found (in the afore-linked thread), current plans are to relist it.So deferred for 30 days(ideally)! Winged Blades Godric 18:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Also, the discussion was moved from Village pump (policy) to Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy, so I changed the link in the header. --George Ho (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've been brave, and this is now done Mdann52 (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates ? Thanks, Mitchumch (talk) 08:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations
There has been a discussion of the wording/content of the good article criteria. It has been open for around two weeks with no edits for four days; closure by an uninvolved editor would be appreciated. 22:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by J Milburn (talk • contribs)
 * Just in case: --George Ho (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done Mdann52 (talk) 19:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)  Dr Strauss   talk   17:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Needs archiving, so I'll say already done by DrStrauss. --George Ho (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Seeking an experienced editor to assess consensus. Much appreciated. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  04:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done for  by request at my talk page, see . Regards  So  Why  13:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section
A solo closure by an uninvolved editor may suffice. Nevertheless, I welcome a joint closure performed by two. --George Ho (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * - Another editor has posted the closing template on the RfC. &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ivo Watts-Russell § Proposed merge with Beggars Group
. Requesting closure by an uninvolved user. North America1000 10:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Whataboutism
An uninvolved editor should evaluate and close the discussion. --George Ho (talk) 06:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--The closure is stayed.Participation has not died down entirely. Winged Blades Godric 16:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Stopping Traffic
Seems to be a keep or a no consensus. I don't want to NAC or Relist it, though. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  14:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)done

Talk:Monarchy of Canada
A bot has just removed the RFC template as "expired" (see ) but no Admin has weighed in to make a determination on whether there or not there's consensus for the proposal. I'm wondering if an uninvolved admin can take a look and make a determination? Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done-- Winged Blades Godric 10:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
The RfC, filed at the Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War on July 6th was agreed to be transferred to the main talk page of the Syrian Civil War article in light of the wide implication of the contested issue in line with a more limited audience of Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War (4 editors participated prior to the decision) and existing consensus at Talk:Syrian Civil War/Israel. As a result, Talk:Syrian_Civil_War was initiated on July 9th and so far 12 editors participated.

However, old RfC hadn't been cancelled/procedurally closed to date, and 2 more users decided to vote at the old RfC after July 9th in addition to their voting at new broader RfC (at talk:Syrian Civil War). Remarkably, one of the editors voted differently at the old and new RfCs. We cannot have two parallel RfC about the exact same topic and potentially different outcome. So far, the main page for topic-wide decisions on the Syrian Civil War arena has been the Syrian Civil War article and so should remain. Therefor i request to close the older RfC procedurally and allow more time for voting on the newer and much wider audience RfC. This request was originally filed on 25 July.GreyShark (dibra) 07:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * done. Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of elevation extremes by country
Please, close this discussion and determine the consensus.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done-- Winged Blades Godric 10:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Mount Athos/Archive 1
. Could somebody close this please? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done--Inform me at my talk if a closure statement is desirable. Winged Blades Godric 10:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Warren National University
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Warren National University ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--They have already arrived at a unanimous consensus.No point of a closure. Winged Blades Godric 10:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done-- Winged Blades Godric 10:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done(consensus reached not to reinstate). --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Category talk:Deaths by type of illness
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Category talk:Deaths by type of illness ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--Scarcity of substantial discussion. Winged Blades Godric 11:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Efforts to impeach Donald Trump
Would an uninvolved editor kindly assess consensus about the merger proposal of Impeachment March into Efforts to impeach Donald Trump or Protests against Donald Trump? Thanks! — JFG talk 23:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done by . Winged Blades Godric  10:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Joseph Stalin
Would an admin or experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Joseph Stalin. Thank you. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done (non-admin closure) Result was "keep". Snuge purveyor (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Trump Tower wiretapping allegations
Would an experienced uninvolved editor please assess the consensus and close it here? Dschslava Δx  parlez moi  02:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅--Aervanath (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Biocom (2nd nomination)
Been relisted thrice, NAC was asked to be reverted. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  16:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done by .Godric on Leave (talk) 08:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics
A uninvolved editor should close a couple ongoing discussions please. Because it is WP:SNOW Thanks. --209.249.5.130 (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed parameter for you (i.e. added ). --George Ho (talk) 23:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done.Godric on Leave (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:James Jamerson
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:James Jamerson ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done-- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Iran/Archive 18
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Iran/Archive 18 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done-- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Lifta
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lifta ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done-- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Syrian Civil War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Civil War ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done-- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Doctor Who
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Doctor Who ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done-- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Breitbart News
It has a fairly overwhelming majority (3 times as many "opposes" as "supports") and it's becoming a magnet for anon griping about NPOV. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  13:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 14:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done although I don't expect that result to solve all the problems unfortunately. Thryduulf (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 ? Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Thryduulf (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at both RFCs (at Talk:2017) Both were initiated: ? Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Talk:2017 always seems to have several RfCs going at once. I guess that you means the ones for Deborah Watling and Tommy Gemmell, both of which had the  in the two hours before you posted this (and which brought the total open down from seven to five). -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep that's why I said both although I probably should've stated the names, I knew no one was going to close this one and thought instead of it sitting there It was best to come here - Ofcourse there's no time limit but I knew someone at somepoint was going to add these 2 to the article and then be reverted "because the RFC was closed" - It's happened plenty of times. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)


 * done both. Thryduulf (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies I should've stated the names above instead of essentially assuming everyone's now mind readers so my apologies for the confusement, Thanks for kindly closing all 3 RFCs, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 20:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Locomotives and rolling stock of the Victorian Railways, predecessors and successors
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Locomotives and rolling stock of the Victorian Railways, predecessors and successors ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Because there has been some debate in a involved editor and because there has been disputes as to the consensus, I request an independent admin (or two) to close and evaluate the consensus however it shall be read. I have a personal view but wish for the community's wishes to be accurately rendered. I also understand that it may still be too early to close and render a consensus, in which case I give consent to have the date parameter adjusted for the template. Hasteur (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The discussion started on 25 July, Hasteur. May you change from " " to " " please? Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * My factual and simple close of a stalled discussion showing 42-12 support was improperly unilaterally overturned claiming unclear consensus possibly in violation of WP:NAC and definitely against the instructions at the top of this page. I request an uninvolved admin review my close and, if they agree, restore the close and the related changes to CSD13. I'm open to tweaks to my proposed G13 wording, but the right of an involved editor to do an NAC close is well established by community decision as reflected in the instructions. The overturn by an Admin claiming not to be acting as an admin is out of line. We have DRV for that. Legacypac (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I said today's date in the revision where I requested it.  You want  who declared July 5th. Hasteur (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Without commenting on the merits (or not) of the previous close, I think this should be left open for a while longer. While the vote numbers are clearly pointing one way, when taken with the context of previous discussion (and more apart from these) on what to do with stale drafts, it is clear that the closure will have to take the wider picture into account. Holding off for another 2 weeks, and having an uninvolved closure won't do any harm here. For reference, I would be happy to close this once discussion has come to a natural close, but as of now I don't think this has quite happened yet. Mdann52 (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Echio . Winged Blades Godric 03:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's probably far too early for this to close, however when we had some disagreement already in the attempted closure of this already, I wanted to get in on record that I want an independent admin (or a few) to close this RFC when the time comes. Hasteur (talk) 01:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)#
 * Completely agree with you here - as an early close has been discussed by some, I just wanted to register my opposition to this being closed "soon", and it wasn't commenting on the merits of the action of bringing it here. Mdann52 (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

The RfC template just expired and around a week has gone by without input from new commenters, so I would say the time has now come for this RfC to be closed. A note to potential closers that there are comments in some of the subsections for and against the proposal that did not make it into the main !vote thread, which should definitely be considered in the close. A2soup (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Counting stray votes per A2soup, there have been 8 more Supports and 7 more Opposes since this request to close was created. Added to the 42-12 on Aug 4 gives 50 Supports vs 19 Opposes = 72.5% Support (to my count anyway). Pretty clear consensus for G13 expansion to cover all Drafts space pages unedited in 6 months. User:Mdann52 is an ArbComm clerk that indicted a willingness to close. Legacypac (talk) 02:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Done by at 04:07 25 August 2017 Hasteur (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Ia Drang
An RfC there has been posted for quite a long time with a few comments. It has expired for twice. Can anybody close it? Ams&#38;CVA (talk) 01:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * It's an obvious no consensus.No points in closing. Winged Blades Godric 09:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done for posterity. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia
RFC over. Could someone provide a close? Casprings (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Algiers expedition (1541)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Algiers expedition (1541) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Archaeology of Israel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Archaeology of Israel ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * not done, but mostly because the end result has been tacitly approved and subsequently the article in question has been modified with no further issues. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Kombucha
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kombucha ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done— S Marshall T/C 12:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Whataboutism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Whataboutism ? Thanks. Eperoton (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done --Cerebellum (talk) 01:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Whataboutism
Would an uninvolved editor kindly assess consensus and provide guidance on closing the debate? Thanks. — JFG talk 16:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Cerebellum. --George Ho (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Alt-left
Consensus has reached result was No Consensus 38.96.9.224 (talk) 22:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done by --Aervanath (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Good_article_reassessment/The_Fine_Young_Capitalists/1
Can someone close this GAR? -- ForbiddenRocky (talk) 06:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by    Dr Strauss   talk   12:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
An uninvolved editor should close the discussion please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done, withdrawn and stayed. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 15:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , just a reminder to put |done=yes in the initiated template when closing an RfCl :)   Dr Strauss   talk   12:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , if you'll take a look at the discussion, it's not yet closed ;) Primefac (talk) 16:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * oops   Dr Strauss   talk   16:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Humanscale § Proposed merge with Niels Diffrient
. Requesting closure by an uninvolved user. North America1000 00:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Francis Schonken (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Dipra Dattasarma
Requesting review/closure of this SPI. CU results were posted on 3 August (5 days ago), and since then, 11 new SPA accounts have been created to disrupt the AFD process at Articles for deletion/RHAPSODY( Annual social of MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOLKATA). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * already done, I think. SPI is archived and the AFD is closed. Primefac (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2017 July
An uninvolved editor should close the move review please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 04:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by GoldenRing. --George Ho (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Congee § Proposed merge with Teochew porridge
Requesting closure by an uninvolved user. North America1000 19:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 16:15, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Uncaged, Vol. 1
Consensus has been reached to move the pages. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Kostas20142 (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Identitarian movement
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Identitarian movement ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , you still working on this? Primefac (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done by someone else -- slakr \ talk / 00:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- slakr \ talk / 00:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:/r/The Donald
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:/r/The Donald ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 01:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Portal talk:Current events
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Portal talk:Current events ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 01:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Can you please close the RFC as snow consensus against G14 and A12 --38.96.9.224 (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above request is non-neutral, so I'll say this more neutrally to fix this: "May an uninvolved editor close the whole discussion please? Thanks." --George Ho (talk) 06:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, --Any thoughts about closing this?Godric on Leave (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That's about as far away from a snow close as it gets without being an actual tie (it's about 55/45% numerically). But, I'll take a look at the arguments and see what sticks. Primefac (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done, though obviously not as the requester intended. :P -- slakr \ talk / 02:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Module talk:Middle East conflicts detailed map
A long overdue discussion concerning map colors of Syrian Civil War spillover in Lebanon in regard to the Middle East conflicts map.GreyShark (dibra) 14:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
This hasn't reached 30 days as of this posting, but will in three days. Listing it hear because its a relatively significant proposal so getting it closed in a timely manner is ideal. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * not done. Got archived without closure, though the consensus seems to be against the proposal. --George Ho (talk) 02:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive962
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess and close this discussion? Thanks, 153.230.106.79 (talk) 11:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Why? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * not done, as I see no need to formally close the thread. Primefac (talk) 03:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Just like Fire
Can someone delete this page so the page Just Like Fire can be moved to it, as the lowercase title is correct? CB19 (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please add to . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 15:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done many days ago by . Samsara 21:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 14
Stale discussion, no contributions after early April. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * done by User:Black Falcon. - Marcocapelle (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Infobox (2nd nomination)
Can be closed early by uninvolved admin due to agreement between nominator and creator for deletion as speedy Agathoclea (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done--Aervanath (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jose Antonio Vargas
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jose Antonio Vargas ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ned Kelly
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly Thank you David. moreno 72    12:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed with consensus to add one of the two images. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Francis Schonken (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
Main thread closed by Primefac so housekeeping close this discussion. (non-admin closure) Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC) This has long since ceased to be productive. Due to the contentious nature of the discussion, I request that three uninvolved admins publish a joint closing statement. I have been involved, but at this point, I no longer have an opinion on the outcome. I just want to see closure so we can all move on. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I would also like to see closure for this discussion, but may have been slightly involved. A question: by three, do you include yourself? Regards, Alex ShihTalk 04:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I should not be one of the three. My prior involvement with this debate disqualifies me.  But, I will take this opportunity to ping all the other admins reading this and ask them to consider stepping up.  The debate is still simmering.  It's not really even a debate any more, it's just the three main players continuing to snipe at each other.  -- RoySmith (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I predict no Administrator will close this and instead will roll off the page unless the enablers of the disruptive action continue to make patently false objections and arguments/proposals that would require jettisoning a great swath of current operating procedure. In short I look forward to an uninvolved user to start Arbitration proceedings or people let this roll off into archives so that it can be pointed at in 6 months as justification for AN not being able to resolve this issue. Hasteur (talk) 23:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I appear to have a very similar problem to this editor which has been going on even longer and would have been easily rectified by viewing provided diffs, new evidence, and new WP policy of AUG2017 today in DRV. In fact, User:RoySmith purposefully ignored my concerns closing the request and each policy mentioned would have been highly relevant to this discussion now. (in fairness to Roy I'm new to this process and it was sort of disorganized). I wish he could have understood the similarities in my case with this one. My drafts were in already in user space and there was no suggestion what-so-ever to compromise with the draft disrupting editor who nominated my draft as stale only 1.5 hours after my last edit.  Johnvr4 (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Johnvr4 your issue has nothing to do with the Taku problem and is nothing like it. I don't think we need a close now. All the abandoned drafts have been run through G13 and refunded (or the CSD tag removed) or have been theough MfD. The admin guidelines on CSD G13 are pretty clear that the second refund is questionable amd the third request unlikely to be granted. I don't expect there wil be much effort on these pages so will G13 them in 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 18:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Here is my take: it's related in a tangential sense that this is really a policy-question as opposed to a behavior-question and thus the AN is not a best venue for the discussion. I suspect that's one of the reasons the admits have difficulty closing the thread. I'm not starting an RfC and such since that will be interpreted as a disruption by the other side... -- Taku (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not supposed to be a situation with two sides. I think the thread is closed now. Legacypac (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Primefac. --George Ho (talk) 15:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jared Taylor
Would an experienced editor determine the consensus at this RfC? THE DIAZ talk • contribs 05:24, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:British Sri Lankans
Could an uninvolved editor take a look at Talk:British Sri Lankans? There was a reasonable amount of discussion, but most of it concerned a now-blocked editor, who created the page that the merge proposal concerns. Cordless Larry (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done----Discussion is too scarce. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit rusty with proposals for mergers, . Is there a formal relisting process, or a way to encourage more input? Cordless Larry (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --You could attribute the same rustiness to me too! But, as far as my knowledge goes, relists don't happen in mergers etc. and it's just better to advertise the disc. at rel. noticeboards, projects, t/p of top contributors without violating WP:CANVASS.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks - have done. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
An uninvolved editor should close this discussion please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * -- Winged Blades Godric 09:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Godric. --George Ho (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines
Guideline change proposal that has gone nowhere but an ever-growing morass of argument about side topics, and circular ones about the original topic. There's clearly no consensus, nor could one conceivably emerge from this, so it should just be closed as unproductive (I would NAC close it myself, but commented in it). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  08:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * not done--This has already ceased for good and has now gave way to a RFC on the issue.Happy consensus-building! . Winged Blades Godric 07:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard
The process at DR has stalled without prospect of resolution, with the moderator having recused themself as a result of representations by the OP at this page. The matter has been extensively discussed and reasonably notified, as evidenced in the thread. I submit that the matter has been sufficiently debated to determine a consensus but the matter requires an independent adjudication to make a close. It is my belief that to protract this matter further would cause unnecessary disruption without any commensurate benefit in preserving natural justice. This course has been suggested at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Accordingly, I request that an uninvolved editor provide a close wrt the substantive issue - whether it is appropriate to mention in a ship's article the response of a state (the PRC) to FONOPS. I am notifying this request at DR. Cinderella157 (talk) 14:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --In my powers as a DRN volunteer and per Robert's proposal of shifting volunteer-responsibility, I could technically close this or continue the discussion.Just give me some time to go through the entire content etc.. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussions at DRN do not normally get formal closure here. However, I would suggest that this be treated as a request for administrative attention because one of the editors doesn't like the consensus that has been reached.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * @ Winged Blades of Godric and @Robert McClenon, this discussion is continuing at Talk:USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) and the admin, Buckshot06 has taken an interest in resolving the matter. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done in my capacity as a DRN volunteer.Some t/p disc. seems to be goingNo comments/actions about them. Winged Blades Godric 07:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Mosul (2016–17)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Mosul (2016–17) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--Typical scarce disc. and a no consensus.A relist can be sought. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 22
— Page creator has voted to delete; redirect now qualifies for G7 speedy deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done by . Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Zoë Quinn
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Zoë Quinn ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Closed as feminine pronouns. Snuge purveyor (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not] ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Closed as no consensus for inclusion with detailed analysis. Snuge purveyor (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Restoring this from archives as it has been unarchived and someone has requested a formal closure of it. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Closed as unsuccessful. Biblio (talk) 20:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Family Guy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Family Guy ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done Tazerdadog (talk) 04:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Cold War II
An uninvolved editor should close this discussion please. Thanks. George Ho (talk) 21:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 23:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Arabs
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess and close this discussion? It has been going on for months and was apparently marred by some canvassing. The discussion has also hit a standstill, and an administrator has just indicated that there is no clear denouement. Thanks. Soupforone (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 23:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox philosopher
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox philosopher ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  21:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Badme
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Badme ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done TonyBallioni (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Right of return
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Right of return ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done TonyBallioni (talk) 22:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 111
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 111 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- slakr \ talk / 01:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:0.999.../Archive 19
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:0.999.../Archive 19 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 01:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Page mover
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Page mover ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- slakr \ talk / 02:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 141
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 141 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 08:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Harry Lauder
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Harry Lauder? ? Thank you. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 04:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done Primefac (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 67
WP:FORUMSHOP – started less than 24 hours after opening discussion on article talk page. User who started discussion has not shown good-faith effort to build consensus on the article talk page (Talk:Linda Sarsour), or to understand the relevant parts of WP:BLP. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion has been archived. Waiting for initiated date as well. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Not done This discussion requires no closure. It's been archived, the OP has left the project, and the related talkpage discussion is now two archives back. Snuge purveyor (talk) 00:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)
Request an uninvolved editor to close this discussion, having 30 days passed and no recent discussion. -- Whats new?(talk) 00:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done TonyBallioni (talk) 00:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ariana Grande discography
Requesting an uninvolved editor to look at this discussion involving a dispute of whether a particular song should be classified as a single. A user initiated a RfC on September 8th, but withdrew it on September 11th; the user then initiated a WP:3O, which was responded to (Although recent discussion has been under the RfC heading, the official RfC request was withdrawn). (I would close this myself, but I commented on the request, though I didn't opine one way or the other.) At the moment, it appears that there is currently only one user holding out; I believe it would be helpful for the discussion to be formally closed to keep it from dragging on unnecessarily. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --The entire sequence of events makes a closure difficult. Winged Blades Godric 07:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. A formal closure may not have been the most proper action, but the outcome was clear-cut and the closure should assist in preventing future disruption. Ways forward are identified. Snuge purveyor (talk) 22:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Westworld (TV series)
Would an uninvolved administrator please close this discussion, ? Thank you. -- (Radiphus ) 01:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Mz7 (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alt-left
A recent deletion nomination for the article Alt-left was closed as no consensus. During the discussions a consensus of editors was formed to begin a merge discussion if the AFD concluded as "No consensus", which it did. Because of the controversial nature of both the article and the dispute, a request is being made for an admin to close this discussion when the duration of the proposal has ended. The rationale of the proposal is strictly the formed consensus and is why the question is left as a simple question to merge or not (there is no policy or guideline to adhere to that requires a fuller, or more detailed rationale). There is no 30 day discussion period required and may be closed when a consensus has been reached.--Mark Miller (talk) 04:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by Winged Blades of Godric . Alsee (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 10
— already relisted, time to close this. Frietjes (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by Primefac. Nihlus 19:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 15
— open for over two weeks. Frietjes (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by Primefac. Nihlus 19:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 66
An article is currently under full protection due to the edit war that spawned this discussion. I suspect it would be helpful to give this some official closure. Many thanks. Samsara 12:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I was tangentially involved in a consequent incident.Withdrawing; Winged Blades Godric 07:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Citing sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades Godric 10:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Ncfriend (talk) 03:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed Done tag. I have commented here. Cunard (talk) 05:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Nihlus 08:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:State atheism
Second trainwreck of a pseudo-RfC back-to-back on the same day and page by same author. Does not ask a clear question, consists of one-sided PoV pushing (in a WP:NOT / WP:TRUTH / WP:GREATWRONGS vein). This should be shut down like the last one. If there's an issue to RfC here, it should be posed by a neutral third party who's actually read WP:RFC. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  22:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * First trainwreck, I think. I already the second one, which was subsequently removed. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm the author of the first trainwreck. My intention was to open a policy-inquiry-commentary (not any POV - I had a hard time deciding which policy to forward for the RfC, thus my citing them all, which may come across as that), but it became a content-dispute. There are problems with that article, so if you're going to close the RfC, please preserve its discussion if you can. Thank you.  THE PROMENADER  ✎ ✓  15:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Article needs work, but topic is legit. Snuge purveyor (talk) 11:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Lindy West
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lindy West ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Closed by Tazerdadog on 27 September 2017. --GRuban (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)
Conversation has died down. If someone could close this when the time comes, it would be appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Primefac. Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Mansplaining
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mansplaining ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done Both proposed wordings were opposed. Criticism section needs a rewrite first. Snuge purveyor (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:CJIL-DT
Need an editor to access merger proposal. Thank you. Anniethiessen (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * not done This was never a WP:RFC. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 14
-- Tavix ( talk ) 01:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Thryduulf. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 14
-- Tavix ( talk ) 01:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Steel1943. -- Tavix ( talk ) 16:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Plasma (physics)
I have closed this discussion for the reason that the instigator posed an invalid question easily failing to meet the stated WP:RFC guidelines. They also did not follow any reasonable attempt to work out the dispute beforehand, and used WP:Retired (then negating it) even before the Rfc was completed. I.e. Please confirm this particular action is valid. Arianewiki1 (talk) 02:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I request some assistence with this WP:RFC as my closure has been reverted by User:VQuakr here claiming "Rv out of process closure." My response to this is here. & . Thanking for any assistance. Arianewiki1 (talk) 05:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done. opened a new, better-formulated RfC on the same topic on 11 October. Snuge purveyor (talk) 01:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alternative for Germany
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alternative for Germany ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Clear consensus for "German nationalism". Snuge purveyor (talk) 00:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump's Real Estate Tycoon
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Donald Trump's Real Estate Tycoon ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done f eminist 16:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 30
— open for over three weeks. Frietjes (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * today by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by . Snuge purveyor (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Uma Thurman
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Uma Thurman ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Done. Closed as: include a rewritten version of the paragraph in question. Snuge purveyor (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Syrian Civil War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syrian Civil War ? Please consider the earlier discussions Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War and Talk:Syrian Civil War/Archive 45 in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Seraphim System. --George Ho (talk) 00:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Nazism sidebar
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Nazism sidebar ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by User:Seraphim System. f eminist 03:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 24
-- Tavix ( talk ) 01:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done f eminist 03:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Days_of_the_year
A discussion about whether Days of the Year pages are exempt from needing references has gone stale. Discussion but RFC tag not applied until RFC properly. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Done agt x  15:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2017 August
An uninvolved editor should close a couple ongoing discussions please. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Move review/Log/2017 August has been dormant for more than one week. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I have closed one of these. One is left to close. bd2412  T 19:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done--The lone remaining discussion has been closed by me. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin
Could somebody uninvolved close this discussion, please? Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 07:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * already done,by . --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber/Archive 3 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done with a note and a link on the current talk page. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3#Jeff Sessions/DACA
Assessment needed on whether information not provided in source material may be included in the Trump presidency timeline. Thanks again. Cpaaoi (talk) 23:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done as "exclude" --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox writer
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox writer ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 23:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

====Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections==== Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   18:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:H. L. Hunley (submarine)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:H. L. Hunley (submarine) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Closed as no consensus.- MrX 23:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Moors
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Moors ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Closed as consensus for version #2.- MrX 23:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of Confederate monuments and memorials
Would an experienced editor please assess the discussion at Talk:List of Confederate monuments and memorials? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   19:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:List of Liberty University people
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Liberty University people ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 05:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Algerian War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Algerian War ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 4
See also Lists of ancient doctors directly below it. -- Tavix ( talk ) 01:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- Tavix ( talk ) 01:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Plimpton 322/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Plimpton 322/Archive 1 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as consensus to omit reporting the article.- MrX 12:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (events)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Notability (events) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 18:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Unreferenced
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Unreferenced ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Recent years
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Recent years The discussion is going nowhere at this point an a fairly clear consensus appears to have developed. ? Thanks, Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not done--I would prefer to stay it open, at least for the minimum stipulated time. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 05:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Meg Patterson
Unclear consensus, differing policy interpretations. G M G <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk   18:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Nihlus  19:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tensor product of representations (2nd nomination)
Please can someone come to MfD and put this out of its misery. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This has already been relisted once and discussion has died down quite extensively. Draft page's author has been topic banned and even during the time of the entire MFD, we have zero improvements anywhere. Please close this now so that we can move forward. Hasteur (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done by . Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 17
Seems to be a consensus to disambiguate. Can someone come and make the closure? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 00:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done.Will dis-ambiguate, once I get some time. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 17
Already been relisted once and discussion has died since. There appears to be a consensus to keep the redirect. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 00:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done.But diferent result. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Template_talk:Infobox_World_Heritage_Site
Please can someone neutral have a look at this. It has been closed four times by the same person, most recently yesterday and today, but reverted each time due to neutrality issues. It needs someone completely uninvolved to resolve it. Also see Administrators'_noticeboard. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done  Winged Blades of Godric On leave 10:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Δ/2017 Advisory RFC
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Δ/2017 Advisory RFC ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Do we even need a close on this, ? This RfC is advisory for the Arbitration Committee, so they'll have to sort through the arguments for and against if they wish to be "advised". There's no "outcome" to such an RfC. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 09:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Per this, Arbcom will formally take the RFC content into consideration when the ban appeal proceeds. Just flagging that as it seems relevant to the wording of any close. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * close Paul August &#9742; 21:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (technical)
Not a month old yet, but unanimously supported and uncontroversial change. Jc86035 (talk) 10:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done As you wish:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Catalan supremacism
A particularly egregious article. If it is to be deleted, it should be done as soon as possible. The discussion has been open for seven days and there is a clear consensus. Scolaire (talk) 13:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done by . Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Islamization of East Jerusalem under Jordanian occupation
Discussion, with latest comment added in May 2017. Seems like sufficient voting is done, but to be concluded by a neutral party.GreyShark (dibra) 08:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Needs an uninvolved editor (or two) to close the discussion. --George Ho (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * not doneHmm...Trends are pretty clear and a closure is most likely to not serve any purpose.Somewhere, a vote-count per proposal could be maintained:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Narendra Modi/1
Discussion has finally died down on this rather contentious debate. Needs a closure and a verdict -Force Radical (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done-To say in your words, verdict given but a detailed rationale is to be posted very soon. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive967
Discussion here has stopped, so could someone please close the discussion? ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 15:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Paul August &#9742; 21:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Marking as done by Oshwah. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa
Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa is ready to close. Please determine conesnsus. Thanks! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines
WP:SNOWBALL support, from the first day, and hasn't changed since then. I say that as someone who opposed. This one really is open and shut, though what it's in favor of is less clear, as the RfC question is vague/general, not about specific wording. .  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  21:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines was closed. Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines still needs to be closed. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Nihlus  00:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Pride (2014 film)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Pride (2014 film) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 17:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 02:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Username policy
— xaosflux  Talk 15:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, already asked it at Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Mz7 (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 18
-- Tavix ( talk ) 01:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Somebody with a mop bring it out of it's misery. Or do a 5th relist:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

done - closed as retarget.--Aervanath (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Sex characteristics
Recently expired. Discussion includes move suggestions as well, but moves are handled via WP:Requested move. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done I'm afraid I read the discussion as clearly in favor of a rename; you are quite right that could be done via wp:requested move, but wp:buro. Even if there is a better potential name, I'm guessing even this temporary disambiguation is at least some improvement. --GRuban (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Laffer curve
This discussion has gone on now since mid-August and should be closed by a neutral party. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)/Archive 1 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   21:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ridgefield,_Washington
Early review requested: RfC initiator contacted me on my TP to close this, as they wish to withdraw that RfC which a sizable majority opposes. However, there is some discussion about alternatives (see in particular K.e.coffman's suggestion and the replies), so it is not obvious that it can be withdrawn. I believe, but am not sure, that it qualifies for a speedy close, and I think it is improper for me to close it (per the spirit of CANVASS, since the RfC initiator contacted me directly, I am somewhat involved even if I offered no view on the RfC). If someone could look at it and either close it early or leave a note saying why it should not be closed early, it would be great. Tigraan <span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me 12:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * --Ask Gilmore to pull it off by removing the RFC tag.He's the best person to do it. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 03:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * well, my point was precisely to avoid that someone involved close the thing. But I am going to assume you looked at it, saw nothing sketchy with closing, and close it myself. Tigraan <span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me 08:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done (non-admin closure) Tigraan <span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me 08:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Move_review/Log/2017_November
Please disposition Move_review/Log/2017_November, which has now been open for more than one week. Users have indicated that they would like this to be dispositioned soon. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done by . Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
A long overdue discussion on a sensitive topic, which should be closed by a neutral party. Thanks.GreyShark (dibra) 11:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Just in case: . --George Ho (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ~Awilley (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinged Awilley; still working, hopefully will close soon. --GRuban (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Sorry about the delay. ~Awilley (talk) 04:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bee Gees
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bee Gees ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed. I don't see a consensus one way or the other, so we retain the status quo. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Historicity of Jesus
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Historicity of Jesus ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Old Norse religion
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Old Norse religion ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 24
-- Tavix ( talk ) 16:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done by User:BDD at 21:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC). Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber/Archive 3 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Closed. Consensus is "No" on the main question.  -- Jayron <b style="color:#090">32</b> 12:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Adding tag so ClueBot will archive since it hasn't for some reason. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Hentai
In one way or another the overall discussion has been open since 6 September 2017 (Talk:Hentai). Since then the RfC has gone wildly off topic with an unclear discussion focus. I am suggesting a close as this is a mess. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I would hope I dont have to point this out to anyone uninvolved in this dispute, but this RfC obviously hasn't reached anywhere near its expiry date and shouldn't be closed. I posted an RfC because I wanted outside opinion on this issue. That there was an earlier discussion between the same few usual suspects on an article is neither here nor there, because the point was to get some fresh opinions in. This is the reason RfCs exist in the first place, and I would hope this would be self evident to an editor as experienced and established as Knowledgekid. :) Brustopher (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Well requesting a closure now isnt going to hurt as there havent been any "fresh" opinions. The latest replies are going into Wikiprojects, and the like. Im not even sure what we are discussing anymore as things are now at status quo with no infobox at the top of the page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done Nihlus  23:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Political prisoners in Spain
A solid consensus has formed around an alternative to deletion. Contributors on both sides are calling for a close. Discussion has stopped, and there has been no new contributor for four days. Scolaire (talk) 12:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Vaccine
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vaccine ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done Ncfriend (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed Already done tag. I have commented here. Cunard (talk) 05:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done, but what a train wreck. There was no consensus for the merge, but the merge was done anyway, and 2 months have passed since, so undoing the merge is going to be an effort. I'll do it if no one else steps up, but this isn't really my area, so anyone who really does know about medicine or its history and wants to put in the work, please say so on the article talk page, or I might make bit of a mess. --GRuban (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:David Ferrie
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David Ferrie ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox television channel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox television channel ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bipolar disorder
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bipolar disorder ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

====Raiders of the Lost Ark - the greatest and most outstanding film in the history of human beings?==== A quick glance at the lower end of the discussion shows that the issue has been resolved and all three involved editors have agreed on a stable version. In order to prevent other editors wondering what's going on can it be closed?

Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 17:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Plasma_(physics)
Expired RfC about the wording of the lead. Not much discussion going on right now. Tigraan <span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me 13:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017_Lower_Manhattan_attack
Please disposition Talk:2017_Lower_Manhattan_attack. I cannot close this due to WP:INVOLVED. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Winged Blades Godric  15:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Democrat Party (epithet)
Expired RfC. Consensus seems pretty clear, but I anticipate that one contributor in particular will fail to get the point. A closing summary world be helpful. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * close by (diff). —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Linda Sarsour
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Linda Sarsour ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the correction. I meant to remove the "Request for comment: San Bernardino attack" close request instead of the "Yiannopoulos and Geller at rally" close request when I saw that the former was on WP:ANRFC already. I've fixed the link from Talk:Linda Sarsour to Talk:Linda Sarsour. Cunard (talk) 08:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure a close is necessary, since that request has already been withdrawn (diff). It should be archived shortly by bot. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Yes, the RfC has been resolved. I have closed it and summarized the consensus and outcome. Cunard (talk) 18:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Manny Pacquiao
RFC expired with unclear consensus. 80.235.147.186 (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hobit (talk) 05:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC) done Closed. There is a box-in-a-box error I can't figure out so the formatting is off. Hobit (talk) 05:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There was an unmatched template. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Birth date and age
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Birth date and age ? Thanks.--Nev&eacute;–selbert 19:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * lots of suggestions, none in agreement. Snuge purveyor (talk) 00:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Relist has expired. It seems like there is a consensus that, while there should be no new parameters, that the proposed functions should be performed automatically (without the need for parameters).--Nev&eacute;–selbert 17:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains
Largely clear consensus; Legobot has removed the RfC template. Jc86035 (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

done ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Roy Moore sexual abuse allegations
-- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done - closed as keep by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Consensus is rough on this discussion that involves some of Wikipedia's core policies. — Sunnya343&#9992; (háblame • my work) 16:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 16:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3
Assessment required on the views expressed on the legitimacy of an entry concerning reportage on the Trump presidency. Many thanks. Cpaaoi (talk) 23:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3
Assessment needed on views concerning the inclusion of a list of diners in the Trump presidency timeline. Thanks again. Cpaaoi (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:The Orville
To put it bluntly, this RfC is flawed at best. The OP came to the talk page 10 days ago asking where content should be placed and when told that it isn't appropriate he wasn't heard from until today. It appears he has just added an RfC tag to his response expecting that was sufficient to create an RfC, which it isn't. Per Requests for comment, the RfC statement should be neutral and brief. It is neither neither neutral nor brief and lacks focus. The OP hasn't really explained what he expects from participants so I don't see any useful outcome from the RfC. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 19:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * not done It looks like the RFC template has already been removed and with a general consensus there isn't much more to do. Primefac (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber
The RfC expired before closure. I have reopened it and request closure. James J. Lambden (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * James J. Lambden, it's natural for RfCs to expire before a close. They are supposed to run their course and then be closed (usually anyway). Re-opening them with a fresh time stamp causes the RfC to start all over again. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * done; technically ended up at Talk:Google%27s_Ideological_Echo_Chamber/Archive_4 -- slakr \ talk / 06:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3
Assessment needed on views concerning whether or not only the specific actions and statements of the Trump presidency may be included on the presidency timeline. Thanks again. Cpaaoi (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 07:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3#Duplication
Assessment needed on views concerning whether or not information is eligible for exclusion from the Trump presidency timeline for the given reason that the particular information is also included on other pages. Thanks again. Cpaaoi (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 07:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * already done The proposal has been withdrawn and relaunched. <b style="color:#F60;font-family:Times New Roman">Sunrise</b> <i style="font-size:11px">(talk)</i> 03:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Dismissal of James Comey and Talk:Dismissal of James Comey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dismissal of James Comey and Talk:Dismissal of James Comey ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 09:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ducati Monster
The bot is trying to close the door so this one must be about done. Please assess consensus and close Talk:Ducati Monster. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Legobot is not "trying to close the door", it is removing the template because more than thirty days have elapsed since you started the RfC. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. Either way. It's about time it was closed. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 8
One of the discussants specifically suggests an outside admin (who is not regularly at CfD) to close this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Catalan Racism
This was relisted on 18 November 2017. Since then a clear consensus has emerged. Discussion has degenerated into prolonged bickering that threatens to boil over. Scolaire (talk) 10:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 31
related to 8 October discussion on top of this section and related to the three discussions below. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 31
related to 8 October discussion on top and related to discussions immediately above and 2 below. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 31
related to 8 October discussion on top and related to both discussions immediately above and one below. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 31
related to 8 October discussion on top and related to three discussions immediately above. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 9 discussion/survey close request
A long discussion has accompanied a slow-motion revert war over the inclusion of a journalist's cited views, which may be UNDUE. The talk thread is at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 9 and resumed here Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 11. Could an Admin please review and close these discussions so as to settle whether there is consensus to include the comments of Mr. Goodin in the article? Thank you. SPECIFICO talk  00:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandstein (talk • contribs) 09:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons
This discussion has been active for just over a week, although given the amount of feedback I don't feel it's necessary to let the whole thing drag out. It seems like there is a growing consensus in favour of going by a case-by-case basis regarding whether to refer to BLP politicians as statesman. There also seems to be some agreement that the term should (if used) be backed up by reliable sources, preferably inline citations. Would an admin please review the discussion and gauge the consensus? Thanks.--Nev&eacute;–selbert 15:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   09:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not closed, Sandstein. George Ho (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Odd. My edit seems to not have been saved. It's closed now.  Sandstein   11:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Family Guy
Contentious issue requires close by uninvolved editor. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 02:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done by  Winged Blades Godric  14:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)
Please disposition Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(music). I cannot close this due to WP:INVOLVED. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done- Winged Blades Godric  14:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Source (game engine)
This proposed merge has consensus, but the discussion has yet to be closed. I'm requesting that the appropriate actions, including closing and merging the content, takes place. D ARTH B OTTO talk • cont 23:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Winged Blades Godric  14:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One
Could an experienced editor or administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One. Thanks, Tvx1 12:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Is anyone going to take a look at this?Tvx1 18:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:T-Mobile Arena
Since new replies have long-since stopped, could an experienced editor please read through the pertinent arguments and close Talk:T-Mobile Arena ? Note that the discussion actually started just above at the Talk:T-Mobile Arena heading and continued at the formal RFC. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Nihlus  10:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 20
-- Tavix ( talk ) 14:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 11:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 6
-- Tavix ( talk ) 14:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 12:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bukhara
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Bukhara ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 08:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Video game reviews
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Video game reviews ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 07:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:University of Notre Dame
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:University of Notre Dame ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- slakr \ talk / 07:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 6
-- Tavix ( talk ) 14:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Relisted by someone else -- slakr \ talk / 07:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 227
Where do we stand on accepting or rejecting bach-cantatas.com as a source for Wikipedia content? . --Francis Schonken (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 07:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
An uninvolved editor (or two if necessary) should close this discussion. George Ho (talk) 11:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Looking:) Winged Blades Godric 14:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Discussion on the inclusion of Cordelia Fine and Gina Rippon to nav box
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Evolutionary psychology ? Thanks, --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Not doneNothing to assess.And t/p discussions are rarely closed except in RFCs or multi-party discussion. Winged Blades Godric 13:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Catalan Republic (2017)
An uninvolved editor is needed to close the discussion, which has grown stale. George Ho (talk) 08:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * already done per Articles for deletion/Catalan Republic (2017) (3rd nomination). George Ho (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:First Battle of Passchendaele
An RfC on the appropriate default units of measurement for a battle in the First World War. Most substantive discussion ended quickly and subsequent commentary was mainly acrimonious in nature. Has been stalled for more than two weeks, with no new additions. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Already done by Cunard. <b style="color: #0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color: green;">Talk page</b> 21:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Should the Reference Desks be closed

 * Main discussion has reached it's natural conclusion, no substantive comments have been made in almost 2 weeks. -- Jayron <b style="color:#090">32</b> 12:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging, for his opinions, since he relisted the entire discussion. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 07:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Just making a note that there are additional calls to close. It has been ANOTHER 2 weeks, and there still has been no substantive discussion on the topic at hand; only occasional comments that the discussion has ended and needs resolution from an uninvolved admin.  -- Jayron <b style="color:#090">32</b> 14:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I noticed that Legobot has already removed the RfC template, so I think it should be time to properly close the discussion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm going to work on closing this. Any of you want to join in? I would like to have multiple people to close this with given its size. Thanks.  Nihlus  00:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You can re-request a multi-editor closure at plain, regular WP:AN if you wish, Nihlus. George Ho (talk) 02:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , I would like to, but the coming week is very difficult for me in terms of the time, so I will skip this time.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thinking.Likely to not participate but not sure:) Winged Blades Godric 14:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * And given how controversial- not to say acrimonious- the topic and its debate have been, can we assume multiple administrator involvement in the close too, please. Serial  Number  54129 15:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I haven't extensively reviewed it (I more haunt the stuff that turns red on here, and it looks like there are people already willing to help out on this one), but at first glance it looks like there's probably not consensus in favor of the proposal. Might need to review the numbers (admittedly vote-y, but sorta necessary on big ones like this), but it also doesn't look like there's clear consensus against it, either (which means there's at least a significant sentiment of imperfection), so it looks like it's more down to summarizing the main points everyone made for/against and possibly pointing them in the direction of possibilities for future RFCs to address whatever their main concerns have been.  Incidentally, it does seem a bit weird to me that this is kind of like an XfD of sorts, yet there doesn't seem to be any sort of XfD-like header on the pages in question, which might have skewed the results(?).  Probably not that huge of a deal given the volume of input (besides, it looks to have been on CENT as of at least this revision) but it still seems somewhat odd to me given the usual way proposed things are tagged. *shrug* anyway... :P -- slakr  \ talk / 02:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually in terms of vote count, it was around 2-to-1 for opposing vs supporting closure. In addition, early on in the discussion, all the reference desks had a red notice on top informing users about the discussion (which is actually how I became aware of it), but they were removed around the time discussion stagnated (so maybe a few weeks in). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Done I went ahead & closed it, per the suggested outcome I had made a few weeks ago. While I likely made a mistake somewhere in doing that, the discussion is in a terminal coma & clearly needed to be put out of its misery. FWIW, I expect the subject of closing the Reference Desks to be raised again, & my closing should not be interpreted as preventing that. -- llywrch (talk) 07:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Sven Hassel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sven Hassel ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains
Getting on for a month old, and there hasn't been any new discussion for a couple of weeks. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor asses the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains?--Cúchullain t/ c 16:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed with consensus for Option D: Use Xxx railway station (Location) for all stations. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Linda Sarsour
Expired RfC. Special attention may be needed on the issue of "sourced/verifiable" vs. "significant part of reliable source coverage". —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Catalan Republic (2017)
An uninvolved editor should close this discussion please. Thanks. George Ho (talk) 04:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * not done. Withdrawing request as the article was merged into Catalan declaration of independence. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy). I agree with George Ho at Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 24 that a close would be useful to summarize how the community views WP:NOTNEWS. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done as best as I could. :P -- slakr \ talk / 13:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. <b style="color:#F60;font-family:Times New Roman">Sunrise</b> <i style="font-size:11px">(talk)</i> 16:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Antisemitism in the United Kingdom
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antisemitism in the United Kingdom ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)


 * done. Deryck C. 18:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 196
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 196 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * not done. This one is an actual request for comments (how ironic) and is not designed to require closure by an uninvolved administrator. Deryck C. 10:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Lyrics and poetry
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Lyrics and poetry ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Citing sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Brustopher (talk) 14:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jadwiga of Poland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jadwiga of Poland ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Brustopher (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Roman Polanski
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Roman Polanski ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done--Brustopher (talk) 10:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Turkey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Turkey ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jianianhualong
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jianianhualong ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * not done. The RfC is not designed to require closure by an uninvolved administrator. Deryck C. 10:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Hore
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Peter Hore ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Danica Roem
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Danica Roem ? Thanks, MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It does not appear to me a consensus will be reached, which is disappointing. It would be better to have an outsider make the call. -- MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This discussion, with WP:BLP implications, has stalled with very unclear consensus; !votes are about evenly split. Administrative assistance would be appreciated. Original question has moderately biased wording, but still spurred extensive discussion on the core issue, and the core issue is one that's important to the article. Jhugh95 (talk) 08:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Retracted; didn't realize it had already been requested here earlier in the process. Not sure what template to use here so the bot cleans it up, sorry. Jhugh95 (talk) 08:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merged duplicate sections. Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * DoneBrustopher (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Shooting of Daniel Shaver

 * Please disposition Talk:Shooting of Daniel Shaver. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by bd2412. Cunard (talk) 09:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Emily Beecham
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emily Beecham and close the RFC please ? (FWIW I think consensus in the discussion is obvious however as I've !voted and have made my objections in the past I'd rather someone not related to the discussion closes it), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by davey. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Rihanna
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rihanna ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Marriage
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Marriage ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Please access and close. --RAN (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Needs closure from uninvolved editor. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 16:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains
Legobot has removed the RfC template. Jc86035 (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Summarising the crux will be difficult and IMO, a read through each and evry argument will be much better for interested parties in future. Winged Blades Godric 14:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done at -- slakr  \ talk / 15:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Disk storage
Can an uninvolved editor please close this discussion. Thanks. --A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III(talk) 15:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 18:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done at -- slakr  \ talk / 17:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Metric
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Metric ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Did not really need a close, as the result is obvious, but done. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox element
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox element ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 19:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:New Israel Fund
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New Israel Fund ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done -- slakr \ talk / 19:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Recent years
Would an uninvolved editor kindly assess consensus and close this debate? — JFG talk 12:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 17:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alex Jones (radio host)
This has been going on for weeks, with an overwhelming consensus and a very small number of editors opposing the consensus continuing to beat the horse. It needs to be shut down. I'd have closed it myself except I !voted. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  17:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 17:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Village Pump (proposals)
Could an experienced editor or administrator please assess the consensus at Village Pump (proposals)? The proposal itself is moot at this point (and as such the discussion no longer needs to be open) but it would still be nice to get some closure on this in case something like this happens in the future. Sky Warrior  18:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * not done No need.If this comes up yet again, we will see yet again. Winged Blades Godric 16:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking
Would an experienced editor assess consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking? NPalgan2 (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 00:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Bannon
Voting took place, remains to assess consensus and close. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 02:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done--Brustopher (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Bannon
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Steve Bannon ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by - duplicate of above. Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Limes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Limes ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't... what? I'm lost on this one. I tried reading it a couple of times over several days, but I still leave scratching my head as to what's actually being discussed, craving some sort of alcoholic beverage with a lime in it&mdash;yet I'm entirely aware that's the wrong reaction and not even the right subject. :P -- slakr \ talk / 19:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done, though I doubt it's a particularly helpful closure. Huon (talk) 21:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: I've had to de-archive this discussion so that it can be properly closed. The closure should be simple, judging by the Survey section. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * close --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 21:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Julie Payette
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Julie Payette ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 23:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers Many Thanks...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing this RfC would potentially affect over 15,000 different articles. In the circumstances it's appropriate to leave things running a bit longer and get more input/generate more discussion. Brustopher (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done for archival. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive971
This topic ban proposal concerning was allowed to archive without administrative action despite universal consensus from 9 editors that a topic ban should be enacted. Requesting closure and/or sanction per consensus. Cjhard (talk) 13:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Aervanath Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Turkey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Turkey ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   13:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   13:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   13:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Done Alsee (talk) 03:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Julian day
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Julian day ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC here and close this debate. tahc chat 21:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 11:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales
An uninvolved editor is requested to close the RfC at the above link with an assessment of all the concerns and arguments pertaining to mention in the article lede of Prince Charles' status as heir. -- ₪   MIESIANIACAL  22:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * already done by Seraphim System. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Blake Shelton
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Blake Shelton ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Godzilla
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Godzilla ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Emily Thornberry
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Emily Thornberry ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 29
-- Tavix ( talk ) 21:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Ooh I was just going to list this here - you bet me to it :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 29
-- Tavix ( talk ) 21:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done by the proposer! Winged Blades Godric 14:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Poutine
A discussion which had been very active for a few days (including a very long section above the "new" RfC) but on which nobody has commented since 1 December. Although this involves possibly sensitive cultural issues it should be a simple close for any experienced closer (not necessarily admin). Cheers, Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The previous RfC is 35000 words long...that's almost a novel. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Winged Blades Godric 14:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
, with 12 users voting and discussing; the last comment was made on November 12th. Request closure from a neutral administrator.GreyShark (dibra) 07:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note - another comment was added in the discussion on November 27th.GreyShark (dibra) 16:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Star_Wars:_The_Last_Jedi ? Thanks, AfD hero (talk) 00:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)
Any chance someone could assess whether there is consensus to change the guideline to allow "telenovela" as a disambiguation term for certain types of TV series? -- wooden superman  10:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged blades of godric did done it. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Linda Sarsour
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Linda Sarsour ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 13:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:First-move_advantage_in_chess
This and the related discussions Talk:First-move_advantage_in_chess and Talk:First-move_advantage_in_chess need to be closed by a neutral party. 222.153.250.135 (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC) withdrawn following SPI222.153.250.135 (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * close by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Prime_Minister_of_the_United_Kingdom
RfC is no longer needed as new sources available answer the question at hand. ChieftanTartarus (talk) 09:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Ok so then you just remove the rfc tag. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:British Jews
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:British Jews ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done by Dennis Brown. Thank you for the close! Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Succession to the British throne
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Succession to the British throne ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Done Esquivalience (talk) 04:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Arrowverse
RfC recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2017 Washington train derailment
Please disposition Talk:2017 Washington train derailment. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "disposition"? Makes no sense to me. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, please assess the consensus and close. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's a strange use of "disposition" then. Not really moving things about at all. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jax 0677 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

====Talk:Richard Blumenthal and Talk:Richard Blumenthal==== Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Richard Blumenthal and Talk:Richard Blumenthal ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This should be easier to close now, due to an additional !vote for the majority. Alsee (talk) 03:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed with consensus for coverage in the U.S. Senate - 2010 election section. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Patriot Prayer
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at this RFC, thanks Darkness Shines (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done. --GRuban (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:One America News Network
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:One America News Network }}? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as there is no consensus for inclusion of the questioned text in the lead. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:June 2017 Brussels attack
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:June 2017 Brussels attack ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as the disputed text does not have consensus for inclusion as originally quoted. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * just want to point out that putting nac etc is unecessary for RfCs. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , while not required (so far as I know), i think it is good practice nonetheless. Thanks. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of areas of London
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of areas of London ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * not done better to just read the discussion, Huskion just got the feedback he wanted. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Benito Mussolini/Archive 4
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Benito Mussolini/Archive 4 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Robert E. Lee
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert E. Lee ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 16
"Procedural close" suggested at Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 16. Batternut (talk)
 * Not done No reason to close something that was opened yesterday. Nihlus  14:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * procedural/it'd be better to discuss later closes are a thing.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm aware, and this is not a case for it. Nihlus  14:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hmm..This definitely does not qualify for a speedy close by any margin of discretion.And, as a rule of thumb, Wikidata-related things usually never qualifies!:) Winged Blades Godric 16:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Mostly that there's also an RfC going on and so it is somewhat redundant. I know it is controversial.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Memoirs_of_a_Murderer_(album)
Please assess the consensus and close Talk:Memoirs_of_a_Murderer_(album). --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * not done kinda, no reason to put this here as it will get closed within a reasonable time as it is listed at WP:RM; relisted by TonyBallioni 2 days ago. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 *  Reply - Not done yet, please leave this notice in place until the discussion is resolved. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It'll get resolved eventually (in reasonable time) being an request move listed on WP:RM.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion_review/Log/2018_January_4
Please assess the consensus and close Deletion_review/Log/2018 January 4. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)