Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 25

Talk:Hair's breadth
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hair's breadth ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One
Could an experienced editor or administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One Thanks, Tvx1 17:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Is anyone going to take a look a this?Tvx1 16:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you feel the consensus is for the change (or is obvious), there doesn't have to be a formal closure; you can just do the change. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I prefer a formal close. I see a broad consensus, but since I proposed the change in the first place it would be a rather inappropriate if I’d claim a consenus in favor of it.Tvx1 22:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Will anyone please look at this?Tvx1 20:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * done - Closed as consensus for the proposed change.- MrX 🖋 20:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2017–18 North American winter
Please assess the consensus and close Talk:2017–18 North American winter. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)done

Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
Can an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion, especially the Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents subsection? The OP has started a vote at the end but has agreed to allow someone to simply close the discussion as customary instead. Regards  So Why  19:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done by  So  Why  09:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Carter Page
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Carter Page ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done - closed as stale and moot. No comments for 2 months, and the section in question has been heavily edited since the RFC went stale. fish &amp;karate  11:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done RFC dwindled to a halt with no clear consensus and was archived without being closed, to Talk:Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections/Archive_17. I can't edit the archive so have made a note on the talk page. fish &amp;karate  11:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 🖋 20:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Church of Satan
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Church of Satan ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as 1. No consensus; 2. Consensus is no; 3. Consensus is yes; 4. No consensus.- MrX 🖋 20:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 🖋 18:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 🖋 19:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Fatima
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Fatima#Request for comment: Fatima or Fatimah ? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as no consensus.- MrX 🖋 19:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Zoë_Quinn
I'm not entirely sure if this requires a multi-close due to the length of discussion but anyway would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Zoë_Quinn ? Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as A.- MrX 🖋 20:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Meghan Markle
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Meghan Markle ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Consensus for including a section on Markle's ancestry. No consensus on whether her ethnic background or 17th century ancestors should be included.- MrX 🖋 02:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Bitcoin ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Consensus to include criminal use and no consensus to include the "bubbly" nature.- MrX 🖋 02:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Be bold
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Be bold ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Administrators
Could someone please assess the consensus in the RfC at Wikipedia_talk:Administrators when it hits 30 days. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Coffee. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
The topic of discussion is a largely populated category, so if all of the articles in it are going to be taken to AfD it will take additional time. I suppose the articles could also be speedy deleted but will let an admin use their judgement here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done by fish and karate. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Clear consensus against use of expressions like "The app allows to download videos." Not so clear whether there's consensus have MoS say so explicitly, just use it as an example of what not to do, or say nothing at all about it (though that last would be contrary to the consensus against "allows to"). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done AdA&D  22:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales
Only one comment, in the last 2 weeks. GoodDay (talk) 05:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident
No comments for 16 days. AdA&D 18:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Byzantine emperors
Would an experienced editor assess whether there is a consensus and this proposal can be closed? Thanks! —Iveagh Gardens (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done fish &amp;karate 11:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Memoirs_of_a_Murderer_(album)
Please review the consensus and close Talk:Memoirs_of_a_Murderer_(album). --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done bd2412  T 00:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Energy East
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Energy East ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done Beeblebrox (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cary Grant
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cary Grant? Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Alex Shih. Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
Please disposition Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "disposition"? Makes no sense to me. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, please assess the consensus and close. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)/Archive 138
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)/Archive 138 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Appears already done and implemented with this requested move Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Armenian Genocide
The Armenian Genocide is a contentious topic and is covered by WP:ARBAA2, so I am requesting an uninvolved editor close this RFC. Billhpike (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Israel
This is a RfC within a broad subject that can often be contentious. Nevertheless, it appears that this RfC has reached a consensus of Wikipedia editors. Would an experienced editor assess the consensus and close this RfC? Thanks. OtterAM (talk) 02:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by . Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trump–Russia_dossier
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trump–Russia dossier ? Casprings (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done AdA&D  ★ 04:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done fish &amp;karate 12:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done fish &amp;karate 12:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

External links/Noticeboard/Archive 20
Should the following archival documentary be included as an external link at Carleton Knights football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnnlaxer (talk • contribs) 15:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * done Closed as stale and no consensus reached. fish &amp;karate 11:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Popoff
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Peter Popoff ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done fish &amp;karate 09:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:National Rifle Association
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:National Rifle Association ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 15:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
This has run its course, with a clear consensus. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - closed by User:Winged Blades of Godric. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 14:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Top German World War II Aces
This has been a contentious subject, but seems to have run its course, but...could someone with experience and not involved check it? auntieruth (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 14:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 14:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jerusalem
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jerusalem ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Seconded. It's been a long RfC, and I think it's time for it to close. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  01:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 14:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
Will an uninvolved editor please close this discussion. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 15:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
This is a RS inquiry that has only been open 24 hours, so I hesitate to come here, but I think is pretty cut and dry (plus, in 3 more days it will have cycled into the archives so there doesn't seem to be a benefit in waiting a full month as with a RfC). Could an experienced editor review it to determine if there is or is not a consensus that a government agency's own website is a reliable source for quotes directly attributed to that agency? Thanks, in advance. Chetsford (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I object to this request for closure. More input is needed to gain a fair consensus from the community. 24 hours only? No. It does not seem so cut and dry based on the few responses so far. As they say, Wikipedia has no deadline. What is the rush? Lacypaperclip (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It does get auto-archived in three days, though, so - given the backlog - by the time someone gets around to this it probably will have received all the feedback it's likely to receive. And, since this is really quite a minor point (should a reliability tag appear at the end of one sentence in a single article) it might not necessarily be a good expenditure of energy to drag this out for too long? Chetsford (talk) 23:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * not done has noted that "this discussion was archived on 19 Jan UTC, so this request for closure appears to be stale". -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Istvaeonic languages
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Istvaeonic languages ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
Seems to have run its course. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Current members of the United States Senate
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Current members of the United States Senate ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 09:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It seems to have been archived without being closed. Not sure what the proper procedure is here. AdA&D  <span style='border-bottom:1px dotted;color:#0093FF' title='I’m watching this page'>★ 21:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Archiving bots usually don't care whether a discussion is ongoing or not, nor if it is formally closed or not, what they generally look for is the time elapsed since the last post to that thread being more than x hours or days ago. In the case of Village pump (policy), which is a high-traffic page, threads are archived by after 14 days of inactivity. In this case, the last post to the thread was at 16:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC) as far as I can make out; the thread was archived at 01:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC), slightly over 14 days later.
 * One archiving bot - - can be configured to only archive threads that are marked in some way; for instance, here at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, the bot will archive any thread which contains one or more of the following strings: "&#x7b;&#x7b;User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow&#x7d;&#x7d;"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;resolved"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;Resolved"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;Done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;DONE"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;already done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;Already done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;not done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;Not done"; "&#x7b;&#x7b;close"; or "&#x7b;&#x7b;Close".
 * But did the discussion at VPP really need closure? See the top of this page, first pool ball "Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here." -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * close - doesn't require closure, has gone into archive due to no comments since 16 January - can be found here for reference. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#28c">fish &amp;<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#D33">karate 09:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Requesting an uninvolved close of this RfC. Thorough knowledge of NPOV and BLP policies would help. Thanks. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  08:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done by GoldenRing. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Classical music
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Classical music ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Useful idiot
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Useful idiot ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem as Israeli capital
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem as Israeli capital ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done it Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Josephine Butler
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Josephine Butler ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - this one was done and the consensus implemented weeks ago, but I've formally closed the RFC. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music
Please assess the consensus and close Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Drmies done it Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem as Israeli capital
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem as Israeli capital ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Slobodan Praljak
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Slobodan Praljak ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
This survey is not a formal RfC but would require a close by an uninvolved editor. . — JFG talk 23:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 58
This discussion wasn't officially an RfC, but ended up following the structure of one and I think it could benefit from a close. Thanks, <b style="color:#F60;font-family:Times New Roman">Sunrise</b> <i style="font-size:11px">(talk)</i> 01:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Harvard Crimson
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:The Harvard Crimson? Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Roy Moore
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Roy Moore ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. Sky  Warrior  04:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Categorizing redirects
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Categorizing redirects? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 19:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Apple Maggot Quarantine Area
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Apple Maggot Quarantine Area? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by someone else -- slakr \ talk / 23:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Game of Thrones
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Game of Thrones Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The New York Times
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The New York Times? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Foreign policy of the Donald Trump administration/Archive 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywrch (talk • contribs) 03:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 16:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Zwarte Piet
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Zwarte Piet? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Times of Israel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Times of Israel? The RfC is about the type of infobox template that should be used. Thanks, OtterAM (talk) 02:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Elizabeth II
No further comments since 15 January. 9 votes to 5 by my count, which seems pretty unequivocal. However, the final voter asked that I "tone down the WP:BLUDGEONING" and I have to admit that he was spot on, so I'd rather take a step back and let someone uninvolved make the final decision. <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#ABAB9D">design</b></b> 01:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

MediaWiki talk:Logentry-patrol-patrol
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at MediaWiki talk:Logentry-patrol-patrol? Thanks, Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * What consensus? There is no sign that a WP:RFC has ever been held on that page. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , the consensus is to remove "revision $4 of".Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * There has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Logentry-patrol-patrol&action=history only one edit] to that talk page - you are the only participant, and despite WP:SILENCE, that is not consensus. Was an RfC concerning this interface page held anywhere else? If so, that is the discussion to request closure for. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * not done as explained above, no discussion is there to close. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Darwin (operating system)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Darwin (operating system)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC) resolved -- llywrch (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 17
Frietjes (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Unite the Right rally
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Unite the Right rally Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests/Archive 1 Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done - RFC had been archived but not closed. I've done that and noted the result on the main talk page of the article. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  11:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Knights of Columbus
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Knights of Columbus? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done, closed as no consensus due to being a mess. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Satanic Temple/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Satanic Temple/Archive 3 Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 15:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 70
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 70 Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done - had already been copied across to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga and closed by MizukaS. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  10:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
This needs an experienced, neutral editor to close. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Be warned that the question asked, and the question people were !voting on, is not necessarily the same thing here.Mike Peel (talk) 11:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * There are two clear !voting areas:
 * Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
 * so "the question people were !voting on" is not too correct, that should be at least plural: "the question s people were !voting on". Preferably, I had seen no warnings ("Be warned that...") in the closure request, makes it seem more difficult than it is imho. --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 04:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:1948 Palestine war
A complex discussion, which has now tailed off. There appears to be consensus on some key elements of the discussion; an experienced admin close may be able to thread a needle through the various viewpoints. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin Cash
Could a neutral editor please assess consensus? Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Giovanni Gentile
Could an admin or Rfc-experienced editor please assess whether this Rfc should be closed based on no prior discussion on the Talk page? This Rfc seems highly premature; there should at least be an attempt at discussion, first. My first time here, but it seems to me I've seen the phrase "procedural close" a few times before, but I can't find it now; am just wondering if that's a rational basis for an immediate closure here, with no prejudice on starting another one later, if a discussion ensues but deadlocks. Mathglot (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I see now that the initiator's first edit was 23 Oct 2017, which probably explains this; they probably were rummaging around in the labyrinth of guidelines and bumped into WP:RFC. Anyway, once the closure request above is disposed of (one way or the other) maybe someone could leave a friendly note on their Talk page about proper procedures, or I can.  Let me know. Mathglot (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Just wondering, perhaps this is really a WP:RSN matter? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No doubt, content-wise, but I wasn't addressing the content of the request, merely the appropriateness of going from zero to Rfc with no discussion. Is this the right place for that? Or should the Rfc simply run it course, now that it's been started? Mathglot (talk) 05:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Heat-not-burn tobacco product
Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:Heat-not-burn tobacco product ? There is a unanimous consensus in support of the nominator's proposal. Part of the proposal is to "fully protect the article for 6 months or longer". Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done applied extended confirmed protection for six months and rolled back as per the clear consensus. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The RFC initiator has decided my close was not right as I didn't give him the full-protection he wanted, so he's reverted my rolling back of the article and created a second RFC asking the exact same question. It would be appreciated if a second admin could look at this one. NB - article is still EC protected, not sure whether I should remove that or not. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  14:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see the real problem there with the close (though not an admin), I reverted the change as reverting changes is not how one challenges a close. I really don't know why he wants full protection so much.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Appreciated. Marked as done again, because on reflection the original RFC is actually closed still. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  15:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Back to the Future
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Back to the Future ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:March 14, 1891, lynchings
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:March 14, 1891, lynchings ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
This discussion has no activity since the 15th, and the result seems obvious to me. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sarah Jane Brown
Any volunteers wanna help close this discussion? Given the contentious nature of the move request, it might be wise to have at least three editors assess the discussion. As I am uninvolved (and a page mover) I could assist in the closure, but I definitively shouldn't do it alone. Sky Warrior  02:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I am reading the discussion, if there's any need for co-closer, just ping me. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm..I may be able to assist too...But, the close don't look like to be a very difficult job:) ~ Winged Blades Godric 07:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for volunteering. I'm going to keep this open for a little bit longer in case anyone else wants to assist. Sky  Warrior  18:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not intending to cast any aspersions here, and the good-faith offers are appreciated, but none of these three are admins, one of them appears to be 18 years old, and two of them have been on Wikipedia less than three years (and the third one less than five years). This is a complex case that has had 14 prior RMs and an MRV. I suggest that we need a more experienced panel to close this – a panel composed (at least primarily) of admins. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Discussion has been close. Any questions should be directed at either me,, or . Sky  Warrior  19:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  10:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations
This has been going for two weeks and folks have stopped !voting. [redacted stupidity] ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  23:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * [redacted stupidity] ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  23:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)  requests for closure are preferred to be neutrally worded. ~ Winged Blades Godric  04:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC) </smalL>
 * Hmm...--I don't think that a snow-call is highly-appropriate in the circumstances and it might be better to wait for a few more days to evaluate the stagnation of the discussion and/or new participation. ~ Winged Blades Godric 04:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not asking for a snow close; If you check the page, I explicitly denied the possibility of a snow close. But it's still quite an obvious close, and folks seem to have stopped !voting (the last one was almost four days ago). By the way, next time I make commentary like that, you may feel free to treat it the same exact way I did with this edit, though your method was rather more considerate. I'd have split it up myself (and posted it as a comment near the end of the RfC, instead of here) except I'm tired and therefore, temporarily stupid. At least I hope it's temporary... ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  04:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It's been 4 more days without any !votes or even commentary. The last !vote was a week ago, do you think that's long enough? (Serious question; I'm not being at all sarcastic and will defer to your judgement here.) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  00:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree. We need closure so we can move on. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 06:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done O3000 (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Transgender
Not sure how much longer the merge discussion should stay open. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Good point. That looks more than ready to be closed. (But it's a touchy topic, so I don't feel qualified to do it myself.) —BarrelProof (talk) 00:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Daily Mail
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Daily Mail? This RfC was only opened two days ago (by myself), but I feel the consensus is so overwhelming that I am justified in seeking to have this discussion closed so that we can move on. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Objection. The person making the request is the person who started the RfC.  I have not participated in it, myself -- because I think it is not a valid RfC.  We are asked to choose between two versions selected by the OP; why does that individual get to determine the choices open to other editors?  I agree the RfC can be closed -- on grounds of being invalid.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A: I’m entitled to request closure (unless someone can point to a policy I’m not familiar with that proves otherwise).
 * B: (Note: edited) I don’t even understand the second objection. This is how RfCs are used in dispute resolution over content. Two or more versions are presented, and other users remain entitled to suggest alternatives. This has already been explained to you by another user on the article talk page. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note, I've ended the RfC per WP:SNOW. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * And I've reverted that, because I'm sure you know better... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes I do know better, because I've read WP:RFCEND. You may find the following useful: "The question may be withdrawn by the poster (e.g., if the community's response became obvious very quickly). In this situation, the editor who started the RfC should normally be the person who removes the template." L.R. Wormwood (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You haven't "withdrawn" it, though, have you? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have withdrawn the RfC question by removing the template, as described above. I'm not going to respond here anymore because it's a waste of my time. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 15:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done per my message to you at ANI. S warm   ♠  17:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you User:Swarm--I came here to see if this had been taken care of already. Drmies (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Inactivity policy for administrators
Open since Feb 4. This is an easy one, consensus is prety clear, but would change policy so a formal close from an uninvolved user is in order. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Let 4 more pass:) ~ Winged Blades Godric 03:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I felt that this RfC could have been worded better. Usually in RfCs, "no" means opposition to change, whereas in this RfC, the way the question was worded causes "no" to mean a support of change. While this may look like an easy close at first glance, I would still advise prospective closers to read the RfC carefully. Mz7 (talk) 04:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
This closure challenge on WP:AN has run its course and the tone of the discussion is moving in the wrong direction. Could an uninvolved administrator assess if the original closure needs to be reopened? BillHPike (talk, contribs) 16:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done Discussion has moved of WP:AN and into archive, so this does not need to be closed. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 07:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done Legacypac (talk) 03:15, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018 in science
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2018 in science ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 07:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 07:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Template_talk:Infobox_venue
Would an experienced editor (ideally someone with template editor rights as the page is template protected) assess the consensus at Template_talk:Infobox_venue please? Iffy★Chat -- 12:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Abkhazia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Abkhazia ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed date, is initiated 12 january 2018 Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 05:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 06:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Carolina Nairne
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Carolina Nairne ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 06:40, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Seth MacFarlane
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Seth MacFarlane ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 15:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Medri Bahri#RFC for geographic boundaries and start and end date of Medri Bahri political entity
Could any editor or admin do a procedural close on withdrawn Rfc Talk:Medri_Bahri? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done Iffy★Chat -- 12:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Satanic Temple/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Satanic Temple/Archive 3 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Noah Oppenheim/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Noah Oppenheim/Archive 1 ? Thanks,BC1278 (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)BC1278
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Featured topic candidates/Naruto characters/archive1
Hasn't been edited in over a year. Can an uninvolved editor please close this now? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinging and  who look after WP:FTC. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  11:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I already failed that topic, per my comment on the nom. I even added it to the milestones on the talk page of the main article. And for future reference, only I or GamerPro64 can close FTC nominations. -- <b style="color: black;">十</b><b style="color: red;">八</b> 12:40, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done for bot's benefit <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Trash metal
I was working my way backwards through the que of new pages and found this mess. The page was created in 2004 and still being discussed for deletion? I don't know what to do with it. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  15:03, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you're asking us to do. The redirect (which had looked for the last six months) was taken to RfD  before you posted here. Are you asking us to close that RfD almost seven days earlier than it normally would be closed? If so, why? Alternatively, if you wish to comment on what should be done with that redirect, please do so at the RfD itself, not here. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 14 minutes?! I probably submitted my request here on this page from another browser window that I had opened for longer than 1/2 hour before the page was nominated for RfD. This page, Trash metal had not been patrolled for 14 years and was the very last new page in the que; I try to work from the back of the que in new page patrolling because most editors prefer the front of the que. Of course I don't want to close the RfD before seven days have passed, the possibility of another editor going to the end of the new page que so close to same time as I did then and nominating it for deletion is pretty astounding. Sorry to trouble you. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉  12:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Putting resolved for the archival bot. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Car_seat
A short merge discussion stalled with no consensus about 9 months ago. SueDonem (talk) 17:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Is it preferred that a third-party removes the template from the tops of the two articles? Or is it fine if I do? SueDonem (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed it; there really is no great formality about merge discussions, so you can remove the templates, and there is no great reason for a formal closure either :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SueDonem (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done - closed and archived. Primefac (talk) 18:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Seymour High School (Indiana)
Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:Seymour High School (Indiana) ? Thanks, IndyNotes (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * not done, this is for RFC closures and other contentious issues. The discussion above has been open for barely over 24 hours. Primefac (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:African-American civil rights movement (1954–1968)
An RM discussion got converted to an RFC here, and discussion has tapered off. The current conversation is complex, and the RM/RFC confusion isn't helping. Dicklyon (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have re-worded this closure request to be more brief and neutrally worded. Iffy★Chat -- 10:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:White House Correspondents' Association
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White House Correspondents' Association ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done - had already been merged anyway. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Canada
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Canada ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Notre Dame Cristo Rey High School
Editors are debating a smallish proposed addition to the History section. We would appreciate a Close from an uninvolved editor.– Lionel(talk) 03:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * There is no RFC there, and there is still nothing resembling a consensus. OP has again revert warned on his false notion of consensus and again the article is at RFPP. And his "we" above can only be construed as a royal we, as there was 0 discussion of closing or requesting an administrator's assistance in assessing consensus.  John from Idegon (talk) 07:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I would say that Lionelt's is the better description of the situation. Jzsj (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As John from Idegon said, there was no RfC regarding the History section of the article. No RfC = no closure needed. Jzsj has apparently confused WP:CANVASSING with WP:RFC. 32.218.152.99 (talk) 17:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Other discussions can also be closed, if needed. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * In fact there is no RFC at all. It is just another trick to turn the article in one big advertising piece, against the prevailing consensus. Extra people have been drummed up by canvassing. The article has been protected a few times now, due to the disruptive editing of both Lionelt and jzsj. Ow, and Lionelt claims proposal 4, with a vote of 3-3 should be the winning proposal. In fact, proposal 3, with a 3-0 vote is votewise the winning proposal. A boomerang should be nice now as the only thing that is happening is restarting the discussion every time both gentleman find themselves on the losing side of arguments. (Inclusing archives, the talkpage is now roughly 250k for an article of not even 5k... <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner  <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 08:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * not done - one of the main parties involved has been banned from school-related editing, the RFC is stale and poorly formatted, and has gone to archives. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 16:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Universalizing religion
Discussion to assess if article should be merged. Open since 30 January 2018. Would an uninvolved, experienced editor please assess the consensus? Thank you. -- Begoon 11:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done, now needs to be merged. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 16:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done. Discussion on this matter still ongoing. The latest comment in this thread is dated 19:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC). I'd wait at least another week on this to be sure the discussion has actually concluded. -- llywrch (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Removed not done template since the bot archives the discussion if thet template is present. I'm fine with waiting a week before assessing the consensus. I've restored this close request from the archive to this board as it can be easily forgotten if it is moved to the archives. Cunard (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

done No new discussion in almost two weeks, so I've closed it. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 135
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 135 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done - moved it back to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games to give the closed RFC some visibility. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bahar Mustafa race row
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bahar Mustafa race row ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Belarus
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Belarus ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rasta Rasivhenge
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rasta Rasivhenge ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2018 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_22
Could an admin please assess the consensus at Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_22? Iffy★Chat -- 13:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done It's been relisted. ~ Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 16:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Files_for_discussion/2018_February_2
Could an admin please asses the concensus at ?—TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 15:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Exorcism of the Syrophoenician woman's daughter
Would an uninvolved editor please formally close a 2016 merge discussion where a close has been contentious; discussion at Talk:Exorcism of the Syrophoenician woman's daughter. Klbrain (talk) 06:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 201
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 201 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't really see a formal 'RFC' here that requires closure, as such, just a lot of meandering discussion. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  13:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Archive_201 this is the actual rfc Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done - thanks . Now closed. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  13:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Coachella Valley Church
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Coachella Valley Church ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Real News Update
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Real News Update ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 146
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 146 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done - I copied it out of the archive first, see Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  12:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Chloe Kim
Clear consensus. No new input since 8 March, and only one (my own) since 27 February. Scolaire (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Daily Mail
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Daily Mail? The consensus is now only more overwhelming than when I last requested closure. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:B'Tselem
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:B'Tselem ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/YouTube/1
It has been ten months since the reassessment was opened and eight months since the last comment was made. This is far beyond the expected timescale of a good article community reassessment. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 22:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * - I've posted to Good_article_help asking for someone who knows the process to close the reassessment. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Alternative for Germany
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alternative for Germany ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * done ResultingConstant (talk) 14:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nunes memo/Archive 2
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nunes memo/Archive 2 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done ResultingConstant (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:COI
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:COI ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Lyndsy Fonseca
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lyndsy Fonseca ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm reviewing now and will close shortly. GiantSnowman 14:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * - do you need some assistance? <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * it's been closed - forgot to mark this, apologies. GiantSnowman 11:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thank you. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done by GiantSnowman <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Morlachs
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at this RFC diff Thanks. Prince of Thieves (talk) 20:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sex
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Proposed IBAN with clear consensus needs to be closed please. The thread looks long but it's only this individual subsection that needs to be closed by an uninvolved editor, so that we can continue the dispute resolution process ASAP. S warm  ♠  21:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by Swarm Legacypac (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Can't do this one, I participated in the discussion. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  11:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz
Requesting an uninvolved editor to speedy close this RfC. A RfC with the exact same language ended ten days ago with 4 out of the 5 respondents in favor of keeping the language. The lone user in opposition (who has a history of rejecting clear consensus in disruptive ways) created this current RfC. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Iffy★Chat -- 15:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy) ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * FYI, this has been moved to the archive already - Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_141. No comments in several days. Still needs a closing statement though. -- Netoholic @ 05:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Done @ -- slakr  \ talk / 04:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done Iffy★Chat -- 09:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Appeasement
Hello! Would an experienced editor (preferably an administrator) assess the consensus at the "Economic appeasement" RfC at Talk:Appeasement? --GPRamirez5 (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Good evening, it's been over a week since I requested the close. Just wondering if this is normal, and if there is anything I can do to help move it forward. Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GPRamirez5 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * See WP:Administrators' noticeboard. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * BTW, please don't use pings to sign your comments, use four tildes,  ~ , so a time and date stamp is provided by the system. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do!- — Preceding unsigned comment added by GPRamirez5 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done by User:Spinningspark (for the bot) Iffy★Chat -- 09:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)
Would someone please close this RfC when they are able. Conversation has died down, and it should be pretty straightforward. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ~ Winged Blades Godric 04:23, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Strike that.Too much work, too less time and sporadic internet connection. ~ Winged Blades Godric 02:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done by User:Winged Blades of Godric (for the bot). Iffy★Chat -- 09:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Polyandry
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Polyandry ? Thanks! Nblund talk 18:55, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done AdA&D  <span style='color:#09F' title='I’m watching this page'>★ 22:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC).

Files for discussion/2018 February 17
Could an admin please assess the consensus ? Aspects (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Explicit Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Dorothy Tarrant
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dorothy Tarrant ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Done -- llywrch (talk) 05:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mohammad Daleel
A 2016 merge proposal on a contentious topic, with lots of views expressed but discussion now quiet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klbrain (talk • contribs) 23:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done -, the merge just needs doing now. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Neutral point of view/Noticeboard
At Neutral point of view/Noticeboard - a massive feud largely about general editor conduct and not related to NPOV issues. Can an uninvolved admin close some of the offtopic sections? power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Now archived and moot. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Pizza by the slice
Requesting closure of this discussion. North America1000 22:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy/Archive 4
RFC about use of a word in the introduction. I think may not have been filed properly, but got broad participation. --Pharos (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bergen County Executive
Requesting closure of this discussion Has been open over a week and received plenty of participation. I believe the discussion has come to a consensus, but is a contentious issue, so need someone uninvolved to close.--Rusf10 (talk) 01:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom ? Thanks. --Neve~selbert 16:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done --Kostas20142 (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Could an experienced editor please close this? –dlthewave ☎ 13:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A very experienced editor, or even better, a very experienced admin, with absolutely no POV-ties to any firearms-related articles. Along with the closure, a consensus, or lack-thereof, will need to be determined, which will not be particularly easy or straight-forward, given the way the RfC is written or the way in which many of the responses have been entered in the straw-poll. This close will potentially affect some very contentious content, as well as groups of editors with very divided opinions. FYI. But just the same, the sooner the better. Thanks - the <em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF  child  22:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done.  I am hopeful I explained the closure well enough to preclude any angry mobs. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  13:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking this on. It is no simple task, so your efforts are appreciated. - the <em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF  child  13:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 30
-- Tavix ( talk ) 18:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_school_massacres_by_death_toll
Requesting closure of this discussion. Open for a month with substantial participation. One oppose !vote.--Carwil (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Portal_talk:Civil_Rights_Movement
Requesting closure of discussion without consensus found after being open over 2 times longer than the 7 day requirement for Requested Move discussions. Closure of this will assist our project (WP:CRM - recently created) to continue to move forward with more important matters. Thank you in advance! <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 10:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done - closed by . He noted it was a non-admin closure but I would endorse his close. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  12:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks:) ~ Winged Blades Godric 12:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:High Point High School
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:High Point High School ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Paektu Mountain/Archive 1
This article has a long history of contention over common-name. I am hoping an uninvolved editor can assess the consensus. Cesdeva (talk) 08:09, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 15
This hasn't drawn comment for a few days now, and is basically 3 weeks into a 1 week discussion. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  14:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Would an experienced and uninvolved closer kindly assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump? Many thanks. — JFG talk 05:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 08:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:David_Hogg_(activist)
Needs a WP:SNOW close; several editors from both sides have asked for such. -- Jayron <b style="color:#090">32</b> 14:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done (as an NAC snow close) -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin
Could an uninvolved editor close the discussion, please? Ladislav Mecir (talk) 09:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as no consensus. - MrX 🖋 18:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi
Adding initiated. -- The SandDoctor Talk 23:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

An easy close, but would be best if an outside person closes it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done A clear consensus for Version 1, so I closed it on that basis. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Stoneman Douglas High School shooting
Request uninvolved close. Strong knowledge of BLP policy is requested as some editors assert BLP implications. Not an RfC, no activity for 5 days. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  20:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Guerillero is working on this.  Have pinged him at the bottom of the RFC. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  09:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as no consensus. - MrX 🖋 17:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Added Initiated -- The SandDoctor Talk 23:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mumia Abu-Jamal
Experienced closer requested for a "straw poll" regarding the wording of the first sentence of the Mumia Abu-Jamal article. Initiated 30 days ago, no activity for 13 days. Marteau (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done - Closed as consensus to include the proposed wording. - MrX 🖋 18:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_28
Could an administrator or an experienced editor please assess the consensus here? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo products
Could an administrator or an experienced editor please assess the consensus here? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Faith_healing
It's still a little bit until 30 days, so just posting ahead of time in case any interested admin feels like getting a head-start on sorting through things before the 30 day mark. This RfC could use an admin close (potential to be contentious in a discretionary sanction topic), especially one familiar with WP:PSCI. Kingofaces43 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Over 37 support and about 25 oppose. RfC is expired now, and it needs to be closed. Raymond3023 (talk) 03:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I counted 26 oppose votes. It should be noted that there are different shades of support and oppose votes, for example, some of the support votes supported inclusion of content but not categorisation and vice versa and other nuances. Same goes for those who voted oppose. It is a contentious RfC.-- Literaturegeek |  T@1k?  08:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Contentious? Oppose side opposing WP:VERIFY and support side supporting WP:VERIFY. While it's a matter of debate if Wikipedia should need an amount of references to support an apparently interesting statement, it needs to be proposed in policy pages. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * done  Sandstein   18:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:National Rifle Association
- The discussion has been inactive for 15 days. Thank you.- MrX 🖋 17:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   18:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Reliable_sources/Noticeboard
- The discussion has been inactive for 8 days. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 17:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   18:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:National Rifle Association
- The discussion has been inactive for 9 days. Thank you.- MrX 🖋 17:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC).

Talk:Stephen_Miller_(political_advisor)
Template expired and discussion seems to have died down. Thank you. NPalgan2 (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC).

Talk:List_of_oldest_living_people
RfC was listed, expired, reformatted & relisted, delisted. Now needs closure. Thanks! NPalgan2 (talk) 04:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * done. Neutralitytalk 23:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of electronic cigarette brands
Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:List of electronic cigarette brands ? I am requesting that an admin close the discussion because if there is consensus for the proposal, admin tools will be needed to implement it. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done, but this should have just been sent to WP:RFPP. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster/Archive 3 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * not done RFC has been archived and is moot. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Joseph Stalin
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Joseph Stalin ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Holocaust denial
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Holocaust denial ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Aaron Rodgers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Aaron Rodgers ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Doctor Who
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Doctor Who ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Collaboration with the Axis Powers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Collaboration with the Axis Powers ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Ronald Skirth (1897-1977) seated.jpg
Could someobody go to Deletion review/Log/2018 March 24 and close the File:Ronald Skirth (1897-1977) seated.jpg discussion. It's been waiting to be closed for a couple of weeks. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Cryptic. Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction
Hello. Would an experienced editor or administrator please close this discussion? Thank you. ---<b style="font-family: Georgia;"> The Old Jacobite </b><i style="font-family: Courier New;">The '45</i> 21:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have re-worded this request to be neutrally worded. Iffy★Chat -- 09:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't believe there was anything non-neutral about my original post, and I don't think you should reword other editor's comments without informing them. ---<b style="font-family: Georgia;"> The Old Jacobite </b><i style="font-family: Courier New;">The '45</i> 12:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Stoneman Douglas High School shooting
Would an experienced uninvolved editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Stoneman Douglas High School shooting? Thanks! AdA&D <span style='color:#09F' title='I’m watching this page'>★ 18:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

====Talk:Raw Power==== Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Raw Power ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * not done with 2 participants, no real consensus and no discussion of note, I don't think this is suitable for a formal close. Mdann52 (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Coco Austin
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Coco Austin ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --RL0919 (talk) 21:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Alina Zagitova
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Alina Zagitova ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --RL0919 (talk) 22:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Winter War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Winter War ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Lists of earthquakes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Lists of earthquakes ? There is a request for closure at the end of the section. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rod Laver
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rod Laver ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox officeholder
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Infobox officeholder ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --RL0919 (talk) 22:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Presidents of the United States
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:List of Presidents of the United States ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --RL0919 (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
Experienced closer needed on difficult issues relating to BLP, DUE WEIGHT etc. in article about a recent event widely reported and discussed in American media. There is additional talk page discussion in several sections of Talk:Shooting of Stephon Clark. <b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 18:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done, although I strongly suspect this is going to need a follow-up RfC to properly sort this. Mdann52 (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed article creation trial/Request for comment on permanent implementation
Per #1 of the instructions above: Could an admin or a very experienced editor consider the possibility of an early close? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Regretably, Check this thread.Best, ~ Winged Blades Godric 08:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

- MrX 🖋 18:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Circling back on this one since it will be eligible for closure within the next couple of days. It would be great if someone could step up in advance with an offer to close it, to short circuit concerns about when it will be closed (which have already started). The numbers are relatively lopsided, but there is a lot of discussion to read for a proper close. (I closed a related RfC several years ago, but am not eligible this time, having participated.) --RL0919 (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Think I'm suitably neutral on this - I'm happy to take a look once you think this is dead if you like (caveat - I have been involved with the NPP/AfC process, but returning from inactivity so I'm happy I'm suitably independent here). Mdann52 (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done -- someone else beat you to it the moment the bot removed the RfC tag. --RL0919 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Physical exercise
An uninvolved administrator is requested to perform a final close of the page-move request. After I closed it, a participant and supporter asked me on my talk page to reconsider my close. I reopened the RM just in case my close was indeed incorrect. Thank you in advance for your consideraton in this matter!  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  10:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd personally like to see the discussion relisted--most of the oppose comments were made early on, before any supporters had made much of an argument in favor of the move. Additionally, a lot of the oppose comments were made with little or no explanation of why they made that choice, while most of the support comments gave detailed arguments in favor of their choice. If you haven't already guessed, I'm a strong supporter of the move, which is why I feel it'd be inappropriate for me to relist the discussion, and thus would really like an admin to consider doing so instead. -- Iago Qnsi (User talk:IagoQnsi) 23:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * already done Mdann52 (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:David Ogden Stiers/Archives/2018
Would someone please close this discussion. Although the !votes are very lopsided, there is a significant dispute regarding the interpretation of policy that needs uninvolved evaluation. ResultingConstant (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Noah Oppenheim/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Noah Oppenheim/Archive 1 ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Racial views of Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Racial views of Donald Trump ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 02:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Black genocide
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Black genocide ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:National Rifle Association
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:National Rifle Association ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 03:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Matthew Island and Hunter Island
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Matthew Island and Hunter Island ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aircorn (talk • contribs) 6:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Margot Robbie
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Margot Robbie ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Westfield Garden State Plaza
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Westfield Garden State Plaza ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mikhail Bulgakov
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mikhail Bulgakov ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Supreme_Court_of_India
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done, you could have closed that one yourself. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_10
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 10? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by User:BrownHairedGirl. Don't put a request for closure back here after it's been closed. Iffy★Chat -- 10:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/New York City Subway/Station naming convention
I am asking if an uninvolved admin can close this topic. It is not the first time that the naming conventions at WP:NYCPT have been disputed by editors in the past that are non-contributors to the project. The argument has been brought up in the past that disambiguators for the station names that fall under the WP:NYCPT scope are long and unnecessary, but we have precedent as to why they are disambiguated the way they are. I do not want another argument to break out like it did a few years ago at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/Archive 14. Thanks in advance. —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 18:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) To add on, there were two proposals in the past to move hundreds of articles to conform to WP:USSTATIONS's naming conventions, in here and here. Both were unsuccessful. —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 23:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Correction: I was not trying to enforce USSTATION with that requested move, I was trying to generically remove unneeded dabs (why is why I originally ommitted the word station). &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no question here. What exactly are you looking for a closer to do? AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 01:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As a fellow NYC Public Transport member, I think LRG5784 wants the thread to be closed. I'm assuming that this would be done using archive top and archive bottom, an action that would probably not need admin rights since this is not an RFC. epicgenius (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I know the process of how to close, I am just not sure how to close this one. I started reading the thread and as someone a long way from New York and with little interest in public transport it was tedious (no offense meant as it is obviously an interesting area to many). It is long, there are a lot of (often vague) references to past discussion, a few personality conflicts and no real questions that a closer could find consensus on. It is a typical convoluted Wikiproject discussion between contributors that are familiar with each other and have strong views on a very specific area within the topic. So I guess does it need closing? Is it worth an editors time to read that thread to try and figure out a consensus? Best I could do would be to close it and say start a RFC, which is the next step anyway for these type of discussions and doesn't need a close. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No offense taken, some people will really like trains and most people won't care that much. On further thought, I don't think this discussion needs closing, since it's not an RFC. I don't believe this needs a whole separate RFC either, since the discussion is about a United States railroad station guideline that already has agreement, except in WikiProject New York City Public Transportation. The guideline has it that U.S. railroad, subway, light rail, etc. stations should be named under the format "X station", but New York City has so many similarly-named subway stations that reaching a consensus on this particular matter is very hard.The discussion was basically about how best to move subway station pages to conform with the guideline, and whether NYC transport pages in general were so complicated that they should be exempted from that guideline for now. The discussion was deadlocked for a while, and some personal attacks were made in that discussion (mostly by the admins who supported the guideline and couldn't wait). That's when this request was made on WP:AN/RFC. Afterward, I proposed a new way to transition to the new guideline, and there was some agreement and disagreement to my suggestion.I suppose that based on the short context I just gave, a formal close isn't necessary. Just letting the discussion run its course is fine. epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Doug Ford Jr.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Doug Ford Jr. ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Equestrian statue of Frederick the Great
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Equestrian statue of Frederick the Great ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done NPalgan2 (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Comedian
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Comedian ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland: Should the article mention Polish railway personnel as collaborators with the Nazi occupation authorities? 198.84.253.202 (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Stoney (album)
Could an experienced editor please review the consensus at Talk:Stoney (album)? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * not done I don't know why you've brought this here. The thread that you linked to is not a deletion discussion, it is the notification of a WP:PROD that was mistakenly put on the article's talk page (21 months ago) by in addition to the creator's talk page, as a direct follow-up to . Since it's a PROD, and somebody has objected, WP:DEPROD applies. No discussion is necessary: consensus is clearly to keep (per DEPROD rules), and certainly no formal closure is required. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jorge I. Domínguez
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jorge I. Domínguez ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:National Rifle Association
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:National Rifle Association? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done by at 01:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC) -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nigeria/News (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nigeria/News (2nd nomination): Nominator has agreed to withdraw. &mdash; The Transhumanist  12:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Where have they explicitly stated this? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Their intent is very clear, but I have posted a reply to them asking for explicit clarification. I'll post a quote here if/when that is received. Thank you. I'll be in touch (hopefully).   &mdash; The Transhumanist   22:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018 Formula One World Championship
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2018 Formula One World Championship? Thanks, Rolf H Nelson (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_23

 * Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_23: Discussion stalled since 20 March. Consensus seems clear. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:51, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I closed it, but we need a robotic editor to remove the cfd notice from hundreds of pages. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * See if Categories for discussion/Working/Retain works. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done - for bot's benefit. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_28

 * Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_28: closure over 40 days overdue. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done - closed yesterday by . <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nicholas Hoult Closure for info-box discussion
We have had a few comments at the talk page. I'd like for someone to take a look and close the discussion, thank you. <small style="background:#132639;padding:2px"> Vedant <small style="background:#FFD200;padding:2px"> Talk  15:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - there isn't really a conclusion to draw from that, there is no consensus; are you sure a closure is necessary? <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, . It's been inactive for a whirl now and I just did not want to close it myself. A couple of commentators said that they'd rather not have it, but none have revisited, neither has the editor with the objection. I was just wondering if we could bury it and not go back to not having an info box, the way the article was when it passed GA? Thanks for the repsonse. <small style="background:#132639;padding:2px"> Vedant <small style="background:#FFD200;padding:2px"> Talk  14:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done, and you were right not to close it yourself, that would have not been appropriate. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 15:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Christina Hoff Sommers
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christina Hoff Sommers ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:06, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Rommel myth/1

 * There is also relevant commentary on the talk page. I can help with the procedural elements of the close once consensus is determined. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done, forgot to tag. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Pill Hill, Chicago

 * I am not sure that since given one respondent is an IP, whether there is a consensus. An uninvolved editor might be of use.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done. IPs are human too. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  09:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed with a clear consensus to describe Carl Benjamin as an "Anti-feminist YouTuber". (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Evanescence
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Evanescence? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for an infobox genre parameter. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  08:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Doug Ford Jr.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Doug Ford Jr.? Please consider the RfC close of Talk:Doug Ford Jr. in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * already done - the discussion archived without being closed. The filer of the RfC was banned for sockpuppetry, and everyone else moved on. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 1

 * -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:13, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Windows Server 2016
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Windows Server 2016? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Done --llywrch (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Great Courses
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Great Courses? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Closed as no consensus on inclusion or deletion of courses and teachers. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Snoop Dogg discography
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Snoop Dogg discography? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus for splitting. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:15, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:George Washington
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:George Washington? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed with a clear consensus to retain the disputed image. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Event coordinator proposal
See Administrators%27_noticeboard, posting here in case it somehow gets some more eyes on this request. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

MediaWiki talk:Watchlist-messages

 * Uninvolved closer requested (per Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost) - Evad37 &#91;talk] 02:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * close closed. — xaosflux  Talk 18:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Hmm, cluebot should've archived it by now based on the close but hasn't, let's try using done.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin Cash
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bitcoin Cash? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Closed with consensus to oppose naming an "author" for this article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Buckingham Palace
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Buckingham Palace? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Neo-Nazism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Neo-Nazism? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Kate Mara
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kate Mara? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Thiel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Peter Thiel? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Chetsford (talk) 01:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  03:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  03:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Mishmar HaEmek/1

 * I can help with the procedural elements of the close once consensus is determined. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - I'm inclined to give this a couple of days more as per Bolter21's comment, would that be ok? <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * A couple more days wouldn't hurt. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * done:Closed it myself. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 07:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done-By others — FR+ 17:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Family of Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Family of Donald Trump? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done-By others — FR+ 17:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 09:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Colt AR-15
Requesting that an uninvolved editor close the RfC as this is a contentious topic. I would ask that the closer review the threaded discussion regarding possible sourcing issues as well. –dlthewave ☎ 01:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done  Sandstein   16:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Adolescence
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nextdoor
Outcome here is very obvious. Currently 6 to 1 vote. I asked the one "keep" vote if we could proceed to consensus but the editor has not answered, while still working actively on other parts of the article.. Since that editor has restored this same content to the article multiple times, a formal closure by an uninvolved editor seems advisable, so the matter does not repeat itself again.BC1278 (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278
 * The question is whether the Nextdoor article should mention its founder's hit-and-run accident. Nirav Tolia, Nextdoor's founder and CEO, caused a freeway accident that severely injured a woman. Tolia (and his wife) fled the scene of the accident -- an oversight for which Tolia was sentenced to 30 days in county jail and a $239 fine. I argued that since Nextdoor is self-proclaimed "community building site" and Mr. Tolia's flight from the accident didn't demonstrate community spirit, mention of the accident should maybe be included. I've been outvoted 1 to 5.5 so far. My opponents' argument is that the accident would belong in an article about Tolia, but not an article about the company he founded and oversees. It definitely belongs in my article about Tolia. I'm still hoping more editors show up to weigh the matter.
 * You may note that BC1278 has a COI here and is being paid by Nextdoor to re-write the article. I think it deserves more discussion, especially in light of the fact that BC1278 didn't mention his COI in his request for comments at at “Economy, Trade, and Companies” and ”Biographies”. Chisme (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Move_review/Log/2018 April
Could someone close this? Thanks Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done-By others — FR+ 17:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ariana Grande discography
This is a topic that has gone trough three RfCs, two discussions, and one WP:30 in the last six months. It is not complex or particularly controversial, but the discussion tends to go on and on, but the arguments on each side don't appear to have changed (you can see this in the current thread). An official closure by an uninvolved user is probably necessary to ensure that it doesn't dragged on and on. Requesting a closure at the appropriate time. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by User:Compassionate727. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Football_pitch

 * Can someone please close this as consensus is against merging and this is subject to a time-sensitive DYK nomination for this Saturday and the merge proposal is preventing it from progressing.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:04, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by User:Cwmhiraeth. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy/Archive 1? Thanks, FallingGravity 16:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy/Archive 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/RfC: Ending the system of portals

 * This is a huge discussion that impacts every corner of Wikipedia, as such it is going to possibly need multiple closers. I am placing this here as a way to find non involved editors that would be willing to take on the task. This is a new RfC yes, but there is a-lot here to process and digest in the discussion to come up with a conclusion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to take this one on, with others if needed. Mdann52 (talk) 19:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * And, I would be happy to join the bandwagon:) ~ Winged Blades Godric  16:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Well thanks, while it isn't time to close yet it is good to know people are on board here to help out. =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , and any other experienced RFC closers: Please take a look at Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/RfC: Ending the system of portals and advise (there) on how the closure will likely proceed (and a possible time table). This is one of the largest and most contentious RFCs ever (probably), so some care should be taken on the exact procedure that is followed. - dcljr (talk) 00:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As I've commented within the RFC, I can't help with the close. In terms of the procedure, though, it's absolutely going to be #4, and I suggest putting a big bold note at the bottom and top of the RFC saying it will be closed on a particular date at least a week in the future, and that the closing summary will be provided within a further week, giving you the time to craft it. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  08:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I want to echo too that other uninvolved experienced RFC closers are also welcome to join in if you guys need it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm game. Curious to see where it ends. Primefac (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that the 30-day mark of this RfC is rapidly approaching, so someone (e.g., the admin who's thinking of officially closing it?) needs to decide whether to extend it (as explained at WP:RFC, in the part about Legobot). I know anyone can extend an RfC, but I'd rather not do it myself. - dcljr (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The RFC is long and dangly and needs surgical removal rather than extension. Closure is straightforward – nearly all recent !votes are oppose and most of the supports are of the form "Support but do not delete any relevant pages". There is no need to summarise the various opinions. Best simply to thank everyone for their thoughtful contributions. Thincat (talk) 11:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please coordinate closure with Consultation on the future of portals. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This important discussion is a month old today, it's time for a verdict on if portals are to be gone or not. I also recommend archiving it as such a large debate could be a good precedent. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * those who expressed an interest in closing this; Kirbanzo what do you mean by "archiving it"? Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure why you pinged us and not, but we're working on a close. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Mostly just to ask if the closing is happening. Good to know Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Primefac (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Forgot to mark it. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Telephone numbering plan
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Telephone numbering plan --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 04:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Could an admin please close WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC, initiated 28 March?  removed the videos in April, but there is a discussion at WT:MED about readding them, so a summary of community consensus on the RFC about these videos would be helpful.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  03:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * There is a discussion about videos not yet a discussion about re adding them. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 14:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done, in terms of formally closing the RFC, but with a note that discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:41, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Apache OpenOffice
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Apache OpenOffice? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Germanic peoples
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Germanic peoples? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of most visited museums
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of most visited museums? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Fantastic Mr. Fox (film)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Fantastic Mr. Fox (film)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:32, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Aromanticism
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 14:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Anatolia
Requesting administrative closure of Talk:Anatolia because another Rfc about essentially the same topic is still running in the long section immediately above that one (here). Mathglot (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done You don't need an admin to close an RfC early - just remove the template . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 06:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Poland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Poland? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:CSA Steaua București (football)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CSA Steaua București (football)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 163
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus for WP:NBOX, criterion #3 at Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 163 (also discussed at  Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing, and Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)). RonSigPi (talk) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to close; the DRN thread that you have linked more than three weeks before you posted here (to be precise, at 07:49, 14 April 2018 (UTC) by ), and it wasn't even an RfC either.
 * Do you actually mean Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing? This one was an RfC . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Essentially, yes. To give full background, an editor started a discussion on a sports specific page, but did not tell the sports project page.  The proposal from that discussion had unanimous support from the project page.  When that editor tried implementing the change, it was shot down because it was not mentioned on the general sports talk page.  A discussion started there, but was less focused on the issue at hand and more on the overall purpose of the sports guidelines.  When a test was requested and in my view passed, I made the change but the test requesting editor undid the change (another undo happened, but that was because they wanted more time to pass).  I took it to dispute resolution and they asked for a RfC.  I put that out, but not much else was said - I was not surprised, it had been discussed a lot, just in a lot of places.  I worked my request the way I did because I didn't want to over explain and violate the request for a neutral statement.  I tried to make it clear all the places this was discussed, but to me Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive 163 was the clearest to see the summary of the points raised.  That is why I headed off with it, but I included the RfC in my links.  Just trying to give all the information out there and not hide anything, which is why there are multiple links.  I really don't know were else to go with this.  This is a second venue after the dispute resolution asked me to do an RfC.  I did that and now am asking for someone to make a decision.  I would make a change, but I am probably too involved and I know my decision will be undone anyways.  Basically, we have four editors all saying yes (all project members without any dissent from the project page) with one editor saying no until more proof (in my opinion, too high a requirement of proof and proof requirement not consistent with other guidelines) and one editor that I would not say has made a decision, but has stated there are some questions.  So at worst this is 4-2 (yes:, , ,  (voted yes, but asked for RfC, which was done); no: ; appear to lean no: ; unknown (but to me likely yes):  (said only issue was that more time was needed, which was given)) with logic to me also favoring the change (previously less fighters were ranked due to less ranking bodies and boxing being a more popular sport).  Everyone has had plenty of time to comment, I would just like a decision made.  I included all the editors so they are aware of this going on, but again this has been discussed at length.  Since the RfC was the last thing request, I went here.  But the RfC was poorly responded to because there was already plenty of comments before it and I tried to make sure all were captured so a neutral party can make a decision.  If this isn't the venue, then please tell me where to take this for someone to make a decision.  Honestly, after almost two months I just want a neutral party to make a decision and explain why. RonSigPi (talk) 01:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This appears to be convoluted to mask the lack of support at the RfC. I've added my opposition there.—Bagumba (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah its pretty clear here that there is no consensus for the changes. 3 yes and 3 no. You can't assume Oknazevad isn't a no since he reverted you. Your time would be better spent doing the easy task that was set before you. Also if you would have taken the suggestion at dispute resolution and put the RfC on the affected page (where they are supposed to be) you also would have had better participation and likely an answer by now. Hiding it on the boxing page means edits to it don't ping the people who have the guideline watchlisted. -DJSasso (talk) 10:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I have little opinion on they actual changes. (Maybe a little more permissive than I would have gone with; many of the boxers that would be under those changes would be covered by the GNG anyway.) I was just purely concerned with rushing through major changes to a widely used guideline with only two days of discussion on a totally separate talk page with no notification to the actual talk page of the guideline itself. There's WP:NOTBURO, and then there's just not holding sufficient discussion to actually determine consensus. oknazevad (talk) 19:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. The monkey-work issue.  The author of the RFC, who is presumed to be an Old World primate (because they are not registered as a bot), was advised to move the RFC to a more visible location, and said that they were not a monkey.  I closed the DRN thread because an RFC, even if it is not in the preferred location, takes precedence over DRN.  I advised the author of the RFC to publicize it neutrally.  Either they didn't publicize it much, or the publicity didn't help much.  It isn't clear to me why moving an RFC is work for a monkey in senso strictu and beneath the dignity of an ape, but that isn't important.   Also, the RFC was already published when the DRN thread was filed.  An RFC takes precedence over DRN, and DRN isn't a vehicle for changing a guideline anyway.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done everything appears very convoluted, however overall there doesn't appear to be anything to close. The simple thing is, if a discussion on WT:NSPORT doesn't have too much participation, not much of a consensus etc, then make an RfC on WT:NSPORT, which should resolve it. A wikiproject talk page isn't an appropriate place to have a consensus to change a guideline; the only really appropriate places would be the talk page of the guideline and WP:VPP (or WP:VPR) Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Holocaust denial
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Holocaust denial? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mark Weisbrot
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mark Weisbrot? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of English monarchs
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:List of English monarchs? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sarah Paulson
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sarah Paulson? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Andrew Scheer
Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Andrew Scheer? Thanks. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done with only you and the other editor commenting, there isn't anything really to assess and close there. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Douma chemical attack
Discussion has gone around in circles and everyone who is going to participate seems to have done so, aside from some suspicious IPs. --Calthinus (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Racism in South Africa
Requesting assistance to close the RFC. Several new editors who joined the discussion agree that using the word "black" to refer to Asians, Indians and Coloureds in South Africa would create tremendous amount of confusion to international readers especially considering how sensitive the topic is. It also changes the entire context in books and websites cited as references. The page has been subject to Disruptive Editing with the admins issuing several warnings to the individuals involved. Please go down to the bottom of the page to see the Survey results and please see the aggregate views (listed by the user Classical liberal za) of the editors who believe that the word should NOT be used to refer to Asians, Indians and Coloured. Thank you. Jansprat123 (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by NeilN. Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Participant in discussion has requested close, as it appears to be in the wrong venue (should have been at NPOV NB) and discussion seems to have run it's course. I was not involved in the discussion. - the <em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF  child  18:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Forest High School (Florida)
Could an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Forest High School (Florida) and the related chat at Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2 --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The RFD was closed as delete. The content discussion is dead in the water and closure would be appreciated. John from Idegon (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cryptocurrency
Can an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cryptocurrency? Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 14:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Alsee (talk) 19:54, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:CNN
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:CNN? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sci-Hub
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Sci-Hub? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy/Archive 5
A discussion about the use of inline attribution instead of Wikipedia's voice with regard to a statement agreed by an earlier RfC. Batternut (talk) 09:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of cryptids
Can an uninvolved editor assess the merge consensus at Talk:List of cryptids. Even though it appears lopsided, since it's a somewhat touchy/controversial topic (or at least has been in the past) I thought it best for a formal close. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bill Shorten
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bill Shorten? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin Cash
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bitcoin Cash? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 May
Would an admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 May? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin Cash
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bitcoin Cash? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Minarchism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Minarchism? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done - closed yesterday by User:Winged_Blades_of_Godric. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Syrian Republic (1930–58)
Seems as consensus has been achieved, though neutral closure would be appreciated.GreyShark (dibra) 10:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Mottainai Grandma
Would someone close this? My nomination received no support, and was attracting unwanted negative attention from the article's creator among others, so I withdrew my nomination two days later, but that hasn't stopped the article's creator from slinging more mud at both me and one of his fellow "keep" !votes. Could someone just close it? Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_13
Marcocapelle (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_25
Marcocapelle (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games
Requesting an uninvolved editor to close this merge discussion.--Martin IIIa (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents


This has gone on for long enough, and has not attracted any attention in the last two days. Vanamonde (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, could an uninvolved administrator please close this discussion? The consensus is fairly clear I think. Alex Shih (talk) 07:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Euryalus Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Dana Loesch/Archive 2
Could someone check the consensus here? Talk:Dana Loesch/Archive 2   14:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Done Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Behavioural genetics/1

 * I can help with the procedural elements of the close once consensus is determined. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - I see this as a close with the GA status being kept; the primary concerns (a lack of a criticism section; the lack of discussion of animal behaviour in favour of exclusively focusing on human behavioural genetics) have been addressed. If you can carry out all the procedural elements and tell me where to post that as the closing summary I'm happy to do that, or just link to this post. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  08:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * done AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 06:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rick Kirby
Though after a month the consensus appears to be clearly against a merge, and nobody has contested the notability of the sculpture, I would appreciate an uninvolved editor closing this discussion. Thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Masonic buildings in the United States
As of 29 May, this has run for one week, a period mentioned in wp:MERGE guidelines. I think it can be seen that a consensus emerged quickly. Because the issue was contentious (in disagreement over several years, happily not much reflected in this basically civil merger discussion), I would appreciate if an uninvolved editor could close the discussion. TIA! --Doncram (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This RFC is now archived at Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_142. Iffy★Chat -- 15:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done, closed as no consensus. It is a pain when the bot archives RFCs when they are still open.  <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate  13:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Thiel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Peter Thiel? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Existentialism Is a Humanism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Existentialism Is a Humanism? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nextdoor
Could an uninvolved editor please assess consensus at Talk:Nextdoor? Is this ready for closure or does it need to go to mediation? - BC1278 (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278
 * not done as superseded by RfC Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Would someone assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --Brustopher (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

====Talk:Raw Power==== ? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Raw Power? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 08:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:John R. Bolton
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:John R. Bolton? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sean Hannity
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sean Hannity? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nicholas Hoult
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nicholas Hoult? Please consider the earlier closed RfC Talk:Nicholas Hoult in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Godric Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Wife and Wife
Page should be speedy-deleted as unambiguous copyright violation, now confirmed by the article creator. If someone wants to tell Dream Focus off for (unwittingly) copying copyvio content onto Wikia with the explicit intent of undermining our deletion policy, engaging in IDHT denialism after it was demonstrated that the content in question was copyvio, implying that it is other users' responsibility to clean up his mess just because he attributed the mess to them, and carelessly writing in a manner that will make new editors think it is okay to copy-paste text as long as it is "fair use", that would be nice too, but honestly I'm increasingly convinced he's never going to change at this point, and no one seems to be willing to do anything about it, so I'd settle for the AFD being closed so everyone can move on with their lives. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by Anthony.Age-old problems with DF and ARS..... ~ Winged Blades Godric  06:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:British Sri Lankans
Could someone assess consensus at Talk:British Sri Lankans? This concerns merging an article created by a now-blocked editor, but it has been hard to attract comments. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done, given half the contributors to that RFC have been indeffed for various unrelated shenanigans I recommend you may just want to get on with a merge. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sean Hannity
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sean Hannity? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Judicial Watch
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Judicial Watch? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 17:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 25
-- Tavix ( talk ) 16:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . -- Tavix ( talk ) 17:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 May
Would an admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 May? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by User:Cuchullain. Iffy★Chat -- 13:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Invasion of Privacy (album)
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Invasion of Privacy (album)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 25
I was wondering if someone could look over this old Cfd, especially the last paragraph I wrote, and close it. Thanks! –Daybeers (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done - closed by User:Fayenatic london. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trump–Russia dossier
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trump–Russia dossier? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done I'm thinking a case related to this matter may be brought before the ArbCom soon. -- llywrch (talk) 23:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done--Brustopher (talk) 13:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Anatolia
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Anatolia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Requests_for_undeletion
Could an administrator please review the request at Requests_for_undeletion? --Jax 0677 (talk) 07:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done. Primefac (talk) 23:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done 198.84.253.202 (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:President's Call to Service Award
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:President's Call to Service Award? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Files_for_discussion/2018_June_5
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus or relist? --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . Most of Files for discussion/2018 June 5 should be processed today, if it wasn't done yesterday (5 June + 7 days is 12 June). Unless a FfD has been left open a lot longer than the others on the same daily page, raising a request here can cause duplicate work. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata/2018 Infobox RfC
This one's quite complex (sorry!) and controversial, so probably needs multiple admins to close. I've been keeping track of the raw numbers for the !votes at (which could do with double-checking), but obviously the numbers only tell a part of the story here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Since the closure has a potential to be contested, three admins would definitely be a preference.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * could we please move this RFC up in the queue ... there are several other potential RFC’s regarding the use of Wikidata that are dependent on how this one is closed for their wording. Blueboar (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * maybe post on WP:AN then? Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A post was made at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive299. Cunard (talk) 07:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * . Note: Polling is closed to enable a consensus to be determined. -- llywrch (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * While I have written up a draft closing decision, there are only two of us working on this at the moment -- yours truly & . I'm making another plea for a third volunteer to help with this. (The original request for a third Admin was in the section moved to archive #299.) -- llywrch (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - I can help but I'm not around much at weekends. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 13:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Well,, neither am I. For some reason my family demands my attention those days. I'll shoot you an email. -- llywrch (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Fish+Karate has helpfully reviewed my draft, so at the moment I'm waiting on to provide input. Once I have that, I'll revise what I've written, send a copy to my fellows to approve, then close the discussion. (In other words, I haven't forgotten my pledge to handle this matter. Honest.) -- llywrch (talk) 07:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done I've received all the feedback, merged, asked for further input, & now closed the RfC. I apologize for the lengthy delay, but because this is an important issue to so many people -- clearly more than who participated in the discussion -- I wanted to take care in getting this right. And any mistakes in this closing are mine alone, not of my fellow closers whom I thank for their time. -- llywrch (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks the closers for the good work. This was almost a suicidal task to accomplish, and though I am sure some users would disagree I think this is the best possible closure given the circumstances.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Kingdom Come: Deliverance
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 11:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Open access in Italy
Could someone check the consensus here and close? Please see also the talk history and the RfC just below. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Theosophy (Blavatskian)
Could someone check the consensus here? Talk:Theosophy (Blavatskian) Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * done Yunshui <sup style="font-size:90%">雲 <sub style="font-size:90%">水 08:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Carles Puigdemont
Normally I'd expect an RFC to run for longer than a week, but all parties seem to have made their salient points and the discussion is now starting to degenerate into backbiting and personal attacks. It's now generating more heat than light, and could use closure (ideally by an admin, since the close will almost certainly be immediately contested by whichever side of the debate feels they have "lost"). Yunshui <sup style="font-size:90%">雲 <sub style="font-size:90%">水 08:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done, agreed that the useful discussion had drawn to a close. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ireland
Could someone check the consensus here and close? <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 15:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Just as a point of interest (because it took me the better part of a good long while to find it) the text in question was changed three days after the RFC opened. Depending on how the discussion is closed (I'm only about halfway through parsing everything) that might need to be reversed. Primefac (talk) 23:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Before or after closing? <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 12:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, if the consensus is to keep the "British Isles" bit, it would need to be reversed. Obviously if the consensus is to remove it, the there's nothing to do. Primefac (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. That will be no problem. I think everybody stayed away to prevent edit wars, expecting the RFC to end quickly. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 17:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 02:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)