Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 26

Talk:Catholic Church and abortion
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Catholic Church and abortion? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done--GRuban (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Category talk:Catholic organizations
? Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Category talk:Catholic organizations? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brain cysts
I went ahead and closed this discussion as delete the other day because the administrator who normally closes MfDs voted and thus cannot close it. I was aware of the guideline that users shouldn't make closes they cannot implement, but decided that was getting in the way of this being closed and ignored it. Now that I think about it, I should have just come here. Thus, would some uninvolved administrator look over the MfD, re-assess the consensus if they feel my closure was in error, and action it if consensus is to delete? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I didn't realize this had been posted here, I'd have left the MfD alone if I'd seen this. That being said, I'll say again that I'm happy to reverse my actioning of the close if anyone sees it as inappropriate. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done One discussion marked "Resolved", the other "unresolved". (I figured the interested parties didn't care enough about the subject to continue the unresolved discussion.) -- llywrch (talk) 17:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion
This discussion on an ambiguity in the deletion policy seems to have petered out. I think it would be useful to have a formal close so that Deletion policy, WP:BLAR, and WP:SK, can be updated accordingly. As it stands they have conflicting advice on what editors should do when a blank-and-redirect is contested. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump/Archive 81
Could an uninvolved editor please assess consensus at Talk:Donald Trump/Archive 81? This was meant to be a quick survey to pick one of two versions of a phrase in the lead after some recent edits, but there is no obvious consensus, so the discussion requires a more subtle closure. There is an element of timeliness that weighs against keeping it open for 30 days. — JFG talk 19:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note there is an intimately related debate in the section below it: Talk:Donald Trump/Archive 81 Any closer should consider whether the two sections should be closed as a single unit. Alsee (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done – Withdrawing close request. In a parallel discussion, North Korea has been temporarily excluded from the lede section entirely, so that the question of which version to include is moot. — JFG talk 18:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Leo Tolstoy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Leo Tolstoy? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 10:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Forever alone
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at this RfC please? Thylacoop5 (talk) 21:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by --Kostas20142 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Flag of Syria
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag of Syria? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done 198.84.253.202 (talk) 17:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Germanic peoples
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Germanic peoples? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done llywrch (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 09:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; WBG converse 13:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard
Would an experienced involved editor please assess the arguments and close the discussion? Thanks LK (talk) 04:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_WWE_personnel
This was discussion initiated by User:IanPCP since the protection of article(don't go at today's initiation template), Continuously arguements regarding separating 205 Live section from RAW, WWE.com is authentic website as unsourced editings resulting in accusation against website for being glitch which is wrong, and providing such source which is not reliable and trivia. I request it for deletion immediately. Thanks.CK (talk) 21:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I have just re-read this. You state "I request it for deletion immediately" - you are at the wrong venue. The avenues open to you are described at WP:DELETE. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:49, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Nothing to close.Regular t/p discourse. &#x222F; WBG converse 14:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Banaras Hindu University
Could an uninvolved party please close the discussion at Talk:Banaras Hindu University? As the initiator I rather not close it myself. --Muhandes (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; WBG converse 14:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Communist Party of China
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Communist Party of China? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * not done-Please re-conduct a RFC.Much of the text in the RFC has been posted by a now-blocked-account and it's just implausible to maneuver through the discussion and evaluate it.I see they are yet again re-litigating it at a normal t/p discourse.So, let it be...... &#x222F; WBG converse 15:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Busts of Cristiano Ronaldo
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Busts of Cristiano Ronaldo? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; WBG converse 16:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
The RfC participation is dwindling so this one should be ripe for closing. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 13:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Not done-Let it run.Working definition of stale is around nil participation in a week or more, at minimum.Nowhere close. &#x222F; WBG converse 15:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Santa Fe High School shooting
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Santa Fe High School shooting? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * &#x222F; WBG converse 14:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; WBG converse 15:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
There are a large number of open discussions on the talk page. I feel that some of them have reached consensus, including "Trump/Rodman image", "Apprentice - I removed a newly added paragraph about the show's ratings", and "Murals". Others, such as the "Religion" thread, may not have consensus yet. Could an experienced editor assess the open talk discussions, and enact those changes which have consensus, and close idle threads which will not reach a consensus for any changes? power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Most of these things don't need closing by a third-party; they will be auto-archived after 7 days of silence. "Rodman" and "Apprentice" look settled; "Murals" is just FORUM; "Religion" is messy, not sure what an uninvolved closer could say except "please raise an RfC". — JFG talk 07:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It might be fine now, I simply thought the page desperately needed some janitorial work, and I had already commented on all the discussions so didn't want to do it myself. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've done some cleanup, and the archive bot has done some more. Looks to me like only the "Religion" section could use a third-party close, however in the meantime somebody else has requested a close specifically for that section at . Given the current state of affairs, would you agree to withdraw your blanket request? — JFG talk 12:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done per Power~enwiki's withdrawal of the request. Cunard (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hospitals
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hospitals? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 07:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 May
Would an admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 May? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:37, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Swiss minaret referendum, 2009
An obvious consensus has been reached. The discussion was interrupted by a sockpuppet investigation requested by the initiator that resulted in no action taken. An uninvolved administrator should close it down. The Gnome (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Music of Rocket League
A clear consensus has been reached in a discussion to merge Rocket League x Monstercat Vol. 1 into Music of Rocket League. Would an administrator be so kind as to close the discussion? Thanks in advance! – PhilipTerryGraham (talk &middot;&#32;articles &middot;&#32;reviews) 01:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Daask (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor or admin please assess the consensus for the above mentioned discussion? Thank you. - MrX 🖋 11:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Seraphim System  ( talk ) 14:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Please consider these related closed discussions in your close: Village pump (policy)/Archive 138, Talk:Stoneman Douglas High School shooting/Archive 6, and Talk:Santa Fe High School shooting. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by TonyBallioni. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Plymouth
Could an uninvolved page mover or admin evaluate the consensus at Talk:Plymouth? Iffy★Chat -- 11:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinging and . &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 14:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I closed the one last year as no consensus, so I don’t want to do this one. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by BD2412. Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mandarin orange
Proposal to merge Mandarin orange and Mandarin orange (fruit). Month since last discussion. Seems like a straightforward consensus, but would prefer to avoid accusations of COI that might come from closing my own proposal. Agricolae (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- slakr \ talk / 04:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 19
Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 19. Most regular RfD closers have contributed to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 3
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 3 The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 29
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 29 The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by someone else -- slakr \ talk / 04:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 26
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 26. The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by someone else -- slakr \ talk / 04:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 23
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 23. The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by user:Timrollpickering. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 20
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 20. The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ bd2412  T 00:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
There have not been comments on this proposal for more than a week. I think it's time to wind it down. Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Would an uninvolved editor please determine consensus? Thank you.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Primefac. Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kazakhstan
Closing by an independent editor would tidy this up. Shouldn't be difficult. Batternut (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Living dinosaur
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Living dinosaur? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Daask (talk) 03:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by User:Winged Blades of Godric. Deryck C. 16:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Is Genesis History?
This RfC has expired, and it appears all the major arguments on both sides have been made. Like nearly every discussion on this talk page, the RfC was contentious. Some editors even speculated that policy does not give clear direction with regard to the issue being discussed and that new policy guidance should be written to handle the situation, so I do not anticipate that this will be an easy close. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 13:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 07:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅  Sandstein   15:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018 Gaza border protests
The RFC ran for over a month and last responses (except me linking to a comment made outside the RFC) were left 3 weeks ago. Can someone not involved please close it ? &#8220;WarKosign&#8221; 12:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * ✅ Batternut (talk) 10:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Singapore Airlines destinations/Archives/2018
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Singapore Airlines destinations/Archives/2018? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Daask (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Colt AR-15
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Colt AR-15? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅  Sandstein   15:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Douma chemical attack
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Douma chemical attack? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Expect some delay- &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 16:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus for this RfC? It's been open for only 3 weeks but there have been no comments in the last 2 weeks and although the issue is contentious the consensus seems rather clear. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Star Wars: The Last Jedi? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * -- llywrch (talk) 02:16, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- llywrch (talk) 02:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Vitamin B3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vitamin B3? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ --GRuban (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Junípero Serra
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Junípero Serra? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- llywrch (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 June 27
Would an admin assess the consensus at Deletion review/Log/2018 June 27? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by . Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 June 20
Would an admin assess the consensus at Deletion review/Log/2018 June 20? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Anybody? -- RoySmith (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 13:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 13:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Move review of List of Presidents of the United States
Could an uninvolved admin, preferrably experienced with the page move review process, kindly evaluate the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 June? — JFG talk 11:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- slakr \ talk / 02:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Help talk:IPA/English
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Help talk:IPA/English? Thanks, Nardog (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ RileyBugz 私に叫ぼう私の編集 18:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Flag of Syria
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag of Syria? A previous close by was reverted under WP:NACIP which prohibits unregistered editors from closing RfCs. Cunard (talk) 06:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 01:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 02:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Diamond and Silk
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Diamond and Silk? Thanks, GRuban (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I've unarchived the discussion and removed the not done template so this closure request will not be archived by the bot. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done The Gnome (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Wayward Pines
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Wayward Pines? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Football Lads Alliance
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Football Lads Alliance? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACatherine%2C_Duchess_of_Cambridge&diff=849692598&oldid=849587108#Trim_down_the_intro. the RfC] at Talk:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Not an RFC. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 09:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was an RfC. See these edits: ; ; . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 12:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Alex Jones
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alex Jones? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:InfoWars
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:InfoWars? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Political views of American academics/Archive 2
Would an experienced and strictly uninvolved editor or admin please evaluate the consensus at Talk:Political views of American academics/Archive 2? Thanks, --Tryptofish (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done by . --Tryptofish (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
This RFC should be speedy closed as a "false start" - the opener has very strong views on this topic, and opened this despite an on-going discussion of the scope/wording of a potential RFC. Once can easily read from the heading, the question, and the BADGERING of the opener already that this is not a clean start. He's jumped the gun, missed the full scope of the question, and uses wording which poisons the discussion. -- Netoholic @ 04:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC) — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I actually agree – this is not a neutrally worded RfC in my estimation, and should be speedy closed on those grounds. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I would advice against any such close, given that there are "very strong views" on both "sides" and it looks like there is just as much badgering going in both directions. Better to let the community discuss it, and to be measured in assessing what the eventual consensus ends up being. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Asking a single editor for sources is not "badgering", it's standard operating procedure when someone offers an empty WP:IKNOWIT argument in an RfC the entire point of which is review of reliable sourcing. An admin already dismissed the claim that it's a non-neutral RfC . The RfC has broadened, and includes three (not just two) versions plus the "write your own" fourth option. The RfC's proceeding fine, to the extent people are interested, including (in "Extended comments") some discussion of various news-site evidence, and what spurred this dispute (possible connection to WP:ARBAP2 matters, and definitely a connection to someone else's WP:MEATBOT spree, which should have been an ANI matter, not a "go change the guidelines" kneejerk reaction). PS: Frankly, this RfC is more than neutral enough, given that it's addressing someone's bold attempts to change a guideline without discussion, revert warring against the existing language after someone else has already objected and restored it, then finally opening discussion only to claim that the language they're trying to get rid of is what was a bold change when it was in fact the product of an extensive consensus discussion last year, not to mention then posting a bad-faith-assumptive conspiracy theory about other editors. (Diffs about all this are included in a user talk post .) It wasn't necessary to open an RfC on this disruption at all (just reverting back to status quo ante would have been fine, and some of this stuff might have been ANI- or AE-worthy). But I RfCed it in a good faith attempt to resolve a "three versions" editorial dispute and to address this editor's addressable concerns. Some of them are off-topic, and are basically a challenge to MOS:ABBR being able to recommend "UK and UNESCO" style over "U.K. and U.N.E.S.C.O." at all; I was not able to work something like that into an RfC about US/U.S., and  is unreasonably angry about it. I don't see a away around that problem other than just letting people own their own emotions, and moving on. I'm attempting to make peace with this editor, but it's difficult when I find I'm being maligned as some kind of RfC faker at an admin notice board without even being pinged about it. If Netoholic wants to upend MOS:ABBR, the place to propose that is probably WT:MOSABBR, and it has nothing to do with MOS:US in particular, which is just a partial  MOS:ABBR.
 * Not done &mdash; I don't feel there's a compelling enough reason for me to be comfortable with a WP:SNOW-close or otherwise "procedurally" close the RFC early. It looks like this RFC&mdash;however flawed it may be perceived by some editors&mdash;has likely been created as a good-faith attempt at WP:DR.  If it goes nowhere, a new one can be made to address its flaws.  Anecdotally, I usually find that flawed RFCs end as no-consensus anyway (the closer will almost certainly see that people disagreed with or were confused by the question to begin with), yet they can still develop themes such that a closer can point the discussion in a better direction (e.g., "These were the main things people were concerned about.... Therefore, consider a new RFC over...." or "There was concern that the RFC wasn't neutrally worded in the first place, perhaps consider....").  Apart from that, this board is usually for old stuff and difficult/contentious closes that have run their course. If you feel the RfC is worded confusingly or problematically, consider raising that point there (consensus might even develop that it truly is problematic and should be closed early).  If the editor's conduct is generally disruptive or clearly questionable, consider WP:ANI or WP:RFARB. -- slakr  \ talk / 05:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trans man
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trans man? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  15:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:University of London
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:University of London? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  15:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Liberty University
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Liberty University? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Only in death does duty end (talk) 01:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Does every RFC require a closure? &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 15:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

<ul><li>This RfC asked the community to answer several questions. Here is one section: The questions for this section: 2. What standards and/or uses make a userpage "useful to the Project" and, conversely, what failures make it "detrimental to the Project"?
 * 2.1 At what point does a useless draft become a violation of CSD U5 and WP:NOTWEBHOST? For the purposes of CSD U5, what is a "plausible draft"?
 * 2.2 Can a stale userpage (one that has not been edited in more than a year) of an inactive user (someone who has not edited in more than a year) be considered "useful to the Project"?
 * 2.3 Does a userpage's uselessness alone warrant deletion at MfD or any other venue, or must it also pose some detriment to the Project, such as by qualifying for speedy deletion?
 * 2.4 If the answer to the above question is "depends", what other criteria should be considered in deciding about deletion?

An RfC close would be useful to determine what the community consensus is on these questions. Cunard (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * <b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  11:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done <b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  13:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC). User:Waggers, did you sign your close? SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Kombucha
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kombucha? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 15:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Kombucha
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kombucha? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 15:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 1
Would an admin assess the consensus at Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by . Deryck C. 14:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive984
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive984? There is an interaction ban subsection. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * not done by request of -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Campaign Against Antisemitism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campaign Against Antisemitism? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Succession to the British throne
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Succession to the British throne? Please consider the closed RfC Talk:Succession to the British throne in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done <b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  11:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)
An uninvolved editor to close this debate would be greatly appreciated.GPRamirez5 (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 16:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Joy Reid
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Joy Reid? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Exercise
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Exercise? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Could an uninvolved administrator (or other editor, if someone prefers) evaluate consensus for this discussion? Thanks, Jc86035 (talk) 09:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by . Jc86035 (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 4
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 4. The two editors who do most of the CfD closures (including myself) are both involved in the discussion, so we need an outsider admin to close. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please give this one another week from today, as the creator had not been notified. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by . No such user (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories for discussion/Log/2018 June 18
Categories for discussion/Log/2018 June 18.

Would an admin please close. The discussion has run for a full month and there have been no new participants for some time. Thanks. Pincrete (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by . No such user (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)
I'm not 100% where to put this, so please move if i've put this in the wrong place. The article above is at FL discussion here. Having noted some of the comments made, I decided to "improve the article by being bold." - but this has now twice been reverted. Firstly, by someone who just reverted because I'm an IP, and secondly by someone who accused me of trying to make a Point, when all I'm trying to do is help. Can you please let me know the proper procedure here? I thought anyone could help wikipedia, but obviously some users either don't want IPs to help, or think that every IP is trying to ruin wiki rather than help. so what channels should I go through in order to try and help out? 2A02:C7D:159:6A00:6599:3B2E:8DEE:562C (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * What exactly are you asking us to close? You originally put this in the section for requests for comment, but I can find no evidence of a related RfC. Also, you have not linked a discussion, other than one WP:FLRC discussion. Is it that which you wish us to close? If not, please link the actual discussion you wish os to examine. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no RFC; they seem disgruntled that their edits were reverted (see their contributions), and have come to the completely incorrect venue to talk about it. This should be removed from here. --  Alex TW 12:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * not done No discussion has been named, other than Featured list removal candidates/List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)/archive1, which being a FLRC should only be closed by Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and The Rambling Man. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
This is a somewhat contentious case, and I'd appreciate someone uninvolved checking the consensus and closing. Much thanks, GPRamirez5 (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This case has made some progress towards consensus - and is more than six weeks old - so I think an uninvolved editor's investment of time here would be very, very well spent. Best, GPRamirez5 (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done --GRuban (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jabel Mukaber
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jabel Mukaber? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done llywrch (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Attapeu dam collapse
Please could someone look at the requested move here, as it's on the mainpage right now. I have commented on the move myself. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 16:16, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done by at 18:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC). -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * slight correction, I only added the archived discussion template. User:John closed the discussion, sorry for the confusion. --Danski454 (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Rally
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Rally? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done -The Gnome (talk) 09:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Julius_Evola
This has been a long and contentious discussion, and I'd appreciate someone experienced/uninvolved checking the consensus and closing. Thanks, VeritasVox (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done -The Gnome (talk) 11:05, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done -The Gnome (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * not done : RfC has been archived. -The Gnome (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Brian Martin (social scientist)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Brian Martin (social scientist)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 07:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jordan Peterson
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jordan Peterson? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 21:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/La_Demoiselle_de_magasin
AfD nominator eventually voted against deletion, omitting to withdraw proposal and close the process. Admin closure requested. -The Gnome (talk) 05:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * not done See WP:WDAFD - once anybody (other than the nominator) has !voted to delete, an AfD cannot be withdrawn by the nominator. This AfD therefore stays open for discussion until closed by the normal process, and since it was relisted yesterday, that closure may be expected on or about 4 August 2018. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Muslim conquest of Khorasan
There is a September 2016 merge proposal on a marginally contentious topic where discussion has been quiet for more than a month, related to Muslim conquests of Afghanistan and Muslim conquest of Khorasan. Could an uninvolved editor review? Klbrain (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done I have now done a non-admin closure. It was not included in the merge lists, so I closed it as a discussion rather than a merge. Hope that is OK. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rescue of Jews by Poles during the Holocaust/Archive 4
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rescue of Jews by Poles during the Holocaust/Archive 4? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Roseanne Barr
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Roseanne Barr? I think one of the options has a clear consensus but am not closing the RfC. This is a contentious RfC because a participant wrote that there is a clear lack of consensus. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done You were kind of both right. --GRuban (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Goliath
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Goliath? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- llywrch (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Richard B. Spencer
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Richard B. Spencer? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 16:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
Would an uninvolved editor please close this? Nothing has been added since 16 July. jamacfarlane (talk) 18:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I have made a non-admin closure. Could an admin confirm all is OK? &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 22:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with your assessment of what was said in that discussion. Marking as done. Deryck C. 14:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways
This is a train-wreck situation (pun intended), a progressively WP:TALKFORKing series of at least five (four still-ongoing) discussions on different pages. The RfC proper looks to be "no consensus", being 5 or 6 competing proposals none of which has broad support, and the one with the most marginal "ILIKEIT" local support conflicting directly with the MOS:NUM guideline.

Not counting earlier discussions going back several years, the dispute erupted at Talk:Darlington railway station in January, fizzled, then re-erupted at Talk:East Croydon station, migrated to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways, thence to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, and has since then continued at Talk:Chain (unit). The concurrent four are all July – and often at cross-purposes (e.g., there are proposals to simply eliminate sourced material from Chain (unit), seemingly just to bolster one side of the RfC, while much of the WT:MOSNUM discussion seems to be refuting the validity of the local-consensus RfC at WT:UKRAIL, and so on). It might not be a bad idea to close them all at once other than the one at the article talk page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * RfC proper:
 * Entire concurrent mess:
 * Counting the January genesis:
 * This closure request appears to suggest that the debate has been fruitless, that there is no consensus for change from the status quo. That is not accurate. It appears to me [although an involved editor] that there is broad consensus for a compromise between proponents and opponents. What is needed now is for an univolved editor to review the debate [in the interest of sanity, I advise limiting this review to the last seven days or so] and make a fair, npov, determination. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I would be willing to make a non-admin closure, although has requested an admin close. Should I go ahead? &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * AFAIK,, you've not participated in the discussion. You are also an editor in good standing, so I'd be happy for you to close the RFC. It's run for long enough and needs to be put to bed. Mjroots (talk) 12:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done I have not looked at the earlier discussions, will be happy to look at a specific one if asked. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 11:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Alt-right
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alt-right? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 13:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of most-viewed YouTube videos
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of most-viewed YouTube videos? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:54, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus for the above mentioned RfC? There have been no new comments in 3 weeks. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Waterboarding
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Waterboarding? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Comic Con
It initiated last year! 177.58.226.37 (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  06:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jet engine
Would an uninvolved Admin be able to close this? Nothing has been added to it since 12 July, well over the requisite week ago. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this can have been initiated on 9 July 2018 when it was only posted on 24 July 2018 and refers to the last comment on the discussion being 12 July. jamacfarlane (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Creation diff dated 9 July. Is 12 days of quiescence too short to bring it here? Is there a guideline about that somewhere? I couldn't find one, my apologies if I missed it. A couple of comments have been added to the discussion since I posted here, but they are not hugely significant. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it's my mistake. I thought the date in the template was the date the request for closure was initiated, not the date the discussion started. jamacfarlane (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done S warm   ♠  06:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Move request: Adam's Bridge → Ram Setu
Could some admin review and close this ~12 day old move request? Pinging and  who have been recently involved in the WP:RM area. Abecedare (talk) 01:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done bd2412  T 01:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank for the superfast reaction time! Abecedare (talk) 02:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Noticeboard
I believe that the above discussion has fully run its course. No need for further discussion. Asking here for an uninvolved editor to assess, summarize, and formally close this discussion on Wikipedia. Thanks.Davidbena (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Quds Day
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Quds Day? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done, closed. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jimmy Savile
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jimmy Savile? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done – closed. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 370? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Deryck C. 16:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Article moved. -- Beland (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why didn't you move the archives? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Could an uninvolved admin kindly close this discussion? — JFG talk 05:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done ~Awilley (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox criminal
Would an admin or template editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox criminal? Template:Infobox criminal has template editor protection applied to it. An admin or template editor will be needed to implement the consensus. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Lawrence Liang
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Lawrence Liang? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done - The Gnome (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology
This has been a very contentious RfC about lists of awardees in articles about those awards. The closer should determine whether there is consensus to remove the list of awardees, if there is consensus for various proposals to change or remove information within the list, and what version remains in the case of a no consensus determination. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 09:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually it's only . The initial discussion was closed, but we still need a close on the more complex discussion at Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology.  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 21:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the correction. I've removed the done template so that this close request will not be archived by a bot. Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Enforceability of logged voluntary editing restrictions
Requesting close of this RfC. Jbh Talk  02:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 06:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * just a bump since this has been in Doing for several days. Cheers. Jbh  Talk  01:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * My PC has gone into permanent hibernation and...... &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 14:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the update. I am sure someone else will pick up the close. I hope your computer is recoverable! Cheers. Jbh  Talk  20:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Deryck Chan. Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Could an uninvolved admin close this discussion? The RfC pertains to the inclusion in articles of "In wrestling" sections, typically constructed from bulleted lists. Note that the RfC initiator did have local consensus for his proposed changes, and /r/SquaredCircle was alerted to the RfC's existence (link was posted in discussion). Please disregard my comments here other than the request to close because I participated in the discussion and am therefore irreparably biased. Jc86035 (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * doing. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 16:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
This discussion turned into a quasi-RfC. Could an uninvolved admin please assess consensus and close appropriately? — JFG talk 10:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Awilley. Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life? An editor wrote, "I was hoping some uninvolved editor would formally close the RfC above". Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Death of Mustafa Tamimi
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Death of Mustafa Tamimi? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

done Seraphim System  ( talk ) 23:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Survey at Sarah Jeong
Could an uninvolved editor/admin close this survey? See here for why the survey needs to be formally closed. Abecedare (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done (see the closing comment for rationale). Abequinn14 (talk) 03:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Natalie Portman
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Natalie Portman? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:InfoWars
Can someone put this thing out of my misery? Ta. Guy (Help!) 17:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Willschmut
Close the SPI. It's been open for more than a week without any progress, and has been allowing users to violate WP:PA (in reverting my and others' edits) with impunity. Mithrandir the Grey (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Either block me, or not. Or at least explain why it's taking so long. If no admin responds within the next 24 hours, I'll close the SPI myself. It's time to put a stop to this indefinite waiting period. Mithrandir the Grey (talk) 14:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * , as requested. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done for the archiving bot Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 August 24
,, , could an experienced editor review the discussion at Deletion review/Log/2018 August 24? This should be backed out, as I filed this change when the verdict for the article was "Merge". The verdict for the article was changed after the fact to "No consensus". I should not close this discussion, due to WP:INVOLVED. Also, should there not be a tag at the article and the AFD while there is a DRV in progress? --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * will not have notified, , or . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, "should there not be a tag at the article and the AFD while there is a DRV in progress"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Re your last question: were all the steps at WP:DRV followed? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, AFAIK the steps at WP:DRV were followed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There's your answer then. If all were followed, this must have included steps 5 & 6 must have been carried out, which cover your question. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums? There is a related discussion at Village pump (policy). Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Steve Down
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Steve Down? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Placebo
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Placebo? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018 in heavy metal music
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2018 in heavy metal music? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Żegota
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Żegota? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 16:29, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Yusuf bin Ahmad al-Kawneyn
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Yusuf bin Ahmad al-Kawneyn? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Adolf Hitler
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Adolf Hitler? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:United States presidential election, 2020
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2020? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Microaggression
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Microaggression? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Blond
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Blond? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 19:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Could an uninvolved admin kindly assess consensus there? — JFG talk 17:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 00:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Political views of American academics
Would an experienced and strictly uninvolved editor or administrator please assess the consensus at Talk:Political views of American academics? Thanks, --Tryptofish (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 01:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Elon Musk
Would an uninvolved and experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Elon Musk? THE DIAZ userpage • talk • contribs 17:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * DONE Chetsford (talk) 00:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Domestic violence
Recently expired. Needs a close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/KSI vs Logan Paul
May an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus? Abequinn14 (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Closed as keep. Abequinn14 (talk) 16:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ezra Pound
This article recently had a discretionary sanction applied, after an Arb Enforcement submission, as pertains to the use and discussion of infoboxes. Specifically, when the above discussion is closed, there is a restriction on discussion for one year. The proposal started at the time above, and the last new !vote was on July 30. The AE submission did not attract much or any new discussion to this page/section. Outriggr (talk) 02:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Outriggr (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sarah Jeong
May an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus at that talk page section? Thanks, Abequinn14 (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Closed as no consensus by an admin. Abequinn14 (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sarah Jeong
Would an uninvolved admin please assess the consensus for the two proposals listed here? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done — I went ahead and closed it. Abequinn14 (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party/Archive 3
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party/Archive 3? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done --GRuban (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Piranshahr, Iran
Someone on my IP range opened this proposal last month and it seems to have no opposition. Is there an uninvolved editor that can assess the consensus for this proposal? Thanks. 2601:589:8000:2ED0:2567:8240:1F23:EDE7 (talk) 06:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * nd Piranshahr,_Iran article was created by a WP:SOCKPUPPET, so can't merge it into other article. Have tagged it WP:G5 so it gets deleted instead Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Disappearance_of_Mollie_Tibbetts
Could an experienced editor review the consensus at Talk:Disappearance_of_Mollie_Tibbetts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 July
Would an admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 July? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 July
Would an admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 July? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 August 14
Would an admin assess the consensus at Deletion review/Log/2018 August 14? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:11, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Last post was 23 Aug (yesterday as of this posting), indicating that discussion is still ongoing. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done by with this edit. Have refactored to be a "proper" RFC close with this edit, though there was zero content change. Primefac (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:No original research
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:No original research? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bernie Sanders
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bernie Sanders? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done — JFG talk 15:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done — JFG talk 15:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done — JFG talk 15:39, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Could an uninvolved admin kindly assess consensus there? — JFG talk 17:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Closed by non-admin on 16 August. Close review requested on 23 August. — JFG talk 21:14, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Marking as done since nothing more has to be done here, whichever way the close review goes Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:History_of_Crayola_crayons
Talk has largely ended and the bot removed the tag. Would an uninvolved editor please determine consensus? I'm afraid that there is quite a lot to read. Thank you. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Miscellany for deletion
Will an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus for all discussions that began before 17 August 2018? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Marking as done for archival; there is currently no old business at MfD Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Real Steel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Real Steel? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   13:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Marketing of electronic cigarettes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Marketing of electronic cigarettes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Could I request an independent assessment of consensus (es) at this RfC, please? HLHJ (talk) 22:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't see that it had been nommed already. Thanks to Redrose64 for the merge, and Cunard for nominating it. HLHJ (talk) 23:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll do my best to tackle this, but it may take me a day or two. Vanamonde (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry, I started last week (because of Wikum) and closed it today. I should've claimed this first! Marking as done. Deryck C. 20:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries: Amy warned me that you were working on it over email, so I didn't actually end up spending any time on it. No harm done. Vanamonde (talk) 22:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks to both of you for being willing to resolve it, and thanks to Deryck for doing so. Apologies for the sprawling discussion. HLHJ (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   23:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * closeby . —  Newslinger  talk   05:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography
This RfC has been running for more than a month and has attracted a lot of discussion but difficult to determine if there's consensus or not. Could someone experienced in this have a look?--Obi2canibe (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Following disputes across several articles and an RfC on one article, this RfC was initiated to establish broader guidance across the topic area. There is considerable debate in the RfC, and a patient uninvolved editor is needed to assess the strengths of argument and provide a usable summary to conclude the RfC. Thanks in advance. --RexxS (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Closure will be processed within 2-3 business days Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Killing of Mollie Tibbetts
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Killing of Mollie Tibbetts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Amakaru. Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of military occupations
Requesting an experienced and uninvolved editor or admin to assess the consensus at Talk:List of military occupations. Thanks-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 07:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of military occupations? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * on it. It may take a couple of days because I will be using Wikum.- MrX 🖋 23:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done - Closed as No consensus to remove Gaza from the list. Consensus not to remove East Jerusalem. - MrX 🖋 16:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Flag of NATO
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag of NATO? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done A close here appears unnecessary, just one person (now blocked for "Abusing multiple accounts"..) arguing against many others, and the issue appears to be settled now. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done this is more of a "thoughts" RfC than a concrete one requiring closure. It should be pretty obvious to that from the comments that the community does support WP:ATD Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 5
The redirect ended up being speedily deleted as a hoax (see the RfD discussion and this ANI discussion for context). I can't close the discussion myself because I was involved in the discussion and the speedy deletion. funplussmart (talk) 19:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Piotrus/South Korean scandals (2nd nomination)
After discussion, Piotrus, the user to whom the page under discussion belongs, has agreed that the page ought to be deleted, making it eligible for WP:CSD, with the consequence that the revisions 856740453 to 856742680 of Political scandals in South Korea and 856740628 to 856889465 of Talk:Political scandals in South Korea must also be deleted as they contain material copied from the said page. I assume this revision deletion is admissible under WP:CRD, applying WP:DEL1 and then WP:G7.

In short, the closing result would be: "Speedy delete; also delete revisions 856740453 to 856742680 of Political scandals in South Korea and 856740628 to 856889465 of Talk:Political scandals in South Korea". I apologize for the rather complex request, but since the user has agreed with speedy deletion, I figure this MfD can now be closed without further discussion. Nardog (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Amakuru. Nardog (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:President of the United States
Talk has winded down. Would an uninvolved editor please determine consensus? Thank you. Garuda28 (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Give me a day or two. Vanamonde (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * How are you doing with this? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll be done in the next 18 hours: RL intervened, and I was trying to use a new RFC closing tool that's being developed (you may have heard about it?). Vanamonde (talk) 02:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done, finally. Vanamonde (talk) 21:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bipolar disorder
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bipolar disorder? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 07:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 September 2
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Roe (talk • contribs) 19:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 September 6
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Roe (talk • contribs) 19:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2018 September 6
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Roe (talk • contribs) 19:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Vanamonde (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mass killings under communist regimes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Archived. -The Gnome (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 15:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Meaningful vote
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Meaningful vote? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Swiss sovereign-money initiative, 2018
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Swiss sovereign-money initiative, 2018? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:California Proposition 187
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:California Proposition 187? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 07:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Move review/Log/2018 August
Could an experienced page mover or admin assess the consensus at Move review/Log/2018 August? Iffy★Chat -- 16:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Cúchullain. Iffy★Chat -- 10:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship
We need an uninvolved admin to have a look at this and see if there's consensus or not to add a new line to the instructions when editing on an RfA page. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. I'm working on closing this but I figured I should hit this first just to avoid any ecs. Primefac (talk) 01:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Archived. Primefac (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that has struck the perfect balanced note, as to the consensus.Lack the inclination to drag that out of the archive and make a close, when the ground reality will be hardly affected, for all practical purposes.......  &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 16:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reviewing the discussion, . I have unarchived the RfC so that the RfC's archival is not a barrier to recording what the consensus is. Cunard (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done via=the shoulders of giants --GRuban (talk) 20:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Archived. Primefac (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 22:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please close the lengthy RfC at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done So  Why  18:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll take this--also since there is no rush with it. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't see your comment here. I already closed this one as 'no consensus'. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Anachronist, I don't mind--I was doing this with some new fancy software as a trial run, not a very successful one I might add, and apparently I forgot to, ahem, you know, do the actual closing... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done, then. I hope my closure didn't contradict what you would have written. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Neighborhoods of Tel Aviv
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Neighborhoods of Tel Aviv? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of cities in Israel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of cities in Israel? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done/needed for now, as has relisted the RfC Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:RAS syndrome
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:RAS syndrome? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy (film)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Pending another day of !voting inactivity, I will close, (for the sake of it).Pretty one-sided, till now. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 14:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Fish 'n' K Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
The involved users have been indefed. As an involved editor I cannot close it myself. funplussmart (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done I don't see any necessity for a closure here; closures are only generally needed if a consensus is needed to be determined, of which here there is none to determine; the indeffing of the users resolves the issue. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Christian ethics/Archive 2
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christian ethics/Archive 2? The responses predominately are "yes" with two editors recommending "Move to cancel the Request for Comment as unclear". Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Requesting a closure on this RfC on the use of Old Testament material in the context of Christian ethics in the article Christian Ethics. Thanks. --Airborne84 (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


 * done -The Gnome (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Help talk:Citation Style 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Help talk:Citation Style 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Brave (web browser)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Brave (web browser)? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   00:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Daniel Mallory Ortberg
As discussion has been dormant for a week now, would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Daniel Mallory Ortberg? Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by The Anome. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 26
There is a discussion to merge a MoS page into another page last year but nothing has taken place. <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="color:#7f2ed1">The editor <u style="color:#bfa6d8"> whose username is <u style="color:#7f2ed1">Z0 13:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It's on my to-do list. Virtually on one else does MoS merges these days (probably because they don't have the asbestos armor that I do). I dealt with all the other out-standing MOS:BIO merges first, and have let that settle out over the last month. The MOS:PN one is a split-and-merge; it'll be a more complicated section-by-section job, since parts of it are about human names, others about titles of works, other about geography, etc.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Serbia and Montenegro national basketball team
Could an uninvolved editor close the discussion, please? --Pelmeen10 (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin Cash/Archive 4
Could an uninvolved editor close the discussion, please? Thanks in advance. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Venezuelan bolívar/Archives/2018
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Venezuelan bolívar/Archives/2018? Thanks, Nicolas Perrault (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Green Bay Packers
Would an uninvolved editor/admin assess the consensus at Talk:Green Bay Packers and close the discussion? This discussion relates back to a previous WP:FLC nomination and it would be good to have a formal archive of the discussion if it goes back to WP:FLC. « Gonzo fan2007  (talk)  @ 17:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Apeshit (song)
Could an experienced editor review the consensus at Talk:Apeshit (song)? Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , there's no harm but there's no real need to list requested moves here because they're listed at WP:RM which is regularly checked over by closers and is generally not too backlogged. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Born2cycle. Cunard (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rahul Easwar
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Rahul Easwar? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Discussion is largely dormant among regular users, and last few weeks have seen a sprout-up of single-purpose IPs coming by to !vote. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Interface administrators
discussion has slowed. I suggest a highly experienced closure, or small group to review this for closing. A list of suggested closing elements are included in the link above. The original stop-gap users will begin to expire in a few weeks. Thank you for your time! — xaosflux  Talk 18:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done was closed by Cyberpower678. — xaosflux  Talk 02:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of_commanding officers of USS Nevada (BB-36)
This page was proposed for deletion on 16 September 2018. The PROD tag was removed to contest the deletion on 22 September 2018. A discussion was started the following day on the talk page. Seven days have passed since the last comment, could an admin or experienced editor review the discussion/straw poll to determine the next course of action? Thanks - wolf  04:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done - WP:AFD is that way. Iffy★Chat -- 12:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Khalistan movement
Could an uninvolved admin close this discussion? New comments have dried up on this RFC. Last comment was at 11:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC). -- D Big X ray  09:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:British Jews
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:British Jews? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * doneMoishe Rosenbaum (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
A close would be appreciated. This was archived by a bot, and legobot pulled the RfC tag here. I pulled it out of the archive, so that it could be closed. Jytdog (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 17
This discussion has managed to pull in all six active admin RfD closers, so I have a feeling this one will sit in the backlogs for a while unless it's posted here. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Two other discussions on the 17 September RfD page also remain open. Thryduulf (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2018 (UTC) These closed by Deryck Chan, but as they have contributed to the Stephni meyer discussion that remains open and in need of closure. Thryduulf (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Killing of Mollie Tibbetts
Could an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Killing of Mollie Tibbetts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ayn Rand
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ayn Rand? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done AGK  &#9632;   17:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Having run for about 30 days, this needs a formal close please. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done AGK  &#9632;   17:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   01:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of 7400-series integrated circuits
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of 7400-series integrated circuits? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   12:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Elon Musk
Would an uninvolved and experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Elon Musk to avoid any edit wars when the protection is peeled back? Thanks! <span style="background:linear-gradient(90deg,#F20,#F70);text-shadow:#F20 0 0 7px"> ⠀TOMÁSTOMÁSTOMÁS ⠀ TALK⠀  15:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   12:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:RF resonant cavity thruster
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:RF resonant cavity thruster? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   13:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:United States elections, 2018
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:United States elections, 2018? Thank you.Casprings (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   13:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of films released in IMAX/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of films released in IMAX/Archive 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Issue looks resolved with reversion back of original version of the list Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Flag of Australia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flag of Australia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Suicide
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Suicide? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sugar
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sugar? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   12:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Albert Cashier
Seeking a neutral, uninvolved editor willing to take on an Rfc in an area subject to WP:AC/DS sanctions for gender-related controversies and disputes. Talk was on-going right up till the end, until Legobot removed the expired Rfc header. An involved editor (the creator) then assessed it and I reverted. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 17:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018
This RfC has been running for 1 month. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/2018 Schoharie New York traffic accident
I understand it's only been a day, but the discussion has garnered significant attention, a consensus appears to be forming, and the item is time sensitive as it is related to a nomination at WP:ITN/C. --LaserLegs (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   05:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Already done by . —  Newslinger  talk   16:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Greece
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Greece? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Perche
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Perche? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Disappearance of Asha Degree
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Disappearance of Asha Degree? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC) doneMoishe Rosenbaum (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trans woman
Could an administrator (participants specifically request an administrator) please assess the outcome of this RfC? Thanks. -sche (talk) 00:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 22:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_airliner_shootdown_incidents
Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus for a merge proposal at Talk:List of airliner shootdown incidents. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 07:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Frayae Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Martha McSally
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Martha McSally? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Kraose (talk) 16:32, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jeremy Corbyn
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jeremy Corbyn? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

WT:Manual of Style/Video games
Legobot came along and removed the notice. We would appreciate a closer for proposal B and proposal C. I closed A as being a no-go and D as being reasonable only when WP:CAPITALS/MOS:TM are necessary. --Izno (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Swarm  talk  02:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Here_(Alicia_Keys_album)
Please determine a consensus for this recently expired RfC (Talk:Here_(Alicia_Keys_album)) Dan56 (talk) 11:32, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Swarm  talk  01:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Naomi Osaka
An early close would be appreciated. If it turns out that there is a consensus to include certain content in the lead, then it shouldn't be kept out indefinitely just on the basis that "there is an ongoing RfC". The article is semi-protected because of the issue. The RfC has been running for a reasonable time, and nobody has posted to it in the last seven days. It is long-ish and at times heated, but a close should not be difficult. Scolaire (talk) 08:43, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * There's no reason to close this RFC early, given how contentious it has been and the edit warring that led to the formation of the RFC in the first place (I am the initiator of the RFC). Iffy★Chat -- 10:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What is the point in keeping open an RfC when nobody is contributing? There has been enough contributors and enough discussion to determine a consensus. A close might have the effect of ending edit-warring; keeping it hanging certainly won't. Scolaire (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


 * It is now over 30 days. Nobody has contributed to the poll since 1 October (day 17). Protection has been removed and edit-warring has already begun. Somebody please close this ASAP. Scolaire (talk) 12:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Swarm  talk  01:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jordanian disengagement from the West Bank
Could an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus for a merge at Talk:Jordanian disengagement from the West Bank. The merge was proposed 18 months ago, has several comments (none in the last month), and relates to a page with active arbitration remedies. Klbrain (talk) 07:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Swarm  talk  01:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump/Archive 92
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump/Archive 92.Casprings (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Swarm  talk  01:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Special Counsel investigation (2017–present)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Swarm  talk  05:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Hamas
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hamas? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Swarm  talk  05:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)
Consensus is pretty clear, but as this will result in a large number of page moves, I thought it would be best to get it formally closed by a third party. Cheers, Number   5  7  23:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Swarm  talk  05:27, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Fountain (Duchamp)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Fountain (Duchamp)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 12:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * this has been "closure in progress" for 20 days :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I hereby initiate a request for WBG to get closer to closing. -The Gnome (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jordan Peterson
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jordan Peterson? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trypophobia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Trypophobia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 07:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation? See the "RfC" subsection. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:How to write a plot summary
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:How to write a plot summary? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Quneitra Governorate
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Quneitra Governorate? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of cities in Israel
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of cities in Israel? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cathy Newman
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cathy Newman? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 08:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Geoffrey Owens
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Geoffrey Owens? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Winona Ryder
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Winona Ryder? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Keanu Reeves
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Keanu Reeves? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Quiet storm
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Quiet storm? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Nabil Gabol
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nabil Gabol? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Millennials
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Millennials? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done --GRuban (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Death year and age
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Template talk:Death year and age. Regards, — <span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran (talk)  10:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Death year and age? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Consensus could likely be evaluated by this point. It's also nearing the 30-day point, with barely under 2 weeks left until it's a month old. Kirbanzo (talk) 19:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * not done Twelve days left is not "nearing the 30-day point"; it's only just past half-way. It's not as if there have been no comments for several days, either - there have been four in the last four days, two of which were today. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Rise of Macedon
A request for move was initiated on 21 October. After the first two days of the discussion, during which there were 7 editors in support and 1 in opposition, there has only been one further comment two days ago (in opposition). I asked the new dissenter a question and there has been no response. The request for move should be accepted, the move made, and the discussion closed. Thank you. --Taivo (talk) 02:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There are several problems here.
 * You have posted this in the RfCs section, but a WP:RFC has never been held at Talk:Rise of Macedon.
 * You have linked to the talk page in general, not to the specific discussion that you wish to be closed - I assume that is Talk:Rise of Macedon, which is a requested move discussion, not a RfC.
 * In the template above, you included the parameter yes which means that no further action is required. You also omitted the time that the discussion began (19:47), although that is less crucial.
 * Since this is a requested move discussion, once the seven day period has elapsed it is automatically listed at WP:RME (which ); hence, it should not also be listed for closure on this page.
 * Accordingly, I am marking this No further action required here. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 08:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Redrose64, I am sorry for troubling the page. Wikipedia can be a confusing place with twenty different places to post issues requiring an admin's attention (and mysterious bots doing some things automatically).  Thank you for clarifying the situation.  --Taivo (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Killing_of_Jamal_Khashoggi
This article is on the Main page. 7 days that are stipulated for a move discussion are over and the thread has drawn immense participation. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd like to emphasize the need for an administrator with experience in closing controversial discussions. This is the fourth structured discussion in a row on this article, and we need a thorough and decisive close.  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 00:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have moved the close request from the "RfCs" section to the "Administrative discussions" section. Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

I will close this later today. ~Awilley (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

done ~Awilley (talk) 01:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Done

Talk:Joan Freeman (politician)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Joan Freeman (politician)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Done

Deletion review/Log/2018 October 9
Would an admin assess the consensus at Deletion review/Log/2018 October 9? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Closed. --RL0919 (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Francis Beaufort
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Francis Beaufort? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Kraose (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Regional power
Any uninvolved editor is welcome to assess consensus. Lorstaking (talk) 04:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Kraose (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Fenway Park
Would an uninvolved editor assess the merge consensus at Talk:Fenway Park; April 2017 proposal with no further discussion in more than a month? Klbrain (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   16:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Miscellany for deletion
Miscellany for deletion closures are behind - 4 days, 12 MfDs. Thanks Legacypac (talk) 03:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Marking as done as the backlog is now only 2 discussions. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * closed by -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of missing aircraft
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:List of missing aircraft? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Done Kraose (talk) 07:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Christine Blasey Ford
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christine Blasey Ford? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christine_Blasey_Ford? Casprings (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by User:Cinderella157. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Boeing
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Boeing? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The hat-note has been removed so this is resolved and it is unnecessary to close this. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

close2001:A61:443:7700:88EE:A210:51F0:818E (talk) 22:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured picture criteria
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture criteria? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 02:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 11:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Manchester Baby
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Manchester Baby? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

done Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 02:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Bank of New York Mellon
Legobot removed RfC template. Would an editor assess the consensus at Talk:The Bank of New York Mellon? Disclosure: I have a financial conflict of interest as I am here on behalf of BNY Mellon as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Danilo Two (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done by --GRuban (talk) 20:11, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)
Could an experienced editor please assess consensus for this RfC? jamacfarlane (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Cinderella157 (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)/Archive1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)/Archive1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Communist Party of China
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Communist Party of China? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defend Ukraine
Articles for deletion/Defend Ukraine is ready to be closed. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme ✍🏻📧 18:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * So are dozens of others listed at Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 31. Why should this one be given priority? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, - the editor is a SPA and appears to be connected to two articles - Defend Ukraine and GBKSOFT (may have been Gbksoft), the company that created the video game (Gbksoft was recently deleted). On Oct 30th, I asked   on their TP to disclose any COI they may have because they appear to be connected to Gbksoft, and to the game subject of this AfD.  I had editors from WikiProject Video Games review the article as well because I'm not all that familiar with the topic.  Perhaps both articles should have been G11s.  If none of the aforementioned fits the bill for listing here, please accept my apologies. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme ✍🏻📧 23:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It was Gbksoft that was deleted. Anyway, I don't see a reason why this one should not be processed in the normal course of things, along with the other AfDs that were filed on 31 October. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Sandstein. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
RFC has run the full 30 days, needs an uninvcoled admin or other experienced user to close. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. --RL0919 (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It has been archived. -The Gnome (talk) 08:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Archive -- The SandDoctor Talk 00:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Special:Diff/869037321. -- The SandDoctor Talk 01:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cleveland, Texas
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cleveland, Texas? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Barkeep49 Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of best-selling singles
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:List of best-selling singles? Thanks, feminist (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Pennsylvania's 7th and 15th congressional district special elections, 2018
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Pennsylvania's 7th and 15th congressional district special elections, 2018? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Closed as no consensus. -- The SandDoctor Talk 04:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Caucher Birkar
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Caucher Birkar? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done Closed as no consensus. Special:Diff/869226090 Special:Diff/869226115 -- The SandDoctor Talk 06:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sealioning
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sealioning? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   00:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Comments have stopped coming in for a while, though it won't hurt to let this hit the full 30 days. It would be very helpful if this were carefully assessed. It is not a proposal to actually implement a particular bot, but an advisory RfC to ArbCom on what such a bot might do (and not do, and why), and what issues with current WP:AC/DS practice are inspiring the desire for such automation in the first place. ArbCom has promised to take the RfC under careful consideration as community feedback. Actually, one closing option would be to simply close it without an admin analysis, instead explicitly reserving that assessment to ArbCom. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Archived. Primefac (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No further action - has stated that "this one came to no consensus (about a 60/40 split), but had the desired effect anyway (ArbCom acted on it in response to the community input, which was the intent)." -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   03:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:People's_Mujahedin_of_Iran
Could an uninvolved experienced editor assess and close this RfC? Thanks. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   03:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Archive303
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive303? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by L235. Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Archive303
Would an admin assess the consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive303? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by RL0919. Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Highway 2 (Israel)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Highway 2 (Israel)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Closed as No consensus Special:Diff/869385817. -- The SandDoctor Talk 07:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Project namespace
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Project namespace? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * not done. According to the discussion, a formal closure is not needed here. —  Newslinger  talk   04:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music? Thanks - wolf  00:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The RfC is now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 38. Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   03:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 208
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 208? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   04:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Saudi Arabia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Saudi Arabia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   04:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Machine Intelligence Research Institute
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Machine Intelligence Research Institute? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   05:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Human evolution
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Human evolution? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   05:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Module talk:Infobox military conflict/Archive 4
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Module talk:Infobox military conflict/Archive 4? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   05:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Lisa Littman
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Lisa Littman? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   04:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Dark wave
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dark wave? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 71
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 71? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   05:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of Humans episodes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Humans episodes? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * not done The version currently in the article appears to be where the consensus lies, and there is no edit warring going on; the discussion is almost entirely back and forth between two editors so there isn't too much point in a close, and let sleeping dogs lie. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Chick-fil-A
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Chick-fil-A? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   05:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Dissent from Catholic teaching on homosexuality
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dissent from Catholic teaching on homosexuality? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Donald Trump
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   06:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:D. H. Lawrence/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:D. H. Lawrence/Archive 1? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   09:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Far-right politics
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Far-right politics? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2019 Formula One World Championship/Archive 1
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:2019 Formula One World Championship? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The correct link to the RfC is Talk:2019 Formula One World Championship/Archive 1. The discussion has been automatically archived. —  Newslinger  talk   09:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * not done. The article has already been updated with more recent information, and the RfC (which didn't show consensus) doesn't need a formal closure because it's no longer applicable. —  Newslinger  talk   09:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Center for Immigration Studies
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Center for Immigration Studies? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   08:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of vegetarians
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of vegetarians? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   10:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Tucker Carlson
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tucker Carlson? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   10:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ron Stallworth
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ron Stallworth? There also is an ongoing RfC at Talk:Ron Stallworth about using the image not as the lead but in the early life section. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   04:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Archived. Primefac (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   22:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   23:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (policy)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   23:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Adam Milstein
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Adam Milstein? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   00:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sport in Australia
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Sport in Australia? Thanks, Siento (talk) 10:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   00:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Shenphen Rinpoche
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Shenphen Rinpoche? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   00:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Monsanto
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Monsanto? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   21:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)
Would an experienced administrator please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)? The RfC was initially initiated 6 September 2018, but was reopened 20 October. No one has commented since 8 November 2018 (~8 days at the time of posting). -- The SandDoctor Talk 00:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC) done GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I have moved the close request from the "RfCs" section to the "Administrative discussions" section. Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)
Would an experienced admin please close this very well-attended debate on a proposal to make a change to this naming guideline. It was originally closed on 15 October 2018, but was then reopened on 20 October after objections that there had not been sufficient participation. Cheers, Number   5  7  18:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Marking as done as this has been closed by GorillaWarfare. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Thousand Oaks shooting
- Could an experienced editor please assess consensus here? This discussion meets at least one of the criteria stated above for uninvolved close. Some participants feel that "consensus remains unclear", and the raw count is 118. There is little question that "the issue is a contentious one". Thanks very much. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  14:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

done by User:L293D. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  14:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   03:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:34, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Reliable sources/Noticeboard? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   03:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 250
Could an uninvolved experienced editor assess and close the discussions regarding the use of Electronic Intifada as a reliable source. Thank you --Andromedean (talk) 10:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I've corrected the link to actual discussion; original link was to side discussion Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   23:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Health and appearance of Michael Jackson
The period of 30 days at Talk:Health and appearance of Michael Jackson will be over soon. Comments have not been added for more than a week. Closing summary by an uninvolved editor and closure requested. Thanks. Quaffel (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 03:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Jeremy Corbyn/Archive 17
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jeremy Corbyn/Archive 17? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   08:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Oscar López Rivera
. Would an administrator experienced in BLP matters please assess the consensus at Talk:Oscar López Rivera? Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Done -- slakr \ talk / 05:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Charles K. Kao
. Any uninvolved editor is welcome to assess consensus, or proper closing if determinate as no consensus. Matthew hk (talk) 03:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   08:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Schools
Given there is a disagreement underlying this RfC that has already gone through a couple of stages of dispute resolution, I am requesting formal closure of this RfC by an uninvolved person. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   08:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Monarchy of Australia
Given as the discussion has run its course, with no new input in the last 3 weeks. GoodDay (talk) 23:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

done Cinderella157 (talk) 09:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Reptilians
Would an admin please assess the consensus in the discussion? Thanks, feminist (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done closed by Amakuru. <u style="font:1.1em/1em Arial Black"><u style="color:#7f2ed1">Flooded <u style="color:#bfa6d8"> with them <u style="color:#7f2ed1">hundreds 13:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Now archived, at here Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * done. I observed that the pencil has been there since shortly after this discussion went stale and has been stable. Since the pencil is one of the trending opinions in the discussion, and the discussion isn't really set up to absolutely require third-party closure, I've closed this by accepting the state of affairs as of today: keep the pencil. Deryck C. 17:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Village pump (proposals)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Village pump (proposals)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by . Deryck C. 15:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Killing of Jamal Khashoggi
Would an admin please assess the consensus in the discussion? Thanks, feminist (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * already done by . Deryck C. 15:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ben Shapiro
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ben Shapiro? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sci-Hub
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Sci-Hub? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   23:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Trypophobia
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Trypophobia? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 06:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Iran and weapons of mass destruction
Can an admin assess the consensus of this merger discussion, please? -- M h hossein   talk 16:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by Winged Blades of Godric. Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Corey Taylor/1
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus at Good article reassessment/Corey Taylor/1? --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Xinjiang conflict
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Xinjiang conflict? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

done Cinderella157 (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Doria Ragland
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Doria Ragland? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done. Primefac (talk) 01:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Louis Farrakhan
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Louis Farrakhan? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 11:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Brett Kavanaugh
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Brett Kavanaugh? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Done feminist (talk) 07:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:The Man in the High Castle (TV series)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Done signed,Rosguill talk 20:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Article titles
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Article titles? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done (non-admin closure) by --John Cline (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:French and Indian War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:French and Indian War? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

ANI thread about James500
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There seems to be a general feeling that this has played out and should close, but an actual close (due to observations of previous promises by the subject to stop various unconstructive behaviors which then resumed after scrutiny dissipated). I opened the report, and am semi-mollified by the subject's responses (am no longer seeking a T-ban, though several others are). However, an actual administrative warning is probably in order, at the minimum. This shouldn't just archive without action, or we have every indication that the problems would resume. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  15:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not apparent to me that there have been any broken promises. In the one instance that I can find in this very lengthy (almost unreadable) thread, I think there may have been a serious misunderstanding as to what was being promised, as I did not expect my words to be construed by reading them one sentence at a time, in an entirely literal fashion, that ignores the context in which that sentence appears, the circumstances under which it was written, and whether the literal meaning is likely to be the intended one. I am not sure whether I should say anything else in the ANI thread. James500 (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done <u style="text-decoration:none;font:1.1em/1em Arial Black;letter-spacing:-0.09em"><u style="text-decoration:none;color:#38a">Fish +<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#B44">Karate 10:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:David M. Cote
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David M. Cote? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * not done. This RfC is malformed, since it was phrased in a manner that solicits local consensus on a more general matter (with the phrases "a company" and "a CEO" referring to any company or any CEO). Additionally, while the !votes suggest no consensus, the discussion has progressed to a point where interested editors have agreed on the article content. A closure is not needed here. —  Newslinger  talk   11:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:List of cults of personality
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of cults of personality? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Drafts
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Drafts? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   10:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Smith & Wesson M&P15? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   10:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Liturgical music
Could an uninvolved editor assess the merge discussion proposal (Church music into Liturgical music) at Talk:Liturgical music? Klbrain (talk) 09:56, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done -The Gnome (talk) 08:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Reliable_sources/Noticeboard
Can an uninvolved admin please assess the procedural closure discussion on this RfC? Whilst it's only be up a day it's also clear that the general discussion on the RfC won't go forward until it's addressed, one way or the other. Whilst it's fair to say that the RfC (which was initially made in an unusual but not unknown format with the voting delayed) has ended up looking a bit of a mess, every issue raised by the initial proposers has been addressed to some extent, so it is as close to being acceptable as it ever will be. Alternatively, if the decision is in favour of a procedural close then this should not be delayed as this will simply waste people's time discussing an RfC that is destined to be procedurally closed. FOARP (talk) 14:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * already done. This discussion has already been closed by . —  Newslinger  talk   04:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done Thryduulf (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Irish stations)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Irish stations)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Proud Boys
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Proud Boys? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Ron Stallworth
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Ron Stallworth? There is a related closed RfC at Talk:Ron Stallworth. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   11:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   10:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
, only one new comment in the past two weeks. Thryduulf (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   03:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Sabrina Carpenter discography
Could an experienced editor please assess the consensus for all of the sections at Talk:Sabrina Carpenter discography? --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * not done. As this discussion concerns the application of a Manual of Style guideline across a broad range of articles, conclusions drawn from this discussion would only show local consensus and not be particularly useful. I encourage interested editors to start a request for comment on this issue at Village pump (policy), Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music, or another similar venue. —  Newslinger  talk   04:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Could an experienced editor please assess consensus? –dlthewave ☎ 15:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Adding Reliable sources/Noticeboard which is closely related –dlthewave ☎ 16:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)


 * done for the original issue. -The Gnome (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:George Soros
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:George Soros? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by CarelessWombatLet's Talk! 21:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history and formally close it? Discussion seems to have reached a conclusion, with no comments for a week. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   21:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:2018 Yilan train derailment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2018 Yilan train derailment? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done by CarelessWombatLet's Talk! 20:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:NPOV dispute
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:NPOV dispute? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * done —  Newslinger  talk   12:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:BTS (band)
Beyond the RfC, it would be highly appreciated if an administrator could address the concerns at Talk:BTS (band)/2018 controversy as well. The concern comes from the fact that three editors feel that the consensus of the RfC was that a draft of the section be prepared ahead of time, while one believes that consensus was simply to have the section added. In order to prevent edit warring it would be highly appreciated that an administrator or uninvolved editor determine whether or not consensus was to prepare a draft ahead of time or not. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 20:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * done by CarelessWombatLet's Talk! 21:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)