Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Aviation

Aviation

 * Nominated on 20:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC); needs 9 votes by May 20.

A whopping three sentences on this subject? Something must be done!

Support: Comments: Yes, hundreds of years of aviation can not be summed up in three sentences. More info should be put in this article instead of just links to somewhere else.
 * 1) PDXblazers 20:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Avala 09:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Felixboy 19:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) RJH 21:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Christhebull 14:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Ynhockey (Talk) 08:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * note, this has undergone a merger since its nomination, and now has considerably more content. Although I still believe that a collaboration would substantially benefit what is still a very poor artilce, if there is a consensus to move the article to AID from here, I would not oppose such a move. PDXblazers 23:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I Think this should be moved to AID. It still needs work but is better suited there I belive.

Weak agree on move to AID - this article has numerous factual errors and its very basis of equating 'Air Transport' to 'Aviation' is incorrect. Possibly needs deletion and a complete rewrite Crum375 13:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)