Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Dinosaur egg

Dinosaur egg

 * Nominated on 04:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC); needs 3 votes by 6 January.

Support:
 * 1) Neutralitytalk 04:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Urthogie 13:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC) I've stricken vote after Silence's comment.--Urthogie 16:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Weather rain.png]]  Soothing R  14:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC). After those extensive cultures and military histories, it would be great for a change if we chose a topic that has nothing to do with nations their national heritage. I've stricken vote after Silence's comment.[[Image:Weather rain.png]] Soothing  R  01:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Fenice 14:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Very important aspect of current dinosaur research. Neutralitytalk 04:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Note that Egg (biology) itself is currently little more than a glorified stub. It has sections on bird eggs and fish eggs, but nothing else. You'd probably be better off simply working on that article and bringing it up to snuff and continuing to expand it until it reaches the point where a split is merited by its length, and then make "dinosaur egg" and "fish egg" and so on articles as daughter articles. Until that happens, making a new article is totally unnecessary and would just hide the information away from the rest of the "egg information where it's more likely to receive the attention it needs. -Silence 18:28, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Neutrality - to begin with we may at least strive to have at least a good article within a reasonable time. For the time, we may concentrate on improving the contents of Egg (biology) as suggested by Silence. --Bhadani 17:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)