Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Hill

Hill

 * Nominated on 15:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC); needs 15 votes by 10 April.

Such a common geographical feature and almost nobody has taken care of it.

Support: Comments:
 * 1) Francisco Valverde 15:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Clayrocks369 05:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Y Ynhockey (Talk) Y 17:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) King of Hearts | (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Juppiter 00:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Daniel Collins 03:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 7)  Cr  na  t e c   Go  ra  04:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) PDXblazers 00:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Badlands17 04:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) --HolyRomanEmperor 15:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Kingpomba 08:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Pointlessness 20:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) -Reuvenk[T][C] 00:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) J. Finkelstein 18:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I know that we have FAs on mundae subjects like butter, but could hill really make it as a FA? Is there enough to say? -Reuvenk[T][C] 06:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * i can't belive this has been overlooked such a base article, it has my vote. Kingpomba 08:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Compare Hill with Dune. I believe they are just as notable... Francisco Valverde 18:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree, these articles should be comparable, but how much can you say about this that isn't already stated in erosion or geology or something like that? I still support the nomination, but I think you'll need an expert or at least someone with a good book to write something good. J. Finkelstein 18:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)