Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Lipovans

Lipovans

 * Nominated on 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC); needs 6 votes by April 28,2006.

Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it. European only rural Russian minority outside former Soviet Union.

Support:
 * 1) Luka Jačov 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) estavisti 22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) serbiana  - talk  22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) --Jovanvb 22:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Elephantus 22:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) RexNL 10:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) --GTubio 11:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) SpeedyGonsales 14:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 9)  PANONIAN   (talk)  14:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 10)  Filip  ( § ) 15:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) --HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) &mdash;  Sasa  Stefa novic  &bull; 20:34 15-04-2006
 * 13) --VKokielov 21:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) -- Obradovi&#263; Goran  ( t  al  k  13:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Avala 16:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments:
 * Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it.
 * I'm not sure if this sentence means anything... --HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It's Belgrade from AID (45 votes in one week) all over again!  I don't think that's a bad thing -- we can all learn from such superior get-out-the-vote campaigns.  -Scottwiki 08:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, as long as there's no competition - like here. Almost everywhere else -- in particular, on AfDs -- it looks like someone's been gathering votes, and everyone else listened.  I'm concerned about the reputation of the community.  --VKokielov 17:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This nomination appears to be the winner. I believe that it should be posted as the current collaboration.  (I'd post it myself -- but I've made newbie mistakes when doing such things recently.)  -Scottwiki 14:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, heck, I'll do it. I'll make sure to follow the instructions.  :-)  -Scottwiki 04:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. -Scottwiki 05:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The week is now half over and only two small changes have been made to this COTW. Why aren't the people who nominated it making improvements? --EncycloPetey 02:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Because it is a fraud, of course. Because the nominator expects every other one of us to work, and none of us (of course) have any intention to work, since the nominator solicited our votes.
 * See . --VKokielov 13:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)