Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Zygote

Zygote

 * Nominated on 18:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC); needs 6 votes by June 27.

Previous nomination from 2004. Still a stub. Deserves more than 3-4 sentences.

Support:
 * 1) Davodd 18:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) AndyZ 23:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Avala 15:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:
 * Does it need to be more than it is? It seems that anything you could say about zygotes is covered by the articles linked in it. Stubinitis? - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Among the topics not covered: The differences between plant and animal zygotes, The history of the scientific discovery of zygotes and their place in the reproductive cycle, Images/photos of zygotes. 20:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I might support the photos. The rest I still think would be better covered in related articles. Zygotes are not that interesting in their own right. They become interesting only when discussed in terms of the reproductive cycle. Basically, like gametes (look at the article, mostly dictdef), the term zygote is a piece of jargon that enables us to talk fluently about interesting things. I'm not sure, however, that the object referred to is interesting in isolation. (Perhaps a little like schools, furniture and boxes...) - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

FAILED: lack of votes