Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Jamie Tubers

Instructions
All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at CCI to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

 * Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
 * If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
 * Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
 * If you remove text presumptively, place   on the article's talk page.
 * If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place   on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
 * If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
 * To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place  on the article's face and   on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.


 * After examining an article:
 * replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add y) or not (add n). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the y.
 * Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes ( ~ )


 * If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing collapse top and collapse bottom beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Images

 * Examine the images below. For free images:
 * Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
 * Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
 * Do a reverse image search using Google Images. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
 * Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
 * See Guide to image deletion on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.


 * For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
 * Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
 * Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background
 Jamie Tubers
 * Check requested by --Demiurge1000 (talk)
 * 1) Render to Caesar - the entire Plot section is copy-pasted from the cited source without quotes and with only a few cosmetic changes in wording.
 * 2) October 1 (film) - entire Plot section is copy-pasted, without quotes, from the film's own website, without inline attribution.
 * 3) Mr and Mrs (film) - Plot section mostly copy-pasted, without quotes, from the cited source, with a few cosmetic changes in wording.
 * 4) Make a Move (film) - entire second paragraph is copy-pasted, without quotes, from the cited source, with only a few very minor changes in wording.
 * 5) Letters to a Stranger - numerous sentences of the Plot section are copy-pasted, without quotes, from the cited source, with a few cosmetic changes in wording.
 * 1) Make a Move (film) - entire second paragraph is copy-pasted, without quotes, from the cited source, with only a few very minor changes in wording.
 * 2) Letters to a Stranger - numerous sentences of the Plot section are copy-pasted, without quotes, from the cited source, with a few cosmetic changes in wording.

I'm also concerned about File:Omotola Jalade Ekeinde.jpg which both claims to be the editor's own work and also states that it was taken on the set of a movie that the star was acting in. It's possible that the editor was on the movie set taking photos to be released under a free license, but seems unlikely? Similar concerns about File:AMAA Statuette.jpg.

I couldn't find any immediately obvious copypaste/paraphrase issues in Last Flight to Abuja, Phone Swap, '76, Silent Scandals. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Comment: I don't get the notion behind this report.The copied section of October 1 (film) was not added by me; it was an anonymous IP address that added it and this is evident in this edit. Now to Letters to a Stranger, like seriously? You want a quote to a plot that is significantly different from what's in the source? If you took your time to compare the plot in the article with the one in the source, you'll see the plot has been expanded and a lot of things has been added and others removed or restructured. It's so wrong to place a quotation to such (well, as I understand WP:CV). the same goes for the other 3 articles you referred to (on another note, if admin find them to be copyright infringement, then it should be removed - I'm indifferent. thanks). And to the images, well I leave that for the admin to investigate.... but they are selfowned.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Well the history of October 1 (film) is certainly interesting. The article was created on 19 December 2013 by you, and on 25 January 2014, Wizardman revdel'd every single revision (all made by you or bots) as a copyvio. (Didn't this send you a message?) All other substantive edits to that article have been either by you or by an IP. You quite sure you're not that IP? Letters to a Stranger duplication detector report - . How did you come to be on the set of that movie, btw, with permission to shoot photos whose copyright would not belong to the movie producers? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to investigate this in full right now, but the low-res images of celebrities are a series concern. I have just deleted [[File:Funlola Aofiyebi.jpg]] as it was published here in 2009. I've also deleted File:The figurine 8.jpg as it is at best a derivative work; since the figurine was created for the film, it is eligible for copyright. I'm afraid images like File:The figurine 4.jpg and File:Omotola Jalade Ekeinde.jpg look very much like screencaps. User:Jamie Tubers, are you able to provide full size images with intact metadata to demonstrate that you are the photographer? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * was copied from . File:Kunle Afolayan Figurine.jpg was copied from . Accepting and blocking. MER-C 12:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__