Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Ktr101

Instructions
All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Copyright violations. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at CCI to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

 * Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
 * If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
 * If you remove text presumptively, place   on the article's talk page.
 * If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place   on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
 * If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
 * To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place  on the article's face and   on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.


 * After examining an article:
 * replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add y) or not (add n). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the y.
 * Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes ( ~ )


 * If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing collapse top and collapse bottom beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background
 Ktr101
 * Reported by Cunard (talk)
 * I first encountered at DYK with his nomination of Jenny Lind Tower. See the exchange here. The source stated: "one of the Aldrich family group was captivated by Jenny Lind’s voice and that this influenced him to move the tower to his land in Truro.". Ktr101's article said, "one of the Aldrich family group was captivated by Jenny Lind's voice, which influenced him to move the tower to his newly bought land in Truro." See my oppose at Featured article candidates/102nd Intelligence Wing/archive1 for extensive evidence of copyright violations and plagiarism. On 31 March 2011,  noted that John T. Olson, created by Ktr101 for DYK, had close paraphrasing issues. For example, Ktr101's article says, "Later, he was transferred to Thule Air Base in Greenland and remained on active duty until 1956." The source states that, "[he] ... later transferred to Thule Air Base in Greenland and remained on active duty until 1956." Cunard (talk) 06:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I am going to fix this issue, I just have absolutely no time to edit and it is bugging me a lot. If you want to go ahead and blank it go ahead and I'll get back to it at a later date but I really have no time to focus on this site in the near future. Also, you are citing some stuff that is more than three years old so it really isn't all that valid. Maybe all of this stems because I am not original and like to include all the facts but frankly I could care less at the moment because I am focusing on passing my classes and not screwing up my numerous papers that are all due in the next month. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The purpose of this CCI is to discover and purge copyright violations you may have inadvertently introduced to Wikipedia in the past three or more years. Featured article candidates/102nd Intelligence Wing/archive1, in March 2011, was fairly recent (some of the added text was several years old, while some was within the past year). The other two examples I listed above occurred in January 2011 and last week. I hope the participants at CCI can give you good advice about avoiding plagiarism and copyright violations, as you have either not comprehended or not read Close paraphrasing. Cunard (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I effectively blanked the last article as I cannot work on it now. The middle article is from text that is mostly three years old so you're incriminating a whole different editor there and I fixed the tower one eventually (school started in the middle of the process) and whatnot. I'm not going to mock you, but this isn't five examples but frankly I could care less about this right now and more on spitting out essays. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for blanking the problematic article. The middle article: You made this edit at 00:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC) to 102nd Intelligence Wing, adding two paragraphs of content copied verbatim from http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Heraldry/AirForce/AirForceUnit.aspx?u=6539. CCI requires five examples to demonstrate a history of violating copyrights. I have already provided three. Here are two more, both from Featured article candidates/102nd Intelligence Wing/archive1, which contains more than enough examples to demonstrate a history of copyright problems and which indicates that I am not "incriminating a whole different editor": 4. You made this edit at 20:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC) to 102nd Intelligence Wing. Your edit added "... Firetrucks were on hand when the team landed a half-hour later, giving the planes and the pilots the customary hose-down for the last time." The source states: "Firetrucks were on hand when the team landed a half-hour later, giving the planes and the pilots the customary hose-down for the last time." 5. You made this edit at 21:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC) to 102nd Intelligence Wing. You added, "... In 1999 the wing participated in Operation Northern Watch when it deployed with its F-15 Eagle aircraft to Turkey to patrol and enforce the no-fly zone north of the 36th parallel in northern Iraq." The source states: "In 1999 the Wing participated in Operation Northern Watch when it deployed with its F-15 Eagle aircraft to Turkey to patrol and enforce the no-fly zone north of the 36th parallel in northern Iraq." There is a history of copyright violations dating back to as early as January 2008 and continuing today with the Jenny Lind Tower and John T. Olson articles. Cunard (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * MER-C 03:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll get to that all sometime in the next week (next week actually looks good for editing here). Thanks again for finding this all. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, that one has been removed. It was me "bookmarking" the link so I can return to evaluating this request. Also, . MER-C 07:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, that one has been removed. It was me "bookmarking" the link so I can return to evaluating this request. Also, . MER-C 07:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Contribution survey
__NOINDEX__