Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Thisthat2011

Instructions
All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Copyright violations. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at CCI to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

 * Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
 * If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
 * If you remove text presumptively, place   on the article's talk page.
 * If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place   on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
 * If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
 * To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place  on the article's face and   on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.


 * After examining an article:
 * replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add y) or not (add n). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the y.
 * Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes ( ~ )


 * If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing collapse top and collapse bottom beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background
 Thisthat2011
 * Reported by &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff 
 * These are the last five textual contributions in article space:
 * User text: When British came to India, there was an explosion of scholarly writings in Sanskrit. The colonial rule fundamentally changed manner & purpose of study and the type of study undertaken by Pundits decayed and devalued.
 * Source: "...when the British first came to India...Corning was writing, there was an explision of scholarly writings in Sanskrit." & "...undertaken by the Pundit was devalued, and decayed."
 * and
 * User text: The Sanskrit texts Shilpa-Shastras give exact prescriptions fashioning and specifications for stances such as hand gestures, bodily proportions, etc.
 * Source: "The Sanskrit texts called Shilpa-Sutras give exact prescriptions for the fashioning of deities. There are specifications for the proper stance of the deities, their hand gestures, bodily proportions, etc., ..."
 * User text: The Karnataka government was considering banning the activities of Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD) in the wake of reports that some members were indulging in anti-social activities, after the arrest of six KFD activists in connection with kidnap and murder of two college students of Hunsur in Mysore district.
 * Source 1: The Karnataka government on Thursday said it was considering banning the activities of Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD) in the wake of reports that some members of the cultural organisation were indulging in anti-social activities.
 * Source 2: arrested six Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD) activists for allegedly kidnapping and murdering two students from Hunsur last week.
 * User text: The Supreme Court gave autonomy to the CBI and insulated it from political influence, despite a few doubting it as judicial overreach. It was held that the government’s statutory power of “superintendence” over the CBI does not empower it to interfere with or regulate the investigation into any offence conducted by the CBI. The CBI’s power to investigate being statutory, it is insulated from any extraneous influence, including that of the concerned minister. The behaviour of the CBI personnel remains unchanged in spite of being given immunity from political influence. Subsequent public reminders are blatantly ignored to avoid political displeasure of all shades. No attempt has been made to discover and plug the common source of funding of terrorism and corruption at high places in governance, even though the Hawala case originated with the arrest of two terrorists funded by that source, thus disclosing the link between them.
 * Source: ...It gave autonomy to the CBI and insulated it from political influence by judicial creativity, despite a few doubting it as judicial overreach..., ...It was held that the government’s statutory power of “superintendence” over the CBI does not empower it to interfere with or regulate the investigation into any offence conducted by the CBI..., ...The CBI’s power to investigate being statutory, it is insulated from any extraneous influence, including that of the concerned minister. ..., ...Subsequent public reminders...blatantly ignored to avoid political displeasure of all shades....& ...no attempt has been made to discover and plug the common source of funding of terrorism and corruption at high places in governance, even though the Hawala case originated with the arrest of two terrorists funded by that source, thus disclosing the link between them.
 * Source 2: arrested six Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD) activists for allegedly kidnapping and murdering two students from Hunsur last week.
 * User text: The Supreme Court gave autonomy to the CBI and insulated it from political influence, despite a few doubting it as judicial overreach. It was held that the government’s statutory power of “superintendence” over the CBI does not empower it to interfere with or regulate the investigation into any offence conducted by the CBI. The CBI’s power to investigate being statutory, it is insulated from any extraneous influence, including that of the concerned minister. The behaviour of the CBI personnel remains unchanged in spite of being given immunity from political influence. Subsequent public reminders are blatantly ignored to avoid political displeasure of all shades. No attempt has been made to discover and plug the common source of funding of terrorism and corruption at high places in governance, even though the Hawala case originated with the arrest of two terrorists funded by that source, thus disclosing the link between them.
 * Source: ...It gave autonomy to the CBI and insulated it from political influence by judicial creativity, despite a few doubting it as judicial overreach..., ...It was held that the government’s statutory power of “superintendence” over the CBI does not empower it to interfere with or regulate the investigation into any offence conducted by the CBI..., ...The CBI’s power to investigate being statutory, it is insulated from any extraneous influence, including that of the concerned minister. ..., ...Subsequent public reminders...blatantly ignored to avoid political displeasure of all shades....& ...no attempt has been made to discover and plug the common source of funding of terrorism and corruption at high places in governance, even though the Hawala case originated with the arrest of two terrorists funded by that source, thus disclosing the link between them.
 * Source: ...It gave autonomy to the CBI and insulated it from political influence by judicial creativity, despite a few doubting it as judicial overreach..., ...It was held that the government’s statutory power of “superintendence” over the CBI does not empower it to interfere with or regulate the investigation into any offence conducted by the CBI..., ...The CBI’s power to investigate being statutory, it is insulated from any extraneous influence, including that of the concerned minister. ..., ...Subsequent public reminders...blatantly ignored to avoid political displeasure of all shades....& ...no attempt has been made to discover and plug the common source of funding of terrorism and corruption at high places in governance, even though the Hawala case originated with the arrest of two terrorists funded by that source, thus disclosing the link between them.

These are the five most recent text contributions to article space, the first time the user was warned regarding this issue was on April 14, once again on May 19th. I don't know of others currently, but it appears that this has been going on for a couple of months at least. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Contribution survey
__NOINDEX__