Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 October 23/Images

Images


 * Image:NewHaven777.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Malepheasant 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Deregulated USA.gif ([ history] · [ last edit]) from "Public Utilities Commission of Texas". Checking both puc.state.tx.us and powertochoose.org, BOTH clearly display unambiguous copyrights, hence the "Public Domain" tag is incorrect. This is also likely NOT allowable as "Fair Use" since it could be very easily recreated from whatever data it was drawn from (Also unexplained). 68.39.174.238 02:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC) (PS. The uploader (User:Energized) has a talk page filled with nothing but image violation notices. 68.39.174.238 02:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Xbox360PremiumBox.JPG ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Image:Xbox360Core.JPG ([ history] · [ last edit])
 * Above two being used as decoration in list. No reference to the packaging whatsoever in the text. ed g2s &bull; talk 12:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Sdkfz 001.JPG ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Claimed as free use but actually cropped from a commercial box image. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Sdkfz 002.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Smae as above. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:NASCO overview.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected)Nomination completed by DumbBOT 16:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Engineering Humans.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from - take your pick - user claiming they created it. SFC9394 20:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Hannity.jpg listed as fair use - but is a picture of a living person used only to illustrate the bio of a living person. Disruptive POV-editwarrior reverting all attempts to remove picture. JBKramer 21:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a released publicity photo, policy allows that until we can get a free replacement. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. Please review WP:FU. JBKramer 13:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Which explicitly includes promotional images "For identification" -- this is what this person looks like -- and links to Publicity photos... Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "Some people find it easier to understand the concept of fair use from what is not fair use. Here are a few examples of uses that would almost certainly not be acceptable as fair use: ... An image of a living person that merely shows what they look like." JBKramer 14:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Which was immediately disputed when it was added and I still disagree with as a case of copyright paranoia. Why do we have the promophoto and promotional tags if it's not acceptable to use them?  Eh, this image has been replaced by a free one, so it isn't necessary, but I still disagree with the exclusion of released promotional material when no free replacement is currently available. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 14:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)