Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 March 8/Images

Images


 * Image:Tuolsleng5.JPG ([ history] · [ last edit]) from original, non-free work of Vann Nath. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Image:Apj.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from rogerd 11:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Emirate of Khaled image.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT 13:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Matalintext.jpg. The tag claims that this image is in the public domain because it was produced by a public university, the University of Miami (in Florida). But this university is private. Even if it were a public university, I dont think we can simply assume the photo is public domain. The image description provides no other detail on a specific URL or other source information. 88.110.210.61 21:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:DSSaund.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Claimed to be gfdl, but source site's says: "The text materials contained in this Web site may be used, downloaded, reproduced or reprinted, provided that this copyright notice appears in all copies, and provided that such use is for non-commercial or personal use only. The text materials contained in this Web site may not be modified in any way."Abu badali (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Image:BruceCatton.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]). Site does not claim to own copyright to the image and the disclaimer of the site only talks about fair use anyway. --140.247.252.156 22:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Conyers.jpg ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Abu badali (talk) 22:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Image:Chandrasekhar.gif ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Tagged as "promotional", but nobelprize.org is not a source for promotional material. It's Legal Notice(pdf) states: "You may not reproduce, distribute, display, transmit, modify, perform, adapt, generate derivative works or otherwise use the Content without prior written permission (...)" . It even goes on to say specifically that the photos of the Laureates (as in this case) can't be copied without permission. Abu badali (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The tag has since been changed from promotional to Non-free fair use in, but I still believe we don't have a good fair use rationale for taking an image from an website with an article about Mr. Chandrasekhar and using in our own website with an article about Mr. Chandrasekhar. Sounds competitive. (If I can see a good photo of Mr. Chandrasekhar in Wikipedia, why look into nobelprize.org's website?). --Abu badali (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Resolved; not a copyvio issue. If there is a fair use claim problem, this has to go through WP:IFD.  Mango juice talk 12:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)