Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 September 8/Articles

Articles


 * Freedom of religion in the Palestinian territories ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/relot07.html. --John Bahrain (talk) 02:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This one is not a copyright problem that I can see. I have done a line for line comparison, and it is entirely copied from the PD source here. The other site may place a copyright notice on their duplication of text, but they don't control copyright to the original material. It's questionable, though, whether it belongs here. It seems like it should be at wikisource. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Noah D. Taylor ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 05:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fuel hedging ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Our article dates from March 2006; theirs dates from December 2005. Carnildo (talk) 06:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hank Kuehne ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Alun (talk) 06:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia came first. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * SUPERPOWER the Movie ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Escape Orbit  (Talk) 12:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ronald G. Sheppard ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Use cleared. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Washington-on-the-Brazos, Texas ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Glenford (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Once sentence did seem to infringe on the source as a derivative work. It might have been attributed and cited, but I have revised and left a note at the article's talk explaining. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The Kevin and Lew Show ([ history] · [ last edit]) from.
 * It's my impression that this usage is allowed, since Conservapedia's copyright is more tolerant than GFDL. I have declined the speedy deletion of this page. I would welcome any comments from others. Naturally it would be better if they used pure GFDL to reduce uncertainty. EdJohnston (talk) 22:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Conservapedia's license is revocable, while the GFDL is irrevocable. You can't mix the two. --Carnildo (talk) 04:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This interesting point is now moot, since the article has been deleted as a G4. I agree that their license needs work, no matter what they wanted it to achieve. (It's not clear that it conveys any usable rights at all). EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Cleethorpes Rugby Union Football ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Design Innovation Institute ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Syzefxis ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * WKC Stahl- und Metallwarenfabrik ([ history] · [ last edit]) from [First ,Second]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Already revised. Tagged a few issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Waldorf School of San Diego ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This and subsequent relisted on 16 September, now that the contributor has been notified and the contents blanked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Waldorf School of San Diego ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Waldorf School of San Diego ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)