Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 February 5

5 February 2009

 * STAR Network Team ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Cbdorsett (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * GFDL infringement. Redirected to primary article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Pruzzo ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Ian Spackman (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Minnesota State Law Library ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . – xeno  ( talk ) 19:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently have permission to use information under GFDL, instructed rights-holder to email confirmation. – xeno  ( talk ) 02:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have blanked the article again to give him time to do so. Although he may very well be who he says he is, we can't take his word for it on wiki, but need external verification of that to meet WP:C. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OTRS pending. If it isn't received by the end of "today", I'll consolidate this so we can remove today's listings as done. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ticket received at 2009021310044613, replied to request explicit GFDL release. Stifle (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Jacksonville Film Festival ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Zagalejo^^^ 21:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Chiddingstone ([ history] · [ last edit]) the Parish Church section section reads very oddly for Wikipedia and was added in a single edit by an anon in October 2008 . The user has no other contributions before or since. I suspect this is copied from a guidebook or information leaflet or similar as the only other place on the internet with this text is explicitly a mirror of the Wikipedia article. Thryduulf (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It also existed here, which seems to be the probable source. It has been removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Rachel Unitt ([ history] · [ last edit]) from rachel-unitt.co.uk, no longer online. See TeaDrinker (talk) 23:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * A new version has been written to replace the one under copyright. --TeaDrinker (talk) 22:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)