Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 January 17

17 January 2009

 * Michelle Ronksley-Pavia ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . It's not a straight copyvio, but there are some distinctive turns of phrase there. I'm also not sure about WP:N, but I wanted to take care of this question first.SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Rights reserved here. I'll check for infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, similarities in the text are even more obvious at the foundational edit, here, but that foundational edit predates the indicated date of copyright here: "Created: 13 September 2007". The material is first archived on October 16. It seems very plausible that the contributor who placed it here is the named contributor there, refining her own work; this is supported by the fact that she was quite active in this article through that time range and then went on hiatus for a while. If there is infringement, it would be presumptively on the part of Barbara Lemon, since we had it first. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Marking resolved, as no action seems necessary. If you want to discuss it further, perhaps take it to WT:CP, where it can evolve more leisurely? This dayis being archived. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)